A comparison of three different intravitreal treatment modalities of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, dexamethasone implant and aflibercept for the management of macular edema (ME) related to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: This retrospective and comparative study included 62 eyes of 62 patients with BRVO and ME. Patients received one of the following treatments: 0.5 mg ranibizumab (group 1, n = 22), 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant (group 2, n = 20) and 2 mg aflibercept (group 3, n = 20). The 6-month treatment protocol in groups 1 and 3 consisted of 3-dose loading treatment for the first 3 months and followed by repeat injections based on clinical necessity. Group 2 received only single dose of 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant for 6 months. Visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), serous retinal detachment (SRD) height and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were done at baseline and first 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, the groups did not differ in age, gender, duration of ME, VA, CMT, IOP and SRD height (p > 0.05). Mean number of injections per eye within six months were 3.64 ± 0.49 (range 3-4) in group 1, only 1 in group 2 and 3.35 ± 0.49 (range 3-4) in group 3.VA was significantly better in group 2 in first 3 months but it became the worst among three groups in sixth month. CMT did not differ between groups in first 3 months, but it was significantly higher in group 2 at sixth month. SRD height was significantly lower in group 2 in first 3 months, but there was no difference between the groups at the end of the sixth month. IOP was significantly higher in group 2 in third and sixth months. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of ME associated with BRVO, dexamethasone implant appears to be more advantageous in terms of VA and SRD height for the first 3 months. However, at the end of the sixth month of treatment, anti-VEGF drugs were more efficient in maintaining the increased visual acuity and reduced CMT. A dexamethasone implant may be the first treatment option in BRVO cases with high SRD.

Based on the Real-Life Data of Türkiye; Comparison of Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Phakic and Pseudophakic Patients in Wet Type Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Objectives: The aim of the study was comparison of wet-type age-related macular degeneration in phakic and pseudophakic patients in terms of anatomical and functional success based on the real-life data of Türkiye. Methods: The multicenter retrospective real-life study data of the. retinal study group were used in this study. Among 867 eyes of 867 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the status of the lens; phakic group and pseudophakic group. The follow-up period of the two groups, the number of injections at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years, and changes in the central macular thickness (CMT, µ) and visual acuity (VA, logMAR) of the patients at the beginning, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 36th months were examined. Results: In our study, the number of injections in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years, respectively, was 4.2±2.0, 1.8±1.9, and 1.0±1.7 in the phakic group, and 3.9±2.0, 1.7±1.9, and 0.8±1.4 in the pseudophakic group. When the two groups were compared in terms of the number of injections, there was a statistically significant difference in the 1st year, but there was no significant difference in the 2nd and 3rd years (p=0.001, p=0.350, and p=0.288, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of CMT in the baseline, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 36th months (p=0.991, p=0.327, p=0.652, p=0.599, and p=0.873, respectively). Although there was no difference in VA between groups at the beginning (p=0.052), the phakic group showed statistically better VA in controls at 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 36th months (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.000, p=0.000, and p=0.003, respectively). Conclusion: Differences in the number of injections and visual results between phakic and pseudophakic patients in wet type AMD may necessitate the creation of different treatment and follow-up protocols.