Continuous Levodopa Delivery with an Intraoral Micropump System: An Open-Label Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Double-blind studies have demonstrated that motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD) can be reduced with continuous delivery of levodopa. The DopaFuse system is a novel, intraoral micropump that attaches to a retainer and uses a propellant to deliver levodopa/carbidopa (LD/CD) continuously into the mouth. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of LD/CD delivered via the DopaFuse system compared to treatment with intermittent doses of standard oral LD/CD in PD patients with motor fluctuations. METHODS: This was a 2-week, open-label study (NCT04778176) in 16 PD patients treated with ≥4 levodopa doses/day and experiencing motor fluctuations. On Day 1 (clinic setting) patients received their usual dose of standard LD/CD; DopaFuse therapy was initiated on Day 2, and on Day 3 patients received DopaFuse plus a morning oral LD/CD dose. Patients returned home on Days 4-14 and returned for in-clinic assessment on Day 15. RESULTS: Continuous DopaFuse delivery of LD/CD was associated with reduced variability in plasma levodopa levels compared to oral LD/CD (mean ± SD levodopa Fluctuation Index reduced from 2.15 ± 0.59 on Day1 to 1.50 ± 0.55 on Day 2 (P = 0.0129) and to 1.03 ± 0.53 on Day 3 (P < 0.0001)). This pharmacokinetic improvement translated into significantly reduced OFF time with DopaFuse therapy (reduction of -1.72 ± 0.37 h at Day 15; P = 0.0004) and increased ON time without severe dyskinesias (increase of 1.72 ± 0.37 h at Day 15; P = 0.0004) versus oral LD/CD administration. DopaFuse therapy was not associated with any clinically significant adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous delivery of LD/CD using the DopaFuse system was associated with significantly less variability in plasma levodopa concentrations and reductions in OFF time compared to treatment with standard oral LD/CD therapy and was well tolerated. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Patient engagement in designing, conducting, and disseminating clinical pain research: IMMPACT recommended considerations.

ABSTRACT: In the traditional clinical research model, patients are typically involved only as participants. However, there has been a shift in recent years highlighting the value and contributions that patients bring as members of the research team, across the clinical research lifecycle. It is becoming increasingly evident that to develop research that is both meaningful to people who have the targeted condition and is feasible, there are important benefits of involving patients in the planning, conduct, and dissemination of research from its earliest stages. In fact, research funders and regulatory agencies are now explicitly encouraging, and sometimes requiring, that patients are engaged as partners in research. Although this approach has become commonplace in some fields of clinical research, it remains the exception in clinical pain research. As such, the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials convened a meeting with patient partners and international representatives from academia, patient advocacy groups, government regulatory agencies, research funding organizations, academic journals, and the biopharmaceutical industry to develop consensus recommendations for advancing patient engagement in all stages of clinical pain research in an effective and purposeful manner. This article summarizes the results of this meeting and offers considerations for meaningful and authentic engagement of patient partners in clinical pain research, including recommendations for representation, timing, continuous engagement, measurement, reporting, and research dissemination.

Methods for pragmatic randomized clinical trials of pain therapies: IMMPACT statement.

ABSTRACT: Pragmatic, randomized, controlled trials hold the potential to directly inform clinical decision making and health policy regarding the treatment of people experiencing pain. Pragmatic trials are designed to replicate or are embedded within routine clinical care and are increasingly valued to bridge the gap between trial research and clinical practice, especially in multidimensional conditions, such as pain and in nonpharmacological intervention research. To maximize the potential of pragmatic trials in pain research, the careful consideration of each methodological decision is required. Trials aligned with routine practice pose several challenges, such as determining and enrolling appropriate study participants, deciding on the appropriate level of flexibility in treatment delivery, integrating information on concomitant treatments and adherence, and choosing comparator conditions and outcome measures. Ensuring data quality in real-world clinical settings is another challenging goal. Furthermore, current trials in the field would benefit from analysis methods that allow for a differentiated understanding of effects across patient subgroups and improved reporting of methods and context, which is required to assess the generalizability of findings. At the same time, a range of novel methodological approaches provide opportunities for enhanced efficiency and relevance of pragmatic trials to stakeholders and clinical decision making. In this study, best-practice considerations for these and other concerns in pragmatic trials of pain treatments are offered and a number of promising solutions discussed. The basis of these recommendations was an Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) meeting organized by the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks.

Transdermal Nicotine Treatment and Progression of Early Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies show that smokers have a lower incidence of Parkinson's disease. Nicotine has been hypothesized to slow progression in early Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients with Parkinson's disease, diagnosed within 18 months, who were in Hoehn and Yahr disease stage less than or equal to 2 (range from 0 to 5; higher scores indicate greater impairment), who were therapy naïve (except for stable monoamine-oxidase-B inhibition), and not requiring dopaminergic therapy, to transdermal nicotine or placebo. The primary end point was change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale parts I­III (Total UPDRS) score (range from 0 to 172; higher scores indicate greater impairment) between baseline and 60 weeks (52 weeks of trial therapy, 8 weeks of washout). The first secondary end point was change in Total UPDRS from baseline to 52 weeks. Differences between groups were estimated using the Hodges­Lehmann (HL) method and tested with the exact two-sided stratified Mann­Whitney­Wilcoxon test according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Among 163 participants, 101 were assessed for the primary end point. Mean worsening of Total UPDRS was 3.5 in the placebo versus 6.0 in the nicotine group (HL-difference with 95% CI: ­3 [­6 to 0], P=0.06). For the first secondary end point, analysis of 138 participants showed a mean worsening of 5.4 in the placebo versus 9.1 in the nicotine group (HL-difference with 95% CI: ­4 [­7 to ­1]). Dropout was mainly because of early treatment discontinuation or adverse events. Cutaneous adverse effects at the patch application site were common. In all, 34.6% of participants initiated dopaminergic therapy during participation. CONCLUSIONS: One-year transdermal nicotine treatment did not slow progression in early Parkinson's disease. (Funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01560754; EudraCT number, 2010-020299-42.)