Impact of artificial intelligence arrhythmia mapping on time to first ablation, procedure duration, and fluoroscopy use.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) ECG arrhythmia mapping provides arrhythmia source localization using 12-lead ECG data; whether this information impacts procedural efficiency is unknown. We performed a retrospective, case-control study to evaluate the hypothesis that AI ECG mapping may reduce time to ablation, procedural duration, and fluoroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases in which system output was used were retrospectively enrolled according to IRB-approved protocols at each site. Matched control cases were enrolled in reverse chronological order beginning on the last day for which the technology was unavailable. Controls were matched based upon physician, institution, arrhythmia, and a predetermined complexity rating. Procedural metrics, fluoroscopy data, and clinical outcomes were assessed from time-stamped medical records. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 28 patients (age 65 ± 11 years, 46% female, left atrial dimension 4.1 ± 0.9 cm, LVEF 50 ± 18%) and was similar to 28 controls. The most common arrhythmia types were atrial fibrillation (n = 10), premature ventricular complexes (n = 8), and ventricular tachycardia (n = 6). Use of the system was associated with a 19.0% reduction in time to ablation (133 ± 48 vs. 165 ± 49 min, p = 0.02), a 22.6% reduction in procedure duration (233 ± 51 vs. 301 ± 83 min, p < 0.001), and a 43.7% reduction in fluoroscopy (18.7 ± 13.3 vs. 33.2 ± 18.0 min, p < 0.001) versus controls. At 6 months follow-up, arrhythmia-free survival was 73.5% in the study group and 63.3% in the control group (p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Use of forward-solution AI ECG mapping is associated with reductions in time to first ablation, procedure duration, and fluoroscopy without an adverse impact on procedure outcomes or complications.

Does aligner refinement have the same efficiency in deep bite correction?: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Refinements are very common in clear aligner treatments. The aim of this study is to assess whether the predictability of deep overbite correction is similar over several refinements using clear aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) and examine the accuracy of vertical movement and inclination change of individual teeth. METHODS: This retrospective study included 20 deep bite patients (7M and 13F; 32.63 ± 11.88 years old; an initial overbite of 5.09 ± 0.98 mm), consecutively treated from September 2016 and March 2023, who completed at least two sets of aligners, including refinements. The initial, predicted, and achieved models were exported from ClinCheck or OrthoCAD (Cadent Inc, Carlstadt, NJ) and superimposed via best-fit surface-based registration using SlicerCMF (version 4.9.0; cmf.slicer.org). We also examined 15 out of 20 patients who completed treatments. The overbite correction and changes in vertical movement and inclination for individual teeth were measured. Descriptive statistics and a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean accuracy of overbite correction was 37.63% after 1st set, followed by 11.19%, 6.32%, and 13.80% (2nd-4th sets), respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the predicted and achieved vertical movements and inclination changes for all teeth for the 1st and 2nd sets. For the completed cases, the mean overbite correction was 38.54% compared to the initially planned overbite correction, which is similar to one of the 1st set. Still, the vertical movements and inclination changes of all teeth present statistically significant differences between the initially planned and finally achieved movements except for maxillary lateral incisor torque. CONCLUSIONS: The most overbite correction occurs during the 1st set of aligners, and refinement treatment does not significantly improve the deep bite correction.

The first clinical validation of whole-genome screening on standard trophectoderm biopsies of preimplantation embryos.

Objective: To validate the performance of our laboratory-developed whole-genome screening assay within clinical preimplantation genetic testing environments. Design: Perform a laboratory-developed whole-genome assay on both cell lines and trophectoderm biopsies, subsequently employing the next-generation sequencing procedure to reach a sequencing depth of 30X. Adhere to the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision calculations by comparing samples with references. Our assay was then applied to cell lines and biopsies harboring known pathogenic variants, aiming to ascertain these changes solely from the next-generation sequencing data, independent of parental genome information. Settings: Clinical laboratory. Patients: Coriell cell lines and research embryos with known chromosomal or genetic variants. Research trophectoderm biopsies from a couple that are heterozygous carriers for distinct variants in the same autosomal recessive gene (HOGA1). Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision were assessed by comparing the samples to their references. For samples with known variants, we calculated our sensitivity to detecting established variants. For the research embryos, noncarrier, carrier, and compound heterozygous states of inherited HOGA1 variants were distinguished independently of parental samples. Results: Amplification of DNA from cell lines and embryos yielded success rates exceeding 99.9% and 98.2%, respectively, although maintaining an accuracy of >99.9% for aneuploidy assessment. The accuracy (99.99%), specificity (99.99%), sensitivity (98.0%), and precision (98.1%) of amplified genome in the bottle (reference NA12878) and embryo biopsies were comparable to results on genomic DNA, including mitochondrial heteroplasmy. Using our assay, we achieved >99.99% sensitivity when examining samples with known chromosomal and genetic variants. This encompassed pathogenic CFTR, BRCA1, and other variants, along with uniparental isodisomies and microdeletions such as DiGeorge syndrome. Our research study identified noncarrier, carrier, and compound heterozygous states within trophectoderm biopsies while simultaneously screening for 1,300 other severe monogenic diseases. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first clinical validation of whole-genome embryo screening. In this study, we demonstrated high accuracy for aneuploidy calls (>99.9%) and genetic variants (99.99%), even in the absence of parental genomes. This assay demonstrates advancements in genomic screening and an extended scope for testing capabilities in the realm of preimplantation genetic testing.

Exodoncia de premolar inferior supernumerario con posterior colocación de Fibrina Rica en Plaquetas y Leucocitos (L-PRF)

Los dientes supernumerarios son una anomalía odontogénica, consiste en aumento del número dentario con respecto a la cantidad normal. La Fibrina rica en Plaquetas y Leucocitos (L-PRF) es una matriz rica en plaquetas y glóbulos blancos, que promueve la curación y regeneración de los tejidos. La exodoncia de un tercer premolar inferior supernumerario con posterior colocación de membrana de L-PRF. Paciente de sexo masculino de 27 años de edad con un probable premolar supernumerario por lingual. Se programó la cirugía incluyendo L-PRF. Se realizó extracción de sangre para preparar la membrana de L-PRF, anestesia, incisión lineal, despegamiento mucoperióstico, osteotomía, exodoncia, tratamiento del lecho quirúrgico colocando la membrana de L-PRF y sutura interdental. Se prescribió medicación antibiótica, antiinflamatoria y analgésica. La técnica con L-PRF es sencilla y económica. Los resultados postoperatorios fueron favorables, observándose una buena cicatrización, ausencia de dolor, edema o infección.

Supernumerary teeth are an odontogenic anomaly, involving an increase in the number of teeth compared to the normal amount. Platelet-Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) is a matrix rich in platelets and white blood cells that promotes tissue healing and regeneration. The Extraction of a supernumerary lower third premolar followed by placement of L-PRF membrane. A 27-year-old male patient with a probable lingual supernumerary premolar. Surgery was scheduled, including L-PRF. Blood was extracted to prepare the L-PRF membrane, followed by anesthesia, linear incision, mucoperiosteal detachment, osteotomy, extraction, treatment of the surgical site with L-PRF membrane placement, and interdental suturing. Antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic medication was prescribed. The L-PRF technique is simple and cost-effective. Postoperative results were favorable, with good healing, absence of pain, swelling, or infection was observed.