Cost analytic model to determine the least costly inpatient erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen.

BACKGROUND: Unlike in outpatient settings, the comparative costs of epoetin alpha (EPO) and darbepoetin alpha (DARB) have not been evaluated broadly from the inpatient hospital perspective. OBJECTIVE: To develop a cost analytic model comparing hospital inpatient costs for erythropoiesis stimulating therapies within the nephrology and oncology settings. METHODS: A cost analytic model incorporating erythropoietic drug, pharmacy, and nursing costs was developed from the inpatient hospital perspective to evaluate comparative costs of EPO and DARB. Erythropoietic drug costs were calculated using unit wholesale acquisition cost multiplied by the number of units or micrograms while comparing the following dosing regimens: EPO 3 times weekly, EPO once weekly, and DARB once weekly. Pharmacy costs included dispensing and delivery costs, while nursing costs incorporated administration time costs; all were calculated by estimated fractional hours per activity multiplied by hourly wages. The total frequency of erythropoiesis stimulating therapy administrations was determined based on the average hospital length of stay. The first erythropoiesis stimulating therapy dose was assumed to occur on day 3 of hospitalization. For total inpatient costs, a weighted average was calculated across disease states. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying length of stay, day of initial erythropoiesis stimulating therapy dose, pharmacy and nursing costs, and once-weekly DARB dose. RESULTS: EPO 3 times weekly was the least costly regimen across all disease states evaluated. Threshold analysis indicated that the cost of once-weekly DARB regimens would have to be reduced by 37% to equal the cost of EPO 3 times weekly for an average length of stay. Sensitivity analyses did not considerably affect the results. CONCLUSIONS: EPO 3 times weekly was found to be the least costly erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen for nephrology and oncology inpatients for the average length of stay as well as most other lengths of stay considered. Once-weekly EPO was the least costly erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen for several other lengths of stay, while once-weekly DARB was never found to be the least costly regimen.

A retrospective claims database analysis to assess patterns of interstitial cystitis diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Interstitial cystitis (IC) is often misdiagnosed as one of several other conditions manifesting similar symptoms. This analysis assesses the potential extent of IC misdiagnosis while considering concomitant conditions in a managed care population and identifies predictors of IC diagnosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Administrative insurance claims data covering 1.7 million lives (1999-2003) were analyzed. Insurance enrollees with >or= 1 IC diagnosis (ICD-9-CM of 595.1x) were identified as IC patients. A random sample of non-IC controls was selected using a 10:1 matching ratio. Six-month incidence rates of 'commonly misdiagnosed conditions', (overactive bladder, urinary tract infection, chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis, prostatitis) were compared before and after patients' initial IC diagnosis and the reduction in incidence rate of commonly misdiagnosed conditions was used as a suggestive measure of the extent of IC misdiagnosis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the extent that commonly misdiagnosed conditions were predictors of subsequent IC. A Cox Proportional Hazards regression model (that adjusts for patient demographics, concomitant and misdiagnosed conditions) was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of these conditions. Similar analyses were performed for the 'commonly concomitant conditions' (fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, vulvodynia). RESULTS: There were 992 IC patients and 9920 controls identified. The reduced incidence of commonly misdiagnosed conditions after initial IC diagnosis suggests that the misdiagnosis rate could be as high as 38% within the 6-month period before initial IC diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnoses of commonly misdiagnosed conditions are significant predictors of future IC diagnosis. When overlooked, potential misdiagnosis of IC can lead to underestimation of the true prevalence of IC. Similarly, diagnoses of commonly concomitant conditions are significant predictors of future IC diagnosis. These initial findings based on claims data suggest hypotheses for further investigation with clinical data. These results suggest more consideration of IC as a diagnosis is warranted, especially when certain diagnoses are repeatedly made and the resulting treatments do not alleviate the patient's symptoms.