RESUMO
Resumo Fundamento Tem surgido uma nova manifestação clínica chamada pós-COVID ou COVID longa (COVID p/l) após a fase aguda da COVID-19. COVID p/l pode levar à lesão miocárdica com problemas cardíacos subsequentes. Diagnosticar esses pacientes de forma rápida e simples é cada vez mais importante devido ao número crescente de pacientes com COVID p/l. Objetivos Comparamos os parâmetros de ecocardiografia com strain (ES) de pacientes que apresentaram dor torácica atípica e achados de sequelas de miocardite na ressonância magnética cardíaca (RMC). Nosso objetivo foi investigar o valor da ES para detecção de envolvimento miocárdico em pacientes com COVID p/l. Métodos Foram incluídos um total de 42 pacientes. Nossa população foi separada em 2 grupos. O grupo RMC(-) (n = 21) não apresentou sequelas miocárdicas na RMC, enquanto o grupo RMC(+) apresentou sequelas miocárdicas na RMC (n = 21). O valor preditivo da ES para miocardite também foi avaliado por análise multivariada ajustada por idade. Valores de p < 0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. Resultados Quando comparado com a fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE), o strain longitudinal global (SLG) e o strain circunferencial global (SCG) tiveram uma relação mais forte (FEVE, p = 0,05; SLG, p < 0,001; SCG, p < 0,001) com envolvimento miocárdico associado à COVID p/l. SLG < 20,35 apresentou sensibilidade de 85,7% e especificidade de 81%; SCG < 21,35 apresentou sensibilidade de 81% e especificidade de 81% como valores diagnósticos para sequelas miocárdicas detectadas com RMC. Enquanto não houve diferença entre os grupos quanto aos marcadores inflamatórios (proteína C-reativa, p = 0,31), houve diferença entre os marcadores bioquímicos, que são indicadores de envolvimento cardíaco (peptídeo natriurético cerebral, p < 0,001). Conclusão A ES é mais útil do que a ecocardiografia tradicional para diagnosticar com rapidez e precisão, a fim de não atrasar o tratamento na presença de envolvimento miocárdico.
Abstract Background A new clinical manifestation called post or long coronavirus disease (p/l COVID) has walked into our lives after the acute COVID-19 phase. P/l COVID may lead to myocardial injury with subsequent cardiac problems. Diagnosing these patients quickly and simply has become more important due to the increasing number of patients with p/l COVID. Objectives We compared strain echocardiography (SE) parameters of patients who suffered from atypical chest pain and had sequel myocarditis findings on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). We aimed to investigate the value of SE for detection of myocardial involvement in patients with p/l COVID. Methods A total of 42 patients were enrolled. Our population was separated into two groups. The CMR(-) group (n = 21) had no myocardial sequelae on CMR, whereas the CMR(+) group had myocardial sequelae on CMR (n = 21). The predictive value of SE for myocarditis was also evaluated by age-adjusted multivariate analysis. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results When compared with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) had a stronger relationship (LVEF, p = 0.05; GLS, p < 0.001; GCS, p < 0.001) with p/l COVID associated myocardial involvement. GLS < 20.35 had 85.7% sensitivity and 81% specificity; GCS < 21.35 had 81% sensitivity and 81% specificity as diagnostic values for myocardial sequelae detected with CMR. While there was no difference between the groups in terms of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, p = 0.31), a difference was observed between biochemical markers, which are indicators of cardiac involvement (brain natriuretic peptide, p < 0.001). Conclusion SE is more useful than traditional echocardiography for making diagnosis quickly and accurately in order not to delay treatment in the presence of myocardial involvement.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A rule exists regarding the use of computed tomography (CT) for patients presenting to the emergency department with head trauma and a Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 15; however, it can be difficult to make this decision due to overcrowded emergency rooms or exaggerated patients complaints. We evaluated patients who presented to the emergency room with minor head trauma, and we aimed to investigate the relationship between brain pathology on CT and hematological markers in order to find markers that help us identify brain pathology in patients with a GCS of 15. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients with pathologies present on their CT scans and a control group consisting of 100 patients with a normal CT. All data obtained from this study were recorded and evaluated using "Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows 20" program. Parametric tests (independent samples test) were used with normally distributed data, while non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test) were used with non-normally distributed data. A p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. FINDING: When we divided the cases into two groups based on the presence of pathologies on CT scan, we determined that there were significant differences between the groups in terms of white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil (neu), troponin T, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR). When differentiating the patients that had brain pathologies on CT scan from patients that had normal CT scans, the troponin T cut-off value of 6.16 lead to 90 % specificity, and setting the NLR cut-off value at 4.29 resulted in a specificity of 90 %. CONCLUSION: MPV, NLR, and troponin T can be used as parameters that indicate brain pathologies on CT scans of patients presenting to the emergency department with isolated minor head trauma and GCS of 15 when the necessity of a CT scan is otherwise unclear.