RESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of obstetrical adverse events and clinical outcome in infants following antenatal hyperimmune globulin (HIG) treatment for primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in pregnancy. METHODS: Data from 50 women including three twin pregnancies were retrospectively evaluated. Primary infection was defined by seroconversion or the presence of CMV-specific IgM and low IgG avidity. All women received two or more infusions of HIG (200 U/kg). Congenital CMV (cCMV) infection was diagnosed by detection of CMV in amniotic fluid and/or neonatal urine. We compared gestational age (GA) at birth, head circumference (HC) and birth weight (BW) of infants in our study cohort with those of live-born infants delivered in our clinic between 2015 and 2016. RESULTS: Median gestational age at time of maternal CMV diagnosis was 13 weeks. One-hundred-forty-one maternal HIG doses were given. No HIG-related severe adverse reactions occurred. Preterm birth rate was 4.2% (2/47) in singleton pregnancies. None of the neonates had birth weight or head circumference < 3rd percentile (< 3P) for gestational age. There was no statistically significant difference regarding GA, BW and HC between our study cohort and the total population of live-born infants. The frequency of CMV-related sequelae in infants with cCMV infection was 10.5% (2/19) (one with bilateral hearing loss and one with mild motoric delay), both cases following first trimester maternal infection. CONCLUSION: Antenatal HIG treatment was well tolerated and not associated with prematurity or decreased birth weight. HIG application might have a favorable effect on the clinical course of congenital CMV infection.
Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/transmissão , Citomegalovirus/imunologia , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/terapia , Adulto , Líquido Amniótico/química , Líquido Amniótico/virologia , Peso ao Nascer , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/virologia , Feminino , Doenças Fetais/diagnóstico , Doenças Fetais/epidemiologia , Doenças Fetais/terapia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro/imunologia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/imunologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/imunologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is one of the most important complications in preterm infants. For this reason, most preterm infants receive antibiotics during their first postnatal week. Since 2013, a weekly colonization screening has been installed in German neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), including multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) and pathogens with increased epidemic potential. We here investigated the impact of early antibiotic exposure on the colonization with these pathogens. METHODS: Data from 1407 preterm infants with gestational age < 32 + 0 weeks and born in three NICUs in Germany between January 2014 and December 2019 were analysed. RESULTS: Antibiotics were administered to 911/1407 (64.7%) participating infants during their first postnatal week. Screening-targeted pathogens were detected in 547/1407 (38.9%). Early antibiotic exposure did not increase the risk of colonization with screening-targeted pathogens. The only independent risk factor for colonisation with potential pathogens was the admitting hospital. Interestingly, longer antibiotic therapy (> 7 days) decreased the risk for acquiring pathogens with increased epidemic potential. CONCLUSION: Early antibiotic exposure did not impact the risk for colonization with MDRO or highly epidemic pathogens in preterm infants. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors for the acquisition of MDRO and highly epidemic pathogens and potential associations with long-term outcome.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Enterococcus , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy has recently proved extremely effective in improving the outcome of patients with large vessel occlusion. Despite this, questions still remain over certain cohorts of patients that were excluded from the large randomised controlled trials. One such cohort includes pregnant patients. Although thromboembolic stroke is uncommon in pregnancy, the outcome from this pathology can be devastating. SUMMARY: We present 2 cases of mechanical thrombectomy in pregnancy both of which underwent successful flow restoration without complications. We discuss the incidence of stroke in pregnancy, potential pitfalls of imaging, radiation protection issues, and the role of thrombolysis as well as the available literature on mechanical thrombectomy in this cohort. KEY MESSAGE: Thrombectomy in pregnancy can be performed safely with no significant changes required to the procedure itself. Radiation exposure during the procedure should be minimised and shielding used to prevent scatter radiation to the fetus; however, given the potential risks of thrombolysis in this cohort of patients, mechanical thrombectomy should be considered in all stages of pregnancy.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To review the anatomy and physiology of the vagina, the merits of vaginal drug administration, and the currently available vaginal drug-administration systems. DESIGN: Review of basic and clinical research. RESULT(S): Although clinicians commonly use topically administered drugs in the vagina, this route for systemic drug administration is somewhat novel. Experience with a variety of products demonstrates that the vagina is a highly effective site for drug delivery, particularly in women's health. The vagina is often an ideal route for drug administration because it allows for the administration of lower doses, steady drug levels, and less frequent administration than the oral route. With vaginal drug administration, absorption is unaffected by gastrointestinal disturbances, there is no first-pass effect, and use is discreet. Knowledge of anatomy, physiology, histology, and immunology of the vagina should allow clinicians to reassure their patients concerning this mode of delivery. Greater understanding and experience by clinicians should lead to increased use and acceptance of the vagina as a route for drug administration. CONCLUSION(S): The safety and efficacy of vaginal administration have been well established. The vaginal route of drug delivery is acceptable and may even be a preferable route of administration for many drugs, particularly hormones, whether for contraception or postmenopausal estrogen therapy.