Association between dysphagia and symptoms of depression and anxiety after ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dysphagia is associated with poor outcome, higher mortality, reduced quality of life, and social isolation. We investigate the relationship between swallowing impairment and symptoms of anxiety and depression after ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke participating in the prospective STROKE-CARD Registry study from 2020 to 2022 were assessed for dysphagia on hospital admission (clinical swallowing assessment) and for persistence until discharge and 3-month follow-up (SINGER Independency Index). Anxiety and depression symptoms were recorded using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of 648 patients, 19.3% had dysphagia on admission, persisting in 14.8% at discharge and 6.8% at 3-month follow-up. With the presence or duration of dysphagia (no dysphagia, dysphagia at baseline, at discharge, at 3 months), score (mean ± SD) increased on the BDI (7.9 ± 6.7, 12.5 ± 8.7, 13.5 ± 9.0, 16.5 ± 10.2), HADS-D (4.4 ± 3.7, 7.1 ± 4.2, 7.7 ± 4.4, 9.8 ± 4.3), and HADS-A (4.4 ± 3.5, 5.4 ± 3.6, 6.0 ± 3.6, 7.0 ± 3.6). In linear regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, dementia, and either functional disability or stroke severity, BDI and HADS-D scores were significantly higher in patients with dysphagia across all points in time (admission, discharge, 3-month follow-up). An independent association with HADS-A scores was only evident in patients with persisting dysphagia after 3 months. Patients with dysphagia were more likely to receive antidepressants, antipsychotics, or benzodiazepines at discharge and 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia after stroke is common and severely affects psychosocial functioning of individuals. Our results highlight swallowing impairment as an independent predictor for poststroke depressive and, to a lesser extent, anxiety symptoms.

No association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and ischaemic stroke or high-risk transient ischaemic attack.

BACKGROUND: Initiation of SARS-CoV-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2) vaccinations aroused scepticism within the general-public about risks including stroke. Our aim was to explore temporal associations between vaccination and cerebrovascular events through an analysis of a prospective large-scale cohort of consecutive stroke and high-risk TIA (transitory ischaemic attack) patients. METHODS: We prospectively recruited a cohort of consecutive ischaemic stroke and high-risk TIA (ABCD2-Score ≥ 4) patients treated at the Innsbruck University Hospital (STROKE-CARD Registry Study, NCT04582825) from December 2020 until February 2022. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status and the time of administration was ascertained by electronic health-data. A Cox model with vaccination status as time-dependent co-variable was employed to examine its association with ischaemic events. RESULTS: Data on 572 participants were available with 355 (62.1%) vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 before suffering cerebral ischaemia. In our cohort, no temporal association between vaccination and cerebrovascular event was detected (HR 1.06 [0.85-1.34; p = 0.60]) and this also applies to TIA (HR [0.82 0.37-1.85; p = 0.64]) or minor stroke (HR 1.18 [0.89-1.56; p = 0.26]) and subgroups defined by sex and age. Neither vector-based (HR 1.11 [0.79-1.56; p = 0.55]) nor mRNA-based (HR 1.06 [0.84-1.34; p = 0.61]) vaccinations were associated with the occurrence of cerebral ischaemia. CONCLUSION: Among patients with stroke or high-risk TIA, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not associated with cerebral ischaemia.