Lateralized Odontoid in Plain Film Radiography: Sign of Fractures? A Comparison Study with MDCT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate X-ray standards for the detection of odontoid fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical spine fractures are a common finding in emergency medicine, accounting for 1-3% of injuries. Involvement of the C1/C2 complex is found in 25% of cases, affecting the odontoid peg in 55-80%. Regarding the consequences of missed fractures, radiographic techniques built the groundwork for further treatment procedures. As standardized X-ray measurements have not been established, the incidence of unrecognized cervical spine fracture is expected to be up to 20%. The establishment of X-ray-based guidelines is also limited by the presumed low specificity and sensitivity of distance measurements caused by rotational distortion which leads to a rising popularity of CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 79 (age 60 ± 26 yrs) patients with lateralization of the odontoid process on conventional plain film radiography (anteroposterior, lateral, and open mouth odontoid process view projection) were examined. The distance between the odontoid process and lateral mass of C1, angles of vertical odontoid line and basis of C2 were measured in the ap view. In the lateral view, dorsal alignment and atlantodental distance were assessed. MDCT examinations were used as a reference. Discriminatory power test was applied to assess significance. RESULTS: 8/79 (10.1%) odontoid process fractures were found. Diagnosis was achieved on conventional radiographs in 6 patients. Neither distance and angle measurements between odontoid and C1 nor the dorsal alignment of the vertebral bodies differed significantly between healthy and affected patients. CONCLUSION: Decentralization of the odontoid process is not necessarily an indirect sign for its fracture. In patients with suspected injury of the odontoid process, an MDCT scan might be the method of choice to rule out a fracture. KEY POINTS: Due to the wide physiological variety of odontoid process position, even a detailed metric analysis of cervical alignment and odontoid process angulation in X-ray scans is not able to facilitate the diagnosis of odontoid process fractures. In the case of cervical spine trauma, which necessitate medical imaging, a primary MDCT scan should be the method of choice.

Imaging of appendicitis in adults.

UNLABELLED: Three imaging modalities are available for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Transabdominal ultrasound should be the first-line imaging test. Abdominal CT is superior to US and is required immediately in patients with atypical clinical presentation of appendicitis and suspected perforation. However, low-dose unenhanced CT is equal to standard-dose CT with intravenous contrast agents in the detection of five signs of acute appendicitis (thickened appendiceal wall more than 2 mm, cross-sectional diameter greater than 6 mm, periappendicitis, abscess, and appendicolith). MRI is necessary in pregnant women and young adults. This review illustrates the principles of state-of-the-art imaging techniques and their clinical relevance. KEY POINTS: • US is the basic diagnostic method in case of suspected appendicitis.• CT is necessary in patients with atypical presentation of appendicitis.• MRI should be the first-line imaging test in pregnant women.

Isolated syndesmotic injury in acute ankle trauma: comparison of plain film radiography with 3T MRI.

OBJECTIVES: To determine cut-off values and the accuracy of plain film measurements for the detection of isolated syndesmotic injury after acute ankle trauma and to investigate MRI findings of concomitant ankle injury. METHODS: Eighty-four consecutive patients with absent fracture in plain film radiographs were prospectively evaluated for isolated syndesmotic injury after acute ankle trauma. The tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), the tibiofibular overlap (TFO), and the medial clear space (MCS) were independently assessed in plain radiographs by two readers. MRI performed at 3T within 24h served as the reference standard. MRI was evaluated for syndesmotic injury, using a four-scale grading system (0=normal syndesmosis, 1a=periligamentous edema, 1b=intraligamentous edema, 2=partial rupture, 3=complete rupture), and for concomitant ankle injury. Inter-observer variability for x-ray measurements was assessed using Bland-Altman diagrams. ROC analyses were performed to determine cut-off values and sensitivity and specificity for TFCS, TFO, and MCS. RESULTS: Eleven of 84 patients (13.1%) revealed syndesmotic injury (Grade 2 or 3) according to MRI. Between patients with and without syndesmotic injury significantly different measurements were obtained for TFCS (p=0.003) and MCS (p=0.04). ROC derived cut-off values were 5.3mm for TFCS, 2.8mm for TFO, and 2.8mm for MCS. Sensitivity and specificity was 82% and 75% for TFCS, 36% and 78% for TFO, and 73% and 59% for MCS. The bias and limits of agreement were -0.04 mm and [-1.54; 1.53] for TFCS, 0.8mm and [-2.5; 2.5] for TFO, and 0.05 mm and [-1.42; 1.43] for MCS. Patients with syndesmotic injury had a 5-fold increased risk of concomitant ankle injury (p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The determined cut-off values aid in the evaluation of syndesmotic integrity in patients with absent fracture in plain radiographs. In case of increased distances MRI is recommended to assess severity of SI and to reveal associated ankle injuries.

[Multidetector computed tomography of urolithiasis: technique and results]. / Multidetektor-Computertomografie der Urolithiasis: Technik und Ergebnisse.

The diagnosis of acute urolithiasis results from unenhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This test analyses the functional and anatomical possibility for passing an ureteral calculi, the localization and dimension of which are important parameters for further therapy. Alternatively chronic urolithiasis could be ruled out by magnetic resonance urography (MRU). MRU is the first choice especially in pregnant women and children because of radiation hygiene. Enhanced MDCT must be emphasized as an alternative to intravenous urography (IVU) for diagnosis of complex drainage of urine and suspected disorder of the involved kidney. This review illustrates the principles of different tests and the clinical relevance thereof.