Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hand Microsurg ; 16(1): 100016, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38854380

RESUMO

Recalcitrant clavicular nonunion is an uncommon but challenging problem. Vascularized bone reconstruction is not first-line therapy due to complexity and donor morbidity, though it has utility in select cases. A systematic review of Embase and Medline databases was undertaken for cases of medial femoral condyle reconstruction for clavicle nonunion. Ten studies met inclusion, encompassing 26 patients. Mean age was 38.9 years. Ten patients were male and 16 female. Mean time of nonunion was 37.79 months prior to intervention; mean time to union following medial femoral condyle flap was 7.60 months. Two patients did not achieve union. Of the 11 patients who previously had at least one failed fixation with bone graft, considered the current "gold standard", 9 patients (81.81%) went on to achieve union, while 2 patients (18.19%) did not. There were six reported complications in five patients. Medial femoral condyle flap is a valuable option in recalcitrant clavicle nonunion.

2.
Burns ; 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981800

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with severe burn injuries are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and associated sequelae. Burn-injured patients may require larger doses of VTE prophylaxis so underdosing may occur with standard regimens. Monitoring anti-factor Xa (AFXa) levels may allow tailoring of dosage but is currently uncommon. The purpose of this systematic review was to methodically review the available literature with respect to AFXa in severe burn-injured patients, and thereby assess its efficacy. METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, "Xa" and "burns" were used to systematically review MEDLINE (1946 - present) and EMBASE (1974 - present) databases for publications regarding the monitoring of AFXa levels for thromboprophylaxis in burn-injured patients. RESULTS: Eight studies (432 patients) met inclusion. Peak AFXa level at initial measurement was reported in all studies and was within the range for prophylaxis in 184 of 432 cases (42.6%), below range in 246 of 432 cases (56.9%) and above range for 2/432 (0.5%). Complications were reported in 7 studies (412 patients), with a total of 30 (7.3%) complications, comprising of 16 (53.3%) VTE events and 14 (46.7%) mortalities. Three studies comprising 270 patients compared complications between patients who were within the reference range with patients who were below the range. There were 164 patients from the 'within the reference range' groups that had a total of 6 (3.7%) complications, comprised of 4 (66.7%) VTE events and 2 (33.3%) mortalities. There were 106 patients from the 'below reference range group' that had a total of 11 (10.4%) complications, comprised of 9 (81.8%) VTE events and 2 (18.2%) mortalities. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest standard prophylactic anticoagulation dosing risks underdosing and therefore, an increased risk in the development of VTE. AFXa monitoring allows individually tailored dose adjustment to reach therapeutic levels, which may be efficacious in reducing VTE events and is therefore recommended where possible.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA