Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Masui ; 54(6): 638-42, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15966381

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia for hip fracture in elderly patients is a challenge because of their reduced functional reserve. We compared spinal and epidural anesthesia retrospectively in the operations of hip fracture in patients above the age of 85. METHODS: Two hundred and eighteen operations from April 1995 to September 2003 in our hospital were examined. Epidural anesthesia was scheduled in 94 operations, and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in 86 operations. Successful anesthetic cases of each group were compared. Blood pressure, heart rate, doses of vasopressors used were recorded before anesthesia and first and second 30-minute periods after anesthesia. RESULTS: Failed anesthetic cases in epidural anesthesia were significantly more than those in spinal anesthesia. Blood pressure in the first 30-minute period after epidural anesthesia was significantly lower than that after spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia is preferable for the operation for hip fracture compared with epidural anesthesia, because of fewer failed cases and smaller decreases of blood pressure.


Assuntos
Anestesia Epidural , Raquianestesia , Geriatria , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Sanguínea , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA