Provider experiences with daily use of elastomeric half-mask respirators in health care.

BACKGROUND: During public health emergencies, demand for N95 filtering facepiece respirators (N95 FFRs) can outpace supply. Elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMRs) are a potential alternative that are reusable and provide the same or higher levels of protection. This study sought to examine the practical aspects of EHMR use among health care personnel (HCP). METHODS: Between September and December 2021, 183 HCPs at 2 tertiary referral centers participated in this 3-month EHMR deployment, wearing the EHMR whenever respiratory protection was required according to hospital protocols (ie, when an N95 FFR would typically be worn) and responding to surveys about their experience. RESULTS: Participants wore EHMRs typically 1 to 3 hours per shift, reported disinfecting the respirator after 85% of the removals, and reported high confidence in using the EHMR following the study. EHMRs caused minimal interference with patient care tasks, though they did inhibit communication. DISCUSSION: HCP who had not previously worn an EHMR were able to wear it as an alternative to an N95 FFR without much-reported interference with their job tasks and with high disinfection compliance. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the feasibility of the deployment of EHMRs during a public health emergency when an alternative respirator option is necessary.

Health Care Workers' Comfort Ratings for Elastomeric Half Mask Respirators Versus N95® Filtering Facepiece Respirators During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Reusable elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMR) are an alternative to address shortages of disposable respirators. While respirator discomfort has been noted as a barrier to adherence to wearing an N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) among health care personnel (HCP), few have examined EHMR comfort while providing patient care, which was the purpose of this study. METHOD: Among a cohort of 183 HCP, we prospectively examined how HCP rated EHMR tolerability using the Respirator Comfort, Wearing Experience, and Function Instrument (R-COMFI) questionnaire at Study Week 2 and Week 10. At the completion of the study (Week-12), HCP compared EHMR comfort with their prior N95 FFR use. Overall R-COMFI scores and three subscales (comfort, wear experience, and function) were examined as well as individual item scores. FINDINGS: The HCP reported an improved overall R-COMFI score (lower score more favorable, 30.0 vs. 28.7/47, respectively) from Week 2 to Week 10. Many individual item scores improved or remained low over this period, except difficulty communicating with patients and coworkers. The overall R-COMFI scores for the EHMR were more favorable than for the N95 FFR (33.7 vs. 37.4, respectively), with a large proportion of workers indicating their perception that EHMR fit better, provided better protection, and they preferred to wear it in pandemic conditions compared with the N95 FFR. CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Findings suggest that the EHMR is a feasible respiratory protection device with respect to tolerance. EHMRs can be considered as a possible alternative to the N95 FFR in the health care setting. Future work is needed in the EHMR design to improve communication.

Nutritional Recovery of Children With HIV and Severe Acute Malnutrition Attending an Outpatient Therapeutic Care Program.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant morbidity and mortality from HIV and severe acute malnutrition (SAM) among children in sub-Saharan Africa, research is lacking in these children. We describe the proportion of children living with HIV with SAM achieving recovery, the factors associated with recovery, and time to recovery in an outpatient therapeutic care program. SETTING AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of children with SAM and HIV on antiretroviral therapy (6 months-15 years), enrolled in outpatient therapeutic care from 2015 to 2017 at a pediatric HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda. SAM diagnosis and recovery by 120 days after enrollment were determined per World Health Organization guidelines. Cox-proportional hazards models were used to determine predictors of recovery. RESULTS: Data from 166 patients were analyzed (mean age 5.4 years, SD 4.7). Outcomes showed 36.1% recovered, 15.6% were lost to follow-up, 2.4% died, and 45.8% failed. Average time to recovery was 59.9 days (SD 27.8). Patients 5 years or older were less likely to recover (crude hazard ratio [CHR] = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.58). In multivariate analysis, febrile patients were less likely to recover (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.65). Patients with CD4 count of 200 or less at enrollment were less likely to recover (CHR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Despite treatment with antiretroviral therapy for children living with HIV, we observed poor rates of recovery from SAM, below the international target of >75%. Moreover, patients 5 years and older, fever, or low CD4 at diagnosis of SAM may require more intense therapy or closer monitoring than their counterparts.