Factors Contributing to Nonvisualization of the Appendix on Ultrasound in Children With Suspected Appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the patient characteristics, history factors, physical examination findings, and sonographic findings, which contribute to a higher risk of the appendix not being visualized on ultrasound evaluation (ie, nondiagnostic or equivocal study) in patients being evaluated for appendicitis. Secondarily, this study assessed the utility of an equivocal ultrasound, specifically in the ability to predict the absence of appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective case review was performed, of children (age, 0-18 years) presenting to a pediatric emergency department with clinical suspicion for appendicitis, who underwent sonographic studies during the 12-month study period. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-three cases were reviewed, of which 75 (14%) were diagnosed with appendicitis. The sensitivity of ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis was 62.7% and specificity was 79.1%. The appendix was not visualized in 398 (73%) cases. Of the cases where the appendix was not visualized, 370 did not have appendicitis (negative predictive value, 93%). In cases where the appendix was not visualized and the white blood cell count was less than 10,000, the negative predictive value rose to 97%. The patient's age (odds ratio [OR], 1.049), weight (OR, 1.015), presence of appendicolith (OR, 0.426), presence of right lower quadrant fat stranding on sonography (OR, 0.081), and presence of hyperemia on sonography (OR, 0.094) were found to be significant in affecting the visualization of the appendix on ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing patient's age and weight leads to increased likelihood that the appendix will not be visualized on ultrasound, whereas the presence of an appendicolith, right lower quadrant fat stranding or hyperemia will increase the likelihood of visualization. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of appendicitis are moderate but the negative predictive value of an equivocal study is high. Clinicians can use supporting clinical examination and laboratory findings, in conjunction with a nondiagnostic ultrasound evaluation of the appendix to exclude the diagnosis of appendicitis, without the need for further imaging.

Reducing Phlebotomy, Length of Stay, Cost: Development of a Blunt Abdominal Trauma Pathway in a Level I, Pediatric Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVES: Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is a leading cause of morbidity in children with higher hemodynamic stabilities when compared with adults. Pediatric patients with BAT can often be managed without surgical interventions; however, laboratory testing is often recommended. Yet, laboratory testing can be costly, and current literature has not identified appropriate pathways or specific tests necessary to detect intra-abdominal injury after BAT. Therefore, the present study evaluated a proposed laboratory testing pathway to determine if it safely reduced draws of complete blood counts, coagulation studies, urinalysis, comprehensive metabolic panels, amylase and lipase levels orders, emergency department (ED) length of stay, and cost in pediatric BAT patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of levels I, II, and III BAT pediatric patients (n = 329) was performed from 2015 to 2018 at our level I, pediatric trauma center. Patients were then grouped based on pre-post pathway, and differences were calculated using univariate analyses. RESULTS: After implementation of the pathway, there was a significant decrease in the number of complete blood counts, coagulation studies, urinalysis, comprehensive metabolic panels, amylase, and lipase levels orders ( P < 0.05). Postpathway patients had lower average ED lengths of stay and testing costs compared with the pre pathway patients ( P < 0.05). There was no increase in rates of return to the ED within 30 days, missed injuries, or readmissions of patients to the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Results displayed that the adoption of a laboratory testing pathway for BAT patients reduced the number of laboratory tests, ED length of stay, and associated costs pediatric patients without impacting quality care.

Concurrent malaria in a child and his father nine months after travel.

Fever is a frequent complaint in the pediatric emergency department. In pursuit of the cause of a febrile illness, one should obtain a history of both recent and remote travel. An important cause of travel-related fever is malaria. We describe a case of concurrent malaria in a child and his father presenting 9 months after travel to an endemic region.

Low-dose ketamine: efficacy in pediatric sedation.

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous (IV) ketamine has gained widespread use in the emergency department (ED) for procedural sedation. The most commonly recommended starting dose is 1.5 mg/kg. We examined whether lower doses of ketamine in the range of 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg could successfully sedate pediatric patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed quality assurance data of patients sedated with IV ketamine in a pediatric ED. Patients were administered 0.02 mg/kg of IV atropine, 0.05 mg/kg of IV midazolam, and then 0.5 mg/kg of IV ketamine. Additional aliquots of 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine were given as necessary, to a maximum of 2.0 mg/kg. Efficacy of sedation was assessed after every dose by pediatric emergency medicine attendings or fellows. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients had quality assurance forms completed. The total ketamine dose administered ranged from 0.5 to 2 mg/kg. Adequate procedural sedation was obtained for 70 (97%) of 72 patients. Forty-four percent of patients required 0.75 mg/kg or less of ketamine to obtain adequate initial sedation; 25% of subjects required only 0.5 mg/kg; 43% of patients required 1.0 mg/kg of IV ketamine. We found that 88% of our patients could be successfully sedated at initial doses of 1 mg/kg or less. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a potential role for low-dose IV ketamine in the range of 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg for pediatric procedural sedation. Most pediatric ED patients can be successfully sedated with 1 mg/kg of ketamine.

Virtue in emergency medicine.

At a time in which the integrity of the medical profession is perceptibly challenged, emergency physicians (EPs) have an opportunity to reaffirm their commitment to both their patients and their practice through acceptance of a virtue-based ethic. The virtue-based ethic transcends legalistic rule following and the blind application of principles. Instead, virtue honors the humanity of patients and the high standards of the profession. Recognizing historical roots that are relevant to the modern context, this article describes 10 core virtues important for EPs. In addition to the long-recognized virtues of prudence, courage, temperance, and justice, 6 additional virtues are offered unconditional positive regard, charity, compassion, trustworthiness, vigilance, and agility. These virtues might serve as ideals to which all EPs can strive. Through these, the honor of the profession will be maintained, the trust of patients will be preserved, and the integrity of the specialty will be promoted.