Laboratory Diagnosis of 37 Cases of Bartonella Endocarditis Based on Enzyme Immunoassay and Real-Time PCR.

Bartonella spp., mostly Bartonella quintana and B. henselae, are a common cause of culture-negative endocarditis. Serology using immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and PCR performed on cardiac tissues are the mainstays of diagnosis. We developed an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and a novel multiplex real-time PCR assay, utilizing Bartonella genus-specific, B. henselae-specific, and B. quintana-specific SimpleProbe probes, for diagnosis of Bartonella endocarditis. We aimed to evaluate the performance of these assays. Thirty-seven patients with definite endocarditis, 18 with B. henselae, 18 with B. quintana, and 1 with B. koehlerae, were studied. Diagnosis was confirmed by conventional PCR and DNA sequencing of surgical cardiac specimens. Similar to the case with IFA, anti-Bartonella IgG titers of ≥1:800 were found in 94% of patients by EIA; cross-reactivity between B. henselae and B. quintana precluded species-specific serodiagnosis, and frequent (41%) but low-titer cross-reactivity between Coxiella burnetii antibodies and B. henselae antigen was found in patients with Q fever endocarditis. Low-titer (1:100) cross-reactivity was uncommonly found also in patients with brucellosis and culture-positive endocarditis, particularly Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis. Real-time PCR performed on explanted heart valves/vegetations was in complete agreement with results of sequence-based diagnosis with characteristic melting curves. The genus-specific probe identified five additional endocarditis-associated Bartonella spp. at the genus level. In conclusion, EIA coupled with a novel real-time PCR assay can play an important role in Bartonella endocarditis diagnosis and expand the diagnostic arsenal at the disposal of the clinical microbiologist. Since serology remains a major diagnostic tool, recognizing its pitfalls is essential to avoid incorrect diagnosis.

Three-day vs longer duration of antibiotic treatment for cystitis in women: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We performed a meta-analysis to ascertain the efficacy and safety of the currently practiced 3-day antibiotic therapy for cystitis versus prolonged therapy (5 days or longer) to relieve symptoms and to achieve bacteriological cure. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Renal Group's Register of trials, EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing 3-day oral antibiotic therapy with prolonged therapy (5 days and longer) for uncomplicated cystitis in adult non-pregnant women. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and extracted data. Relative risks (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated; a fixed effect model was used. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed whenever possible. RESULTS: Thirty-two trials and 9605 patients met inclusion criteria. For symptomatic failure rates no difference between 3-day and prolonged antibiotic regimens was found at short term (RR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.96-1.41) and long-term follow-up (RR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.99-1.38). Three-day treatment was less effective than prolonged therapy in preventing bacteriological failure, relative risk 1.37 (95% CI: 1.07-1.74) for short-term follow-up, and 1.47 (95% CI: 1.22-1.77) for long-term follow-up. Adverse effects were more common in the prolonged therapy group (RR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.79-0.91). The results were consistent for subgroup and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic therapy for 3 days is similar to prolonged therapy in achieving symptomatic cure for cystitis, while the prolonged treatment is more effective in obtaining bacteriological cure.