BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk.

BACKGROUND: Clinical classification of rare sequence changes identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is essential for appropriate genetic counselling of individuals carrying these variants. We previously showed that variant BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln in the BRCA1 transcriptional transactivation domain demonstrated equivocal results from a series of functional assays, and proposed that this variant may confer low to moderate risk of cancer. METHODS: Measures of genetic risk (report of family history, segregation) were assessed for 68 BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) families recruited through family cancer clinics, comparing results with 34 families carrying the previously classified pathogenic BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp (R1699W) mutation at the same residue, and to 243 breast cancer families with no BRCA1 pathogenic mutation (BRCA-X). RESULTS: Comparison of BRCA1 carrier prediction scores of probands using the BOADICEA risk prediction tool revealed that BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln variant carriers had family histories that were less 'BRCA1-like' than BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp mutation carriers (p<0.00001), but more 'BRCA1-like' than BRCA-X families (p=0.0004). Further, modified segregation analysis of the subset of 30 families with additional genotyping showed that BRCA1 c.5096G >A p.Arg1699Gln had reduced penetrance compared with the average truncating BRCA1 mutation penetrance (p=0.0002), with estimated cumulative risks to age 70 of breast or ovarian cancer of 24%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide substantial evidence that the BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) variant, demonstrating ambiguous functional deficiency across multiple assays, is associated with intermediate risk of breast and ovarian cancer, highlighting challenges for risk modelling and clinical management of patients of this and other potential moderate-risk variants.

How harmful is genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in young children; the parents' experience.

Predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is routinely offered to children at-risk from the age of 10 years onwards. Predictive testing for FAP at a younger age is debatable, because of absence of medical benefits. However, circumstances may arise when testing at a younger age (<10 years) is appropriate. Currently, there is a lack of published experience with predictive testing of children at this young age. We evaluated 13 children who were tested for FAP at the age younger than 10 years; 7 mutation-carriers and 6 non-carriers. Parents of these children were re-contacted and open-ended semi-structured interviewed. None of the contacted parents regretted the timing of genetic testing. The major reasons for testing at the young age were (1) testing of all children in the family at the same moment; (2) certainty for the future; and (3) preparing the child for future surveillance. None of the parents observed changes in mental or physical health in their child after testing. Also, young genetic testing did not lead to colon surveillance before it was indicated. Genetic testing for FAP at a young age is experienced as causing no harm by parents. Future studies should evaluate children's own experiences with early genetic testing.

Identification of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis carriers among children with desmoid tumours.

OBJECTIVE: Desmoid tumours are rare mesenchymal tumours with unpredictable progression and high recurrence risk. They can occur sporadically or in association with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), which is caused by germline APC mutations. The Wnt/ß-catenin pathway has a central role in the pathogenesis of desmoid tumours. These tumours can occur due to either a somatic CTNNB1 or APC mutation but can also be the first manifestation of FAP. Because germline APC analysis is not routinely performed in children with desmoid tumours, the diagnosis FAP may escape detection. The aim of this study is to form guidelines for the identification of possible APC germline mutation carriers among children with desmoid tumours, based on CTNNB1 mutation analysis and immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) for ß-catenin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed IHC of ß-catenin and mutation analysis of CTNNB1 and APC in 18 paediatric desmoid tumours, diagnosed between 1990 and 2009 in the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam. RESULTS: In 11 tumours, IHC showed an abnormal nuclear ß-catenin accumulation. In this group a CTNNB1 mutation was detected in seven tumours. In two tumours with an abnormal nuclear ß-catenin accumulation and no CTNNB1 mutation, an APC mutation was identified, which appeared to be a germline mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant staining of ß-catenin in paediatric desmoids helps to identify children at risk for FAP. We recommend to screen paediatric desmoid tumours for nuclear localisation of ß-catenin and consequently for CTNNB1 mutations. For patients with nuclear ß-catenin expression and no CTNNB1 mutations, APC mutation analysis should be offered after genetic counselling.