Predictors of Readmission and Reoperation Following Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Under 45 Years of Age.

BACKGROUND: The use of shoulder arthroplasty has increased among all age groups, albeit most prominently in older patients. While previous studies have investigated predictors of short-term readmission and reoperation in the general population, there is a paucity of literature available on these in patients under 45 years of age. This study aimed to identify the predictors of 30-day readmission and reoperation following shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 45 years of age. METHODS: A retrospective query in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2019 was used to identify patients who underwent primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of 30-day readmission and reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 530 patients were included. Multivariate regression revealed that Black race and Hispanic ethnicity were independent predictors of readmission. Functional dependence, hypertension requiring medication, and prolonged length of stay predicted reoperation. Finally, low hematocrit and prolonged length of stay predicted morbidity. DISCUSSION: Identifying and accounting for these risk factors for poor outcomes may help improve perioperative risk stratification. As a result, these findings have the potential to reduce healthcare costs associated with readmission and reoperation following shoulder arthroplasty in young patients. Our results also highlight the underlying disparities in healthcare outcomes among racial and ethnic groups that must be considered.

The Incidence of Subsequent Cervical Spine Surgery after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, a Minimum Two-year Follow-up.

To identify the risk factors and incidence of subsequent cervical spine surgery in patients undergoing primary cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). We analyzed the 2005-2015 NYS SPARCS database. Patients were longitudinally followed to determine the incidence of re-operation. Univariate and Multivariate analyses were used to identify demographic risk factors. Eight-hundred and thirty-five CDA patients had a cervical spine re-operation rate of 7.5%; 4.4% re-operation rate at two-year follow-up. The most common cervical re-operation was a primary anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) (76.2%). Patients who underwent re-operation were more likely to be younger (p = 0.034) and female (p = 0.007). Logistic regression analysis found only female sex to have increased odds of re-operation (odds ration = 2.10, 95% confidence interval 1.21-3.63). There was a 4.4% rate of subsequent cervical spine surgery following CDA at 2 years and a 7.5% rate of subsequent cervical spine surgery. The most common cervical spine procedure following CDA was ACDF. Female sex was the only patient demographic factor to significantly influence the odds of cervical spine re-operation. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(1):007-011, 2022).

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of antiepileptic drugs in adults with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Psychiatric and behavioral side effects (PBSEs) are common, undesirable effects associated with antiepileptic drug (AED) use. The objective of the study was to compare the PBSE profiles of older and newer AEDs in a large specialty practice-based sample of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. METHODS: As part of the Columbia and Yale AED Database Project, we reviewed patient records including demographics, medical history, AED use, and side effects for 4085 adult patients (age: 18 years) newly started on an AED regimen. Psychiatric and behavioral side effects were determined by patient or physician report in the medical record, which included depressive mood, psychosis, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, irritability, aggression, and tantrum. Significant non-AED predictors of PBSE rate were first determined from 83 variables using logistic regression. Predictors were then controlled for in the comparison analysis of the rate of PBSEs and intolerable PBSEs (PBSEs that led to dosage reduction or discontinuation) between 18 AEDs. RESULTS: Psychiatric and behavioral side effects occurred in 17.2% of patients and led to intolerability in 13.8% of patients. History of psychiatric condition(s), secondary generalized seizures, absence seizures, and intractable epilepsy were associated with increased incidence of PBSE. Levetiracetam (LEV) had the greatest PBSE rate (22.1%). This was statistically significant when compared with the aggregate of the other AEDs (P<0.001, OR=6.87). Levetiracetam was also significantly (P<0.001) associated with higher intolerability rate (17.7%), dose decreased rate (9.4%), and complete cessation rate (8.3%), when compared with the aggregate of the other AEDs. Zonisamide (ZNS) was also significantly associated with a higher rate of PBSE (9.7%) and IPBSE (7.9%, all P<0.001). On the other hand, carbamazepine (CBZ), clobazam (CLB), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenytoin (PHT), and valproate (VPA) were significantly associated with a decreased PBSE rates (P<0.001). Carbamazepine, GBP, LTG, PHT, and VPA were also associated with lower IPBSE rates when compared individually with the aggregate of other AEDs. All other AEDs were found to have intermediate rates that were not either increased or decreased compared with other AEDs. When each AED was compared to LTG, only CBZ had a significantly lower PBSE rate. The main limitations of this study were that the study design was retrospective and not blinded, and the AEDs were not randomly assigned to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric and behavioral side effects occur more frequently in patients taking LEV and ZNS than any other AED and led to higher rates of intolerability. Lower PBSE rates were seen in patients taking CBZ, CLB, GBP, LTG, OXC, PHT, and VPA. Our findings may help facilitate the AED selection process.

A National Database Retrospective Review of Short-Term Postoperative Mortality in the Geriatric Population: A Comparison Between Emergency Spine Fractures and Hip Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates following emergency spine fracture surgery are high, especially in the elderly. However, how the postoperative mortality rate following spine fractures compares to other geriatric fractures such as hip fractures remains unclear. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study aimed to compare 30-day mortality rates and risk factors between emergency spine fracture versus hip fracture surgery in the elderly. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried between 2011 and 2021 for emergency spine fractures and hip fractures in the elderly. Univariate analyses evaluated demographic data, perioperative factors, comorbidities, and 30-day mortality rates as the primary outcomes. A multivariable regression model was then constructed to control for significant baseline and demographic differences and evaluate independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: A total of 18,287 emergency hip fractures and 192 emergency spine fractures were included in our study. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in female sex, body mass index (BMI), operation time, length of hospital stays, disseminated cancer, and functional dependence between spine and hip fractures. Thirty-day mortality rates were significantly higher in spine versus hip fractures (9.4% vs. 5%). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated emergent spine fracture surgery, disseminated cancer, functional dependence, and length of stay as independent predictors of mortality in our cohort. Female sex, BMI, and operation time were protective factors for mortality in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency spine fractures in the elderly represent an independent predictor for 30-day postoperative mortality compared to emergency hip fractures. Disseminated cancer, functional dependence, and length of stay were independent predictors of mortality while female sex, BMI, and operation time were protective factors. These data demonstrate the severity of injury and high rates of mortality that clinicians can use to counsel patients and their families.

Multilevel posterior spinal fusion following percutaneous third generation kyphoplasty complicated by vertebral compression fracture progression.

Newer third generation percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKs) may minimize risks associated with older generation kyphoplasties such as new adjacent fractures, fracture progression, cement leakage, neurologic sequelae, and kyphosis. Additionally, posterior pedicle spinal fusion (PPSF) may minimize risk of long-term complications following PKs while maximizing the benefits of stable spinal alignment. The patient developed adjacent fracture progression, posterior retropulsion, and kyphosis following third generation kyphoplasty. Vertebral compression fracture progression was corrected and prolonged symptomatic relief was successfully achieved with T11-L4 PPSF and L1-L2 laminectomy. Postoperative follow-ups at 2, 4, 7 weeks, 1 and 2 years showed continued symptomatic improvement in back pain with resolution of thigh and groin pain. This case supports the use of PPSF in third generation PK-related complications to provide long-term symptom relief and improve quality of life in patients with severe osteoporotic compression fractures.

A Comprehensive Review of the Historical Description of Spine Surgery and Its Evolution.

Major strides in the advancement of spine surgery came about in the 21st century. However, the extensive history of spine surgery can be traced back to long before this time. A clear description of the journey from a primitive yet accurate understanding of the human musculoskeletal system to today's modern aspects of spinal techniques is lacking. A narrative literature review was conducted to elucidate where spine surgery began and the techniques used that evolved over time. This review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Search terms used included "history of spine surgery," "evolution of spine surgery," "origins of spine surgery," "history of laminectomy," "history of spinal fusion," "history of lumbar interbody fusion," "minimally invasive spine surgery," and "navigation in spine surgery." We highlight the evolution of the basic understanding of anatomy and non-surgical and surgical techniques, including bracing, laminectomy, discectomy, and spinal fusion. The current evolution and integration of minimally invasive techniques, lumbar interbody fusion techniques, robotics, navigation, and motion preservation are discussed, as these are the major areas of focus for technological advancement. This review presents an overarching synopsis of the events that chronicle the progress made in spine surgery since its conception. The review uniquely contributes to the growing body of literature on the expansion of spine surgery and highlights major events in its history.

Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Surgery on the Accuracy of Spine Pedicle Screw Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Spinal fusion is a common method by which surgeons decrease instability and deformity of the spinal segment targeted. Pedicle screws are vital tools in fusion surgeries and advancements in technology have introduced several modalities of screw placement. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in robot-assisted (RA) versus fluoroscopic-guided (FG) techniques. The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed from January 2007 through to August 8, 2022, to identify relevant studies. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was determined using the Gertzbein-Robbins (GR) classification system. Facet joint violation (FJV), total case radiation dosage, total case radiation time, total operating room (OR) time, and total case blood loss were collected. Twenty-one articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Successful screw accuracy (GR Grade A or B) was found to be 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 1.01 - 1.04) times more likely with the RA technique. In defining accuracy solely based on the GR Grade A criteria, screws placed with RA were 1.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.06 - 1.15) times more likely to be accurate. There was no significant difference between the two techniques with respect to blood loss (Hedges' g: 1.16, 95% confidence interval: -0.75 to 3.06) or case radiation time (Hedges' g: -0.34, 95% CI: -1.22 to 0.53). FG techniques were associated with shorter operating room times (Hedges' g: -1.03, 95% confidence interval: -1.76 to -0.31), and higher case radiation dosage (Hedges' g: 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 2.10). This review suggests that RA may slightly increase pedicle screw accuracy and decrease per-case radiation dosage compared to FG techniques. However, total operating times for RA cases are greater than those for FG cases.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Outcomes and Perioperative Factors Associated with Posterior Cervical Fusion.

Introduction: While there is anecdotal evidence that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic altered perioperative decision-making in patients requiring posterior cervical fusion (PCF), a national-level analysis to examine the significance of this hypothesis has not yet been conducted. This study aimed to determine the potential differences in perioperative variables and surgical outcomes of PCF performed before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Adults who underwent PCF were identified in the 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 (intrapandemic) NSQIP datasets. Differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. On the other hand, differences in operative time and relative value units (RVUs) were estimated using quantile regression. Furthermore, the odds ratios (OR) for length of stay (LOS) were estimated using negative binomial regression. Secondary outcomes included rates of nonhome discharge and outpatient surgery. Results: A total of 3,444 patients were included in this study (50.7% from 2020). Readmission, reoperation, morbidity, operative time, and RVUs per minute were similar between cohorts (p>0.05). The LOS (OR 1.086, p<0.001) and RVUs-per-case (coefficient +0.360, p=0.037) were significantly greater in 2020 compared to 2019. Operation year 2020 was also associated with lower rates of nonhome discharge (22.3% vs. 25.8%, p=0.017) and higher rates of outpatient surgery (4.8% vs. 3.0%, p=0.006). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a 28% decreased odds of nonhome discharge following PCF and a 72% increased odds of PCF being performed in an outpatient setting were observed. The readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates remained unchanged during this period. This is notable given that patients in the 2020 group were more frail. This suggests that patients were shifted to outpatient centers possibly to make up for potentially reduced case volume, highlighting the potential to evaluate rehabilitation-discharge criteria. Further research should evaluate these findings in more detail and on a regional basis.

Comparison of Value per Operative Time between Primary and Revision Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To compare the relative value units (RVUs) per minute of operative time between primary and revision surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgery for ASD is technically demanding and has high risks of complications and revision rates. This common need for additional surgery can increase the overall cost of care for ASD. RVU is used to calculate reimbursement from Medicare and to determine physician payments nationally. In calculating RVUs, the physician's work, the expenses of the physician's practice, and professional liability insurance. Cost effectiveness of surgeries for ASD have been evaluated, except for RVUs per minute compared between primary and revision surgery. METHODS: Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent surgery for spinal deformity between 2011 and 2019 were identified and included. To ensure a homogenous patient cohort, those who underwent anterior-only and concurrent anterior-posterior fusions were excluded. Propensity score matching analysis was performed, and Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test were used to compare matched cohorts as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients who underwent revision surgery were matched with 206 primary surgery patients via propensity score matching. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values, and readmission and reoperation rates were not significantly different between groups. The revision surgery group had significantly higher mean RVUs per minute than that of the primary surgery group (0.331 vs. 0.249, p <0.001), as well as rates of morbidity and blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to primary surgery, revision surgery for ASD is associated with significantly higher RVUs per minute and total RVUs and higher rates of 30-day morbidity and blood transfusions. Readmission and reoperation rates are similar between surgeries.

Comparison of Relative Value Units and 30-Day Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the relative value units (RVUs) and 30-day outcomes between primary and revision pediatric spinal deformity (PSD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PSD surgery is frequently complicated by the need for reoperation. However, there is limited literature on physician reimbursement rates and short-term outcomes following primary versus revision spinal deformity surgery in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilizes data obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Pediatric database. Patients between 10 and 18 years of age who underwent posterior spinal deformity surgery between 2012 and 2018 were included. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to assess the independent impact of revision surgery on RVUs and postoperative outcomes, including 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications. RESULTS: The study cohort included a total of 15,055 patients, with 358 patients who underwent revision surgery. Patients in the revision group were more likely to be younger and male sex. Revision surgery more commonly required osteotomy (13.7% vs. 8.3%, P =0.002).Univariate analysis revealed higher total RVUs (71.09 vs. 60.51, P <0.001), RVUs per minute (0.27 vs. 0.23, P <0.001), readmission rate (6.7% vs. 4.0%, P =0.012), and reoperation rate (7.5% vs. 3.3%, P <0.001) for the revision surgery group. Morbidity rates were found to be statistically similar. In addition, deep surgical site infection, pulmonary embolism, and urinary tract infection were more common in the revision group. After controlling for baseline differences in multivariate regression, the differences in total RVUs, RVUs per minute, reoperation rate, and rate of pulmonary embolism between primary and revision surgery remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Revision PSD surgery was found to be assigned appropriately higher mean total RVUs and RVUs per minute corresponding to the higher operative complexity compared with primary surgery. Revision surgery was also associated with poorer 30-day outcomes, including higher frequencies of reoperation and pulmonary embolism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.