Limited contribution of astroglial gap junction coupling to buffering of extracellular K+ in CA1 stratum radiatum.

Astrocytes form large networks, in which individual cells are connected via gap junctions. It is thought that this astroglial gap junction coupling contributes to the buffering of extracellular K+ increases. However, it is largely unknown how the control of extracellular K+ by astroglial gap junction coupling depends on the underlying activity patterns and on the magnitude of extracellular K+ increases. We explored this dependency in acute hippocampal slices (CA1, stratum radiatum) by direct K+ -sensitive microelectrode recordings and acute pharmacological inhibition of gap junctions. K+ transients evoked by synaptic and axonal activity were largely unaffected by acute astroglial uncoupling in slices obtained from young and adult rats. Iontophoretic K+ -application enabled us to generate K+ gradients with defined spatial properties and magnitude. By varying the K+ -iontophoresis position and protocol, we found that acute pharmacological uncoupling increases the amplitude of K+ transients once their initial amplitude exceeded ~10 mM. Our experiments demonstrate that the contribution of gap junction coupling to buffering of extracellular K+ gradients is limited to large and localized K+ increases.

The Drosophila blood-brain barrier invades the nervous system in a GPCR-dependent manner.

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a crucial interface between the circulatory system and the brain. In Drosophila melanogaster, the BBB is composed of perineurial and subperineurial glial cells. The perineurial glial cells are small mitotically active cells forming the outermost layer of the nervous system and are engaged in nutrient uptake. The subperineurial glial cells form occluding septate junctions to prevent paracellular diffusion of macromolecules into the nervous system. To address whether the subperineurial glia just form a simple barrier or whether they establish specific contacts with both the perineurial glial cells and inner central nervous system (CNS) cells, we undertook a detailed morphological analysis. Using genetically encoded markers alongside with high-resolution laser scanning confocal microscopy and transmission electron microscopy, we identified thin cell processes extending into the perineurial layer and into the CNS cortex. Interestingly, long cell processes were observed reaching the glia ensheathing the neuropil of the central brain. GFP reconstitution experiments highlighted multiple regions of membrane contacts between subperineurial and ensheathing glia. Furthermore, we identify the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) Moody as negative regulator of the growth of subperineurial cell processes. Loss of moody triggered a massive overgrowth of subperineurial cell processes into the CNS cortex and, moreover, affected the polarized localization of the xenobiotic transporter Mdr65. Finally, we found that GPCR signaling, but not septate junction formation, is responsible for controlling membrane overgrowth. Our findings support the notion that the Drosophila BBB is able to bridge the communication gap between circulation and synaptic regions of the brain by long cell processes.

Signaling Pathways Controlling Axonal Wrapping in Drosophila.

The rapid transmission of action potentials is an important ability that enables efficient communication within the nervous system. Glial cells influence conduction velocity along axons by regulating the radial axonal diameter, providing electrical insulation as well as affecting the distribution of voltage-gated ion channels. Differentiation of these wrapping glial cells requires a complex set of neuron-glia interactions involving three basic mechanistic features. The glia must recognize the axon, grow around it, and eventually arrest its growth to form single or multiple axon wraps. This likely depends on the integration of numerous evolutionary conserved signaling and adhesion systems. Here, we summarize the mechanisms and underlying signaling pathways that control glial wrapping in Drosophila and compare those to the mechanisms that control glial differentiation in mammals. This analysis shows that Drosophila is a beneficial model to study the development of even complex structures like myelin.