Risk factors for early recurrence in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative approach. However, the rate of recurrence remains high, particularly within the first 6 months, and is associated with a poor prognosis. The present study evaluated the clinical characteristics and risk factors for early recurrence in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who underwent curative resection, regardless of the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to identify predictive factors associated with early recurrence and poor outcomes as well as to determine the optimal treatment strategy for patients at high risk of early recurrence after surgical resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatic resection for PDAC at our institution from 2013 to 2021 were included in this study. We investigated the clinicopathological features of patients in groups: those with recurrence within 6 months, recurrence between 6 and 12 months, and recurrence beyond 12 months or no recurrence. A logistic regression analysis identified covariates associated with early recurrence at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The study included 403 patients with a median follow-up of 25.7 months. Recurrence was observed in 279 patients, with 14.6% recurring within 6 months, 23.3% within 6-12 months, and 62% after 12 months or not at all. The preoperative CA19-9 level, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and positive peritoneal cytology were significant risk factors for early recurrence within 6 months, while positive peritoneal cytology, lymph node metastasis, and the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy were significant risk factors for recurrence within 12 months. For patients who received preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, the preoperative CA19-9 level, mGPS, and positive peritoneal cytology were significant independent risk factors for early recurrence within 6 months, while positive peritoneal cytology, lymph node metastasis, and the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy were significant independent risk factors for recurrence within 12 months. The study concluded that the overall survival after surgical resection for potentially resectable PDAC worsened according to the number of risk factors present in the patient. CONCLUSIONS: We clarified that preoperative CA19-9, positive peritoneal cytology, and the lack of adjuvant chemotherapy were consistent predictors for early recurrence within 6 and 12 months. In addition, an increased number of risk factors affecting the patient was associated with a poorer overall survival after potentially curable resection. Calculating the number of risk factors for early recurrence may be an essential predictive factor when considering treatment strategies.

Postoperative acute pancreatitis after pancreatic resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the major critical complications after pancreatic resection. Recently, postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP), a new concept for a pancreatic-specific complication following pancreatic resection, has been advocated, and its association with POPF has been reported. The present study examined the clinical features of POAP and identified the associations of POAP with POPF and other postoperative morbidities in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients undergoing pancreatic resection. METHODS: A total of 312 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resection for PDAC at our institution from 2013 to 2019 were enrolled in this study. POAP was defined as an elevated serum amylase level above the upper limit normal on postoperative day (POD) 0 or 1, based on Connor's definition. The severity of POPF was assessed by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery definition. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients (58.9%) had POAP. POAP occurred in 58.5% of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy patients and 60% of distal pancreatectomy combined with splenectomy patients. The presence of POAP was significantly associated with the development of clinically relevant POPF, higher rates of severe morbidity, and a prolonged hospital stay after pancreatic resection. A multivariate analysis showed that the presence of POAP and elevated C-reactive protein levels on POD 3 were independent predictors of clinically relevant POPF after subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: POAP is associated with the development of POPF, higher rates of severe morbidity, and a prolonged hospital stay after pancreatic resection and is an independent risk factor for clinically relevant POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. POAP represents an important indicator for planning treatment strategies to prevent serious complications, including POPF.

Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?

BACKGROUND: Most evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a practice-based cohort. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who were diagnosed with stage II-III mid-to-low rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 and underwent primary resection with curative intent at a general surgery unit were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity matching, 144 patients were divided into the following groups for short- and long-term outcome evaluation: mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection (n = 72) and mesorectal excision (n = 72). RESULTS: This practice-based cohort was characterized by a high pT4 (41.6%) and R1 resection (10.4%) rate. Although the operative time was longer in the lateral dissection group (349 min vs. 237 min, p < 0.001), postoperative complications (19.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.829), and hospital stay (18 days vs. 22 days, p = 0.059) did not significantly differ; 5-year relapse-free survival (62.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.378), and cumulative local recurrence (9.7% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.451) were also in the same range in both groups. In the seven locally recurrent cases in the lateral dissection group, four had undergone R1 resection. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral lymph node dissection was found to be safe in this practice-based cohort; however, the local control effect was not obvious. To maximize the potential merits of lateral lymph node dissection, strategies need to be urgently established to avoid R1 resection in clinical practice.

[A Case in Which the Radial Incision and Cutting(RIC)Method Was Effective for Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation-Resistant Anastomotic Stenosis after Esophageal Cancer Surgery].

In recent years, the radial incision and cutting(RIC)method has been developed as a treatment for intractable anastomotic stenosis after esophageal cancer surgery, and its usefulness is attracting attention. We report a case in which the RIC method was effective for endoscopic balloon dilatation-resistant anastomotic stenosis. The case was a 69-year-old woman. Transthoracic esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection, and narrow gastric tube reconstruction through antethoracic route, were performed for middle thoracic esophageal cancer. The patient suffered from Grade Ⅲa anastomotic leakage, but was discharged relieved. After discharge, the patient needed regular endoscopic balloon dilation for against intractable anastomotic stenosis. RIC was performed for the patient. Although stenosis relapsed after the RIC, the pain during balloon dilatation improved and oral intake can be continued without surgery. The required interval of dilatation was about 2 weeks before RIC, but it has been gradually extended to about 4 weeks after 1 year after the RIC. Moreover, oral intake and body weight of the patient were increased. The RIC method may be useful for intractable anastomotic stenosis after esophageal cancer surgery, and further case accumulation is needed.

[A Case of Port-Site Herniation from an Eight mm Port after Robot-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy].

A 63-year-old-woman was diagnosed with gastric cancer cStage ⅠA after ESD, and then, underwent robot-assisted distal gastrectomy. She vomited on the postoperative day 2 and then was inserted nasogastric tube. The amount of drainage from the tube was increased on the postoperative day 5, therefore, abdominal computed tomography scan was performed, which showed herniation of small bowel at the 8 mm port site in the left upper abdomen. The emergent surgery was performed because of difficulty in manual reduction. Intraoperative findings showed that small intestine was incarcerated at the left 8 mm port-site. The intestine was released by incising the fascia of hernia orifice, then, the fascia was repaired. There was no recurrence of gastric cancer and port-site hernia for 34 months after surgery. In general, the fascia of over 10 mm port site is sutured and closed to avoid port-site hernia, however, it is unclear whether the fascia of 8 mm port-site should be closed after robotic surgery. Since we experienced this case, we have also performed fascia suture on the 8 mm port-site in all cases. And then, we could prevent occurrence of port-site hernia in the 8 mm port-site.

The clinical impacts of the prognostic nutritional index for the esophageal cancer patients who received curative treatment.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on esophageal cancer survival and recurrence after curative treatment. METHODS: This study included 120 patients who underwent curative surgery followed by the adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer between 2008 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. RESULTS: The PNI of 49 was regarded to be the optimal critical point of classification considering the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rate. The OS rates at three and five years after surgery were 47.4% and 36.0% in the PNI low group, respectively, and 62.5% and 56.5% in the PNI high group, which amounted to a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.020). The RFS rates at three and five years after surgery were 31.0% and 24.8% in the PNI low group, respectively, and 50.9% and 42.8% in the PNI high group, which amounted to a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.020). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PNI was a significant independent risk factor for the OS and a marginally significant independent risk factor forRFS. CONCLUSION: The PNI was a risk factor for survival in patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer. It is necessary to develop the effective plan of the perioperative care and the surgical strategy according to the PNI.

The Systemic Immune-inflammation Index Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was developed and evaluated for various malignancies. This study evaluated the clinical impact of the SII in patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for GC at Yokohama City University between 2005 and 2020 were chosen consecutively based on their medical records. SII was calculated as follows: platelet (cell/mm3 ×103)× neutrophil (cell/mm3)/lymphocyte (cell/mm3). Three measurements were obtained preoperatively. RESULTS: In total, 258 patients were enrolled in this study. Based on the 3- and 5-year survival rates and previous studies, we set the cutoff value of the SII to 550. The 258 patients were classified into the SII-low (n=152) and SII-high (n=106) groups, respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 82.6% and 78.7%, respectively, in the SII-low group and 74.5% and 61.9%, respectively, in the SII-high group. There were significant differences between the two groups (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis of factors associated with OS, the SII was identified as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=1.816; 95% confidence interval=1.075-3.069, p=0.026). Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival. In addition, the incidence of postoperative surgical complications was 30.9% in the SII-low group and 45.2% in the SII-high group (p=0.019). CONCLUSION: The SII was an independent prognostic factor for GC. Thus, the SII may be a promising biomarker for the treatment and management of GC.

Comparison of the Dietary Intake After Gastrectomy Between Male and Female Patients With Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to investigate the differences in the postoperative dietary intake (DI) loss between men and women after radical resection for early gastric cancer (GC), and to identify effective nutritional support for both sexes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC. DI was assessed using the food frequency questionnaire containing 82 food items (FFQW82) during nutritional counseling before surgery and one and three months postoperatively. RESULTS: The median preoperative DI of all participants was 1,856.3 kcal/day, and DI at 1 and 3 months were 1,532.5 kcal/day and 1,637 kcal/day, respectively. The median preoperative DI was 1805 kcal/day (1,300-2,330 kcal/day) and 1481 kcal/day (1,126-1,957 kcal/day) in men and women, respectively (p<0.0001). The median DI at 1 month was 1627 (1,101-2,195) kcal/day and 1,308 (986-1,915) kcal/day in men and women, respectively (p<0.0001). At 3 months postoperatively, the median DI was 1737 (1,130-2,443) kcal/day in men and 1428 (816-2,005) kcal/day in women (p<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the DI loss rate at 1 month (median: -9.7% vs. -9.3%, p=0.765) and 3 months (median: -3.5% vs. -4.8%, p=0.137) between men and women. CONCLUSION: Although the DI loss rate in men and women after gastrectomy for GC was almost similar, the postoperative DI and DI loss differed significantly. Therefore, differences in DI loss after gastrectomy between men and women should be considered while assessing the efficacy of additional nutritional support such as oral nutritional supplements after gastrectomy.

Global Immune-Nutrition-Information Index Is Independent Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients Who Received Curative Treatment.

Background/Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the Global Immune-Nutrition-Information Index (GINI) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received curative treatment and to clarify the potential of the GINI as a biomarker. Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent curative resection for GC at Yokohama City University between 2005 and 2020 were selected based on their medical records. The GINI was calculated as follows: GINI=[C-reactive protein × platelet × monocyte × neutrophil]/[albumin × lymphocyte]. Results: A total of 258 patients were included in this study. Of these, 169 patients were categorized into the GINI-low group and 89 into the GINI-high group using a cut-off value of 1,730. The three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86.4% and 78.4%, respectively, in the GINI-low group, and 66.4% and 58.3% in the GINI-high group (p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis for OS, the GINI was identified as an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR)=1.772; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.053-2.979, p=0.031]. Similar results were observed for RFS. In addition, the GINI affected the perioperative clinical course, including postoperative surgical complications and postoperative adjuvant treatment. Conclusion: The GINI is a promising biomarker for the treatment and management of GC.

The Clinical Impact of the Pretreatment Albumin to Fibrinogen Ratio in Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The albumin to fibrinogen ratio (AFR) has been identified as a promising prognostic marker for some malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of AFR in esophageal cancer patients who received curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study included 123 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters were compared between patients with high and low AFRs. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) stratified by each clinical factor was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed when using a pretreatment AFR of 1.23. When comparing the patient backgrounds between the high-AFR (AFR ≥12.3) and low-AFR (AFR<12.3) groups, significant differences were noted in the pathological T status. The high-AFR group had significantly higher OS rates at 3 years (70.8%) and 5 years (59.3%) after surgery in comparison to the low-AFR group (46.6% and 37.4%, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS showed that the AFR was a significant prognostic factor. In addition, when comparing the site of first recurrence, a marginally significant difference was noted in hematological recurrence. CONCLUSION: The AFR is a significant risk factor in patients with esophageal cancer, holding promise as a valuable prognostic factor.

The CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) Index Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a promising biomarker. We clarified the clinical impact of the CALLY index in gastric cancer patients who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer at Yokohama City University from 2005 to 2020 were selected based on medical records. The CALYY index was calculated as follows: serum ALB level (g/dl) × lymphocyte count (cells/µl)/C-reactive protein (mg/dl) ×104 Results: Two hundred fifty-nine patients were included in the present study. The three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 64.8% and 57.0%, respectively, in the CALLY index-low group, and 86.2% and 78.2%, respectively, in the CALLY index-high group. There were significant differences between the two groups. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the CALLY index was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio=1.791; 95% confidence interval=1.067-3.009; p=0.028). When comparing the perioperative clinical course between the CALLY index-low and CALLY index-high groups, there were significant differences in postoperative surgical complications and adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The CALLY score was an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer. Our results suggest that the CALLY index is a promising tool for assessing inflammation and nutritional status in patients undergoing gastric cancer treatment and management.

Clinical Impact of Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index in Surgical Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Treated With Perioperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is used as a marker to evaluate the nutritional and immunological status of patients with various cancers. This study aimed to investigate whether preoperative PNI is a prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 232 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent surgical resection with perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2013 and December 2022. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff value for the preoperative PNI was 44.3 in the present study. PNI <44.3 was associated with older age (p<0.001) and affected the clinical course of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The PNI <44.3 had an important influence on the decreased OS (25.1 vs. 39.0 months) and RFS (13.1 vs. 22.8 months). In univariate and multivariate analyses, the preoperative PNI was an independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.682, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.059-2.673, p=0.028] and RFS (HR=1.559, 95% CI=1.037-2.344, p=0.033). CONCLUSION: Preoperative PNI is a prognostic factor for both OS and RFS in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. This study suggests that a low PNI may cause a lack of full-dose adjuvant chemotherapy, leading to recurrence and resulting in a poor prognosis for surgical pancreatic cancer patients treated with perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical Impact of the Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Patients With Gastric Cancer who Received Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) on both short- and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were chosen based on our medical records from consecutive cases of curative resection for GC performed at Yokohama City University from 2005 to 2020. The LMR was calculated as the lymphocyte count divided by the monocyte count measured before surgery. RESULTS: The three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 63.1% and 57.4%, respectively, in the low-LMR subgroup and 86.4% and 77.5%, respectively, in the high-LMR subgroup. According to multivariate analysis, the LMR was an independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.926, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.143-3.245, p=0.014]. In addition, the three- and five-year RFS rates were 54.4% and 50.7%, respectively, in the low-LMR subgroup and 84.0% and 76.0% in the high-LMR subgroup. According to multivariate analysis, the LMR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR=2.031, 95%CI=1.266-3.258, p=0.003). When comparing the sites of recurrence between the low-LMR and high-LMR groups, there were significant differences in hematologic recurrence, lymph node recurrence, and peritoneal recurrence. CONCLUSION: Preoperative LMR might be a promising tool for the treatment and management of GC.

The Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Indices Are Independent Prognostic Factors for Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recently, the prognostic immune and nutritional index (PINI) was developed and reported to be a promising nutritional and inflammatory prognostic marker. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical impact of the PINI for esophageal cancer patients who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and collected data on consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative resection at Yokohama City University between 2005 and 2020. The PINI was calculated by dividing the serum ALB concentration (g/dl) by the serum monocyte concentration, both of which were measured before surgery. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were included in this study. The cutoff value of the PINI was 3.0 in the present study. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 45.2% and 33.5%, respectively, in the PINI-low subgroup, and 69.1% and 61.8%, respectively, in the PINI-high subgroup. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PINI was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio=2.091, 95% confidence interval=1.287-3.399, p=0.003). Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival. When comparing the sites of recurrence between the two groups, the incidence of hematological recurrence was significantly greater in the PINI-low subgroup compared to the PINI-high subgroup (46.8% vs. 21.1%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The PINI is a promising nutritional and inflammatory marker for esophageal cancer patients. The PINI might be a useful marker for the treatment and management of esophageal cancer patients.

The Clinical Impact of the Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Received Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The prognostic immune and nutritional index (PINI) was developed and reported as a promising prognostic factor. This study aimed to clarify the clinical impact of the PINI in gastric cancer (GC) patients who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for GC at Yokohama City University between 2005 and 2020 were selected based on their medical records. The PINI was calculated by dividing the serum albumin concentration (g/dl) by the serum monocyte concentration. Both measurements were performed prior to surgery. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients were included in this study. Based on the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS), we set the cutoff value of the PINI at 3.4 in the present study. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 69.0% and 66.1%, respectively, in the PINI-low group and 90.5% and 82.8% in the PINI-high group. There were significant differences between the two groups (p<0.001). A multivariate analysis of factors associated with OS identified PINI as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=1.996; 95% confidence interval=1.096-3.636, p=0.024). Similar results were observed for RFS. In addition, the PINI status affected the recurrence pattern, postoperative anastomotic leakage, and the introduction of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The PINI is a promising nutritional and inflammatory marker for patients with GC and might be a useful marker for the treatment and management of patients with GC.

The Clinical Benefit of the Modified Neutrophil-Platelet Score as a Surrogate Prognostic Marker in Patients With Resectable Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Gastric cancer is a common cause of cancer death worldwide, especially in East Asia. This study evaluated the impact of preoperative modified Neutrophil-Platelet Score (mNPS) on the survival and recurrence of patients with resectable gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study analyzed 168 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy and subsequently received adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer between 2015 and 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups: 76 patients with an mNPS of 0 were classified into the low-mNPS group, whereas 92 patients with an mNPS of ≥1 were classified into the high-mNPS group. The 3- and 5-year OS rates in the low-mNPS group were 65.6% and 56.2%, respectively, and those in the high-mNPS group were 45.3% and 36.9%, respectively. The difference in OS between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.007). The 3- and 5-year RFS rates in the low-mNPS group were 45.6% and 38.7%, respectively, whereas those in the high-mNPS group were 33.4% and 28.1%, respectively. The difference in RFS between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.043). A multivariate analysis showed that the mNPS was a significant independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: mNPS is a potential prognostic marker for patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy. Higher mNPS values were associated with lower 3- and 5-year OS and RFS rates, indicating a potential correlation between elevated mNPS and worse outcomes.

Dietary Intake After Surgery in Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Underwent Laparoscopic-assisted Versus Those Who Underwent Conventional Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Dietary intake (DI) loss after gastrectomy is a serious problem for patients with gastric cancer. This study compared the dietary intake after surgery in patients with early gastric cancer who received laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) versus those who underwent conventional open distal gastrectomy (ODG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study enrolling patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Dietary intake was assessed using the food frequency questionnaire with eighty-two food items (FFQW82) at nutritional counseling before surgery and one and three months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included. Among them, 69 (58.5%) were male, and 49 (41.5%) were female. Seventy-five (63.6%) received LDG, and 43 (36.4%) received ODG. At 1 month postoperatively, the median DI in the LDG group was 1,540 (1,014-2,195) kcal/day, whereas that in the ODG group was 1547 (986-2,143) kcal/day (p=0.891). At 3 months postoperatively, the median DI in the LDG group was 1,624 (1,050-2,443) kcal/day, and that in the ODG group was 1,652 (917-2,144) kcal/day (p=0.749). There was no significant difference in the DI loss rate at 1 month (median: -8.2% vs. -9.3%, p=0.398) and 3 months (median: -3.2% vs. -3.7%, p=0.635) between the LDG and ODG groups. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery may not prevent postoperative DI loss after distal gastrectomy. Therefore, methods other than laparoscopic surgery are needed to prevent post-gastrectomy DI loss.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The perioperative nutritional status has recently been reported to influence the prognosis of various types of cancer. We investigated the relationship between the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with esophageal cancer who received radical and adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent radical resection for esophageal cancer at our hospital (n=187) were included. Background characteristics, surgical factors, and OS were examined retrospectively. The GNRI was calculated using preoperative values, with GNRI <98 classified as low-GNRI. RESULTS: Seventy-five and 112 patients were classified into the GNRI-low and -high groups, respectively. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 75.7% and 66.7%, respectively, in the GNRI-high group and 43.2% and 36.7% in the GNRI-low group; the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, low-GNRI was selected as a risk factor for OS. The hazard ratio for low-GNRI was 2.184 (95% confidence interval=1.361-3.508, p=0.001). The 5-year RFS rate in the high- and low-GNRI groups was 54.6% and 25.0%, respectively (p=0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, low-GNRI was a risk factor for RFS. The hazard ratio for low-GNRI was 1.704 (95%CI=1.121-2.590, p=0.013). Regarding the type of recurrence, lymph node recurrence was significantly more common in the low-GNRI group (p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Low-GNRI was an independent risk factor for OS and RFS after radical resection of esophageal cancer. The preoperative GNRI may be a useful prognostic factor after esophageal cancer surgery.

Pretreatment Fibrinogen Level Is a Prognostic Factor for Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pretreatment fibrinogen levels are a promising prognostic marker for some malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of fibrinogen levels before treatment in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 123 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters in the high fibrinogen and low fibrinogen groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) stratified by individual clinical factors was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed when a pretreatment fibrinogen level of 400 g/dl was used as a cutoff value. The comparison of the patient background factors between the high fibrinogen (400 g/dl) and low fibrinogen (<400 g/dl) groups revealed significant differences in pathological T status and lymph node metastasis. In the low fibrinogen group, the OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery (71.4% and 58.1%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the high fibrinogen group (38.3% and 32.4%, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS showed that the fibrinogen level prior to treatment was a significant prognostic factor. Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival. In addition, when the first recurrence site was compared, there were marginally significant differences in hematologic recurrence. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment fibrinogen levels are a significant risk factor in patients with esophageal cancer. Therefore, pretreatment fibrinogen levels are a promising prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer.

Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study evaluated the clinical impact of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with esophageal cancer who received curative treatment and perioperative adjuvant treatment. The association between LMR and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with esophageal cancer was also investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 181 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters of patients with high and low LMR statuses were analyzed. RESULTS: The OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were significantly lower (40.6% and 33.8%, respectively) in the low-LMR group than in the high-LMR group (67.1% and 58.4%, respectively). The pretreatment LMR was selected as an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis model [hazard ratio (HR)=2.606; 95%CI=1.504-4.516, p<0.001]. Similar results were observed for RFS. Furthermore, LMR was associated with the occurrence of postoperative surgical complications and hematological recurrence. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was 63.3% in the low-LMR group and 27.2% in the high-LMR group (p<0.001). Moreover, the hematologic recurrence rate in the low-LMR group was significantly higher than that in the high-LMR group (46.7% vs. 23.8%, p=0.011). CONCLUSION: The LMR may be a promising prognostic and predictive factor for esophageal cancer, and may be used to select optimal treatment strategies in the future.