Interaction of basal positive and negative transcription elements controls repression of the proximal rat prolactin promoter in nonpituitary cells.

The proximal rat prolactin (rPRL) promoter contains three cell-specific elements, designated footprints I, III, and IV, which restrict rPRL gene expression to anterior pituitary lactotroph cells. Footprint II (-130 to -120) binds a factor, which we have termed F2F, present in pituitary and nonpituitary cell types. Here we demonstrate that a key role of the footprint II site is to inhibit rPRL promoter activity in nonpituitary cells, specifically, by interfering with the basal activating function of a vicinal element. Gene transfer analysis revealed 20-fold activation of the rPRL promoter in nonpituitary cell types when footprint II was either deleted or specifically mutated. Similar activation of the intact rPRL promoter was obtained by in vivo F2F titration studies. In GH4 rat pituitary cells, the footprint II inhibitory activity was masked by the redundant, positively acting cell-specific elements and was inhibitory only if the two upstream sites, footprints III and IV, were deleted. Deletion of the -112 to -80 region in the footprint II site-specific mutant background resulted in complete loss of rPRL promoter activity in both pituitary and nonpituitary cell types, mapping a basal activating element that is operative irrespective of cell type to this region. While the basal activating element imparted an activating function in a heterologous promoter assay, the footprint II sequence did not display any inherent repressor function and actually induced several minimal heterologous promoters. However, the inhibitory activity of the footprint II site was detected only if it was in context with the basal activating element. These data underscore the importance of ubiquitous activating and inhibitory factors in establishing cell-specific gene expression and further emphasize the complexity of the molecular mechanisms which restrict gene expression to specific cell types. We provide a novel paradigm to study rPRL promoter function and hormone responsiveness independently of lactotroph cell-specific requirements.

Analysis of rat prolactin promoter sequences that mediate pituitary-specific and 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate-regulated gene expression in vivo.

To determine the rat PRL (rPRL) promoter sequences that mediate pituitary-specific and cAMP-induced gene expression in vivo, various lengths of the rPRL promoter were ligated to the luciferase reporter gene and introduced into pituitary and non-pituitary cell lines. A 30-fold increase in rPRL promoter activity was observed in GH4 rat pituitary tumor cells compared to nonpituitary Rat2 fibroblast and HeLa cervical carcinoma cells. About 45% of this cell-specific promoter activity was competed by a plasmid containing the -67 to -45 rPRL promoter region, which is the most proximal binding site for a lactotroph-specific factor. Compared to a -425 rPRL construct, transfection with rPRL 5'-end points of -212, -178, and -127 contained 23%, 45%, and 1%, respectively, of luciferase activity. Forskolin stimulation resulted in a 10-fold induction of all the rPRL promoter fragments tested. Of note, a -127 deletion which was devoid of any basal promoter activity was also induced 10-fold by forskolin. The forskolin effect was abolished when GH4 rat pituitary cells were cotransfected with a plasmid encoding a protein kinase A inhibitor, indicating protein kinase A is involved in the activation mechanism. These data document that both positive and negative effectors influence basal rPRL promoter activity. Furthermore, the minimum sequences required for pituitary-specific rPRL promoter activity are altered by intracellular cAMP levels. Taken together, the data indicate that hormone-activated and cell-specific factors may interact to establish a particular setpoint for rPRL gene expression.

Cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate activation of the rat prolactin promoter is restricted to the pituitary-specific cell type.

Pituitary lactotroph cell function and PRL gene expression are highly regulated by the cAMP-protein kinase-A (PKA) pathway. To further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which cAMP/PKA regulates rat (r) PRL promoter activity and to determine whether cAMP regulation is cell type specific, we 1) transected intact (-425), internal and 5'-deletion, and site-specific mutants of the rPRL promoter ligated to the firefly luciferase reporter gene into both pituitary and nonpituitary cell lines; and 2) assessed the role of the cAMP-cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) pathway in GH4 rat pituitary cells. The data show that deleting the rPRL promoter from -425 to -116 did not abolish cAMP regulation, implying that proximal elements, such as the basal transcription element (-112/-80) or the pituitary-specific footprint (FP) I (-67/-45), mediate the cAMP response. However, nucleotide changes within FP I or FP II (-130/-120) did not alter the rPRL promoter response to 1 microM forskolin (FSK), despite the 77% and 26% reductions in basal rPRL promoter activity caused by these mutations, respectively. Furthermore, internal deletion of either the basal transcription element of FP I element also failed to affect cAMP regulation of the rPRL promoter, again despite the 90% and 93% reductions in basal promoter activity by these deletions, respectively. Since these internal deletion constructs otherwise contain rPRL promoter sequences from -425 to +73, including the up-stream pituitary-specific FPs III and IV, the data suggest that any one of these cell-specific elements is capable of imparting cAMP regulation to the proximal rPRL promoter. To directly test the implication that the cAMP response of the rPRL promoter is restricted to the pituitary-specific cell type, we took advantage of a 5'-deletion mutant truncated at position -116 and a FP II site-specific mutant, since constructs containing these rPRL promoters are active in nonpituitary cells. Despite the 6.6- and 18.5-fold stimulations over wild-type rPRL promoter activity in nonpituitary cells, respectively, these mutations remained completely unresponsive to FSK treatment. To document that the cAMP-CREB pathway was functional in GC/GH4 rat pituitary cells, CREB was affinity purified from GC rat pituitary cells, and DNase-I protection studies showed that it does not bind to the proximal rPRL promoter. Also, the human glycoprotein alpha-subunit promoter was induced 10-fold by FSK in GH4 rat pituitary cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Insulin activation of rat prolactin promoter activity.

The role of insulin regulation of rat prolactin (rPRL) gene transcription was studied using GH4 rat pituitary tumor cells transiently transfected with plasmids containing proximal rPRL promoter fragments ligated to the reporter gene luciferase. Here we show that insulin, at nanomolar concentrations, has a rapid effect on the rPRL promoter stimulating its activity about 1.8-fold within 4h after hormone addition. Furthermore, we have mapped the rPRL promoter element responsible for mediating insulin hormone action between positions -212 and +73. The stimulation of rPRL gene transcription by insulin was abolished when insulin doses extended into the micromolar range. Thus, rPRL promoter sequences downstream of -212 are sufficient to mediate increased rPRL gene transcription in response to insulin.

Relationship between weaning and secretion of luteinizing hormone, cortisol and transcortin in beef cows.

The effects of suckling on secretion of luteinizing hormone, cortisol and transcortin were investigated in anovulatory postpartum cows. On d 35 postpartum, calves were separated from 12 cows to prevent suckling and eight calves continued to suckle their dams ad libitum. Between 35 and 41 d postpartum, samples of jugular blood were collected every 15 min for two periods of 6 h/d. In non-suckled cows, frequency of pulses and basal luteinizing hormone increased but amplitude of pulses did not change. Concentrations of total cortisol in serum of cows were not altered during 3 d after weaning calves and did not differ among intervals before, during and after a suckling event. Affinity of transcortin for cortisol was not affected by postpartum interval or treatment. Capacity of transcortin to bind cortisol tended to increase after weaning. We found no evidence to support the hypothesis that suckling reduces binding capacity of transcortin or increases unbound cortisol. Differences in preovulatory secretion of luteinizing hormone between suckled and non-suckled cows could not be accounted for by differences in secretion of cortisol. In beef cows that are fed to satisfy requirements for energy and have average body condition, we conclude that negative modulation of luteinizing hormone by suckling is not mediated by cortisol.