Physiological mechanisms associated with the use of a passive heat intervention: positive implications for soccer substitutes.

PURPOSE: Soccer substitutes are exposed to periods of limited activity before entering match-play, likely negating benefits of active warm-ups. This study aimed to determine the effects of using a passive heat intervention following a pre-match, and half-time warm-up, on muscle and core temperature in soccer players during ambient (18 °C) and cold (2 °C) conditions. METHODS: On four occasions, 8 male players, completed a pre-match warm-up, followed by 45 min of rest. Following this, participants completed a half-time re-warm-up followed by an additional 45 min of rest, simulating a full match for an unplaying substitute. During periods of rest, participants wore either standardised tracksuit bottoms (CON), or heated trousers (HEAT), over typical soccer attire. RESULTS: Vastus lateralis temperature declined less in HEAT compared to CON following the 1st half in 2 °C (Δ - 4.39 ± 0.81 vs. - 6.21 ± 1.32 °C, P = 0.002) and 18 °C (Δ - 2.48 ± 0.71 vs. - 3.54 ± 0.88 °C, P = 0.003). These findings were also observed in the 2nd half for the 2 °C (Δ - 4.36 ± 1.03 vs. - 6.26 ± 1.04 °C, P = 0.002) and 18 °C (Δ - 2.85 ± 0.57 vs. - 4.06 ± 1 °C, P = 0.018) conditions. In addition, core temperature declined less in HEAT compared to CON following the 1st (Δ - 0.41 ± 0.25 vs. - 0.84 ± 0.41 °C, P = 0.037) and 2nd (Δ - 0.25 ± 0.33 vs. - 0.64 ± 0.34 °C, P = 0.028) halves of passive rest in 2 °C, with no differences in the 18 °C condition. Perceptual data confirmed that participants were more comfortable in HEAT vs. CON in 2 °C (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Following active warm-ups, heated trousers attenuate the decline in muscle temperature in ambient and cold environments.

Comparison of low-dose maximal-intent versus controlled-tempo resistance training on quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength in untrained healthy adults: a comparative effectiveness study.

Lack of physical activity is a global issue for adults that can lead to sedentary behaviour and a higher prevalence of health complications and chronic diseases, resulting in reduced quality-of-life (QoL) and functional capacity (FC). A potential strategy to mitigate this inactivity is low-dose resistance training (RT); however, physiological, and psychological responses are limited in evidence. Twenty untrained participants aged 30-60 years old (mean ± SD age 42 ± 7 years, mass 77 ± 13 kg, stature 166 ± 8 cm; 18 females and two males) were recruited and randomly assigned to maximal velocity-intent (MI, n = 10) or controlled-tempo (CT, n = 10) RT according to CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Participants attended one training session per week for 6 weeks, consisting of five sets of five repetitions at 60% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press. The interventions differed only during the concentric phase, with MI group pushing with maximal intent, and CT group pushing in a time-controlled manner (3 s). Outcome measures assessed pre- and post-RT included body mass, body mass index (BMI), strength-to-mass ratio, bipedal balance, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 30-second sit-to-stand (30s-STS), timed up and go (TUG), and leg press 1RM. Time effects were observed for all demographics and FC-related outcomes, such as identical reductions in mass and BMI (- 2%), improvements in strength-to-mass ratio (25%) leg press 1RM (22%), 6MWT (3%), and 30s-STS (14%), as well as a 9% improvement in both TUG-clockwise and anticlockwise. Results show low-dose once-weekly RT is effective in improving QoL, FC, and strength in untrained healthy adults, regardless of modality. Positive responses from participants suggest an increased likelihood of consistent participation for low-dose once-weekly RT over more intense modalities. Retrospective ClinicalTrials.gov ID (TRN): NCT06107855, 24/10/2023.

Concurrent validity of the portable gFlight system compared to a force plate to measure jump performance variables.

OBJECTIVE: Lower-limb strength and power is commonly assessed indirectly by measuring jump performance. A novel portable system (gFlight) that can be used in applied settings provides measures of jump performance. The aim of this study was to validate jump performance measures provided by the gFlight to those provided by a force plate. APPROACH: Thirty-six participants performed three countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) trials. Jump height (JH), contact time, and reactive strength index (RSI) were simultaneously recorded by a force plate and gFlight sensors to assess concurrent validity. MAIN RESULTS: The gFlight provided significantly higher measures of JH during the CMJ (mean: +8.79 ± 4.16 cm, 95% CI: +7.68 to 9.90 cm, P < 0.001) and DJ (mean: +4.68 ± 3.57 cm, 95% CI: +3.73 to 5.63 cm, P < 0.001) compared to the force plate. The gFlight sensors displayed significantly higher measures of RSI (mean: +0.48 ± 0.39 m·s-1, 95% CI: +0.37 to 0.58 m·s-1, P < 0.001) and lower measures of contact time (mean: -0.036 ± 0.028 s, 95% CI: -0.044 to -0.029 s, P < 0.001) during the DJ compared to the force plate. The bias displayed by the gFlight for JH, contact time and RSI measures are reduced using corrective equations. SIGNIFICANCE: The gFlight sensors are a cost-effective, portable measurement system with high concurrent and ecological validity for the objective measurement of jump performance in applied settings. Corrective equations should be used to reduce measurement biases so comparisons can be made to force plate measurements of jump performance.