Incident Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Cohort of Patients Undergoing Coronary or Peripheral Arterial Angiography.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI; related to supply/demand mismatch), little is known about its risk factors or its association with outcome. METHODS: A single-center cohort of patients undergoing coronary or peripheral angiography with or without intervention was prospectively enrolled and followed for incident type 1 and T2MI, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], heart failure, stroke, transient ischemic attack, peripheral arterial complication, and cardiac arrhythmia), as well. T2MI was adjudicated using criteria from the Third Universal Definition of MI. Baseline characteristics, blood samples, and angiography information were obtained. Major end points subsequent to first MI were assessed using landmark analyses to compare the rates of first events only where everyone with a prior history of any MACE before MI were censored and adjusted for follow-up times. Cox proportional hazard models were used for time-to-event analyses with age and sex forced into all models and additional covariates evaluated by using the stepwise option for the selection. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred fifty-one patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 3.4 years. Of these patients, 152 (12.2%) had T2MI during follow-up; T2MI was frequently recurrent. Multivariable predictors of T2MI were older age, lower systolic blood pressure, history of coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, nitrate use, and elevated concentrations of glucose, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, and cystatin C. Patients with T2MI had higher rates of subsequent adverse events than those without T2MI (per 100 person-years: MACE, 53.7 versus 21.1, P<0.001; all-cause death, 23.3 versus 3.3, P<0.001; cardiovascular death, 17.5 versus 2.6, P<0.001; heart failure events, 22.4 versus 7.4, P<0.001); these rates are similar to those seen in patients with type 1 MI. Incident diagnosis of T2MI strongly predicted risk for subsequent MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-2.48; P<0.001), all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-4.36; P<0.001), and cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-3.43; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: T2MI is common and associated with poor prognosis. Studies evaluating treatment strategies for management of T2MI are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00842868.

Predicting new-onset HF in patients undergoing coronary or peripheral angiography: results from the Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases (CASABLANCA) study.

AIMS: Methods to identify patients at risk for incident HF would be welcome as such patients might benefit from earlier interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a registry of 1251 patients referred for coronary and/or peripheral angiography, we sought to identify independent predictors of incident HF during follow-up and develop a clinical and biomarker strategy to predict this outcome. There were 991 patients free of prevalent HF at baseline. Cox proportional hazard models were developed to predict adjudicated diagnosis of incident HF. Model discrimination and reclassification were evaluated. At follow-up, 177 (18%) developed new-onset HF. Independent predictors of new-onset HF included five clinical variables (age, male sex, heart rate, history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and history of hypertension) and two biomarkers (amino-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide and ST2). The c-statistic for the model without biomarkers was 0.69; including biomarkers increased the c-statistic to 0.76 (P < 0.001). A score was developed from the model. Patients in the highest score quintile had shortest time to incident HF compared with lower quintiles (log-rank P < 0.001). Following 100 bootstrap iterations, internal validation was confirmed with Harrell's c-statistic of 0.77. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and beta-blockers at enrollment was associated with substantial attenuation of predictive value of the risk score. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing coronary/peripheral angiographic procedures are a population at high risk for incident HF. We describe an accurate clinical and biomarker strategy for predicting incident HF and possibly intervening in such patients (NCT00842868).

The role of B-type natriuretic Peptide testing in guiding outpatient heart failure treatment.

OPINION STATEMENT: While heart failure (HF) treatment guidelines exist, there are significant gaps in their implementation owing in part to the lack of objective data to help guide clinicians in their medical decision-making. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its amino-terminal equivalent (NT-proBNP) are objective markers of HF prognosis, are useful to monitor response to treatment in outpatients with HF, and may have a role in "guiding" HF care as well. Successful BNP or NT-proBNP guided HF treatment requires regular attempts to reach and maintain target values (BNP ≤ 125 pg/mL or NT-proBNP ≤ 1000 pg/mL). This may be achieved through lifestyle modifications, exercise programs, medication adjustments, and therapeutic interventions shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in HF patients. Failure to achieve biomarker targets portends a worse prognosis, proportional to the lowest achieved natriuretic peptide concentration; in those with significant biomarker "nonresponse," prognosis is poor, and alternative therapeutic strategies should be considered.