Strategies to improve respiratory chemoreflex characterization by Duffin's rebreathing.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? We assessed the test-retest variability of respiratory chemoreflex characterization by Duffin's modified rebreathing method and explored whether signal averaging of repeated trials improves confidence in parameter estimation. What is the main finding and its importance? Modified rebreathing is a reproducible method to characterize responses of central and peripheral respiratory chemoreflexes. Signal averaging of multiple repeated tests minimizes within- and between-test variability, improves the confidence of chemoreflex characterization and reduces the minimal change in parameters required to establish an effect. Future experiments that apply this method might benefit from signal averaging to improve its discriminatory effect. ABSTRACT: We assessed the test-retest variability of central and peripheral respiratory chemoreflex characterization by Duffin's modified rebreathing method and explored whether signal averaging of repeated trials improves confidence in parameter estimation. Over four laboratory visits, 13 participants (mean ± SD age, 25 ± 5 years) performed six repetitions of modified rebreathing in isoxic-hypoxic conditions [end-tidal P O 2 ${P_{{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$ ( P ET , O 2 ${P_{{\rm{ET,}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$ )  = 50 mmHg] and isoxic-hyperoxic conditions ( P ET , O 2 ${P_{{\rm{ET,}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$   = 150 mmHg). End-tidal P C O 2 ${P_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$ ( P ET , C O 2 ${P_{{\rm{ET,C}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$ ), P ET , O 2 ${P_{{\rm{ET,}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$ and minute ventilation ( V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E ) were measured breath-by-breath, by gas analyser and pneumotachograph. The V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E versus P ET , C O 2 ${P_{{\rm{ET,C}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$ relationships were fitted with a piecewise model to estimate the ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT) and the slope above the VRT ( V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E S). Breath-by-breath data from the three within- and between-day trials were averaged using two approaches [simple average (fit then average) and ensemble average (average then fit)] and compared with a single-trial fit. Variability was assessed by intraclass correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variance (CV), and the minimal detectable change was computed for each approach using two independent sets of three trials. Within days, the VRT and V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E S exhibited excellent test-retest variability in both hyperoxic conditions (VRT: ICC = 0.965, CV = 2.3%; V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E S: ICC = 0.932, CV = 15.5%) and hypoxic conditions (VRT: ICC = 0.970, CV = 2.9%; V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E S: ICC = 0.891, CV = 17.2%). Between-day reproducibility was also excellent (hyperoxia, VRT: ICC = 0.930, CV = 2.2%; V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E S: ICC = 0.918, CV = 14.2%; and hypoxia, VRT: ICC = 0.940, CV = 3.0%; V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E S: ICC = 0.880, CV = 18.1%). Compared with a single-trial fit, there were no differences in VRT or V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E S using the simple average or ensemble average approaches; however, ensemble averaging reduced the minimal detectable change for V ̇ $\dot {\rm V}$ E S from 2.95 to 1.39 L min-1  mmHg-1 (hyperoxia) and from 3.64 to 1.82 L min-1  mmHg-1 (hypoxia). Single trials of modified rebreathing are reproducible; however, signal averaging of repeated trials improves confidence in parameter estimation.

Quantifying Improvement in V˙ o2peak and Exercise Thresholds in Cardiovascular Disease Using Reliable Change Indices.

PURPOSE: Improving aerobic fitness through exercise training is recommended for the treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, strong justifications for the criteria of assessing improvement in key parameters of aerobic function including estimated lactate threshold (θ LT ), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and peak oxygen uptake (V˙ o2peak ) at the individual level are not established. We applied reliable change index (RCI) statistics to determine minimal meaningful change (MMC RCI ) cutoffs of θ LT , RCP, and V˙ o2peak for individual patients with CVD. METHODS: Sixty-six stable patients post-cardiac event performed three exhaustive treadmill-based incremental exercise tests (modified Bruce) ∼1 wk apart (T1-T3). Breath-by-breath gas exchange and ventilatory variables were measured by metabolic cart and used to identify θ LT , RCP, and V˙ o2peak . Using test-retest reliability and mean difference scores to estimate error and test practice/exposure, respectively, MMC RCI values were calculated for V˙ o2 (mL·min -1. kg -1 ) at θ LT , RCP, and V˙ o2peak . RESULTS: There were no significant between-trial differences in V˙ o2 at θ LT ( P = .78), RCP ( P = .08), or V˙ o2peak ( P = .74) and each variable exhibited excellent test-retest variability (intraclass correlation: 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99; coefficient of variation: 6.5, 5.4, and 4.9% for θ LT , RCP, and V˙ o2peak , respectively). Derived from comparing T1-T2, T1-T3, and T2-T3, the MMC RCI for θ LT were 3.91, 3.56, and 2.64 mL·min -1. kg -1 ; 4.01, 2.80, and 2.79 mL·min -1. kg -1 for RCP; and 3.61, 3.83, and 2.81 mL·min -1. kg -1 for V˙ o2peak . For each variable, MMC RCI scores were lowest for T2-T3 comparisons. CONCLUSION: These MMC RCI scores may be used to establish cutoff criteria for determining meaningful changes for interventions designed to improve aerobic function in individuals with CVD.

A standardized approach to evaluate effectiveness of aerobic exercise training interventions in cardiovascular disease at the individual level.

BACKGROUND: Reliable change indices can determine pre-post intervention changes at an individual level that are greater than chance or practice effect. We applied previously developed minimal meaningful change (MMCRCI) scores for oxygen uptake (V̇O2) values associated with estimated lactate threshold (θLT), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise training in cardiovascular disease patients. METHODS: 303 patients (65 ± 11 yrs.; 27% female) that completed a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) before and after 6-months of guideline-recommended exercise training were assessed to determine absolute and relative V̇O2 at θLT, RCP, and V̇O2peak. Using MMCRCI ∆V̇O2 scores of ±3.9 mL·kg-1·min-1, ±4.0 mL·kg-1·min-1, and ± 3.6 mL·kg-1·min-1 for θLT, RCP, and V̇O2peak, respectively, patients were classified as "positive" (ΔθLT, ΔRCP, and/or ΔV̇O2peak ≥ +MMCRCI), "non-" (between ±MMCRCI), or "negative" responders (≤ -MMCRCI). RESULTS: Mean RCP (n = 86) and V̇O2peak (n = 303) increased (p < 0.05) from 19.4 ± 3.6 mL·kg-1·min-1 and 18.0 ± 6.3 mL·kg-1·min-1 to 20.1 ± 3.8 mL·kg-1·min-1 and 19.2 ± 7.0 mL·kg-1·min-1 at exit, respectively, whereas θLT (n = 140) did not change (15.5 ± 3.4 mL·kg-1·min-1 versus 15.7 ± 3.8 mL·kg-1·min-1, p = 0.324). For changes in θLT, 6% were classified as "positive" responders, 90% as "non-responders", and 4% as "negative" responders. For RCP, 10% exhibited "positive" changes, 87% were "non-responders", and 2% were "negative" responders. For ΔV̇O2peak, 57 patients (19%) were classified as "positive" responders, 229 (76%) as "non-responders", and 17 (6%) as "negative" responders. CONCLUSION: Most patients that completed the exercise training program did not achieve reliable improvements greater than that of chance or practice at an individual level in θLT, RCP and V̇O2peak.

Do Clinical Exercise Tests Permit Exercise Threshold Identification in Patients Referred to Cardiac Rehabilitation?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of "threshold-based" aerobic exercise prescription in cardiovascular disease, we aimed to quantify the proportion of patients whose clinical cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) permit identification of estimated lactate threshold (θLT) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) and to characterize the variability at which these thresholds occur. METHODS: Breath-by-breath CPET data of 1102 patients (65 ± 12 years) referred to cardiac rehabilitation were analyzed to identify peak O2 uptake (V˙O2peak; mL·min-1 and mL·kg-1·min-1) and θLT and RCP (reported as V˙O2, %V˙O2peak, and %peak heart rate [%HRpeak]). Patients were grouped by the presence or absence of thresholds: group 0: neither θLT nor RCP; group 1: θLT only; and group 2: both θLT and RCP. RESULTS: Mean V˙O2peak was 1523 ± 627 mL·min-1 (range: 315-3789 mL·min-1) or 18.0 ± 6.5 mL·kg-1·min-1 (5.2-46.5 mL·kg-1·min-1) and HRpeak was 123 ± 24 beats per minute (bpm) (52 bpm-207 bpm). There were 556 patients (50%) in group 0, 196 (18%) in group 1, and 350 (32%) in group 2. In group 1, mean θLT was 1240 ± 410 mL·min-1 (580-2560 mL·min-1), 75% ± 8%V˙O2peak (52%-92%V˙O2peak), or 84% ± 6%HRpeak (64%-96%HRpeak). In group 2, θLT was 1390 ± 360 mL·min-1 (640-2430 mL·min-1), 70% ± 8%V˙O2peak (41%-88%V˙O2peak), or 78% ± 7%HRpeak (52%-96%HRpeak), and RCP was 1680 ± 440 mL·min-1 (730-3090 mL·min-1), 84% ± 7%V˙O2peak (54%-99%V˙O2peak), or 87% ± 6%HRpeak (59%-99%HRpeak). Compared with group 1, θLT in group 2 occurred at a higher V˙O2 but lower %V˙O2peak and %HRpeak (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Only 32% of CPETs exhibited both θLT and RCP despite flexibility in protocol options. Commonly used step-based protocols are suboptimal for "threshold-based" exercise prescription.