Impact of Empiric Treatment for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus in Colonized Patients Early after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

In recent years, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization is being increasingly encountered in transplant recipients, and VRE has become one of the leading causes of bacteremia early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Data are sparse on the effect of empiric VRE therapy for febrile, neutropenic allo-HSCT recipients colonized with VRE. All allo-HSCT recipients aged ≥18years who developed VRE bacteremia (VREB) between 2005 and 2014 were identified and categorized as to whether they received empiric or directed VRE therapy. There were 434 (33%) VRE-colonized and 872 (67%) non-VRE-colonized patients during the study period, and 172 of the 434 (40%) VRE-colonized patients received empiric therapy. There was no significant difference in incidence of VREB among colonized patients who did or did not receive empiric therapy (28 of 172 [16%] vs 55 of 262 [21%]; P = .22). There were 95 patients with VREB, of which the majority (83 of 95; 87%) was known to be VRE-colonized. Of the 95 VREB episodes, 29 (31%) were treated with empiric VRE therapy, whereas 66 (69%) were treated with directed therapy. No significant differences in clinical outcomes, including median duration of bacteremia (2 days vs 2 days; P = .39), recurrent VREB (3 of 29 [10%] vs 5 of 66 [8%]; P = .65), 30-day all-cause mortality (1 of 29 [3%] vs 4 of 66 [6%]; P = .62), or VRE-attributable mortality (1 of 29 [3%] vs 1 of 66 [2%]; P = .55), were observed between the empiric therapy and directed therapy groups. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed no significant difference in survival at 30days in allo-HSCT recipients with VREB who received empiric therapy and those who received directed therapy (97% vs 94%; P = .62). Based on our data, we recommend against empiric use of VRE-active agents for fever and neutropenia in VRE-colonized patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Trends in Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Cancer Patients After the Introduction of 7-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine: A 20-year Longitudinal Study at a Major Urban Cancer Center.

Background: Rates of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) declined since routine childhood immunization with the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in 2000. We studied the impact of PCV7 on the incidence of IPD in cancer patients. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of adult and pediatric patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 1992 to 2012. Recovery of Streptococcus pneumoniae from a sterile site defined IPD. IPD incidence was calculated as cases per 1,000 unique patient-visits per year (UPV). IPD incidence was calculated for the periods: "before PCV7" (1992-2000), "after PCV7" (2001-2010) and "after PCV13" (2011-2012). Results: Of 343 IPD cases, 165, 155, and 23 cases occurred "before PCV7," "after PCV7" and "after PCV13" respectively. The IPD incidence declined from 0.43 "before PCV7" to 0.17 "after PCV7" (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.46, P < .001) and 0.11 "after PCV13" (95% CI: 0.42-0.96, P = .004). Adults with hematologic malignancies and children had the highest incidence. In patients 1-4 years old, the incidence declined from 11.2 "before PCV7" to 2.38 "after PCV7" (79% decrease, 95% CI: 0.1-0.4, P < .001). In patients with hematologic malignancies, the incidence declined from 2.55 "before PCV7" to 0.92 "after PCV7" (64% decrease, 95% CI: 0.27-0.47, P < .001). Conclusions: The incidence of IPD among cancer patients sharply declined after introduction of PCV7; especially in high risk groups. The decline in adults suggests an indirect effect from PCV7 childhood vaccination.

Bacterial infections and antibiotic utilization varies by coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) severity in hospitalized cancer patients: Analysis from the first phase of the pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize bacterial infections and antibiotic utilization in hospitalized cancer patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary cancer center in New York City. PATIENTS: Hospitalized cancer patients ≥18 years with COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020. METHODS: Patients were classified with mild COVID-19 (ie, with room air), moderate COVID-19 (ie, using nasal cannula oxygen), or severe COVID-19 (ie, using high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation). The primary outcome was bacterial infection rate within 30 days of COVID-19 onset. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients receiving antibiotics and antibiotic length of therapy (LOT). RESULTS: Of 358 study patients, 133 had mild COVID-19, 97 had moderate COVID-19, and 128 had severe COVID-19. Of 358 patients, 234 (65%) had a solid tumor. Also, 200 patients (56%) had 245 bacterial infections, of which 67 (27%) were microbiologically confirmed. The proportion of patients with bacterial infection increased with COVID-19 severity: mild (n = 47, 35%) versus moderate (n = 49, 51%) versus severe (n = 104, 81%) (P < .0001). Also, 274 (77%) received antibiotics for a median of 4 days. The median antibiotic LOTs were 7 days with 1 infection and 20 days with multiple infections (P < .0001). Antibiotic durations were 1 day for patients with mild COVID-19, 4 days for patients with moderate COVID-19, and 8 days for patients with severe COVID-19 (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized cancer patients with COVID-19 had a high rate of bacterial infection. As COVID-19 severity increased, the proportion of patients diagnosed with bacterial infection and given antibiotics increased. In mild COVID-19 cases, antibiotic LOT was short, suggesting that empiric antibiotics can be safely avoided or discontinued in this group.

Analyzing Adherence to the 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for Candidemia in Cancer Patients.

Background: Candidemia is associated with morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. We analyzed adherence to the 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines and the reasons for guideline nonadherence. We also investigated whether matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) improved time to effective antifungal therapy compared with historical data (median, 43.2 hours). Methods: Cancer patients with candidemia between 1/1/17 and 12/31/19 were included. Adherence to 7 individual IDSA guideline components was assessed. Composite IDSA guideline adherence (defined as meeting ≥6 guideline components) was also assessed. Charts were reviewed to examine reasons for noncompliance. Results: Of 157 patients with candidemia, 150 (95.5%) had infectious disease (ID) consultation. The median total time from blood culture collection to antifungal initiation was 42.1 hours. Excluding 39 patients with short treatment due to death, there was 100% adherence with surveillance blood cultures, followed by antifungal susceptibility testing (117/118, 99.2%), initial appropriate therapy (117/118, 99.2%), antifungal duration (110/118, 93.2%), line removal (82/91, 90.1%), eye exams (93/118, 78.8%), and step-down therapy (69/94, 73.4%). A quarter (30/118) did not meet composite IDSA guideline adherence. Univariate logistic regression suggested a relationship between poor cancer prognosis and incomplete adherence to the 2016 IDSA candidiasis guidelines (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% CI, 1.6-47). Conclusions: The addition of MALDI-TOF did not shorten time to effective antifungal therapy. Nearly all patients were seen by ID for candidemia. Poor cancer prognosis was a common factor for incomplete composite adherence to the 2016 IDSA candidiasis guidelines.

Chemotherapy and COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE: Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) mortality is higher in patients with cancer than in the general population, yet the cancer-associated risk factors for COVID-19 adverse outcomes are not fully characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed clinical characteristics and outcomes from patients with cancer and concurrent COVID-19 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center until March 31, 2020 (n = 309), and observed clinical end points until April 13, 2020. We hypothesized that cytotoxic chemotherapy administered within 35 days of a COVID-19 diagnosis is associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) of severe or critical COVID-19. In secondary analyses, we estimated associations between specific clinical and laboratory variables and the incidence of a severe or critical COVID-19 event. RESULTS: Cytotoxic chemotherapy administration was not significantly associated with a severe or critical COVID-19 event (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.60). Hematologic malignancy was associated with increased COVID-19 severity (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.80). Patients with lung cancer also demonstrated higher rates of severe or critical COVID-19 events (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.20 to 3.30). Lymphopenia at COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with higher rates of severe or critical illness (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.10). Patients with baseline neutropenia 14-90 days before COVID-19 diagnosis had worse outcomes (HR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.70 to 11.00). Findings from these analyses remained consistent in a multivariable model and in multiple sensitivity analyses. The rate of adverse events was lower in a time-matched population of patients with cancer without COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Recent cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment was not associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Patients with active hematologic or lung malignancies, peri-COVID-19 lymphopenia, or baseline neutropenia had worse COVID-19 outcomes. Interactions among antineoplastic therapy, cancer type, and COVID-19 are complex and warrant further investigation.

Real Time Locating Systems and sustainability of Perioperative Efficiency of Anesthesiologists.

OBJECTIVE: We determine if Real Time Locating Systems (RTLS) paired with automated notifications have a sustained effect on perioperative efficiency in anesthesiologists over a one-year period from the time of implementation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all outpatient and short-stay patients, who received general anesthesia at our ambulatory surgery center between July 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2018 was performed. Patients included were over 18 years of age who presented for non-urgent cases with ASA classification of 1, 2, and 3. Additionally, only first cases of the day for individual anesthesiologists were included.Time was used as a measure of efficiency between three comparison groups: Anesthesiologists who use RTLS prior to implementation of automated notification pairing for the period of 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2017.Anesthesiologists who use RTLS paired with automated notifications for the period of 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2018.Anesthesiologists who use RTLS paired with automated notifications for the period of 1 July 2018 to 31 December 2018.The primary outcome measure duration (DUR) was collected from patient electronic records.DUR was defined as duration of time, in minutes, from patient arrival to the Operating Room (OR) and initiation of induction by the anesthesiologist (exclusively for first cases of the day). RESULTS: During the initial six months, DUR between time of OR admission and time of induction was significantly reduced to 6.0 minutes (5.0,8.0) post-implementation of automated notification pairing with RTLS. DUR then returned to pre-intervention baseline of 7.0 minutes (5.0, 9.0) during the subsequent six-month study period. CONCLUSION: Initial results indicate that implementation of integrated RTLS technology enabled anesthesiologists at our institution to be more efficient during the perioperative period. However, this perceived benefit was not sustained over a 1-year period as our measure of efficiency DUR ultimately returned to the pre-intervention baseline.

Hospitalists on an inpatient tertiary care oncology teaching service.

PURPOSE: Hospitalists provide quality care in various inpatient settings, but the ability of hospitalists to provide quality inpatient care for patients with complex cancer has not been studied. This study explores outcomes with a hospitalist-led versus medical oncologist-led house staff team on an inpatient medical GI oncology teaching service. METHODS: This observational retrospective cohort study examined 829 patient discharges from August 2012 to January 2013 on the GI oncology inpatient teaching service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, a tertiary cancer center in New York, New York. We compared average length of stay (ALOS), 30-day readmission rates, establishment of new do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, nosocomial pneumonia and urinary tract infection (UTI) rates, radiographic and laboratory tests per patient, and disposition on discharge between hospitalist-led and oncologist-led teams. RESULTS: Median years of clinical experience was 6 (range, 4 to 9 years) for hospitalists and 7 (range, 0.5 to 36 years) for oncologists. ALOS (hospitalist led, 5.6 v oncologist led, 5.2 days; P = .30), readmission within 30 days (hospitalist led, 14% v oncologist led, 16%; P = .44), new DNR orders (hospitalist led, 18% v oncologist led, 19%; P = .90), nosocomial pneumonia (hospitalist led, 0.5% v oncologist led, 0.7%; P = .63) and UTI rates (hospitalist led, 0.5% v oncologist led, 0.7%; P = .63), number of radiographic studies and laboratory tests, and disposition on discharge were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: A hospitalist-led inpatient service with house staff represents a novel approach for caring for hospitalized GI oncology patients with cancer.