Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 31(4): 233-236, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36594980

RESUMO

This study's objective was to identify a difference in maximum temperature change during forward versus oscillating drilling of cadaveric bone. Paired femurs were dissected from the soft tissue of five cadavers. Each cadaver had one femur assigned to forward and the other to oscillation. The first drill hole was 2.5 cm distal to the lesser trochanter and the remaining 10 holes were evenly spaced 2 cm apart. A System 7 drill and 3.5 mm drill bit were attached to an Instron 5500R to provide a progressive force of 50 Newtons per minute for each drill hole. A thermal camera recorded each drilling. A new drill bit was used for each femur. Fifty bicortical drillings were analyzed in each group. The average time to complete forward drilling (45.0 seconds) was shorter compared to oscillation (55.5 s, p < 0.001). The average force required for forward drilling (27.7 N) was lower than for oscillation (44.3N, p < 0.001). The maximum change in temperature during the drilling process was similar (oscillating 100.2° F vs. forward 100.7° F, p = 0.871). The maximum change in temperature at the near cortex was lower for oscillation (78.1°F) compared to forward drilling (89.1°F, p = 0.011), while the maximum change at the far cortex was lower for forward drilling (89.3°F) compared to oscillation (95.8°F, p = 0.115) but not significantly. Overall, there is no difference in the thermal output between techniques. Oscillation may be beneficial in proximity to vital structures or to navigate narrow bony corridors, but it requires additional time and force. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(4):233-236, 2022).


Assuntos
Osso e Ossos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Humanos , Temperatura , Osso e Ossos/cirurgia , Fêmur/cirurgia
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(4): e148-e152, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32569069

RESUMO

SUMMARY: Treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures remains challenging due to assuring adequate distal fixation. Traditional treatment options include lateral locked plating and retrograde nailing, although recently dual implant constructs have been explored with promising results. Allowing immediate weight-bearing in this patient population has benefits with regards to rehabilitation and outcome. Recent literature has focused on nail-plate constructs, however plate-plate constructs are preferred at our institution as they do not require arthroplasty component compatibility, facilitate the coronal plane reduction, and allow for immediate weight-bearing.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Fraturas do Fêmur , Fraturas Periprotéticas , Placas Ósseas , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia
3.
JSES Int ; 4(1): 15-20, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195462

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome is in situ decompression. However, this procedure does not come without complications. Subluxation of the ulnar nerve and ulnar nerve neuritis from adhesion formation remain 2 potential complications after this procedure. It has been shown in the literature that young, active, male patients are most likely to have these complications postoperatively. We have developed a modification to in situ decompression by developing a fascial turnover flap and using a porcine submucosa extracellular matrix (Axogen) to help reduce both ulnar nerve subluxation and adhesion formation postoperatively. METHODS: Thirteen patients underwent cubital tunnel surgery by the highlighted technique to prevent postoperative ulnar nerve subluxation and adhesion formation. Patient outcomes including elbow range of motion, functional status, paresthesia, and grip strength were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 13 patients, 10 had excellent results, 1 had a good result, and 2 required revision with anterior transposition of the nerve. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the 11 patients not needing revision was 92.7. CONCLUSION: The described surgical technique provides surgeons with the ability to directly decompress the ulnar nerve while decreasing postoperative complications such as instability and adhesion formation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA