Comparison of the induction of P-glycoprotein activity by nucleotide, nucleoside, and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Combination therapy against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infection is complicated by drug-drug interactions between antiretrovirals and also between anti-HIV drugs and drugs used to treat co-morbidity. P-glycoprotein represents one important site for drug interactions and induction of its function could reduce the effectiveness of drugs that are P-glycoprotein substrates. We therefore investigated induction of P-glycoprotein function in LS180 cells by non-nucleoside and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs and NRTIs) and tenofovir as essential components of antiretroviral combination therapy. P-glycoprotein activity was increased by all NNRTIs and some NRTIs with delavirdine (5.3-fold at 100 muM) having the largest effect.

Evaluation of drug transporters' significance for multidrug resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug resistance (MDR) hampers chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). There is little information about MDR mediating drug transporters in HNSCC. METHODS: Nine HNSCC cell lines were characterized concerning drug transporter expression and susceptibility to cisplatin, paclitaxel, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) using a DNA microarray and proliferation assays. Three cells lines were precisely investigated for transporter expression using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and drug resistance before and after simulated chemotherapies. RESULTS: The cell lines differed in drug resistance and transporter expression. Cisplatin and paclitaxel resistances were inversely associated. Drugs rendered HNSCC cells resistant, cross-resistant, or cross-sensitive. Sensitivity changes were accompanied by transporter mRNA expression changes. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel was identified as a potent inducer of numerous drug transporters and phenotypic MDR in HNSCC. Thus, cytostatic susceptibility of HNSCC cannot exclusively be deduced from the expression of single transporters but more likely of the entire transportome and non-transporter modulators.

Induction of multiple drug transporters by efavirenz.

Efavirenz, an important component of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) therapy, causes substantial drug interactions as an inducer of cytochromes and the transporter ABCB1. So far its effect on the expression of other transporters is unknown. We therefore investigated the effect of long-term exposure of cells to efavirenz on expression of a large number of important drug transporters and on cell proliferation as a surrogate of intracellular availability. LS180 cells were used as a surrogate for the major site of drug interactions and Jurkat cells were used as a surrogate for the main target cells of HIV therapy. Cells were treated with efavirenz over 4 weeks and mRNA expression of drug transporters was repeatedly quantified. After 4 weeks, efavirenz significantly up-regulated the mRNA of ABCB1, ABCG2, ABCC2, ABCC3, ABCC5, and SLCO3A1 in LS180 cells and ABCG2, ABCC1, ABCC4, ABCC5, and SLCO2B1 in Jurkat cells. However these changes in transporter expression did not influence cell proliferation indicating that intracellular efavirenz concentrations were likely not altered. Efavirenz induces mRNA expression of several drug transporters critically modulating the kinetics of other drugs. While these expressional changes will most likely not influence the efficiency of efavirenz itself, they might change the effect of other co-administered drugs.

NKIM-6, a new immortalized human brain capillary endothelial cell line with conserved endothelial characteristics.

Primary human brain capillary endothelial cells (hBCECs) are available only in small quantities and have a short life span in vitro; this restricts their use as in vitro model for the blood-brain barrier (BBB). To overcome these limitations, we have established an immortalized hBCEC line (NKIM-6) by transfection with pLXSN16E6E7, which encodes the human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 genes. The cell line exhibits an extended life span in vitro and retains its characteristic endothelial morphology, endothelial markers, and physiology. Likewise, as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), NKIM-6 cells express BBB markers, and the lack of glial, neuronal, and epithelial markers confirms their endothelial origin. Moreover, with quantitative RT-PCR, we have been able to demonstrate that several ATP-binding cassette-transporters are expressed in NKIM-6 cells with a conserved expression order compared with primary hBCECs. Our results suggest that this cell line might be suitable as in vitro model for several aspects of the BBB.

Inhibition of MRP1/ABCC1, MRP2/ABCC2, and MRP3/ABCC3 by nucleoside, nucleotide, and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Many drug interactions with drugs used for the therapy of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) occur at the level of different cytochrome P450 isozymes. Increasing evidence suggests that antiretrovirals may also modify activity and expression of active drug transport systems. Such interactions may alter drug absorption, elimination, and also drug distribution and reach clinical importance if thereby access to the target site is affected. Beyond P-glycoprotein, the family of multidrug resistance-related proteins (MRP/ABCC) substantially contributes to the elimination of numerous drugs and their metabolites. Because the interaction of MRPs with non-HIV protease inhibitor antiretrovirals has not been studied thoroughly, we investigated whether important non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) (delavirdine, efavirenz, and nevirapine), nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) (abacavir, emtricitabine, and lamivudine), and tenofovir as a nonnucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor can interact with MRP1, MRP2, and MRP3 in vitro. Inhibition of these ABC transporters was quantified by confocal laser-scanning microscopy using the 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate assay. With the exception of abacavir, which had no effect on MRP3, all the test compounds increased intracellular 5-chloromethylfluorescein fluorescence in a concentration-dependent manner, and this effect was observed in all the overexpressing cell lines but not in the parental cell line, indicating inhibition of MRP1, MRP2, and MRP3. In conclusion, the present study provides the first evidence for a significant and concentration-dependent inhibition of MRPs by NNRTI, NRTI, and tenofovir, which was most pronounced for delavirdine, efavirenz, and emtricitabine, suggesting that this might contribute to some of the known drug interactions impairing HIV therapy and also to the superior effectiveness of combination pharmacotherapy.

Modulation of human BCRP (ABCG2) activity by anti-HIV drugs.

OBJECTIVES: The safety and effectiveness of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is challenged by viral resistance to antiretrovirals and the frequent occurrence of drug interactions which may limit the access of these drugs to the target sites. In particular, drug distribution and elimination may be modified by active efflux transporters. While P-glycoprotein is well evaluated in this regard, the interaction of antiretrovirals with the ABC transporter BCRP (ABCG2) is far from being elucidated. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of all important anti-HIV drugs on BCRP activity in vitro in one assay to allow unrestricted comparison of the results. METHODS: BCRP inhibition was assessed by an increase in pheophorbide A accumulation in MDCKII-BCRP cells and compared with the corresponding parental cell line MDCKII lacking human BCRP. RESULTS: According to the IC(50) estimation, the rank order for BCRP inhibition was lopinavir > nelfinavir > delavirdine > efavirenz > saquinavir > atazanavir > amprenavir > abacavir. Whereas nevirapine and zidovudine exerted weak inhibition, the inhibitory potency for ritonavir and tipranavir could not be estimated due to their low solubility and all other tested compounds (indinavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir and zalcitabine) were devoid of an effect. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our study demonstrates significant inhibition of BCRP by many anti-HIV drugs. These results suggest that inhibition of BCRP might contribute to drug-drug interactions observed during HAART in vivo and possibly also the superior effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy.

Dose individualisation in patients with renal insufficiency: does drug labelling support optimal management?

OBJECTIVE: An important information source for pharmacotherapy in populations at risk is drug labelling. We compared the recommendations for patients with renal insufficiency included in German drug labellings with evidence from the literature. METHODS: From the 120 drugs with the highest turnover in a large university hospital, all drugs with pharmacokinetics independent of renal function (n=48) and those with substantial accumulation in renal failure (n=28) were identified. For both groups of compounds, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects relevant for dose individualisation in those with renal insufficiency were extracted from the literature and compared with the information given in the German drug labelling. RESULTS: Over half of the labellings (15 of 26) of non-accumulating drugs without renal adverse drug reactions contained no dose recommendation for patients with renal insufficiency. The labelling of nephrotoxic compounds that do not accumulate included more frequently a recommendation to adapt the dose or to monitor than the labelling of drugs without nephrotoxic potential (15 of 22 versus 5 of 26, P=0.002). For over half of accumulating drugs (16 of 28), the dose given in the labelling depends primarily on creatinine clearance. The ratio between the labelling dose and the dose based on the pharmacokinetic concept to achieve identical plasma concentrations (Q0 concept) differed widely (0.4-2). CONCLUSIONS: When renal failure had no impact on dosing, information was often missing. Such information is however important to differentiate, whether no dose adaptation is necessary or no information is available. If dose adjustment is required, application of a uniform concept is desirable.

P-glycoprotein modulation by the designer drugs methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methylenedioxyethylamphetamine and paramethoxyamphetamine.

There are increasing numbers of deaths related to taking MDMA, MDE and PMA reported where the deceased typically took several different drugs with these compounds. Hence, mutual modulation of the pharmacokinetics in drug combinations with "ecstasy" might be a risk factor for "ecstasy"-related morbidity. Regarding potential drug - drug interactions, there are no data evaluating a possible contribution of the multidrug resistance transporter P-glycoprotein (Pgp) in contrast to the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Therefore, individual "ecstasy" compounds have been tested for their ability to interact with Pgp using a fluorometric calcein assay as a model for Pgp inhibition in porcine kidney epithelial cells with overexpression of human Pgp (L-MDR1). All three compounds increased calcein retention in L-MDR1 cells in a concentration-dependent manner, with MDE being the most potent and MDMA the weakest Pgp inhibitor. The effective concentrations were 1 - 3 orders of magnitude higher than plasma concentrations observed in vivo, suggesting that these compounds are only weak inhibitors of Pgp, which is unlikely to influence the access of other compounds to the brain. However, it cannot be excluded that co-administration of Pgp inhibitors such as ritonavir or paroxetine could increase MDMA, MDE and PMA bioavailability and also enhance brain entry leading to severe side effects.

Inhibition of P-glycoprotein by newer antidepressants.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions often occur at the level of P-glycoprotein (Pgp). To study possible interactions caused by the newer antidepressants we investigated citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine and their major metabolites desmethylcitalopram, norfluoxetine, paroxetine-metabolite (paroxetine-M), desmethylsertraline, N-desmethylvenlafaxine, and O-desmethylvenlafaxine for their ability to inhibit Pgp. Pgp inhibition was studied by a fluorometric assay using calcein-acetoxymethylester as Pgp substrate and two different cell systems: L-MDR1 cells (model for human Pgp) and primary porcine brain capillary endothelial cells (pBCECs, model for the blood-brain barrier). Both cell systems proved to be suitable for the evaluation of Pgp inhibitory potency of drugs. All antidepressants tested except O-desmethylvenlafaxine showed Pgp inhibitory activity with sertraline, desmethylsertraline, and paroxetine being the most potent, comparable with the well known Pgp inhibitor quinidine. In L-MDR1 cells fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, fluvoxamine, reboxetine, and paroxetine-M revealed intermediate Pgp inhibition and citalopram, desmethylcitalopram, venlafaxine, and N-desmethylvenlafaxine were only weak inhibitors. The ranking order was similar in pBCECs. The fact that some of the compounds tested exert Pgp inhibitor effects at similar concentrations as quinidine suggests that pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between the newer antidepressants and Pgp substrates should now be thoroughly studied in vivo.