COVID-19, Vaccination, and Conspiracies: A Micro-Level Qualitative Study in Islamabad, Pakistan.

Although vaccination is the only hope to fight against COVID-19, existing vaccine hesitancy is a thought-provoking phenomenon. Significantly, vaccine hesitancy is worsening the situation in Pakistan, leading to an increased number of COVID cases. In this context, this study aims to examine people's perceptions and attitudes towards vaccination. Here the focus was on determining the factors causing disease hesitancy among the masses. The researchers randomly selected a sample of n=17 individuals and gathered data by using telephone interviews and assessed data by using the Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach. Results revealed that the increased vaccine hesitancy is due to misinformation, conspiracies, myths, and rumors about the side effects of the vaccination. It was also notable that the participants indicated digital media as the primary source of information, showing a potential relationship between social media and misinformation. Also, an intense uncertainty about the healthcare system in Pakistan is hindering the efforts to sustain herd immunity. Thus, due to several myths, rumors, and distrust of the healthcare system, vaccine hesitancy is halting the country's ability to overcome the COVID-19 outbreak. Misinformation is vigorously circulating due to ease of access to different communication platforms, instilling fear of presumed side effects. Hence, the researchers suggest some practical considerations for the government, healthcare workers, and media platforms to counteract the misinformation and increase vaccine acceptance among the masses.

Evaluation of hematological parameters as an indicator of disease severity in Covid-19 patients: Pakistan's experience.

BACKGROUND: The severity of COVID-19 could be evaluated by examining several blood parameters mainly white blood cell (WBC) count, granulocytes, platelet, and novel hemocytometric markers neutrophils to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR). The current study was conducted to investigate alteration in blood parameters and their association with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 patients. METHODOLOGY: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted retrospectively, a total of 101 COVID-19 positive patients were examined: 52 were mild, 24 were moderate, 09 were severe, and 16 were critically diseased patients. We also recorded 16 deaths associated with the critical group. The overall mean age observed in our study was 48.94 years, where the mean age for critical individuals was 62.12 ± 14.35 years. RESULTS: A significant association between the disease severity and elevation in blood parameters were observed. The WBC's and granulocyte count were significantly increased (p value <0.001) while the mean platelet count (165.0 × 109 /L) and red blood cell volume distribution width (RDW) were decreased in the critical group (57.86%) compared to mild group's patients (177.3%) (p = 0.83). The lymphocytes count was decreased in critical patients (1.40 × 109 /L) compared to mild patients (1.92 × 109 /L) (p = 0.28). A significant association was observed in platelet-lymphocyte ratio (p < 0.001), Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio (p = <0.001), and Lymphocyte-Monocyte ratio (0.011). CONCLUSION: These blood parameters could be used as a suitable biomarker for the prognosis and severity of COVID-19. Evaluating novel hemograms NLR, PLR, and LMR can aid clinicians to identify potentially severe cases at early stages, initiate effective management in time, and conduct early triage which may reduce the overall mortality of COVID-19 patients.

'Immune-inflammatory markers & clinical characteristics for outcomes in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 infected patients of Pakistan: a retrospective analysis'.

OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidence suggests the role of immune-inflammatory markers in early risk stratification and prognostication of COVID-19 patients. We aimed to evaluate their association with severity and the development of diagnostic scores with optimal thresholds in critical patients. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective case study includes hospitalized COVID-19 patients from March 2019 to March, 2022, in the developing area teaching hospital in Pakistan. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive patients, n = 467 were investigated for clinical outcomes, comorbidities and disease prognosis. The plasma levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT), ferritin and Complete blood count markers were measured. RESULTS: Majority were males (58.8%) and patients with comorbidities had more severe disease. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the commonest comorbidities. Shortness of breath, myalgia and cough were the main symptoms. The hematological markers NLR, as well as the plasma levels of immune-inflammatory variables, IL-6, LDH, Procalcitonin, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Ferritin were markedly raised in severe and critical patients (p < 0.0001 for these markers). ROC analysis supports IL-6 as the most accurate marker with high prognostic relevance with proposed cut-off threshold (43 pg/ml), determining >90% of patients in terms of COVID-19 severity (AUC = 0.93, 91.7%, se; 90.3%sp). Furthermore, positive correlation with all other markers including NLR with cut-off = 2.99 (AUC = 0.87, se = 89.8%, sp = 88.4%), CRP with cut-offs at 42.9 mg/l, (AUC = 0.883, se = 89.3% and sp = 78.6%), LDH cut-off at 267µg/L, evidenced in >80% patients (AUC = 0.834 se = 84% and sp = 80%). Additionally, ESR and ferritin have the corresponding AUC 0.81 and 0.813 with cut-off at 55 mm/hr and 370, respectively. CONCLUSION: Investigating the immune-inflammatory markers can assist physicians in providing prompt treatment and ICU admission in terms of COVID-19 severity. As a result, which may reduce the overall mortality of COVID-19 patients.

Cecal duplication cyst mimicking intussusception in a female: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Cecal duplication cysts occur only in 0.4% of all the gastrointestinal tract duplication cysts. More than 80% cases present in the first two years of life. However, asymptomatic individuals may also present in adult life. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A female patient of 42 years presented with generalized abdominal pain and multiple episodes of vomiting from one day. A vague tender mass was palpable in the left lumber region, firm in consistency with ill-defined borders and not moving with respiration. Ultrasound shows mild free fluid with internal debrinous echoic area noted in lower abdomen and pelvis along with fatty hepatomegaly. CeCT scan of the abdomen and pelvis shows twisted appearance of the gut and mesentery in right sub-hepatic region. Complete resection and Ileocolic anastomosis was done along with right hemicolectomy. Based on radiological, surgical and pathological findings, the final diagnosis was enteric duplication cyst. DISCUSSION: Based on their location, terminal ileum and ileocecal junction are the most common sites (53 %) with colonic duplication second to it (13%). However, cecal duplication cysts remain the least common with incidence of 0.4 % only. Females are more common than males. However, their exact cause is not known. Possible causes are defective recanalization, fusion of embryonal longitudinal folds, persistant diverticulae of embryonic life and uterine vascular anomalies. CONCLUSION: Enteric duplication cysts most commonly presenting with palpable abdominal mass, pain mimicking appendicitis & bleeding per-rectum. The treatment of choice is resection and ileocolic anastomosis with overall good prognosis. The delay in the diagnosis can lead to high mortality.

Poorly controlled hypertension is associated with elevated serum uric acid to HDL-cholesterol ratio: a cross-sectional cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis and follow-up of hypertension (HT) depend on the blood pressure measurements, which can be affected by several factors. In the present work, we aimed to explore the role of uric acid/HDL-cholesterol ratio (UHR) in HT and whether/or not it was associated with poor blood pressure control. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional cohort study, all the participants treated for hypertension and then followed up in the internal medicine clinics of our institution were enrolled. Hypertensive patients were grouped as either poorly or well-controlled hypertension groups, according to the suggestions of Joint National Committee VIII criteria and healthy volunteers were enrolled as control group. UHR of the study groups was compared. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 535 subjects; 258 in the well-controlled HT group, 186 in the poorly controlled HT group, and 91 in the control group. Median UHR levels of the poorly controlled HT group (13 (4-43) %) were significantly higher than well-controlled HT group 11 (4-22) %) and control group (8 (4-19) %) (p < 0.001). UHR was correlated with systolic (r = 0.33, p < 0.001) and diastolic (r = 0.28, p < 0.001) BP. UHR level greater than 11% has 70% sensitivity and 60% specificity in predicting poor BP control (AUC: 0.73, p < 0.001, 95%CI: 0.68-0.77). UHR was an independent risk factor for poor BP control in HT subjects and a unit elevation in UHR increased the risk of poorer BP control by 7.3 times (p < 0.001, 95%CI: 3.9-13.63). CONCLUSION: Assessment of UHR may be useful in HT patients since elevated UHR levels could be associated with poor blood pressure control in this population.

Is COVID-19 Immune to Misinformation? A Brief Overview.

During the current COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation is a major challenge, raising several social and psychological concerns. This article highlights the prevailing misinformation as an outbreak containing hoaxes, myths, and rumours. In comparison to traditional media, online media platforms facilitate misinformation even more widely. To further affirm this ethical concern, the researchers cite relevant studies demonstrating the role of new media in misinformation and its potential consequences. Besides other significant psychosocial impacts, such as xenophobia, psychological distress, LGBT rights violation, gender-based violence, misinformation is undermining healthcare workers' psychological health and their efforts to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. In view of the adverse consequences of misinformation, this article addresses it as a massive ethical challenge during the current outbreak. Thus, the researchers make relevant suggestions to evaluate misinformation sources and mitigate the psychosocial impacts attributed to misinformation during crises. They include forming mental health teams comprising of psychologists, psychiatrists, and trained paramedical staff; rapid dissemination of authentic and updated COVID-19 situation reports regularly; establishing helpline services; and recognizing a broader range of personal needs. All health authorities should make clear that they are listening and responding to public concerns. Much effort is needed to counteract COVID-19 misinformation.

Does C-reactive protein to serum Albumin Ratio correlate with diabEtic nephropathy in patients with Type 2 dIabetes MEllitus? The CARE TIME study.

AIMS: Diabetic Nephropathy (DN) is a complication of Diabetes Mellitus and is associated with chronic and low-grade inflammatory burden. Novel inflammatory predictors, such as, C-reactive protein to serum albumin ratio (CAR) has been studied various inflammatory conditions, recently. Increased inflammatory burden accompany to both type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and DN, hence we aimed to compare CAR levels of the T2DM subjects with DN to those of without DN. METHODS: Patients with T2DM were enrolled to the study. Study population grouped into two according to the presence (group A) or absence (group B) of DN. Characteristics and laboratory data, as well as CAR levels; of the study groups were compared. RESULTS: Median CAR levels of the groups A and B were 2.17% (0.02-13.2) and 0.39% (0.02-4.39), respectively (p < 0.001). CAR was found to be an independent risk factor for diabetic nephropathy (adjusted to age, BMI, fasting glucose, HbA1c, and body weight). One unit (0.1%) elevation in CAR increased the risk of nephropathy by 3.5 folds (p < 0.001, 95%CI: 2.24-5.45). CAR levels greater than 0.82% have 79% sensitivity and 78% specificity in predicting DN (AUC: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.80-0.92]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, elevated CAR levels are higher in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. According to the ROC curve, a level higher than 0.82% presents the best sensitivity and specificity in the association with the presence of DN.

Hematological and biochemical parameters as diagnostic and prognostic markers in SARS-COV-2 infected patients of Pakistan: a retrospective comparative analysis.

Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate alteration in blood parameters and their association with the presence, severity, and mortality of COVID-19 patients as the data on hematological abnormalities associated with the Pakistani COVID-19 patients is limited.Methodology: A double-centered, hospital-based comparative retrospective case study was conducted, to include all the admitted patients (n = 317) having COVID-19 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive. The control group (n = 157) tested negative for COVID-19.Results: Of 317 admitted cases, the majority were males n = 198 (62.5%). Associated comorbidities, lower lymphocytes, platelets, and higher White blood cells, neutrophil, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were found in COVID-19 cases as compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001 for all). The biochemical parameters of cases including Ferritin, D-Dimer, CRP, IL-6, LDH, ALT, AST, and APTT also showed a statistically significant difference compared with standard values (p < 0.001 for all). However, their comparison with a severity level of the severe and non-severe groups showed significance for WBCs, neutrophils, NLR (p < 0.001 for all), and PLR (p = 0.06) only. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that NLR had the highest area under curve (0.84) followed by 1/lymphocyte (0.82), neutrophils (0.74), PLR (0.67),1/platelets (0.68) and WBC's (0.65). Comparison of cases and controls with recommended cut-off values derived from sensitivity and 1-specificity was also done (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Monitoring all the hematological and biochemical parameters including novel hemograms NLR, PLR can aid clinicians to identify potentially severe cases at early stages and initiate effective management in time which may reduce the overall mortality of COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 and its Challenges for the Healthcare System in Pakistan.

This article aims to highlight the healthcare issues raised by COVID-19 in Pakistan's scenario. Initially, Pakistan lacked "standard operating procedures," and the government had to ship testing kits from China and Japan. Moreover, due to violations of the lockdown and standard operating procedures (SOPs), the rapidly increasing number of cases created a burden on the healthcare system. More and more, this pandemic and its impact have grown. As vaccine development has not been successful yet, "herd immunity" can only be achieved if about three quarters of the population contract the virus-requiring immunocompromised citizens to be sacrificed for the sake of the country. Moreover, Pakistan has limited testing capacity, so most COVID-19 tests are missing their mark even as the virus spreads. The current scenario is also raising several concerns about the capacity of the government to tackle the prevailing healthcare crisis. In this regard, healthcare professionals suggest that the government must act responsibly to ensure better security provided to healthcare professionals. Identifying suspected cases, introducing personal protective equipment, and taking administrative measures to ensure that better security is provided to healthcare professionals are the needs of the hour to improve outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Testing, tracking, and lockdowns must be focused on areas where clusters are detected. The healthcare professionals must be given utmost protection before this pandemic could wreak havoc in terms of fatalities. Investing in the chronically underfunded healthcare system is needed, so that Pakistan can build capacity to fight the pandemic.