Effects of blood sampling stewardship and erythropoietin administration in extremely low birth weight infants-a quality improvement non-controlled before-and-after retrospective study.

The majority of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates receive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions; at least 50% receive multiple transfusions. Anemia care bundles could be the most effective approach to reduce transfusion rates. We conducted a quality improvement non-controlled before-and-after retrospective study involving 345 ELBW infants admitted over a 5-year period in two consecutive epochs before and after implementation of an anemia care bundle in January 2017. Bundle components included (a) prophylactic subcutaneous erythropoietin twice each week (600 IU/kg/week) from day 7 through 8 weeks of age and (b) blood sampling stewardship in the first five postnatal weeks. Early postnatal blood sampling losses were significantly reduced following the implementation of the care bundle (21.2 ml/kg vs 25 ml/kg, P < 0.001). We found a 50% reduction in the rate of multiple RBC transfusions (adjusted RR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34-0.59) and a reduced odds of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (4% vs 10%, adjusted OR 0.38 (95% CI: 0.15-0.78)) among infants that received the anemia care bundle (n = 182 infants). The overall transfusion rate, number and volume of transfusions, and multiple donor exposures were also significantly reduced.Conclusion: The combination of extended subcutaneous erythropoietin administration and reduced early postnatal blood sampling was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of multiple erythrocyte transfusions and NEC in ELBW neonates. What is known: • The majority of extremely low birth weight neonates continue to require blood transfusions despite advances in standardized transfusion practices; at least 50% require multiple transfusions. • Anemia care bundles, employing a combination of anemia prevention strategies, can effectively reduce the RBC transfusion rates in ELBW infants. What is new: • A combination of extended subcutaneous erythropoietin supplementation and blood sampling stewardship practices reduced the rate of multiple RBC transfusions in ELBW neonates by 50%. • Implementation of the anemia care bundle was associated with a significant reduction in the rates of necrotizing enterocolitis.

Montelukast versus budesonide as a first line preventive therapy in mild persistent asthma in 2 to 18 y.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of oral Montelukast and inhaled Budesonide as a first line preventive therapy in mild persistent asthma in age group 2-18 y. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled clinical study was conducted for 12 wk. Sixty patients of mild persistent asthma aged 2 to 18 y were randomly allocated to either oral Montelukast (n = 60) or inhaled Budesonide (n = 60) group. Outcomes measured were improvement in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced expiratory volume 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), day time and night time symptoms and frequency of exacerbations and need to change medications. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in PEFR, FEV1/FVC, day time and night time symptoms and frequency of exacerbations in both groups. However, more significant improvement in FEV1/FVC (CI 95 %, p = 0.029) and day time symptoms (CI 95 %, p = 0.002) was seen in Budesonide group compared to Montelukast group. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that oral Montelukast is not inferior to Budesonide in treatment of mild persistent asthma in 2 to 18 y children in terms of control of symptoms and improvement in pulmonary function tests over a 12 wk period. However, there was more significant improvement in day time symptoms, more significant increase in FEV1/FVC ratio and less exacerbation in patients receiving Budesonide compared to those receiving Montelukast. However, side effects due to long term use of steroids such as growth stunting and bone osteopenia should also be considered before recommending. Trial registered at CTRI no. REF/2012/09/004035.