Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the ID-Pain Questionnaire.

Background: The Identification Pain questionnaire (IDPQ) is one of the recommended tools by the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain for neuropathic pain screening. This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Persian version of the IDPQ. Methods: First, the IDPQ was translated based on the recommended guidelines. Afterward, the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), construct validity (compared to the Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4] questionnaire), and discriminant validity (Receiver operating curve analysis) of the IDPQ-P were evaluated. A total of 90 patients with neuropathic (n=50) and nociceptive pain (n=40) were enrolled in the study. In the next 72 h after the initial assessment, 30 patients (15 with neuropathic and 15 with nociceptive pain) completed the IDPQ-P. Results: No modifications were needed in the process of translation and cultural adaptation. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was obtained at 0.47 for all patients, indicating poor internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient was estimated at 0.97, showing excellent test-retest reliability. A high correlation was found between the DN4 questionnaire and IDPQ-P (0.74), showing acceptable construct validity. The area under the curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.99) when the physician's diagnosis and the DN4 cut-off value were used as the reference standard, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of ≥ 2 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (98%) and specificity (79%). Conclusion: The IDPQ-P can be used in the clinical setting as an accurate and quick screening tool to diagnose patients with neuropathic pain. Sufficient test-retest reliability, construct validity, discriminant validity, and high diagnostic accuracy were found for the IDPQ-P.

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the neuropathic pain questionnaire.

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Persian version of the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ-P). METHODS: We translated the NPQ to the Persian language based on the recommended guidelines. Measurement properties (internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), construct validity (compared to DN4 questionnaire), and discriminant ability (Receiver operating curve analysis)) of the NPQ-P were evaluated. A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: No modification was needed in the translation and cultural adaptation process. High Cronbach's alpha (0.81) and ICC (0.94) supported good reliability of the NPQ-P. The correlation coefficient between the NPQ-P and DN-4 questionnaires was 0.42, indicated moderate construct validity of the NPQ-P. The NPQ-P demonstrated acceptable discriminant ability (AUC: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66-0.84)). A total score of -0.3 indicated the highest Youden index with a corresponding sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.64 for the NPQ-P. CONCLUSION: The NPQ was successfully translated to the Persian language and indicated acceptable reliability, diagnostic accuracy, and discriminant ability. The NPQ-P can be used in a clinical setting adjunct to physical examinations and electrodiagnostic tests for a quick screening to distinguish between patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONNeuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) can be used for a quick screening to discriminate between patients with neuropathic and nociceptive pain.Persian version of the NPQ (NPQ-P) is a reliable and accurate tool with acceptable discriminant ability.The NPQ-P should be used in clinical setting adjunct to physical examinations and electrodiagnostic tests.

Factors associated with disability and pain intensity in patients with complex regional pain syndrome.

PURPOSE: To examine the associations between psychological factors (pain catastrophizing, pain-related anxiety, and fear of pain) and level of pain and disability in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). METHODS: One hundred and two patients with CRPS were recruited from tertiary care centers with the different upper limb injuries were evaluated for pain, disability, and psychological factors. Patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). The associations of pain and disability with presence of these behavioral and mental health factors were examined using bivariate and multivariable analyses. These models were adjusted for age, sex, injured dominant hand, and previous surgery. RESULTS: A higher pain catastrophizing score (ß = 0.55, p = 0.00) was associated with greater disability. A higher pain catastrophizing score (ß = 0.35, p = 0.001) and female gender (ß = 0.24, p = 0.01) were associated with greater pain at rest (PAR). A higher pain catastrophizing score and having a surgical history were associated with greater pain with movement (ß = 0.25, p = 0.02). Scores of ≥18.5 in PCS, ≥57.5 on TSK, and ≥15.5 on DASS were associated with higher risk of experiencing pain and disability. CONCLUSIONS: Pain catastrophizing, female sex, and surgical intervention are associated with poor outcomes. Physiologic, psychological factors, and treatment factors interact to influence outcomes. The results of this study further validate the associations of chronic pain and disability with pain catastrophizing in patients with CRPS. The novel finding of this study is introducing cut-off scores for TSK, PCS, and DASS as a screening tool to predict pain, functional limitations.Implication for rehabilitationPain catastrophizing has a vital role in the magnitude of disability and pain in patients with CRPS.The novel finding of this paper was the cut-off scores on the psychological evaluations that can enable using them as screening tool for bad outcomes in patients with CRPS.Cut off scores from different psychological evaluations can be used as a yellow flag for clinician's for detecting patients with increased risk of pain and disability.The identification of a cut-off can also have implications for implementing change in clinical practice by identifying the need for early and intensive interventions.