Phase II study of vemurafenib in children and young adults with tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations: NCI-COG pediatric MATCH trial (APEC1621) Arm G.

BACKGROUND: This is a phase II subprotocol of the NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH study evaluating vemurafenib, a selective oral inhibitor of BRAF V600 mutated kinase, in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations. METHODS: Patients received vemurafenib at 550 mg/m2 (maximum 960 mg/dose) orally twice daily for 28-day cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary aim was to determine the objective response rate and secondary objectives included estimating progression-free survival and assessing the tolerability of vemurafenib. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients matched to the subprotocol and 4 patients (18%) enrolled. Primary reasons for non-enrollment were ineligibility due to exclusions of low-grade glioma (nâ=â7) and prior BRAF inhibitor therapy (nâ=â7). Enrolled diagnoses were one each of histiocytosis, ameloblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, and high-grade glioma, all with BRAF V600E mutations. Treatment was overall tolerable with mostly expected grade 1/2 adverse events (AE). Grade 3 or 4 AE on treatment were acute kidney injury, hyperglycemia, and maculopapular rash. One patient came off therapy due to AE. One patient (glioma) had an objective partial response and remained on protocol therapy for 15 cycles. CONCLUSION: There was a low accrual rate on this MATCH subprotocol, with only 18% of those who matched with BRAFV600 mutations enrolling, resulting in early termination, and limiting study results (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03220035).

Recommendations for the collection and annotation of biosamples for analysis of biomarkers in neurofibromatosis and schwannomatosis clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis are characterized by potential lifelong morbidity and life-threatening complications. To date, however, diagnostic and predictive biomarkers are an unmet need in this patient population. The inclusion of biomarker discovery correlatives in neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis clinical trials enables study of low-incidence disease. The implementation of a common data model would further enhance biomarker discovery by enabling effective concatenation of data from multiple studies. METHODS: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis biomarker working group reviewed published data on emerging trends in neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis biomarker research and developed recommendations in a series of consensus meetings. RESULTS: Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising assay for neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis biomarker discovery and validation. In addition, we review recommendations for a range of biomarkers in clinical trials, neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis-specific data annotations, and common data models for data integration. CONCLUSION: These Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis consensus guidelines are intended to provide best practices for the inclusion of biomarker studies in neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis clinical trials, data, and sample annotation and to lay a framework for data harmonization and concatenation between trials.

Development and pilot validation of a novel disfigurement severity scale for plexiform neurofibromas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We developed an observer disfigurement severity scale for neurofibroma-related plexiform neurofibromas to assess change in plexiform neurofibroma-related disfigurement and evaluated its feasibility, reliability, and validity. METHODS: Twenty-eight raters, divided into four cohorts based on neurofibromatosis type 1 familiarity and clinical experience, were shown photographs of children in a clinical trial (NCT01362803) at baseline and 1 year on selumetinib treatment for plexiform neurofibromas (n = 20) and of untreated participants with plexiform neurofibromas (n = 4). Raters, blinded to treatment and timepoint, completed the 0-10 disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma on each image (0 = not at all disfigured, 10 = very disfigured). Raters evaluated the ease of completing the scale, and a subset repeated the procedure to assess intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: Mean baseline disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma ratings were similar for the selumetinib group (6.23) and controls (6.38). Mean paired differences between pre- and on-treatment ratings was -1.01 (less disfigurement) in the selumetinib group and 0.09 in the control (p = 0.005). For the disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma ratings, there was moderate-to-substantial agreement within rater cohorts (weighted kappa range = 0.46-0.66) and agreement between scores of the same raters at repeat sessions (p > 0.05). In the selumetinib group, change in disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma ratings was moderately correlated with change in plexiform neurofibroma volume with treatment (r = 0.60). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that our observer-rated disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma was feasible, reliable, and documented improvement in disfigurement in participants with plexiform neurofibroma shrinkage. Prospective studies in larger samples are needed to validate this scale further.

Outcome of Patients With Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Enrolled on Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration (SARC) Phase II Trials.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of prior phase II trials for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) may help develop more suitable trial endpoints in future studies. METHODS: We analyzed outcomes of patients with recurrent or unresectable/metastatic MPNST enrolled on prior Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC) phase II trials and estimated the progression-free survival (PFS). PFS from SARC006 (NCT00304083), the phase II trial of upfront chemotherapy in chemotherapy naïve patients, was analyzed separately. Impact of baseline enrollment characteristics on PFS was evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (29 male, 35 female, median age 39 years (range 15-81)) with MPNST were enrolled on 1 of 5 trials of single agent or combination therapy that were determined to be inactive. Patients had received a median of 1 (range 0-5) prior systemic therapy, and most had undergone prior surgery (77%) and radiation (61%). Seventy-three percent had metastatic disease at enrollment. Median PFS was 1.77 months (95% CI, 1.61-3.45), and the PFS rate at 4 months was 15%. Greater number of prior systemic therapies and worse performance status were associated with inferior PFS. There was no significant difference in PFS based on age at enrollment, treatment trial, response criteria, presence of metastatic disease, disease site at enrollment, and prior surgery or radiation. In comparison, on the SARC006 trial the PFS rate at 4 months was 94% in 40 patients. CONCLUSION: These data provide a historical baseline PFS that may be used as a comparator in future clinical trials for patients with MPNST.

Selumetinib in Children with Inoperable Plexiform Neurofibromas.

BACKGROUND: No approved therapies exist for inoperable plexiform neurofibromas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, phase 2 trial of selumetinib to determine the objective response rate among patients with plexiform neurofibromas and to assess clinical benefit. Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and symptomatic inoperable plexiform neurofibromas received oral selumetinib twice daily at a dose of 25 mg per square meter of body-surface area on a continuous dosing schedule (28-day cycles). Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcome assessments (pain, quality of life, disfigurement, and function) were performed at least every four cycles. Children rated tumor pain intensity on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). RESULTS: A total of 50 children (median age, 10.2 years; range, 3.5 to 17.4) were enrolled from August 2015 through August 2016. The most frequent neurofibroma-related symptoms were disfigurement (44 patients), motor dysfunction (33), and pain (26). A total of 35 patients (70%) had a confirmed partial response as of March 29, 2019, and 28 of these patients had a durable response (lasting ≥1 year). After 1 year of treatment, the mean decrease in child-reported tumor pain-intensity scores was 2 points, considered a clinically meaningful improvement. In addition, clinically meaningful improvements were seen in child-reported and parent-reported interference of pain in daily functioning (38% and 50%, respectively) and overall health-related quality of life (48% and 58%, respectively) as well as in functional outcomes of strength (56% of patients) and range of motion (38% of patients). Five patients discontinued treatment because of toxic effects possibly related to selumetinib, and 6 patients had disease progression. The most frequent toxic effects were nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea; an asymptomatic increase in the creatine phosphokinase level; acneiform rash; and paronychia. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 trial, most children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas had durable tumor shrinkage and clinical benefit from selumetinib. (Funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01362803.).

Phase 1 study of sorafenib and irinotecan in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib,an orally bioavailable, multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, have demonstrated activity in pediatric and adult malignancies. We evaluated the toxicity, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacogenomic (PGX) profile of sorafenib with irinotecan in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors and assessed the feasibility of incorporating patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures as an adjunct to traditional endpoints. METHODS: Sorafenib, continuous oral twice daily dosing, was administered with irinotecan, orally, once daily days 1-5, repeated every 21 days (NCT01518413). Based on tolerability, escalation of sorafenib followed by escalation of irinotecan was planned. Three patients were initially enrolled at each dose level. Sorafenib and irinotecan PK analyses were performed during cycle 1. PRO measurements were collected during cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were evaluable. Two of three patients at dose level 2 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), grade 3 diarrhea, and grade 3 hyponatremia. Therefore, dose level 1 was expanded to 12 patients and two patients had DLT, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 elevated lipase. Nine of 15 (60%) patients had a best response of stable disease with four patients receiving ≥6 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for pediatric patients was sorafenib 150 mg/m2 /dose twice daily with irinotecan 70 mg/m2 /dose daily × 5 days every 21 days. This oral outpatient regimen was well tolerated and resulted in prolonged disease stabilization. There were no significant alterations in the PK profile of either agent when administered in combination. Patients were willing and able to report their subjective experiences with this regimen.

Technology and precision therapy delivery in childhood cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe current advances in pediatric precision therapy through innovations in technology and engineering. A multimodal approach of chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiation therapy has improved survival outcomes for pediatric cancer but with significant early and late toxicities. The pediatric population is particularly vulnerable given their age during treatment. Advances in precision interventions discussed include image guidance, ablation techniques, radiation therapy and novel drug delivery mechanisms that offer the potential for more targeted approach approaches with improved efficacy while limiting acute and late toxicities. RECENT FINDINGS: Image-guidance provides improved treatment planning, real time monitoring and targeting when combined with ablative techniques and radiation therapy. Advances in drug delivery including radioisotopes, nanoparticles and antibody drug conjugates have shown benefit in adult malignancies with increasing use in pediatrics. These therapies alone and combined may lead to augmented local antitumor effect while sparing systemic exposure and potentially limiting early and late toxicities. SUMMARY: Pediatric cancer medicine often requires a multimodal approach, each with early and late toxicities. Precision interventions and therapies offer promise for more targeted approaches in treating pediatric malignancies and require further investigation to determine long-term benefit.

Are Current Technical Exclusion Criteria for Clinical Trials of Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Too Restrictive?: Early Experiences at a Pediatric Hospital.

Certain technical criteria must be met to ensure the treatment safety of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. We retrospectively reviewed how our enrollment criteria were applied from 2014 to 2017 in a clinical trial of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of recurrent malignant and locally aggressive benign solid tumors. Among the 36 screened patients between 2014 and 2017, more than one-third were excluded for technical exclusion criteria such as the anatomic location and proximity to prosthetics. Overall, patients were difficult to accrue for this trial, given the incidence of these tumors. To increase potential accrual, screening exclusion criteria could be more generalized and centered on the ability to achieve an acceptable treatment safety margin, rather than specifically excluding on the basis of general anatomic areas.

Activity of Selumetinib in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas.

BACKGROUND: Effective medical therapies are lacking for the treatment of neurofibromatosis type 1-related plexiform neurofibromas, which are characterized by elevated RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. METHODS: We conducted a phase 1 trial of selumetinib (AZD6244 or ARRY-142886), an oral selective inhibitor of MAPK kinase (MEK) 1 and 2, in children who had neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to evaluate plasma pharmacokinetics. Selumetinib was administered twice daily at a dose of 20 to 30 mg per square meter of body-surface area on a continuous dosing schedule (in 28-day cycles). We also tested selumetinib using a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1-related neurofibroma. Response to treatment (i.e., an increase or decrease from baseline in the volume of plexiform neurofibromas) was monitored by using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging analysis to measure the change in size of the plexiform neurofibroma. RESULTS: A total of 24 children (median age, 10.9 years; range, 3.0 to 18.5) with a median tumor volume of 1205 ml (range, 29 to 8744) received selumetinib. Patients were able to receive selumetinib on a long-term basis; the median number of cycles was 30 (range, 6 to 56). The maximum tolerated dose was 25 mg per square meter (approximately 60% of the recommended adult dose). The most common toxic effects associated with selumetinib included acneiform rash, gastrointestinal effects, and asymptomatic creatine kinase elevation. The results of pharmacokinetic evaluations of selumetinib among the children in this trial were similar to those published for adults. Treatment with selumetinib resulted in confirmed partial responses (tumor volume decreases from baseline of ≥20%) in 17 of the 24 children (71%) and decreases from baseline in neurofibroma volume in 12 of 18 mice (67%). Disease progression (tumor volume increase from baseline of ≥20%) has not been observed to date. Anecdotal evidence of decreases in tumor-related pain, disfigurement, and functional impairment was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our early-phase data suggested that children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas benefited from long-term dose-adjusted treatment with selumetinib without having excess toxic effects. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01362803 .).

2016 Children's Tumor Foundation conference on neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, and schwannomatosis.

Organized and hosted by the Children's Tumor Foundation (CTF), the Neurofibromatosis (NF) conference is the premier annual gathering for clinicians and researchers interested in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN). The 2016 edition constituted a blend of clinical and basic aspects of NF research that helped in clarifying different advances in the field. The incorporation of next generation sequencing is changing the way genetic diagnostics is performed for NF and related disorders, providing solutions to problems like genetic heterogeneity, overlapping clinical manifestations, or the presence of mosaicism. The transformation from plexiform neurofibroma (PNF) to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is being clarified, along with new management and treatments for benign and premalignant tumors. Promising new cellular and in vivo models for understanding the musculoskeletal abnormalities in NF1, the development of NF2 or SWN associated schwannomas, and clarifying the cells that give rise to NF1-associated optic pathway glioma were presented. The interaction of neurofibromin and SPRED1 was described comprehensively, providing functional insight that will help in the interpretation of pathogenicity of certain missense variants identified in NF1 and Legius syndrome patients. Novel promising imaging techniques are being developed, as well as new integrative and holistic management models for patients that take into account psychological, social, and biological factors. Importantly, new therapeutic approaches for schwannomas, meningiomas, ependymomas, PNF, and MPNST are being pursued. This report highlights the major advances that were presented at the 2016 CTF NF conference.

A phase 1 study of cabozantinib in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory solid tumors, including CNS tumors: Trial ADVL1211, a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary activity of cabozantinib in children with refractory or relapsed solid tumors. METHODS: Patients received cabozantinib tablets on a continuous dosing schedule in a rolling-six escalating phase 1 trial design. PK and PD studies were performed. RESULTS: Forty-one patients, median (range) age 13 (4-18) years, received cabozantinib to achieve a weekly cumulative dose equivalent to 30 (n = 6), 40 (n = 23). or 55 (n = 12) mg/m2 /day. At 40 mg/m2 /d, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, mucositis, and elevated alanine aminotransferase, lipase, and bilirubin. At 55 mg/m2 /d, hypertension, reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome, headache, fatigue, and proteinuria were DLTs. Frequent non-DLTs included diarrhea, hypothyroidism, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, elevated hepatic transaminases, and proteinuria. In subsequent cycles, DLTs occurred at all dose levels. Across all dose levels, the steady-state exposure and peak cabozantinib concentrations were similar. Four patients experienced a confirmed partial response: medullary thyroid cancer (MTC; n = 2), Wilms tumor, and clear cell sarcoma. Stable disease (>6 cycles) was seen in seven patients (MTC [n = 2], Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, paraganglioma, and ependymoma). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol-defined MTD was not reached; DLTs and dose reductions for toxicity occurred in the first and subsequent cycles at all dose levels. Based on the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and responses, the recommended dose of cabozantinib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors is 40 mg/m2 /day. A phase 2 study of cabozantinib is being conducted.

Technical aspects of osteoid osteoma ablation in children using MR-guided high intensity focussed ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a painful bone tumour occurring in children and young adults. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided high intensity focussed ultrasound (MR-HIFU) allows non-invasive treatment without ionising radiation exposure, in contrast to the current standard of care treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This report describes technical aspects of MR-HIFU ablation in the first 8 paediatric OO patients treated in a safety and feasibility clinical trial (total enrolment of up to 12 patients). MATERIALS AND METHODS: OO lesions and adjacent periosteum were treated with MR-HIFU ablation in 5-20 sonications (sonication duration = 16-48 s, frequency = 1.2 MHz, acoustic power = 20-160 W). Detailed treatment workflow, patient positioning and coupling strategies, as well as temperature and tissue perfusion changes were summarised and correlated. RESULTS: MR-HIFU ablation was feasible in all eight cases. Ultrasound standoff pads were shaped to conform to extremity contours providing acoustic coupling and aided patient positioning. The energy delivered was 10 ± 7 kJ per treatment, raising maximum temperature to 83 ± 3 °C. Post ablation contrast-enhanced MRI showed ablated volumes ranging 0.46-19.4 cm3 extending further into bone (7 ± 4 mm) than into soft tissue (4 ± 6 mm, p = 0.01, Mann-Whitney). Treatment time ranged 30-86 min for sonication and 160 ± 40 min for anaesthesia. No serious treatment-related adverse events were observed. Complete pain relief with no medication occurred in 7/8 patients within 28 days following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: MR-HIFU ablation of painful OO appears technically feasible in children and it may become a non-invasive and radiation-free alternative for painful OO. Therapy success, efficiency, and applicability may be improved through specialised equipment designed more specifically for extremity bone ablation.

Mechanical fractionation of tissues using microsecond-long HIFU pulses on a clinical MR-HIFU system.

PURPOSE: High intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) can non-invasively treat tumours with minimal or no damage to intervening tissues. While continuous-wave HIFU thermally ablates target tissue, the effect of hundreds of microsecond-long pulsed sonications is examined in this work. The objective of this study was to characterise sonication parameter-dependent thermomechanical bioeffects to provide the foundation for future preclinical studies and facilitate clinical translation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Acoustic power, number of cycles/pulse, sonication time and pulse repetition frequency (PRF) were varied on a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided HIFU (MR-HIFU) system. Ex vivo porcine liver, kidney and cardiac muscle tissue samples were sonicated (3 × 3 grid pattern, 1 mm spacing). Temperature, thermal dose and T2 relaxation times were quantified using MRI. Lesions were histologically analysed using H&E and vimentin stains for lesion structure and viability. RESULTS: Thermomechanical HIFU bioeffects produced distinct types of fractionated tissue lesions: solid/thermal, paste-like and vacuolated. Sonications at 20 or 60 Hz PRF generated substantial tissue damage beyond the focal region, with reduced viability on vimentin staining, whereas H&E staining indicated intact tissue. Same sonication parameters produced dissimilar lesions in different tissue types, while significant differences in temperature, thermal dose and T2 were observed between the parameter sets. CONCLUSION: Clinical MR-HIFU system was utilised to generate distinct types of lesions and to produce targeted thermomechanical bioeffects in ex vivo tissues. The results guide HIFU research on thermomechanical tissue bioeffects, inform future studies and advice sonication parameter selection for direct tumour ablation or immunomodulation using a clinical MR-HIFU system.

Comparison of Noninvasive High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound with Radiofrequency Ablation of Osteoid Osteoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical feasibility and safety of magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatment of symptomatic osteoid osteoma and to compare clinical response with standard of care treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Nine subjects with radiologically confirmed, symptomatic osteoid osteoma were treated with MR-HIFU in an institutional review board-approved clinical trial. Treatment feasibility and safety were assessed. Clinical response was evaluated in terms of analgesic requirement, visual analog scale pain score, and sleep quality. Anesthesia, procedure, and recovery times were recorded. This MR-HIFU group was compared with a historical control group of 9 consecutive patients treated with radiofrequency ablation. RESULTS: Nine subjects (7 male, 2 female; 16 ± 6 years) were treated with MR-HIFU without technical difficulties or any serious adverse events. There was significant decrease in their median pain scores 4 weeks within treatment (6 vs 0, P < .01). Total pain resolution and cessation of analgesics were achieved in 8 of 9 patients after 4 weeks. In the radiofrequency ablation group, 9 patients (8 male, 1 female; 10 ± 6 years) were treated in routine clinical practice. All 9 demonstrated complete pain resolution and cessation of medications by 4 weeks with a significant decrease in median pain scores (9 vs 0, P < .001). One developed a second-degree skin burn, but there were no other adverse events. Procedure times and treatment charges were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This pilot study shows that MR-HIFU treatment of osteoid osteoma refractory to medical therapy is feasible and can be performed safely in pediatric patients. Clinical response is comparable with standard of care treatment but without any incisions or exposure to ionizing radiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT02349971.

Patient/parent perspectives on genomic tumor profiling of pediatric solid tumors: The Individualized Cancer Therapy (iCat) experience.

BACKGROUND: Genomic tumor profiling (GTP) plays an important role in the care of many adult cancer patients. Its role in pediatric oncology is still evolving, with only a subset of patients currently expected to receive clinically significant results. Little is known about perspectives of pediatric oncology patients/parents on GTP. PROCEDURE: We surveyed individuals who previously underwent GTP through the iCat (Individualized Cancer Therapy) pilot study of molecular profiling in children with relapsed, refractory, and high-risk solid tumors at four pediatric cancer centers. Following return of profiling results, a cross-sectional survey was offered to the patient, if he or she was 18 years or older at enrollment, or parent, if he or she was under 18 years of age. Forty-five surveys (85% response) were completed. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent (39/44) of respondents reported hoping participation would help find cures for future patients, while 59% (26/44) hoped it would increase their/their child's chance of cure. Most had few concerns about GTP, but 12% (5/43) worried they would learn their/their child's cancer was less treatable or more aggressive than previously thought. Sixty-four percent (29/45) reported feeling their participation had helped others and 44% (20/45) felt they had helped themselves/their own child, despite only one substudy subject receiving targeted therapy matched to GTP findings. Fifty-four percent (21/39) wished to receive all available profiling data, including findings unrelated to cancer and of unclear significance. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in pediatric GTP research perceive benefits of GTP to themselves and others, but expectations of personal benefits of GTP may exceed actual positive impact. These issues warrant consideration during consent discussions about GTP research participation.

Phase 2 trial of sorafenib in children and young adults with refractory solid tumors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is an oral small molecule inhibitor of multiple kinases controlling tumor growth and angiogenesis. The purpose of the phase 2 study was to determine the response rate of sorafenib and gain further information on the associated toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sorafenib in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory tumors including rhabdomyosarcoma, Wilms tumor, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). PROCEDURE: Sorafenib, 200 mg/m(2) /dose, was administered every 12 hr continuously for 28 day cycles using a two-stage design in two primary strata (rhabdomyosarcoma and Wilms tumor) and two secondary strata (HCC and PTC). Correlative studies in consenting patients included determination of sorafenib steady state trough concentrations and assessments of VEGF and sVEGFR2. RESULTS: Twenty patients (median age of 11 years; range, 5-21) enrolled. No objective responses (RECIST) were observed in the 10 evaluable patients enrolled in each of the two primary disease strata of rhabdomyosarcoma and Wilms tumor. No patients with HCC or PTC were enrolled. Sorafenib was not associated with an excessive rate of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The mean ± SD steady state concentration during cycle 1 day 15 was 6.5 ± 3.9 µg/ml (n = 10). CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib was well tolerated in children at 200 mg/m(2) /dose twice daily on a continuous regimen with toxicity profile and steady state drug concentrations similar to those previously reported. Single agent sorafenib was inactive in children with recurrent or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma or Wilms tumor.

Phase 1 trial and pharmacokinetic study of the oral platinum analog satraplatin in children and young adults with refractory solid tumors including brain tumors.

BACKGROUND: Based on pre-clinical and clinical activity in adult refractory tumors, and absence of significant neuro-, nephro-, or oto-toxicity, we conducted a pediatric phase 1 trial to determine the toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of satraplatin, an oral platinum analogue, in children and young adults with refractory solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Satraplatin was administered orally once daily on days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle at dose level (DL) 1 (60 mg/m(2) /dose), and DL2 (80 mg/m(2) /dose). Toxicities, responses, satraplatin pharmacokinetics, and pharmacogenomic expression of specific DNA repair genes were evaluated. RESULTS: Nine patients received 1-15 cycles (median = 2). The MTD was exceeded at DL2 with delayed prolonged myelosuppression as dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 2/4 patients. At DL1, 0/5 patients had DLTs. Common non-DLTs included myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicities, fatigue, headache, liver enzyme elevation, and electrolyte abnormalities. No significant neuro-, nephro-, or oto-toxicity was observed. No objective responses were observed but 2 patients experienced prolonged disease stabilization (---6-15 cycles). Satraplatin exposure (day 1 plasma ultrafiltrate area under the curve) was similar at DL1 and DL2. A strong correlation between estimated creatinine clearance and satraplatin pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance, area under the curve, and peak concentration) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of oral satraplatin in children with solid tumors was 60 mg/m(2) /dose daily ×5 days every 28 days, which is lower than the adult recommended dose of 80-120 mg/m(2) /dose. The toxicity profile was similar to adults and delayed myelosuppression was the DLT. No significant neuro-, nephro- or oto-toxicities were observed.

Current treatment options for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas characterized by high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. The only known curative therapy is complete resection. Adjuvant radiation is recommended for larger lesions or those with more aggressive histology. Given the dismal prognosis in tumors that cannot be cured by surgery alone and the lack of systemic therapy with proven benefit, targeted therapies based on knowledge of activation of the Ras pathway and downstream effectors have been trialed in MPNST, thus far without proven benefit. However, novel or combination therapies based on recent preclinical advances are highly desirable and are the subject of ongoing clinical trials.

Early detection of malignant and pre-malignant peripheral nerve tumors using cell-free DNA fragmentomics.

Early detection of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNST) informs clinical decision-making, potentially averting deadly outcomes. Here, we describe a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentomic approach which distinguishes non-malignant, pre-malignant and malignant forms of NF1 PNST. Using plasma samples from a novel cohort of 101 NF1 patients and 21 healthy controls, we validated that our previous cfDNA copy number alteration (CNA)-based approach identifies malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) but cannot distinguish among benign and premalignant states. We therefore investigated the ability of fragment-based cfDNA features to differentiate NF1-associated tumors including binned genome-wide fragment length ratios, end motif analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization deconvolution of fragment lengths. Fragmentomic methods were able to differentiate pre-malignant states including atypical neurofibromas (AN). Fragmentomics also adjudicated AN cases suspicious for MPNST, correctly diagnosing samples noninvasively, which could have informed clinical management. Overall, this study pioneers the early detection of malignant and premalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in NF1 patients using plasma cfDNA fragmentomics. In addition to screening applications, this novel approach distinguishes atypical neurofibromas from benign plexiform neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, enabling more precise clinical diagnosis and management.

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in children with neurofibromatosis type I and plexiform neurofibromas.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib targets multiple pathways thought to be crucial in growth of plexiform neurofibroma (PN) in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Sorafenib has been tolerated with manageable toxicities in adults and children with refractory cancer. We conducted a separate study in this population. Monitoring long-term toxicities such as effects on growth and obtaining additional pharmacokinetic data were of importance due to the young age and long duration of therapy seen in previous phase I trials in children with NF1. PROCEDURE: Children ≥3 and ≤18-year-old with NF1 and inoperable PN were eligible. Sorafenib was administered orally twice daily for consecutive 28-day cycles. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined from toxicities observed during the first three cycles. RESULTS: Nine children enrolled, median age 8 (6-12) years. At the starting 115 mg/m(2) /dose (n = 5), two experienced dose-limiting grade 3 pain in their PN. At the de-escalated 80 mg/m(2) /dose (n = 4), approximately 40% of the pediatric solid tumor MTD, two had dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 rash and grade 4 mood alteration), exceeding the MTD. At 80 mg/m(2) /dose, the median AUC(0-12 hours) at steady-state was 39.5 µg hours/ml. Toxicities appeared to correspond with decreases in quality of life (QOL). No tumor shrinkage was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Children with NF1 and PN did not tolerate sorafenib at doses substantially lower than the MTD in children and adults with malignant solid tumors. Future trials with targeted agents for children with NF1 may require a more conservative starting dose and separate definitions of dose limiting toxicities (DLT) than children with cancer.