High-dose versus standard-dose radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in stages II-III esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the effects of radiotherapy ≥60 Gy in the setting of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for treating patients with Stages II-III esophageal cancer. METHODS: A total of 126 patients treated with 5-fluorouracilbased concurrent chemo-radiotherapy between January 1998 and February 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 49 received a total radiation dose of <60 Gy (standard-dose group), while 77 received a total radiation dose of ≥60 Gy (high-dose group). The median doses in the standard- and high-dose groups were 54 Gy (range, 45-59.4 Gy) and 63 Gy (range, 60-81 Gy), respectively. RESULTS: The high-dose group showed significantly improved locoregional control (2-year locoregional control rate, 69 versus 32%, P < 0.01) and progression-free survival (2-year progression-free survival, 47 versus 20%, P = 0.01) than the standard-dose group. Median overall survival in the high- and the standard-dose groups was 28 and 18 months, respectively (P = 0.26). In multivariate analysis, 60 Gy or higher radiotherapy was a significant prognostic factor for improved locoregional control, progression-free survival and overall survival. No significant differences were found in frequencies of late radiation pneumonitis, post-treatment esophageal stricture or treatment-related mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose radiotherapy of 60 Gy or higher with concurrent chemotherapy improved locoregional control and progression-free survival without a significant increase of in treatment-related toxicity in patients with Stages II-III esophageal cancer. Our study could provide the basis for future randomized clinical trials.

IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: plan evaluation and treatment outcome.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the outcome of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 53 consecutive nasopharyngeal cancer patients who received definitive treatment using intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost and cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. Forty-six patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation and seven patients with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiation. The gross tumor (PTV(70)) received 69.96 Gy (2.12 Gy/fraction), high-risk subclinical disease (PTV(60)) received 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) and low-risk subclinical disease (PTV(56)) received 56.1 Gy (1.7 Gy/fraction) in 33 fractions. Twenty-eight patients were treated with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy and 25 patients with helical tomotherapy. Dosimetric parameters were compared between the two modalities. RESULTS: The median treatment duration was 49 days (range: 41-65 days). The complete response rate was 92.5%. Three local, two regional, one locoregional and seven distant failures were observed. With the median follow-up of 41 months (range: 8-89 months), the 3- and 5-year local control, locoregional control, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 91.8 and 91.8%; 87.6 and 87.6%; 77.5 and 70.5%; and 86.4 and 82.1%, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis, dermatitis, leucopenia and grade 4 leucopenia were observed in 10, 1, 2 and 1 patient, respectively. No grade 3 or higher xerostomia occurred. Helical tomotherapy significantly improved dosimetric parameters including the maximum dose, volume receiving >107% of the prescribed dose and uniformity index (D(5)/D(95)). CONCLUSIONS: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost with concurrent chemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment modality for nasopharyngeal cancer. Helical tomotherapy has a dosimetric advantage over step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy in a clinical setting.

Is there a clinical benefit to adaptive planning during tomotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer at risk for xerostomia?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the necessity of adaptive planning in helical tomotherapy (TOMO) for head and neck cancer in terms of dosimetric influence on the parotid gland. METHODS: Thirty-one patients underwent curative TOMO for head and neck cancer from April 2006 to April 2007. For each patient, neck diameter was monitored together with body weight at first cervical spine level through mega-voltage computed tomography during the TOMO course. Ten of 31 patients, with significant weight loss (>5%) and/or neck diameter decrease (>10%), were selected for dosimetric analysis, and parotid dose was recalculated at the fourth and last week of TOMO. Xerostomia was estimated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS: The median dose was 69.96 Gy (range, 54 to 69.96 Gy) and there was no grade 3 or greater complication. Ten patients with significant neck diameter decrease and/or weight loss showed frequent grade 2 acute xerostomia (P=0.02). The volume percentage of daily fractional dose over 0.75 Gy for the parotid gland (V0.75 Gy) increased by 23.6% at the end of TOMO. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with significant anatomic contour change; neck diameter decrease (>10%) or weight loss (>5%), adaptive planning using mega-voltage computed tomography can identify dosimetric changes and reduce deleterious side effects such as xerostomia.