RESUMO
Background: In addition to cognitive impairment, people with Alzheimer's disease (PWAD) experience neuropsychiatric symptoms (e.g., apathy, depression), altered gait, and poor balance that further diminish their quality of life (QoL). Here, we describe a unique, randomized, controlled trial to test the hypothesis that both movement and social engagement aspects of a group dance intervention alter the connectivity of key brain networks involved in motor and social-emotional functioning and lead to improved QoL in PWAD. Methods: IMOVE (NCT03333837) was a single-center, randomized, controlled 2x2 factorial trial that assigned PWAD/caregiver dyads to one of 4 study conditions (Movement Group, Movement Alone, Social Group, or Usual Care control). The Movement Group participated in twice-weekly group improvisational dance (IMPROVment® Method) classes for 12 weeks. The Movement Alone intervention captured the same dance movement and auditory stimuli as the group class without social interaction, and the Social Group used improvisational party games to recapitulate the fun and playfulness of the Movement Group without the movement. The primary outcome was change in QoL among PWAD. Key secondary outcomes were functional brain network measures assessed using graph-theory analysis of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans, as well as neuropsychiatric symptoms, gait, and balance. Results: A total of 111 dyads were randomized; 89 completed the study, despite interruption and modification of the protocol due to COVID-19 restrictions (see companion paper by Fanning et al.). The data are being analyzed and will be submitted for publication in 2023.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A primary etiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is currently unknown, but poor postural control of the spinal extensor musculature has been identified as an AIS risk factor. Identifiable postural differences would aid in advancing the precise postural behaviors that should be modified during Physiotherapy Scoliosis Specific Exercise (PSSE) to help limit the progression of AIS. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are there any determinable differences in lumbopelvic posture or range of motion between subjects with AIS and controls? METHODS: This prospective cohort pilot study consisted of 53 subjects (27 AIS and 26 control) aged 11-17 years. Subjects had their lumbopelvic posture assessed and monitored using the ViMove DorsaVi sensor package. All subjects underwent a live assessment to obtain initial lumbopelvic (LP) range of motion (ROM) measurements. Subjects were then monitored while continuing with normal activities of daily living (ADLs) for 12 h. With an alpha level of 0.05, nonparametric analyses were performed for each variable via a Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: During the live assessment, controls exhibited a significantly greater anterior pelvic tilt ROM in the sitting position than the AIS group (p = 0.0433). When compared to female controls, females with AIS had a sitting pelvic tilt ROM that was significantly more retroverted (p = 0.0232) and less anteverted (p = 0.0010). During ADLs, female controls exhibited a higher total number of extension events than their female with AIS (p = 0.0263). These associations did not strengthen with greater spinal deformity. SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates postural differences between patients with AIS and controls. Further study is necessary to determine why patients with AIS adopt these postures, and if PSSEs can be utilized to limit the progression of AIS.