Lantern-type dinickel complexes: An exploration of possibilities for nickel-nickel bonding with bridging bidentate ligands.

Many binuclear nickel complexes have NiNi distances suggesting NiNi covalent bonds, including lantern-type complexes with bridging bidentate ligands. This DFT study treats tetragonal, trigonal, and digonal lantern-type complexes with the formamidinate, guanidinate, and formate ligands, besides some others. Formal bond orders (ranging from zero to two) are assigned to all the NiNi bonds on the basis of MO occupancy considerations. A VB-based electron counting approach assigns plausible resonance structures to the dinickel cores. Model tetragonal complexes with the dimethylformamidinate and the dithioformate ligands have singlet ground states whose non-covalently bonded NiNi distances are close to those in their experimentally known counterparts. Trigonal dinickel complexes are unknown, but are predicted to have quartet ground states with NiNi bonds of order 0.5. The model digonal complexes are predicted to have triplet ground states, but the predicted NiNi bond lengths are longer than those found in their experimentally known counterparts. This could owe to inadequate treatment of electron correlation by DFT in these short NiNi bonds with their multiconfigurational character. All the NiNi bond distances here are categorized into ranges according to the NiNi bond orders of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2, no NiNi bonds of order higher than two being identified. The NiNi bonds of given order in these lantern-type complexes are consistently shorter than the corresponding NiNi bonds in dinickel complexes having carbonyl ligands, attributable to the metalmetal bond lengthening effect of CO ligands.

Polyhedral Dicobaltadithiaboranes and Dicobaltdiselenaboranes as Examples of Bimetallic Nido Structures without Bridging Hydrogens.

The geometries and energetics of the n-vertex polyhedral dicobaltadithiaboranes and dicobaltadiselenaboranes Cp2Co2E2Bn-4Hn-4 (E = S, Se; n = 8 to 12) have been investigated via the density functional theory. Most of the lowest-energy structures in these systems are generated from the (n + 1)-vertex most spherical closo deltahedra by removal of a single vertex, leading to a tetragonal, pentagonal, or hexagonal face depending on the degree of the vertex removed. In all of these low-energy structures, the chalcogen atoms are located at the vertices of the non-triangular face. Alternatively, the central polyhedron in most of the 12-vertex structures can be derived from a Co2E2B8 icosahedron with adjacent chalcogen (E) vertices by breaking the E-E edge and 1 or more E-B edges to create a hexagonal face. Examples of the arachno polyhedra with two tetragonal and/or pentagonal faces derived from the removal of two vertices from isocloso deltahedra were found among the set of lowest-energy Cp2Co2E2Bn-4Hn-4 (E = S, Se; n = 8 and 12) structures.

Tris(Butadiene) Compounds versus Butadiene Oligomerization in Second-Row Transition Metal Chemistry: Effects of Increased Ligand Fields.

The geometries, energetics, and preferred spin states of the second-row transition metal tris(butadiene) complexes (C4H6)3M (M = Zr-Pd) and their isomers, including the experimentally known very stable molybdenum derivative (C4H6)3Mo, have been examined by density functional theory. Such low-energy structures are found to have low-spin singlet and doublet spin states in contrast to the corresponding derivatives of the first-row transition metals. The three butadiene ligands in the lowest-energy (C4H6)3M structures of the late second-row transition metals couple to form a C12H18 ligand that binds to the central metal atom as a hexahapto ligand for M = Pd but as an octahapto ligand for M = Rh and Ru. However, the lowest-energy (C4H6)3M structures of the early transition metals have three separate tetrahapto butadiene ligands for M = Zr, Nb, and Mo or two tetrahapto butadiene ligands and one dihapto butadiene ligand for M = Tc. The low energy of the experimentally known singlet (C4H6)3Mo structure contrasts with the very high energy of its experimentally unknown singlet chromium (C4H6)3Cr analog relative to quintet (C12H18)Cr isomers with an open-chain C12H18 ligand.

Empty versus filled polyhedra: 11 vertex bare germanium clusters.

The structures and energetics of centered 10-vertex Ge@Ge10(z) (z = -4, -2, 0, +2, +4) clusters have been investigated by density functional theory (DFT) for comparison with the previously studied isomeric empty 11-vertex Ge11(z) clusters. For the cationic species (z = +2, +4) such centered Ge@Ge10(z) structures are shown to be energetically competitive (within ∼1 kcal mol⁻¹) to the lowest energy isomeric empty Ge11(z) structures. These Ge@Ge10(z) structures can be derived from the lowest energy empty 10-vertex Ge10(z-4) structures by inserting a Ge4⁺ ion in the center. The outer 10-vertex polyhedron in the lowest energy Ge@Ge10²âº dication structure is the most spherical D(4d) bicapped square antiprism, which is also the lowest energy structure of the empty Ge10²â» dianion, as expected from the Wade-Mingos skeletal electron counting rules. For the tetracationic Ge114⁺ /Ge@Ge104⁺ system the lowest energy centered Ge@Ge104⁺ structure can be obtained by inserting a Ge4⁺ ion in the center of a C(3v) deltahedral empty Ge10 cluster. Centered 10-vertex polyhedral Ge@Ge10(z) structures were also found for the neutral (z = 0) and dianionic (z = -2) systems but at significantly higher energies than the lowest energy isomeric empty Ge11(z) structures.