Conversion of Failed J-Pouch to Kock Pouch: Indications, Contraindications, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The IPAA has been successful in restoring intestinal continuity and preserving continence in the majority of patients requiring a proctocolectomy. However, a subset of individuals experience significant complications that might result in pouch failure. The conversion of the J-pouch to a continent ileostomy pouch represents a significant surgical procedure. In this article, we discuss the indications and contraindications, present the technical principles applied for the conversion, and describe the outcomes of such conversion in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The main objective during the conversion of the J-pouch to a continent ileostomy is the creation of a sufficiently sized reservoir with a high-quality valve mechanism while preserving as much small bowel as possible. CONCLUSIONS: The conversion of the J-pouch to a continent ileostomy represents a significant surgical procedure. When performed in centers of expertise, it can be a good option for patients who otherwise will require an end ileostomy. Indications for conversion include most cases of J-pouch failure, with a few important exceptions. See video from symposium .

Role of Microbiome in the Outcomes Following Surgical Repair of Perianal Fistula: Prospective Cohort Study Design and Preliminary Results.

BACKGROUND: Anal fistulae are common, predominantly cryptoglandular, and almost invariably require surgical treatment. Recurrences are common for procedures other than fistulotomy regardless of technique and adequacy of repair. Growing evidence supports the pivotal role of specific intestinal bacteria in anastomotic failures after bowel resection. Anal crypts harbor colonic microbiota suggesting that similar mechanisms to anastomotic healing might prevail after anal fistula repair and hence influence healing. This study aims at assessing the potential role of the intestinal microbiome in the clinical outcomes after surgical repair of cryptoglandular anal fistula. METHODS: This is a pilot prospective cohort study enrolling patients with anal fistula undergoing endoanal advancement flap. For microbiome analysis, stool samples are taken via rectal swab before the procedure; additionally, a portion of the fistula is collected intraoperatively after fistulectomy. Samples from groups with treatment failure are compared to samples from patients who healed after surgical repair. Alpha and beta diversities and differential abundance of microbial taxa are determined and compared between groups with DADA2 analytical pipeline. RESULTS: Five patients have been enrolled to date (one female, four male). At median follow-up of 6 months (2-11), one patient experienced disease recurrence at 3 months. DNA from the 5 rectal swab and tissue samples was extracted, showing increased relative abundance of Enterococcus faecalis in samples from the patient who developed a recurrent fistula but not in those without recurrence. CONCLUSION: These very preliminary data suggest that intestinal microbiome may represent a crucial determinant of the surgical outcomes after anal fistula surgery.

Feasibility and Safety of Ambulatory Surgery as the Next Management Paradigm in Colorectal Resection Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Current clinical dogma favors universal inpatient admission after colorectal resection particularly in the presence of an anastomosis. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the feasibility and safety of ambulatory surgery in carefully selected patients undergoing colorectal resection/anastomosis. METHODS: Between October 2020 and October 2021, all patients undergoing colorectal resection/anastomosis meeting specific criteria {no major comorbidity [American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) <4], not on therapeutic anticoagulation, compliant patient/family} were counseled preoperatively for ambulatory surgery (discharge <24 h postsurgery). Complicated surgery (ileoanal pouch, enterocutaneous fistula repair, reoperative pelvic surgery, multiple resections) and/or ostomy creation (loop/end ileostomy, Hartmann's, abdominoperineal resection) were exclusions. Discharge was at 6 to 8 hours postoperatively if all predetermined factors (no ostomy teaching needed, ambulating comfortably, tolerating diet, stable vitals, and blood-work) were met and patients were willing, or was postponed to the next day at patient request. All discharged patients received phone checks the next day with the option also given for voluntary readmission if inpatient care was preferred by patient. Patients discharged <24 hours postop (AmbC) were compared to those staying on as inpatients admitted (InpC) and also to a comparable historical (October 2019-October 2020) group when ambulatory surgery was not offered (HistC). RESULTS: Of 184 abdominal colorectal surgery patients, 97 had complicated colorectal resection and/or ostomy. Of the remaining 87, 29 (33.3%) were discharged <24 hours postoperatively [7 (24%) patients at 8 h]. Of these 29 AmbC patients, 4 were readmitted <30 days (ileus: 1, rectal bleeding: 2, nausea/vomiting: 1), 1 readmission was on first postdischarge day, none were voluntary post phone-check. AmbC and InpC (n=58) had similar age, sex, race, body mass index, and comorbidity. InpC had greater estimated blood loss (109 vs 34 mL, P <0.001) while length of stay was expectedly significantly longer (109 vs 17 hours, P <0.001). There was no mortality in either group. AmbC and InpC had similar readmission, reoperation, anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infection. Mean length of stay for HistC was 83 hours. AmbC and HistC had similar age, sex, race, body mass index, and ASA class. Complications including readmission, reoperation, anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infection were also similar for AmbC and HistC. CONCLUSIONS: With careful patient selection, preoperative education, perioperative management, and postoperative follow-up, ambulatory surgery is feasible in up to a third of patients undergoing colorectal resection/anastomosis and can be performed with comparable safety to the time-honored practice of routine inpatient hospitalization. Refinements in inclusion/exclusion criteria and postoperative outpatient follow-up will allow a paradigm shift in how such patients are managed, which has huge implications for patient experience, care-giver workload and health care finances.

Association Between Portal Vein Thrombosis and Pouchitis in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication in patients requiring colectomy ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with medically refractory ulcerative colitis or colitis-associated neoplasia. A previous small case series suggests associated between portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and ischemic pouchitis. AIM: To evaluate the association between PVT and other demographic and clinical factors and pouchitis. METHODS: We used Explorys Inc., a population-based database, to search medical records between 1999 and 2020 with SNOMED-CT code criteria for "construction of pouch" and "ileal pouchitis." Patients with pouchitis were compared to those with previous pouch construction without pouchitis. Factors associated with pouchitis identified with univariable analysis were introduced into a multivariable model. A post hoc analysis further stratified demographical findings of the association between PVT and pouchitis. RESULTS: We identified 7900 patients with ileal pouchitis (7.5%) and 97,510 with pouch construction without pouchitis. In multivariate binary logistic regression, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the risk of pouchitis in patients with PVT was 10.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.04-16.49, P < 0.001). Other significant factors associated with pouchitis included male gender (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21, P = 0.018), deep vein thrombosis (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.72, P < 0.001), and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28-1.45, P < 0.001). Smoking was a protective factor (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.33-0.36, P < 0.001). Further sub-analysis showed a higher prevalence of younger patients with PVT and pouchitis. CONCLUSIONS: We report PVT as an independent risk factor associated with pouchitis. Our findings support that PVT is a potentially manageable perioperative complication, and intervention may reduce the risk of pouchitis.

Impact of Intraoperative Data on Risk Prediction for Mortality After Intra-Abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Risk prediction models for postoperative mortality after intra-abdominal surgery have typically been developed using preoperative variables. It is unclear if intraoperative data add significant value to these risk prediction models. METHODS: With IRB approval, an institutional retrospective cohort of intra-abdominal surgery patients in the 2005 to 2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was identified. Intraoperative data were obtained from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We evaluated the performance of machine learning algorithms to predict 30-day mortality using: 1) baseline variables and 2) baseline + intraoperative variables. Algorithms evaluated were: 1) logistic regression with elastic net selection, 2) random forest (RF), 3) gradient boosting machine (GBM), 4) support vector machine (SVM), and 5) convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC). The sample was randomly divided into a training/testing split with 80%/20% probabilities. Repeated 10-fold cross-validation identified the optimal model hyperparameters in the training dataset for each model, which were then applied to the entire training dataset to train the model. Trained models were applied to the test cohort to evaluate model performance. Statistical significance was evaluated using P < .05. RESULTS: The training and testing cohorts contained 4322 and 1079 patients, respectively, with 62 (1.4%) and 15 (1.4%) experiencing 30-day mortality, respectively. When using only baseline variables to predict mortality, all algorithms except SVM (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.69-0.97]) had AUROC >0.9: GBM (AUROC, 0.96 [0.94-1.0]), RF (AUROC, 0.96 [0.92-1.0]), CNN (AUROC, 0.96 [0.92-0.99]), and logistic regression (AUROC, 0.95 [0.91-0.99]). AUROC significantly increased with intraoperative variables with CNN (AUROC, 0.97 [0.96-0.99]; P = .047 versus baseline), but there was no improvement with GBM (AUROC, 0.97 [0.95-0.99]; P = .3 versus baseline), RF (AUROC, 0.96 [0.93-1.0]; P = .5 versus baseline), and logistic regression (AUROC, 0.94 [0.90-0.99]; P = .6 versus baseline). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative mortality is predicted with excellent discrimination in intra-abdominal surgery patients using only preoperative variables in various machine learning algorithms. The addition of intraoperative data to preoperative data also resulted in models with excellent discrimination, but model performance did not improve.

Predictors of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer: A Current Audit of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Positive circumferential resection margin is a predictor of local recurrence and worse survival in rectal cancer. National programs aimed to improve rectal cancer outcomes were first created in 2011 and continue to evolve. The impact on circumferential resection margin during this time frame has not been fully evaluated in the United States. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of positive circumferential resection margin after rectal cancer resection, across patient, provider, and tumor characteristics. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted using the National Cancer Database, 2011-2016. PATIENTS: Adults who underwent proctectomy for pathologic stage I to III rectal adenocarcinoma were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate and predictors of positive circumferential resection margin, defined as resection margin ≤1 mm, were measured. RESULTS: Of 52,620 cases, circumferential resection margin status was reported in 90% (n = 47,331) and positive in 18.4% (n = 8719). Unadjusted analysis showed that patients with positive circumferential resection margin were more often men, had public insurance and shorter travel, underwent total proctectomy via open and robotic approaches, and were treated in Southern and Western regions at integrated cancer networks (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis noted that positive proximal and/or distal margin on resected specimen had the strongest association with positive circumferential resection margin (OR = 15.6 (95% CI, 13.6-18.1); p < 0.001). Perineural invasion, total proctectomy, robotic approach, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, integrated cancer network, advanced tumor size and grade, and Black race had increased risk of positive circumferential resection margin (all p < 0.050). Laparoscopic approach, surgery in North, South, and Midwest regions, greater hospital volume and travel distance, lower T-stage, and higher income were associated with decreased risk (all p < 0.028). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective cohort study with limited variables available for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite creation of national initiatives, positive circumferential resection margin rate remains an alarming 18.4%. The persistently high rate with predictors of positive circumferential resection margin identified calls for additional education, targeted quality improvement assessments, and publicized auditing to improve rectal cancer care in the United States. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B584. PREDICTORES PARA UN MARGEN POSITIVO DE RESECCIN CIRCUNFERENCIAL EN EL CNCER DE RECTO UNA AUDITORA VIGENTE DE LA BASE DE DATOS NACIONAL DE CANCER: ANTECEDENTES:El margen positivo de resección circunferencial es un predictor de recurrencia local y peor sobrevida en el cáncer de recto. Los programas nacionales destinados a mejorar los resultados del cáncer de recto se crearon por primera vez en 2011 y continúan evolucionando. La repercusión del margen de resección circunferencial durante este período de tiempo no se ha evaluado completamente en los Estados Unidos.OBJETIVO:Determinar la incidencia y los predictores para un margen positivo de resección circunferencial posterior a la resección del cáncer de recto, según las características del paciente, el proveedor y el tumor.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AMBITO:Base de datos nacional de cáncer, 2011-2016.PACIENTES:Adultos que se sometieron a proctectomía por adenocarcinoma de recto con un estadío por patología I-III.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES EVALUADAS:Tasa y predictores para un margen positivo de resección circunferencial, definido como margen de resección ≤ 1 mm.RESULTADOS:De 52,620 casos, la condición del margen de resección circunferencial se informó en el 90% (n = 47,331) y positivo en el 18.4% (n = 8,719). El análisis no ajustado mostró que los pacientes con margen positivo de resección circunferencial se presentó con mayor frecuencia en hombres, tenían un seguro social y viajes más cortos, se operaron de proctectomía total abierta y robótica, y fueron tratados en las regiones del sur y el oeste en redes integradas de cáncer (todos p <0,001). El análisis multivariado destacó que el margen proximal y / o distal positivo de la pieza resecada tenía la asociación más fuerte con el margen postivo de resección circunferencial (OR 15,6; IC del 95%: 13,6-18,1, p <0,001). La invasión perineural, la proctectomía total, el abordaje robótico, la quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante, la red de cáncer integrada, el tamaño y grado del tumor avanzado y la raza afroamericana tenían un mayor riesgo de un margen de una resección positiva circunferencial (todos p <0,050). El abordaje laparoscópico, la cirugía en las regiones Norte, Sur y Medio Oeste, un mayor volumen hospitalario y distancia de viaje, estadio T más bajo y mayores ingresos se asociaron con una disminución del riesgo (todos p <0,028).LIMITACIONES:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo con variables limitadas disponibles para análisis.CONCLUSIONES:A pesar del establecimiento de iniciativas nacionales, la tasa de margen positivo de resección circunferencial continúa siendo alarmante, 18,4%. El índice continuamente elevado junto a los predictores de un margen positivo de resección circunferencial hace un llamado para una mayor educación, evaluaciones específicas de mejora de la calidad y difusión de las auditorías para mejorar la atención del cáncer de recto en los Estados Unidos. Vea el resumen de video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B584. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B584.

Intraoperative Data Enhance the Detection of High-Risk Acute Kidney Injury Patients When Added to a Baseline Prediction Model.

BACKGROUND: Aspects of intraoperative management (eg, hypotension) are associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in noncardiac surgery patients. However, it is unclear if and how the addition of intraoperative data affects a baseline risk prediction model for postoperative AKI. METHODS: With institutional review board (IRB) approval, an institutional cohort (2005-2015) of inpatient intra-abdominal surgery patients without preoperative AKI was identified. Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (preoperative and procedure data), Anesthesia Information Management System (intraoperative data), and electronic health record (postoperative laboratory data) were linked. The sample was split into derivation/validation (70%/30%) cohorts. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or >50% within 7 days of surgery. Forward logistic regression fit a baseline model incorporating preoperative variables and surgical procedure. Forward logistic regression fit a second model incorporating the previously selected baseline variables, as well as additional intraoperative variables. Intraoperative variables reflected the following aspects of intraoperative management: anesthetics, beta-blockers, blood pressure, diuretics, fluids, operative time, opioids, and vasopressors. The baseline and intraoperative models were evaluated based on statistical significance and discriminative ability (c-statistic). The risk threshold equalizing sensitivity and specificity in the intraoperative model was identified. RESULTS: Of 2691 patients in the derivation cohort, 234 (8.7%) developed AKI. The baseline model had c-statistic 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.80). The additional variables added to the intraoperative model were significantly associated with AKI (P < .0001) and the intraoperative model had c-statistic 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83). Sensitivity and specificity were equalized at a risk threshold of 9.0% in the intraoperative model. At this threshold, the baseline model had sensitivity and specificity of 71% (95% CI, 65-76) and 69% (95% CI, 67-70), respectively, and the intraoperative model had sensitivity and specificity of 74% (95% CI, 69-80) and 74% (95% CI, 73-76), respectively. The high-risk group had an AKI risk of 18% (95% CI, 15-20) in the baseline model and 22% (95% CI, 19-25) in the intraoperative model. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative data, when added to a baseline risk prediction model for postoperative AKI in intra-abdominal surgery patients, improves the performance of the model.

Elevation of Serum CEA in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus.

The proportion of anal cancer cases that produce elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels is not well described in the medical literature. In this study, we used electronic health record data from a single urban cancer center to identify patients from 2004-2018 with anal cancer who have also had a pre-initial treatment CEA measurement. We identified 40 patients who met our eligibility criteria. Of those, 11 (27.5%) had an elevated pretreatment CEA. Elevated CEA was not associated with any of the clinical or demographic covariates; however, three out of five patients with a recurrence had an elevated CEA.

Epidural analgesia in the era of enhanced recovery: time to rethink its use?

BACKGROUND: Previous assessments of the impact of epidural analgesia (EA) on outcomes after colorectal surgery were related to the period before widespread implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. This study evaluates the impact of EA on postoperative recovery after colectomy using recent multicenter data. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective colectomy from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data (2014-2015) were identified. Demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis, procedure type and approach, and postoperative complications associated with EA were assessed. Impact of EA on postoperative ileus, length of stay (LOS), and prolonged LOS (defined as LOS > 75 percentile) was evaluated for all, open, and laparoscopic cases using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 9045 elective colectomy procedures, 3081 (34.1%) received EA. Epidural analgesia was associated with greater rates of postoperative ileus (15.9% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.0001), superficial (5.5% vs. 4%, p = 0.001) and deep (1.8% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.0001) wound infections, pulmonary embolism (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.004), deep vein thrombosis (1.3% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.01), sepsis/septic shock (4.6% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.0001), unplanned reintubation (1.5% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.003), cardiac complications (1.2% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.03), and transfusion (9.1% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001). Postoperative length of stay (LOS) [mean (SD), days: 6.7(6.2) vs. 5(4.5) days, p < 0.0001] was greater for EA. On multivariable analysis, EA had no impact on postoperative ileus for all and laparoscopic cases. However, EA increased the likelihood for ileus (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.78) after open colectomy alone. Similarly, EA did not influence prolonged LOS for all and laparoscopic cases but was independently associated with prolonged LOS after open colectomy (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was not associated with improved recovery after elective colectomy in the era of ERAS.

Latent class analysis stratifies mortality risk in patients developing acute kidney injury after high-risk intraabdominal general surgery: a historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: Risk stratification for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) evaluates a patient's risk for developing this complication using preoperative characteristics. Nevertheless, it is unclear if these characteristics are also associated with mortality in patients who actually develop this complication, so we aimed to determine these associations. METHODS: The 2011-15 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to obtain a historical, observational cohort of high-risk intraabdominal general surgery patients with AKI, which was defined as an increase in serum creatinine > 177 µmol·L-1 (2 mg·dL-1) above the preoperative value and/or the need for dialysis. Latent class analysis, a model-based clustering technique, classified patients based on preoperative comorbidities and risk factors. The associations between the latent classes and the time course of AKI development and mortality after AKI were assessed with the Kruskall-Wallis test and Cox models. RESULTS: A seven-class model was fit on 3,939 observations (derivation cohort). Two patterns for the time course of AKI diagnosis emerged: an "early" group (median [interquartile range] day of diagnosis 3 [1-10]) and a "late" group (day 9 [3-16]). Three patterns of survival after AKI diagnosis were identified (groups A-C). Compared with the group with the lowest mortality risk (group A), the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for 30-day mortality were 1.79 [1.55 to 2.08] for group B and 3.55 [3.06 to 4.13] for group C. These differences in relative hazard were similar after adjusting for the postoperative day of AKI diagnosis and surgical procedure category. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AKI after high-risk general surgery, the preoperative comorbid state is associated with the time course of and survival after AKI. This knowledge can stratify mortality risk in patients who develop postoperative AKI.

Surgical Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas in Crohn's Disease.

Crohn's disease is a chronic, inflammatory bowel condition that can affect the entire digestive tract and in many cases lead to enteric fistula formation. The management of enteric fistulas can be challenging and often requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Correction to: Anal canal squamous cell cancer: are surgical alternatives to chemoradiation just as effective?

One of the author's middle name of this article was incorrectly published as "Emmanouil E. Pappou." This is now presented correctly in this article as "Emmanouil P. Pappou."

Anal canal squamous cell cancer: are surgical alternatives to chemoradiation just as effective?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to study long-term oncologic outcomes after different treatment strategies for anal canal cancer (SCAC). METHODS: Patients with SCAC (2004-2013) were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients undergoing radiation (RT) were compared to those undergoing local excision (LE), abdominoperineal resection (APR), and abdominoperineal resection after radiation (RT + APR). Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) data were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred and seventy-two (83.8%) patients underwent RT, 382 (11.6%) LE, 77 (2.3%) APR, 76 (2.3%) RT + APR. Median age for the four groups was 60, 57, 64, and 56 years and 32, 49.7, 53.2, and 39.5% were male, respectively, while median tumor size was 4.4, 2.6, 5.3, and 5.5 cm, respectively. Five-year OS of RT, LE, APR, and RT + APR groups was 63.7, 79.6, 25.8, and 41.8% while CSS was 79.6, 92.5, 75.6, and 58.8%, respectively, (p < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratios for OS for LE, APR, and RT + APR with RT as reference were 1.007 (0.702-1.444), 2.311 (1.367-3.906), and 2.072 (1.016-4.228), respectively. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that APR does not provide better outcomes in treatment of SCAC. Chemoradiation remains the gold standard treatment for majority of patients. Local excision is associated with favorable outcomes in some circumstances.

Readmissions after colorectal surgery: not all are equal.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess factors associated with preventable readmissions after colorectal resection. METHODS: All readmissions following colorectal resection from May 2013 to May 2016 at an academic medical center were reviewed. Readmissions that could be prevented were identified. Factors associated with preventable readmission were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 686 patients discharged during the study period, there were 75 patients (11%) with unplanned readmission. Twenty-nine readmissions (39%) were preventable-these readmissions were due to dehydration or acute kidney injury, pain, ostomy complications, and gastrointestinal bleeding. On regression analysis, the strongest preoperative risk factors associated with preventable readmission were urgent or emergent operation (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.6-9.9), recent myocardial infarction (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.0-9.0), total or subtotal colectomy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.3), and American Society of Anesthesiologist score ≥ 3 (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.7). Intraoperative risk factors associated with preventable readmission included intraoperative stapler complication (OR 24.2, 95% CI 1.5-397). Postoperative risk factors associated with preventable readmission included postoperative arrhythmia (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.0-16.1), and postoperative anemia (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.7). On multivariable analysis while controlling for procedure type, urgent or emergent operation (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-8.2), intraoperative stapler complication (OR 37.5, 95% CI 2.3-627.8), and postoperative arrhythmia (OR 4, 95% CI 1.3-12.8) remained statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Approximately 40% of readmissions following colorectal surgery are potentially preventable. Since specific patients and factors that are associated with preventable readmission can be identified, resources should be targeted to factors associated with preventable readmissions.

Visceral fat area, not body mass index, predicts postoperative 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing colon resection for cancer.

PURPOSE: Colectomy for cancer in obese patients is technically challenging and may be associated with worse outcomes. Whether visceral obesity, as measured on computed tomography, is a better predictor of complication than body mass index (BMI) or determines long-term oncologic outcomes has not been well characterized. This study examines the association between derived anthropometrics and postoperative complication and long-term oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients undergoing elective colectomy for cancer at a single tertiary-care center from 2010 to 2016. Adipose tissue distribution measurements, including visceral fat area (VFA), were determined from preoperative imaging. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication; secondary outcomes included overall and disease-free survival. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine association between obesity metrics and outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four patients underwent 266 primary resections of colon cancer. Twenty-eight patients (10.5%) developed major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III). VFA but not BMI was significantly associated with morbidity in multivariate analysis (p = 0.004, odds ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.25-3.19). No other imaging-derived anthropometric was associated with increased morbidity. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, VFA was predictive of major morbidity (area under curve 0.660). A cutoff value of VFA ≥ 191 cm2 was associated with 50% sensitivity and 76% specificity for predicting major morbidity. Patients with VFA ≥ 191cm2 had 19.4% risk of morbidity, whereas those with < 191 cm2 had 7.2% risk (relative risk ratio 2.69, unadjusted p = 0.004). Neither VFA nor BMI was associated with overall or disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: VFA but not BMI predicts morbidity following elective surgery for colon cancer.

Factors influencing discharge disposition after colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with discharge destination after colectomy despite accounting for surgical morbidity have not previously been well characterized. This study aims to evaluate perioperative predictors for extended care after complicated and uncomplicated colectomy. METHODS: Patients admitted from home for elective colectomy were identified from the American College of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, 2012-2013 general and colectomy-targeted datasets. Patients who were discharged home (DH) were compared to those discharged to facility (DF) for patient, disease, treatment, and pre-discharge postoperative adverse events. Patients without any 30-day postoperative complication were similarly compared. RESULTS: Of 19,527 patients undergoing elective colectomy, 18,128 (92.8%) were discharged home and 1399 (7.2%) patients to other facilities. When there was no postoperative complication, these rates were 96.3 and 3.7%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with DF included female gender, functional dependence, weight loss, ASA class ≥ 3, open and stoma surgery, and development of postoperative complications. For patients without postoperative complications, increasing age, functional dependence, and ASA score ≥ 3 were associated with DF. Preoperative bowel preparation, albumin, a minimally invasive surgical approach, and length of stay < 5 days were significantly associated with reduced DF. CONCLUSION: The majority of perioperative factors associated with extended care after colectomy are patient driven. The adoption of oral antibiotics as bowel preparation, minimally invasive surgery, and accelerated recovery protocols may reduce post-acute care placement after elective colectomy.

Characterization of Readmission by Day of Rehospitalization After Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with readmission stratified by the day of postdischarge rehospitalization after colorectal surgery have not been characterized previously. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify factors leading to readmission on a day-to-day basis after discharge from colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of patients readmitted within 30-days after colorectal surgery. Reasons and factors associated with readmission each day after discharge were evaluated. Early readmitted patients (day 0-5 postdischarge) were compared with those readmitted later (day 6-29 postdischarge). SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary center. PATIENTS: Patients included those who had undergone primary colorectal resection from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012-2013). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study intended to identify factors associated with any early versus late hospital readmission and to evaluate diagnoses for unplanned readmissions on a day-to-day basis after discharge. RESULTS: For 69,222 elective colorectal procedures, 7476 patients (10.8%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. Early (median, 3 days) and late (median, 11 days) readmissions were 3278 (43.8%) and 4198 (56.2%). Except for sex, patient demographics were similar between groups. Neurologic comorbidity; wound disruption; sepsis or septic shock; unplanned reintubation and reoperation; anastomotic leak and ileus; and neurological, cardiovascular, and pulmonary complications were significantly higher in the early readmission, whereas disseminated malignancy, stoma creation, and renal/urological complications were significantly higher in the late readmission group. On multivariable analysis, early readmission was significantly associated with male patients, wound disruption, sepsis or septic shock, reoperation, reintubation, and postoperative neurological complications. Disseminated malignancy, ostomy creation, and postoperative renal dysfunction/urological infection were associated with delayed readmission. LIMITATIONS: Thirty-day readmissions and reasons for unplanned rehospitalizations were evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Differing factors are associated with early versus late readmission after colorectal resection. These data suggest that early readmission is intricately related to patient and operative complexity and hence may be inevitable, whereas delayed hospital presentation is associated with identifiable perioperative predictors at the time of discharge and hence more likely to be targetable.

The robotic approach significantly reduces length of stay after colectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Robotic surgery has helped overcome several of the inherent limitations of conventional laparoscopy. The aim of this study is to identify any short-term advantage of robotic-assisted (RC) over laparoscopic colectomy (LC) using standardized nationwide data. METHODS: Patients from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2012-2014 datasets who underwent elective LC or RC were compared for patient demographics, comorbidity, diagnosis, extent of colon resection, operative duration, and conversion rates. Thirty-day postoperative complications and post-discharge utilization of resources, readmission, and discharge to another facility were also evaluated. Propensity score matching was used to balance the sample size in the two groups. RESULTS: Of 35,839 LC and RC procedures, 2482 cases were eligible for propensity score matching for the statistically significant variables (standardized difference > 0.10) and 1241 colectomy procedures were assigned to each group. Most of the major, minor surgical, and medical postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. However, RC was associated with reduced 30-day postoperative septic complications (2.3 vs. 4%, p = 0.02), hospital stay (mean: 4.8 vs. 6.3 days, p = 0.001), and discharge to another facility (3.5 vs. 5.8%, p = 0.01). RC was, however, associated with readmission within 30 days after surgery (9.4 vs. 9.1%, p = 0.049). Postoperative ileus, anastomotic leak, reoperation, reintubation, and mortality were equivalent between RC and LC. CONCLUSION: This propensity score-matched analysis suggests that RC is associated with some recovery benefits over LC. Greater experience with the technique may allow these advantages to counter some of the cost-related concerns that have deterred the more widespread utilization of robotic technology for colectomy.

Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) are established as quality targets in average-risk (AR) individuals undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening colonoscopy. Little is known about the ADR in high-risk (HR) individuals undergoing index or surveillance colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare ADR in HR versus AR individuals undergoing colonoscopy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study, tertiary care center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: We reviewed records of 7357 patients who underwent colonoscopy by 66 multispecialty endoscopists at our institution during the period 2008 to 2009. Both screening and surveillance colonoscopies in AR and HR patients for CRC were studied. HR patients were further divided into 3 subgroups: those with a (1) personal history of polyps (PHP), (2) family history of polyps (FHP), and (3) family history of CRC (FHCRC). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate differences in ADR between the groups after adjusting for possible confounders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: ADR in HR patients. RESULTS: The study included 4141 patients, of whom 2170 were AR and 1971 were HR. Patients in the HR group were older (64.5 ± 9.1 years vs 59.1 ± 7.9 years, P < .001). HR patients were more likely to have adenomas (30.7% vs 25.6%, P < .001). Adenomas were detected more often in the proximal colon than in the distal colon (29.3% vs 21.0%, P < .001 and 22.8% vs 15.8%, P < .001, respectively). Patients with a PHP had the highest ADR (33.1%, P < .001). However, after adjusting for confounders, HR status was not found to be associated with ADR (odds ratio [OR] 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.6; P = .15 for females and 0.93; 95% CI, 0.70-1.2; P = .61 for males). HR females were found to have a 40% greater likelihood of having proximal adenomas than AR females (1.4; 95% CI, 1.01-2; P = .04). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, single tertiary center. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a PHP have a significantly higher ADR compared with AR patients. Defining a minimum target ADR for individuals with a PHP undergoing surveillance colonoscopy is important.