Is administration of preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors important for renal protection after cardiac surgery?

OBJECTIVE: There are various reasons for renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery; however, activation of the renin-angiotensin system has an important role following cardiac surgery. We investigated the effect of preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on renal functions after cardiovascular surgery. MATERIAL-METHODS: Three hundred sixty-six patients awaiting elective cardiac surgery were allocated to two groups, namely the treatment group, comprising the ACE inhibitor group (n = 186), and the control group, which was without ACE inhibitor (n = 180). The renal parameters [blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, creatinine clearance, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR)] and the need for dialysis were evaluated associated with renal functions between the two groups in the postoperative period. RESULTS: After cardiac surgery, renal dysfunction requiring dialysis developed in 11 (3.8%) patients in the control group patients. There was no required dialysis in the treatment group (p < 0.05). As an indicator of renal dysfunction, the increase in creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels and the decrease in GFR and creatinine clearance were higher in the control group (p < 0.05). The multivariate analysis indicated that therapy with ACE inhibitors was found to decrease the incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-2.50; p < 0.05). The other independent predictors were age, preoperative intra-aortic blood pump, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and a left ventricular ejection fraction below 0.40. CONCLUSION: Preoperative therapy with ACE inhibitors has an influence on renal functions. This study demonstrates that administration of ACE inhibitors provides better renal protection after cardiac surgery.

The relationship between arteriovenous fistula success and inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the most important vascular access method for hemodialysis (HD). In this study, the relationship between AVF success and inflammation in patients who had HD due to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) was investigated. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In the study, a total of 658 patients, who started HD for ESRF, were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 386 patients were included in this study. The demographic data and C-reactive protein, albumin and fibrinogen levels were investigated in patients with recognized success AVF. RESULTS: In total 311 patients with successful AVF and 75 unsuccessful AVFs were found. In unsuccessful AVF group the average low albumin level, high C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels were found to be statistically meaningful when compared with successful AVF group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: As a result, we think that the evaluation of inflammation before creating AVF in HD patients is very important for increasing the success of AVF.

On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: early outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the effects of on-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting techniques requiring cardioplegic arrest in patients with coronary artery disease with left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: We report the early outcomes associated with survival, morbidity and improvement of left ventricular function in patients with low ejection fraction who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between August 2009 and June 2012. Patients were separated into 2 groups: group I underwent conventional coronary artery bypass grafting and group II underwent an on-pump beating-heart technique without cardioplegic arrest. RESULTS: In all, 131 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting: 66 in group I and 65 in group II. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 26.6% ± 3.5% in group I and 27.7% ± 4.7% in group II. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter was 65.6 ± 3.6 mm in group I and 64.1 ± 3.2 mm in group II. There was a significant reduction in mortality in the conventional and on-pump beating-heart groups (p < 0.001). Perioperative myocardial infarction and low cardiac output syndrome were higher in group I than group II (both p < 0.05). Improvement of left ventricular function after the surgical procedure was better in group II than group I. CONCLUSION: The on-pump beating-heart technique is the preferred method for myocardial revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. This technique may be an acceptable alternative to the conventional technique owing to lower postoperative mortality and morbidity.

CONTEXTE: Nous avons voulu comparer les effets du pontage coronarien sur coeur battant sous CEC (circulation extracorporelle) et ceux du pontage coronarien classique exigeant un arrêt cardioplégique chez des patients atteints de coronaropathie et de dysfonction ventriculaire gauche. MÉTHODES: Nous faisons état des premiers résultats aux plans de la survie, de la morbidité et de l'amélioration de la fonction ventriculaire gauche chez des patients qui avaient une fraction d'éjection faible et qui ont reçu un pontage coronarien entre août 2009 et juin 2012. Les patients ont été répartis en 2 groupes : le groupe I a été soumis à la technique de pontage coronarien classique et le groupe II a été soumis à la technique à coeur battant sous CEC sans arrêt cardioplégique. RÉSULTATS: En tout, 131 patients ont reçu un pontage coronarien : 66 dans le groupe I et 65 dans le groupe II. La fraction d'éjection ventriculaire gauche était de 26,6 % ± 3,5 % dans le groupe I et de 27,7 % ± 4,7 % dans le groupe II. Le diamètre télédiastolique ventriculaire gauche était de 65,6 ± 3,6 mm dans le groupe I et de 64,1 ± 3,2 mm dans le groupe II. On a noté une réduction significative de la mortalité dans les groupes soumis à l'intervention classique et à l'intervention à coeur battant sous CEC (p < 0,001). L'infarctus du myocarde peropératoire et le syndrome de faible débit cardiaque ont été plus fréquents dans le groupe I que dans le groupe II (tous deux p < 0,05). L'amélioration de la fonction ventriculaire gauche après l'intervention chirurgicale a été plus marquée dans le groupe II que dans le groupe I. CONCLUSION: La technique à coeur battant sous CEC est la méthode préférée de revascularisation myocardique chez les patients atteints d'une dysfonction ventriculaire gauche. Cette technique peut être une solution de rechange acceptable à la technique classique en raison des taux de mortalité et de morbidité postopératoires plus faibles qui y sont associés.

Basilic vein transposition fistulas versus prosthetic bridge grafts in patients with end-stage renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Basilic vein transposition fistulas (BVTFs) and prosthetic bridge grafts (PBGs) provide good vascular access for hemodialysis. To evaluate the patency and complication rates after arteriovenous fistula formation, a concurrent series of patients was reviewed. METHODS: Between September 2003 and September 2009, 147 hemodialysis access procedures were performed in 147 consecutive patients at Van Research and Training Hospital and Yuzuncu Yil University Hospital, Van, Turkey. All access procedures were planned on the basis of preoperative duplex scans of arm and forearm veins. Functional patency was defined as the ability to cannulate hemodialysis patients successfully. Primary and secondary cumulative functional patency rates of BVTFs and PBGs were determined with life-table analysis and differences were analyzed with retrospective study. Differences in revision rates, including thrombolysis thrombectomies and operative revisions, were analyzed with the Fisher exact t-test. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 15 months (range, 3-24 months). Risk factors were similar between the two groups. BVTFs had better patency at 15 months. The dialysis access complications were higher in the PBG group versus BVTF group, and the PBG group had a higher infection rate than the BVTF group. CONCLUSION: The primary and secondary patency rates were superior in the BVTF group. Our data strongly support the contention that as long as the patient is a candidate for an upper arm BVTF based on anatomical criteria, BVTF always be considered before a PBG.

Mitral valve and coronary artery bypass surgeries 13 years after pneumonectomy for lung cancer.

We successfully performed coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement in a 72-year-old man who had undergone a left pneumonectomy 13 years previously due to a malignant mass. The patient was admitted to our clinic with symptoms of dyspnoea, palpitations, chest pain and fatigue. He was diagnosed with mitral valve disease and two-vessel coronary artery disease, as seen from echocardiography and catheterisation studies. Conventional cardiopulmonary bypass grafting was performed following sternotomy. The patient's heart was completely displaced to the left hemithorax. Saphenous vein grafts were harvested. Distal anastomoses were performed with the use of the on-pump beatingheart technique without cross clamping. Afterwards a cross clamping was placed and a left atriotomy was performed. The mitral valve was severely calcific. A mitral valve replacement was performed using number 27 mechanical valve after the valve had been excised. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Cardiac contractility was seen to be normal and the mitral valve was functioning on echocardiography done in the second postoperative month.