Two-stage weaning strategy using veno-veno-arterial perfusion for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following cardiogenic shock.

OBJECTIVES: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation represents the last therapy option in refractory cardiogenic shock. Successful weaning becomes difficult if the myocardial function recovers but pulmonary impairment persists. We present our experience with a new weaning strategy, using a stepwise mode-switch from veno-arterial to veno-veno-arterial and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation setting for patients with primary cardiogenic shock and subsequent respiratory failure. METHODS: From 81 patients treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following acute cardiogenic shock between January 2014 and April 2018, eight patients with cardiac and pulmonary failure were identified to be treated using the following protocol: patients were put on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a second inflow cannula was inserted via the right jugular vein and cardiac weaning was performed via veno-veno-arterial support. Finally, patients were pulmonary weaned via veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mode. RESULTS: In the mode-switch group, etiologies of cardiogenic shock were cardiac arrest (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12.5%) and post-cardiotomic heart failure (75%). Mean time between onset of cardiogenic shock and start of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 76 ± 117 min. At implantation, lactate and pH values were 9.5 ± 5.0 mmol/L and 7.2 ± 0.2. Total extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-time was 9.3 ± 4.7 days, with a mode-switch from veno-arterial to veno-veno-arterial after 3.9 ± 2.7 days. The weaning rate in the mode-switch group was 75% (vs. 41% in the entire cohort) and the 30-day survival was 50% (vs 32% in the cohort). 38% of the patients presented a favorable neurological outcome. CONCLUSION: Mode-switch from veno-arterial to veno-veno-arterial and weaning via veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mode is feasible for combined cardiac and pulmonary failure, with promising results due to an optimized pre-pulmonary oxygenation.

Beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass results in a more complete revascularization when compared to off-pump grafting.

The technique of miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (M-CPB) for beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is relatively new and has potential advantages when compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). M-CPB consists of less tubing length and requires less priming volume. The system is phosphorylcholine coated and results in minimal pump-related inflammatory response and organ injury. Finally, this technique combines the advantages of the off-pump CABG (OPCAB) with the better exposure provided by CPB to facilitate complete revascularization. The hypothesis is that CABG with M-CPB has a better outcome in terms of complete coronary revascularization and perioperative results as that compared to off-pump CABG (OPCAB). In a retrospective study, 302 patients underwent beating-heart CABG, 117 (39%) of them with the use of M-CPB and 185 (61%) with OPCAB. After propensity score matching 62 patients in both groups were demographically similar. The most important intra- and early-postoperative parameters were analyzed. Endpoints were hospital mortality and complete revascularization. Hospital mortality was comparable between the groups. The revascularization was significantly more complete in M-CPB patients than in patients in the OPCAB group. Beating-heart CABG with M-CPB is a safe procedure and it provides an optimal operative exposure with significantly more complete coronary revascularization when compared to OPCAB. Beating-heart CABG with the support of a M-CPB is the operation of choice when total coronary revascularization is needed.

Beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting using a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system.

BACKGROUND: Experience with miniaturized coronary artery bypass (CAB) systems in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery on the beating heart is limited. We used a relatively new miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system, which we termed assisted CAB (ACAB), to perform CABG on the beating heart in 110 patients, and we analyzed clinical outcomes in this patient group. METHODS: Between January 2004 and September 2006, we used ACAB to perform CABG on the beating heart in 110 patients. The mean patient age was 73 +/- 8.1 years. The ACAB system uses a small prime volume of only 500 mL, and the circuit is shorter than that used in conventional CPB. In addition, the tubing and oxygenator systems were surface-coated with phosphorylcholine. The initial heparin dose was 150 IU/kg, with a target activated clotting time of >250 seconds. With this management, none of the patients experienced system thrombosis. We did not use cardioplegia or aortic crossclamping and did not routinely retransfuse cardiotomy blood. Observational data for the 110 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean number of anastomoses performed was 2.67. The rate of perioperative infarction was 1.8% (2 patients). Perioperative mortality was 7% (8 patients). The mean EuroSCORE for all patients was 6.4 +/- 4, whereas it was 13.75 +/- 6.18 for the patients who died. Mean CPB time was 64.96 +/- 16.66 minutes. CONCLUSION: In our experience, beating heart CABG supported by a miniaturized CPB is a safe procedure with acceptable perioperative results.

[Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Comparison of 270 case-matched elderly patients]. / Aortokoronare Bypass-Operationen im Off- und On-pump-Verfahren: Vergleichende Studie mit 270 älteren Patienten.

INTRODUCTION: Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: it still remains a matter of debate which method results in a lower incidence of perioperative morbidity and mortality. This case-matched study evaluates the outcome of elderly patients in both groups. METHODS: All patients aged 75 and older, who underwent CABG from 1998 to 2002, were examined retrospectively. They were matched according to Euroscore and the number of diseased vessels. The Student's t-test and chi-square test were used where appropriate. RESULTS: 270 CABG patients were considered: 135 off-pump and 135 on-pump patients. Mean age was 78.4 +/- 3.1 versus 77.5 +/- 2.9 years, respectively. EuroSCORE was 7.11 +/- 2.3 in both groups; number of distal anastomoses per patient 1.7 +/- 0.74 versus 2.6 +/- 0.63 (p < 0.001), operation time 138 versus 177 minutes (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications including hospital mortality 3.0 versus 3.7%, renal failure 8.9 versus 12.1% (new onset), acute myocardial infarction 1.5 versus 4.4% and cerebral events 0 versus 1.5%, respectively. The number of transfused packed cells was 2.6 +/- 2.8 versus 4.6 +/- 5.3 (p < 0.001). Intubation time and ICU stay were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: OPCAB is not associated with a reduction of perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients aged 75 and older.