Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(6)2022 Mar 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35328753

RESUMO

During injuries in the central nervous system, intrinsic protective processes become activated. However, cellular reactions, especially those of glia cells, are frequently unsatisfactory, and further exogenous protective mechanisms are necessary. Nimodipine, a lipophilic L-type calcium channel blocking agent is clinically used in the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage with neuroprotective effects in different models. Direct effects of nimodipine on neurons amongst others were observed in the hippocampus as well as its influence on both microglia and astrocytes. Earlier studies proposed that nimodipine protective actions occur not only via calcium channel-mediated vasodilatation but also via further time-dependent mechanisms. In this study, the effect of nimodipine application was investigated in different time frames on neuronal damage in excitotoxically lesioned organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Nimodipine, but not nifedipine if pre-incubated for 4 h or co-applied with NMDA, was protective, indicating time dependency. Since blood vessels play no significant role in our model, intrinsic brain cell-dependent mechanisms seems to strongly be involved. We also examined the effect of nimodipine and nifedipine on microglia survival. Nimodipine seem to be a promising agent to reduce secondary damage and reduce excitotoxic damage.


Assuntos
Fármacos Neuroprotetores , Hipocampo , Microglia , Neurônios , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/farmacologia , Nifedipino/farmacologia , Nimodipina/farmacologia
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(21)2021 Oct 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34768900

RESUMO

Based on oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC), several hemostyptic materials, such as Tabotamp®, Equicel® and Equitamp®, have been developed to approach challenging hemostasis in neurosurgery. The present study compares ORC that differ in terms of compositions and properties, regarding their structure, solubility, pH values and effects on neuronal tissue. Cytotoxicity was detected via DNA-binding fluorescence dye in Schwann cells, astrocytes, and neuronal cells. Additionally, organotypic hippocampal slice cultures (OHSC) were analyzed, using propidium iodide, hematoxylin-eosin, and isolectin B4 staining to investigate the cellular damage, cytoarchitecture, and microglia activation. Whereas Equicel® led to a neutral pH, Tabotamp® (pH 2.8) and Equitamp® (pH 4.8) caused a significant reduction of pH (p < 0.001). Equicel® and Tabotamp® increased cytotoxicity significantly in several cell lines (p < 0.01). On OHSC, Tabotamp® and Equicel® led to a stronger and deeper damage to the neuronal tissue than Equitamp® or gauze (p < 0.01). Equicel® increased strongly the number of microglia cells after 24 h (p < 0.001). Microglia cells were not detectable after Tabotamp® treatment, presumably due to an artifact caused by strong pH reduction. In summary, our data imply the use of Equicel®, Tabotamp® or Equitamp® for specific applications in distinct clinical settings depending on their localization or tissue properties.


Assuntos
Astrócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Celulose Oxidada/farmacologia , Hipocampo/efeitos dos fármacos , Microglia/efeitos dos fármacos , Neurônios/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Astrócitos/citologia , Astrócitos/metabolismo , Celulose Oxidada/classificação , Hemostáticos/farmacologia , Hipocampo/citologia , Hipocampo/metabolismo , Humanos , Microglia/citologia , Microglia/metabolismo , Neurônios/citologia , Neurônios/metabolismo , Ratos , Ratos Wistar
3.
Front Aging Neurosci ; 14: 863598, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35572146

RESUMO

Acute lesions of the central nervous system often lead to permanent limiting deficits. In addition to the initial primary damage, accompanying neuroinflammation is responsible for progression of damage. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as a selective inhibitor of inosine 5-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) was shown to modulate the inflammatory response and promote neuronal survival when applied in specific time windows after neuronal injury. The application of brain cytoprotective therapeutics early after neuronal damage is a fundamental requirement for a successful immunomodulation approach. This study was designed to evaluate whether MMF can still mediate brain cytoprotection when applied in predefined short time intervals following CNS injury. Furthermore, the role of microglia and changes in IMPDH2 protein expression were assessed. Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures (OHSC) were used as an in vitro model and excitotoxically lesioned with N-methyl-aspartate (NMDA). Clodronate (Clo) was used to deplete microglia and analyze MMF mediated microglia independent effects. The temporal expression of IMPDH2 was studied in primary glial cell cultures treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In excitotoxically lesioned OHSC a significant brain cytoprotective effect was observed between 8 and 36 h but not within 8 and 24 h after the NMDA damage. MMF mediated effects were mainly microglia dependent at 24, 36, 48 h after injury. However, further targets like astrocytes seem to be involved in protective effects 72 h post-injury. IMPDH2 expression was detected in primary microglia and astrocyte cell cultures. Our data indicate that MMF treatment in OHSC should still be started no later than 8-12 h after injury and should continue at least until 36 h post-injury. Microglia seem to be an essential mediator of the observed brain cytoprotective effects. However, a microglia-independent effect was also found, indicating involvement of astrocytes.

4.
Front Neurosci ; 13: 1180, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31787870

RESUMO

Various studies performed in cultured cells and in in vivo models of neuronal damage showed that cannabinoids exert a neuroprotective effect. The increase in cannabinoids and cannabinoid like substances after stroke has been postulated to limit the content of neuronal injury. As well-accepted, inflammation, and neuronal damage are coupled processes and microglial cells as the main intrinsic immunological effector within the brain play a central role in their regulation. Treatment with the endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) or the endocannabinoid-like substance, palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) affected microglial cells and led to a decrease in the number of damaged neurons after excitotoxical lesion in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures (OHSC). 2-AG activated abnormal cannabidiol (abn-CBD) receptor, PEA was shown to mediate neuroprotection via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α. Despite the known neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties, the potential synergistic effect, namely possible entourage effect after treatment with the combination of these two protective cannabinoids has not been examined yet. After excitotoxical lesion OHSC were treated with PEA, 2-AG or a combination of both and the number of damaged neurons was evaluated. To investigate the role of microglial cells in PEA and 2-AG mediated protection, primary microglial cell cultures were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and 2-AG, PEA or a combination of those. Thereafter, we measured NO production, ramification index, proliferation and PPARα distribution in microglial cells. While PEA or 2-AG alone were neuroprotective, their co-application vanished the protective effect. This behavior was independent of microglial cells. Furthermore, PEA and 2-AG had contrary effects on ramification index and on NO production. No significant changes were observed in the proliferation rate of microglial cells after treatment. The expression of PPARα was not changed upon stimulation with PEA or 2-AG, but the distribution was significantly altered. 2-AG and PEA mediated neuroprotection was abolished when co-applied. Both cannabinoids exert contrary effects on morphology and function of microglial cells. Co-application of both cannabinoids with different targets did not lead to a positive additive effect as expected, presumably due to the contrary polarization of microglial cells.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA