Breast Tumor Metastasis and Its Microenvironment: It Takes Both Seed and Soil to Grow a Tumor and Target It for Treatment.

Metastasis remains a major challenge in treating breast cancer. Breast tumors metastasize to organ-specific locations such as the brain, lungs, and bone, but why some organs are favored over others remains unclear. Breast tumors also show heterogeneity, plasticity, and distinct microenvironments. This contributes to treatment failure and relapse. The interaction of breast cancer cells with their metastatic microenvironment has led to the concept that primary breast cancer cells act as seeds, whereas the metastatic tissue microenvironment (TME) is the soil. Improving our understanding of this interaction could lead to better treatment strategies for metastatic breast cancer. Targeted treatments for different subtypes of breast cancers have improved overall patient survival, even with metastasis. However, these targeted treatments are based upon the biology of the primary tumor and often these patients' relapse, after therapy, with metastatic tumors. The advent of immunotherapy allowed the immune system to target metastatic tumors. Unfortunately, immunotherapy has not been as effective in metastatic breast cancer relative to other cancers with metastases, such as melanoma. This review will describe the heterogeneic nature of breast cancer cells and their microenvironments. The distinct properties of metastatic breast cancer cells and their microenvironments that allow interactions, especially in bone and brain metastasis, will also be described. Finally, we will review immunotherapy approaches to treat metastatic breast tumors and discuss future therapeutic approaches to improve treatments for metastatic breast cancer.

Overcoming brain-derived therapeutic resistance in HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis.

Brain metastasis of HER2+ breast cancer occurs in about 50% of all women with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer and confers poor prognosis for patients. Despite effective HER2-targeted treatments of peripheral HER2+ breast cancer with Trastuzumab +/-HER2 inhibitors, limited brain permeability renders these treatments inefficient for HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). The scarcity of suitable patient-derived in-vivo models for HER2+ BCBM has compromised the study of molecular mechanisms that promote growth and therapeutic resistance in brain metastasis. We have generated and characterized new HER2+ BCBM cells (BCBM94) isolated from a patient HER2+ brain metastasis. Repeated hematogenic xenografting of BCBM94 consistently generated BCBM in mice. The clinically used receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKi) Lapatinib blocked phosphorylation of all ErbB1-4 receptors and induced the intrinsic apoptosis pathway in BCBM94. Neuregulin-1 (NRG1), a ligand for ErbB3 and ErbB4 that is abundantly expressed in the brain, was able to rescue Lapatinib-induced apoptosis and clonogenic ability in BCBM94 and in HER2+ BT474. ErbB3 was essential to mediate the NRG1-induced survival pathway that involved PI3K-AKT signalling and the phosphorylation of BAD at serine 136 to prevent apoptosis. High throughput RTKi screening identified the brain penetrable Poziotinib as highly potent compound to reduce cell viability in HER2+ BCBM in the presence of NRG1. Successful in-vivo ablation of BCBM94- and BT474-derived HER2+ brain tumors was achieved upon two weeks of treatment with Poziotinib. MRI revealed BCBM remission upon poziotinib, but not with Lapatinib treatment. In conclusion, we have established a new patient-derived HER2+ BCBM in-vivo model and identified Poziotinib as highly efficacious RTKi with excellent brain penetrability that abrogated HER2+ BCBM brain tumors in our mouse models.

Characterization of HMGA2 variants expands the spectrum of Silver-Russell syndrome.

Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. HMGA2 variants are a rare cause of SRS and its functional role in human linear growth is unclear. Patients with suspected SRS negative for 11p15LOM/mUPD7 underwent whole-exome and/or targeted-genome sequencing. Mutant HMGA2 protein expression and nuclear localization were assessed. Two Hmga2-knockin mouse models were generated. Five clinical SRS patients harbored HMGA2 variants with differing functional impacts: 2 stop-gain nonsense variants (c.49G>T, c.52C>T), c.166A>G missense variant, and 2 frameshift variants (c.144delC, c.145delA) leading to an identical, extended-length protein. Phenotypic features were highly variable. Nuclear localization was reduced/absent for all variants except c.166A>G. Homozygous knockin mice recapitulating the c.166A>G variant (Hmga2K56E) exhibited a growth-restricted phenotype. An Hmga2Ter76-knockin mouse model lacked detectable full-length Hmga2 protein, similarly to patient 3 and 5 variants. These mice were infertile, with a pygmy phenotype. We report a heterogeneous group of individuals with SRS harboring variants in HMGA2 and describe the first Hmga2 missense knockin mouse model (Hmga2K56E) to our knowledge causing a growth-restricted phenotype. In patients with clinical features of SRS but negative genetic screening, HMGA2 should be included in next-generation sequencing testing approaches.