Intraocular pressure changes and corneal biomechanics after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST), a non-contact tonometer, and an ocular response analyzer after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: Thirteen patients who underwent hyperopic SMILE in one eye were enrolled prospectively. IOP and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively with a non-contact tonometer (IOPNCT), Corvis ST (biomechanical corrected IOP [bIOP]), and ocular response analyzer (Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure [IOPg] and cornea compensated IOP [IOPcc]). A linear mixed model was used to compare the IOPs and biomechanical values among methods at each time point. RESULTS: IOPNCT, IOPg, and IOPcc dropped significantly after surgery, with the amplitude being 3.15 ± 0.48 mmHg, 5.49 ± 0.94 mmHg, and 4.34 ± 0.97 mmHg, respectively, at the last follow-up visit. IOPNCT decreased by 0.11 ± 0.06 mmHg per µm of excised central corneal thickness. bIOP did not change significantly after surgery. Preoperatively, no difference was found among the four measurements (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, IOPNCT and bIOP were higher than IOPg and IOPcc. bIOP was independent of cornea thickness at last follow-up visit, whereas it correlated significantly with corneal biomechanics similar to the other three IOP values. CONCLUSION: bIOP is a relative accurate measure of IOP after hyperopic SMILE.

[Presbyopia Correction with Intraocular Lenses]. / Presbyopiekorrektur mittels Linsensystemen.

Surgical correction of presbyopia can be performed by refractive lens exchange, replacing the lens with a monofocal, a multifocal or an extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). Option 1, a monofocal IOL, must be combined with monovision, otherwise presbyopia cannot be corrected. Monovision in this context means one eye for distance and one eye targeted for - 1.5 D. With this concept glasses are still required for near (30 - 40 cm) and for driving, but intermediate distances and everyday life is usually possible without glasses. Option 2, a multifocal IOL, results in spectacle independence. Current multifocal IOL typically use three foci and are therefore called trifocal IOL. Distance vision and near vision are typically good, intermediate vision still acceptable but lower than distance and near, resulting in occasional problems while working on a computer. Option 3, EDOF-IOL, provide good distance and intermediate vision without glasses but near vision typically requires reading glasses.

Development of the continuous curvilinear lenticulerrhexis technique for small incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate the new continuous curvilinear lenticulerrhexis (CCL) technique for small incision lenticule extraction. METHODS: Thirty-one eyes of 20 patients with myopia were included in the study. The CCL technique for lenticule extraction was developed and used in 16 eyes of 10 patients (CCL group). The traditional technique of lenticule extraction was used in 15 eyes of 10 patients (traditional group). Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, lenticule quality, the duration of the extraction procedure, microdistorsions in Bowman's layer under optical coherence tomography (Optovue OCT; Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA), and adverse events were evaluated at 1 day and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: At the first postoperative month, all eyes in both groups had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 1.0 or better. The safety indices were 1.12 and 1.09 for the CCL and traditional groups, respectively. The efficacy indices were 1.06 and 1.09 for the CCL and traditional groups, respectively. All lenticules in the CCL group had intact, round margins, whereas one lenticule in the traditional group had a microdefect margin. There was no statistically significant difference in duration of lenticule extraction or microdistorsions in Bowman's layer. No eyes in the CCL group developed diffuse lamellar keratitis, as compared to one eye in the traditional group. CONCLUSIONS: The CCL technique exhibited excellent safety and efficacy for myopia correction, suggesting CCL is a promising technique that merits further development and study.

The use of femtosecond lasers in cataract surgery: review of the published results with the LenSx system.

PURPOSE: To review the published literature describing the use of the LenSx femtosecond laser technology (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) in cataract surgery. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS: The LenSx system has been used in more than 200,000 cataract surgery procedures to date. Pre-clinical evaluations have shown that this system produces accurate and reproducible capsulorhexes, and that both the energy required for phacoemulsification and total phacoemulsification time are less than with conventional phacoemulsification. In comparative studies, femtosecond lasers have been shown to produce more precise and reproducible capsulorhexes than manual procedures, and better intraocular lens placement; capsule overlap, circularity of capsulotomy, and centration of the intraocular lens are consistently better with femtosecond lasers than with manual procedures. The improved quality of capsulorhexis and intraocular lens positioning are reflected in favorable visual and refractive outcomes. As with any new technology, there is a significant learning curve: prospective cohort studies have shown that the incidence of intraoperative complications such as suction breaks or anterior capsular tears or tags decreases with experience. In general, the incidence of such complications is within the range (< 2%) considered in recent evidence-based guidelines to be feasible and desirable. CONCLUSIONS: Although femtosecond laser cataract surgery is in its infancy, the technology is evolving rapidly and offers the potential for more consistent and predictable results after cataract surgery.

Influence of co-payment levels on patient and surgeon acceptance of advanced technology intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To investigate patients' willingness to pay for advanced technology intraocular lenses and surgeons' willingness to recommend them. METHODS: In this study, 370 cataract surgeons and 700 patients undergoing cataract surgery from seven countries underwent online interviews in which they were shown unbranded profiles of three advanced technology intraocular lenses (ie, biconvex toric aspheric optic, symmetric biconvex diffractive optic, and biconvex diffractive aspheric toric) and asked to indicate their willingness to accept (for patients) or suggest (for surgeons) each lens. Acceptance was assessed assuming there was either no co-payment or co-payments of €500 to €1,500 +15%. RESULTS: All three lenses were widely accepted by patients, with 68% to 99% indicating acceptance when there was no co-payment. In contrast, surgeons' willingness to suggest them was markedly lower (20% to 43%). Both patients' acceptance of the lenses and surgeons' willingness to suggest them decreased with increasing co-payment levels to 19% to 74% (patients) and 5% to 31% (surgeons) at the highest co-payment levels. CONCLUSIONS: There is a marked discrepancy between patients' acceptance of the three lenses and surgeons' willingness to suggest them. Although patients' acceptance is high, it decreases with increasing out-of-pocket expenditure. Manufacturers should communicate the relative benefits and costs of their lenses to both surgeons and patients.

Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in corneal deformation parameters after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 17 eyes of 17 patients after SMILE, 18 eyes of 18 patients after LASEK, and 17 eyes of 17 patients after FS-LASIK were included. Corneal deformation parameters were measured with the CorVis ST tonometer (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean value of deformation amplitude of the FS-LASIK group was significantly higher than that of the LASEK group (P = .022). The mean value of applanation time (applanation 1) of the LASEK group was significantly higher than that of the FS-LASIK group (P = .038). No significant difference was detected in the mean values of deformation amplitude and applanation time (applanation 1) (P > .05) between the LASEK and SMILE groups or between the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups. Multiple linear regression model analysis revealed that after adjustment for age and preoperative central corneal thickness and manifest refraction spherical equivalent, the significance of the difference in the mean values of applanation time (applanation 1) and deformation amplitude between the LASEK and FS-LASIK groups were P = .084 and .059, respectively. In all three groups, the values of applanation 1 negatively correlated to those of applanation time (applanation 2) (SMILE: r = −0.577, P = .015; LASEK: r = −0.833, P < .001; FS-LASIK: r = −0.516, P = .034) and deformation amplitude (SMILE: r = −0. 556, P = .021; LASEK: r = −0.877, P < .001; FS-LASIK: r = −0.509, P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: Applanation time (applanation 1) and deformation amplitude (as measured with the CorVis ST tonometer) may be helpful in assessing corneal biomechanical changes after corneal refractive surgery. The relations between these parameters should be discussed in further studies.

Comparison of corneal sensation between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the impact on corneal sensation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (femto-LASIK) in patients with myopia. METHODS: In this prospective, nonrandomized comparative study, 71 subjects were enrolled. Thirty-eight eyes of 38 patients underwent SMILE and 33 eyes of 33 patients underwent femto-LASIK. Corneal sensation was tested with Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry in five corneal areas preoperatively and at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Comparison of corneal sensation was performed for the SMILE and femto-LASIK groups. Additionally, the correlations were evaluated between the postoperative corneal sensation, preoperative spherical equivalent, and ablation depth. RESULTS: All tested areas within the cap or flap demonstrated corneal hypoesthesia immediately after both surgeries. SMILE-treated eyes showed less compromised corneal sensation than femto-LASIK-treated eyes at all postoperative visits in the central, inferior, nasal, and temporal areas at the 1-week and 1-month visits. In the SMILE group, the inferior, nasal, and temporal quadrants recovered faster than other areas. In the femto-LASIK group, the sensation over the flap did not recover to preoperative levels by postoperative 6 months. There was no correlation between postoperative corneal sensation, preoperative spherical equivalent, and ablation depth in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The impairment of corneal sensation was less significant in the SMILE group than in the femto-LASIK group and was independent of preoperative spherical equivalent or ablation depth.

Evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted and manual clear corneal incisions and their effect on surgically induced astigmatism and higher-order aberrations.

PURPOSE: To evaluate femtosecond laser-assisted and manual clear corneal incisions and their effect on surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs). METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, conventional phacoemulsification with a 2.8-mm clear corneal incision using a disposable keratome was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (manual group), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with a 2.8-mm biplanar clear corneal tunnel created by a femtosecond laser (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (femtosecond laser group). Corneal topography readings and corneal wavefront aberrations (diameter: 9.0 mm) were obtained using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR; Oculus Optikgerate, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in SIA between the groups (femtosecond laser group: 0.47 ± 0.13 vs manual group: 0.41 ± 0.14; P = .218), but the axis deviation of the SIA axis from the previously planned axis was significantly smaller in the femtosecond laser group compared to the manual group (4.47°± 2.59° vs 7.38°± 4.72°, respectively; P = .048). Corneal HOAs increased significantly in both groups (femtosecond laser group: 0.13 ± 0.09 to 0.18 ± 0.12, P = .025; manual group: 0.13 ± 0.05 to 0.15 ± 0.05, P = .002), but preoperative and postoperative values did not differ significantly between them (P = .472 and .078, respectively). Lower-order and total corneal aberration values remained stable in both groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in SIA and induced HOAs between manual and femtosecond laser-created clear corneal incisions.

The effect of femtosecond laser capsulotomy on the development of posterior capsule opacification.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effects of femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy and manual anterior capsulorhexis on posterior capsule opacification (PCO) development. METHODS: Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy was performed in 40 eyes of 40 patients (FS group) and manual anterior capsulorhexis was performed in 39 eyes of 39 patients (CCC group). An AcrySof one-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) was implanted in all eyes. The PCO level was measured using Open-Access Systematic Capsule Assessment (OSCA) software 18 to 26 months after surgery. Postoperative intraocular lens position (ie, tilt and decentration) was measured using Scheimpflug images (Pentacam; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in age, axial length, and follow-up time between the two groups (P > .05). Vertical tilt, horizontal and total decentration of intraocular lenses, and PCO proved to be significantly higher in the CCC group (P = .03, .04, .03, and .01, respectively). After adjusting for axial length and follow-up time, manual anterior capsulorhexis was found to be a significant predictor of higher PCO scores in the multivariable regression model (ß: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.65; P = .04). Vertical tilt affected PCO scores after adjusting for axial length and follow-up time (ß: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.12; P = .02). No capsulotomies were performed during follow-up in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy proved to be a safe procedure for postoperative PCO rates. Due to better intraocular lens position, femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy resulted in slightly decreased PCO scores; however, evaluating its clinical significance requires further studies.

Anterior segment OCT imaging after femtosecond laser cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To report the anterior segment imaging characteristics after femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery. METHODS: Cataract surgery was performed with the LenSx femtosecond laser (Alcon-LenSx Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) in 40 eyes of 40 patients. The laser was programmed to perform a 4.5-mm capsulorhexis, a cross-pattern fragmentation of the nucleus, a 2.8-mm main incision, and a 1.0-mm side-port incision. The anterior segment was then analyzed using the Visante OCT anterior segment program (Zeiss-Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). RESULTS: The preoperatively set treatment parameters correlated well with the achieved results. For the capsulorhexis, the femtosecond laser cut was programmed to start 350 µm behind the anterior lens capsule and OCT measured 377 ± 55.3 µm. Nucleus fragmentation was programmed to start 750 µm in front of the posterior capsule and end 550 µm behind the anterior capsule, and OCT measured 794 ± 111 and 568 ± 147 µm, respectively. The diameter of the capsulorhexis measured by OCT was 4.54 ± 0.2 mm, compared to the 4.5 mm programmed. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior segment OCT imaging was able to detect the tissue changes within the lens after femtosecond laser capsulorhexis and nucleus fragmentation. The measured values correlated well with the planned treatment parameters.

Removability of a small aperture intracorneal inlay for presbyopia correction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of the corneal inlay removal procedure and the reversibility of visual acuities, corneal topography, and corneal biomicroscopy changes in a series of cases. METHODS: Ten cases implanted with one of three versions of the AcuFocus Kamra Inlay (ACI 7000, 7000T, and 7000PDT; AcuFocus, Inc., Irvine, CA) were followed for a minimum of 6 months after corneal inlay removal. RESULTS: The reason for removal was related to subjective dissatisfaction with visual symptoms (8 of 10 patients) such as night glare, photophobia, starburst, blurry vision, and halos. One case of removal was related to inadvertent thin flap and the final case was related to insufficient near vision. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was 0 ± 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/20) and 0.5 ± 0.2 logMAR (Snellen 20/40), respectively, preoperatively and 0.1 ± 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/25) and 0.5 ± 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/63), respectively, 6 months after corneal inlay removal. Mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) was 0 ± 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/20) and 0 ± 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/20), respectively, preoperatively and 0 ± 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/20) and 0.1 ± 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/25), respectively, 6 months after corneal inlay removal. Mean root mean square (RMS) higher-order aberration (HOA) was 0.50 ± 0.12 (range: 0.30 to 0.70) preoperatively and 0.69 ± 0.14 (range: 0.48 to 0.95) 6 months after corneal inlay removal (P < .8). Weak positive correlation was found between Δt Implant-Removal (Δt I-R), RMS spherical, coma, and HOA at 6 months (Δt I-R vs RMS spherical was r = 0.2, r(2) = 0.5, P < .7; Δt I-R vs RMS coma was r = 0.8, r(2) = 0.6, P < .3; and Δt I-R vs HOA r = 0.8; r(2) = 0.6, P < .9). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that after removal of the corneal inlay, corneal topography and corneal aberrometry are not permanently affected. In more than 60% of patients, CNVA, CDVA, UNVA, and UDVA were similar to the preoperative value.

Subjective outcomes after bilateral implantation of an apodized diffractive +3.0 D multifocal toric IOL in a prospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: To assess subjective outcomes after bilateral implantation of an aspheric apodized diffractive +3.0 diopter (D) multifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: This was a prospective, single-arm, 6-month study conducted at five study sites in Europe and South America. Forty-nine patients requiring bilateral cataract extraction or refractive lens exchange and IOL implantation in both eyes with preoperative regular corneal astigmatism of 0.75 D or greater and 2.5 D or less received bilateral AcrySof ReSTOR +3.0 D toric IOLs (Models SND1T3, SND1T4, or SND1T5; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Subjective questionnaires were administered preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Patient subjective experience with visual tasks at all distances improved from the preoperative visit to the 6-month visit. At the 6-month visit, 90% (36 of 40) of respondents reported complete freedom from corrective wear compared with 14% (6 of 43) pre-operatively. On a scale of 0 (worst) to 10 (best), the mean score that patients rated their uncorrected vision was 7.9 ± 1.9 at 6 months (n = 37) compared with 3.6 ± 2.0 at the preoperative visit (n = 38). CONCLUSIONS: Six months following bilateral implantation of the AcrySof ReSTOR +3.0 D toric IOL revealed improved subjective experience, increased spectacle freedom, and higher satisfaction when compared with the preoperative baseline.

Distance and near visual acuity improvement after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients with presbyopia: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) as well as uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) as outcomes in treating presbyopic cataract patients to assist clinicians and ophthalmologists in their decision-making process regarding available interventions. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Evidence Based Medicine Reviews were systematically reviewed to identify studies reporting changes in UDVA and UNVA after cataract surgery in presbyopic patients. Strict inclusion/exclusion criteria were used to exclude any studies not reporting uncorrected visual acuity in a presbyopic population with cataracts implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Relevant outcomes (UDVA and UNVA) were identified from the studies retrieved through the systematic review process. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were identified that reported uncorrected visual acuities, including one study that reported uncorrected intermediate visual acuity. Nine brands of multifocal IOLs were identified in the search. All studies identified in the literature search reported improvements in UDVA and UNVA following multifocal IOL implantation. The largest improvements in visual acuity were reported using the Rayner M-Flex lens (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd) (UDVA, binocular: 1.05 logMAR, monocular: 0.92 logMAR; UNVA, binocular and monocular: 0.83 logMAR) and the smallest improvements were reported using the Acri.LISA lens (Carl Zeiss Meditec) (UDVA, 0.21 decimal; UNVA, 0.51 decimal). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review show the aggregate of studies reporting a beneficial increase in UDVA and UNVA with the use of multifocal IOLs in cataract patients with presbyopia, hence providing evidence to support the hypothesis that multifocal IOLs increase UDVA and UNVA in cataract patients.

Intrastromal femtosecond laser presbyopia correction: 1-year results of a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To investigate functional outcomes of the INTRACOR femtosecond laser-based intrastromal procedure to treat presbyopia. METHODS: Sixty-three eyes from 63 presbyopic patients (median age: 54 years) with mild hyperopia were enrolled in this prospective, ethics committee-approved, multi-center, nonrandomized clinical trial. The INTRACOR procedure was performed using the Technolas femtosecond laser (Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH) in the nondominant eye. Postoperatively, follow-up was performed at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and included near and distance visual acuity tests, slit-lamp examinations, and corneal topography. RESULTS: All 63 surgeries were uneventful. Twelve months postoperatively, outcomes of 58 (92.1%) eyes were available for evaluation. Median uncorrected distance visual acuity (0.1 logMAR [range: 0.5 to 0.0 preoperatively and 0.5 to -0.1 postoperatively]) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (0.0 logMAR [range: 0.2 to -0.2 preoperatively and 0.3 to -0.1 postoperatively]) remained stable. Median spherical equivalent changed from +0.63 diopters (D) preoperatively to 0.00 D postoperatively. Median uncorrected near visual acuity increased significantly from 0.7 logMAR (range: 1.0 to 0.2) preoperatively to 0.2 logMAR (range: 0.8 to -0.1) postoperatively and eyes gained a median of 4 lines (range: 1 to 9 lines). Losses of 2 lines of CDVA were noted in 7.1% of eyes. Ring cuts were faintly visible at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The INTRACOR presbyopia procedure showed good and stable visual acuity outcomes over 12-month follow-up but loss of CDVA occurred in 7% of eyes. Overall patient satisfaction with the procedure was approximately 80%. Short treatment time and maintained corneal surface integrity are advantages of this procedure.

Comparison of long-term visual outcome and IOL position with a single-optic accommodating IOL After 5.5- or 6.0-mm Femtosecond laser capsulotomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term visual outcome and intraocular (IOL) position parameters with a single-optic accommodating IOL after 5.5- or 6.0-mm femtosecond laser capsulotomy. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, pilot study comprised 17 eyes from 11 patients (7 men) with a mean age of 65.82±10.64 years (range: 51 to 79 years). All patients received a Crystalens AT-50AO (Bausch & Lomb) accommodating IOL after femtosecond laser refractive cataract surgery using either a 5.5-mm capsulotomy (5.5-mm group; 9 eyes) or 6.0-mm capsulotomy (6.0-mm group; 8 eyes). Near and distance visual acuities, manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), and IOL tilt and decentration were evaluated 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between groups for postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, distance-corrected near visual acuity, and MRSE. Vertical and horizontal tilt were significantly higher in the 6.0-mm group than in the 5.5-mm group (P=.014 and P=.015, respectively). No significant difference was observed between groups regarding IOL decentration. CONCLUSIONS: A 5.5-mm capsulotomy created with a femtosecond laser is associated with less IOL tilt and therefore may be superior to a 6.0-mm capsulotomy when implanting a single-optic accommodating IOL.

Intraocular femtosecond laser use in traumatic cataracts following penetrating and blunt trauma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of femtosecond laser cataract surgery in traumatic cataracts of different origin. METHODS: The first case developed acute traumatic cataract due to penetrating injury of the cornea and the anterior lens capsule; the second developed traumatic cataract 11 years after a penetrating corneal injury; and the third developed a "white" cataract 12 months after blunt ocular trauma. In all cases, 4.5-mm capsulorrhexis and corneal incisions were performed using a femtosecond laser system (Alcon LenSx Inc), and nucleus liquefaction with the laser was performed additionally in the second case. RESULTS: In all patients, a capsulorrhexis could be created with the femtosecond laser. Preexisting radial tears were present in the first case, but the remaining anterior capsule could be cut with the laser. The second and third cases showed an intact 4.5-mm capsulorrhexis. Corneal incisions were stable in all cases, and nucleus liquefaction was possible in the second case (grade 1-2 nuclear density). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that a femtosecond laser can be used successfully in certain instances of traumatic cataract after penetrating eye injury, even if an anterior capsule laceration is present, and also after blunt trauma resulting in "white" cataracts.

Central corneal volume and endothelial cell count following femtosecond laser-assisted refractive cataract surgery compared to conventional phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on the cornea using Scheimpflug imaging and noncontact specular microscopy. METHODS: In each group, 38 eyes (38 patients) underwent cataract surgery using either femtosecond laser-assisted (Alcon LenSx laser) (femtolaser group) or conventional phacoemulsification (phaco group). Central corneal thickness, 3-mm corneal volume, and Pentacam Nucleus Staging (PNS) were determined by a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), and the volume stress index was calculated at 1 day and 1 month postoperatively. Endothelial cell count was measured by noncontact specular microscopy preoperatively, 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: Central corneal thickness was significantly higher in the phaco group (607±91 µm) than in the femtolaser group (580±42 µm) on day 1, but did not differ significantly preoperatively and at 1 week and 1 month. Volume stress index at day 1 was significantly lower in the femtolaser group than in the phaco group (P<.05) but did not differ significantly at 1 month. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the type of surgery had a significant effect on central corneal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery causes less corneal swelling in the early postoperative period and may cause less trauma to corneal endothelial cells than manual phacoemulsification.

Intraocular lens tilt and decentration measured by Scheimpflug camera following manual or femtosecond laser-created continuous circular capsulotomy.

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt following a circular capsulotomy created with a femtosecond laser (laser CCC) to a manually performed continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis (manual CCC). METHODS: In a prospective, randomized study, a laser CCC (Alcon LenSx Inc) was performed in 20 eyes from 20 patients and a manual CCC was performed in 25 eyes from 25 patients. Intraocular lens decentration and tilt were measured using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) 1 year after surgery. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and manifest refraction were also determined postoperatively. Between-group differences of IOL decentration and tilt as well as the correlation between IOL decentration and postoperative refractive changes and between IOL tilt and visual acuity were analyzed. RESULTS: Horizontal and vertical tilt were significantly higher in the manual CCC group (P=.007 and P<.001, respectively). Lenses implanted after manual CCC showed greater horizontal and total decentration (P=.034 and P=.022, respectively). Significant differences were found in the homogeneity of dichotomized IOL vertical tilt and both horizontal and total decentration distribution (P=.008, P=.036, and P=.017, respectively). Total IOL decentration showed a significant correlation with changes in manifest refraction values between 1 month and 1 year after surgery (R=0.33, P=.032). A significant correlation was noted between IOL vertical tilt and CDVA (R(2)=0.17, ß=-0.41, 95% confidence limit: -0.69 to -0.13, P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis created with a femtosecond laser resulted in a more stable refractive result and less IOL tilt and decentration than manual CCC.

Comparison of IOL power calculation and refractive outcome after laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation and refractive outcome between patients who underwent laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser and those with conventional cataract surgery. METHODS: In this prospective study, 77 eyes from 77 patients underwent laser refractive cataract surgery (laser group; Alcon LenSx femtosecond laser), and conventional cataract surgery with phacoemulsification was performed in 57 eyes from 57 patients (conventional group). Biometry was done with optical low coherence reflectometry (Lenstar LS900, Haag-Streit AG), and IOL calculation was performed with third-generation IOL formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay). The refractive outcome was analyzed using the mean absolute error (MAE; difference between predicted and achieved postoperative spherical equivalent refraction), and multivariable regression analysis was performed to compare the two groups. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between age, axial length, keratometry, and preoperative corrected visual acuity in the laser and conventional groups (P>.05; Mann-Whitney U test). At least 6 weeks after surgery, MAE was significantly lower in the laser group (0.38±0.28 diopters [D]) than in the conventional group (0.50±0.38 D) (P=.04). The difference was the greatest in short (axial length <22.0 mm, 0.43±0.41 vs 0.63±0.48) and long (axial length >26.0 mm, 0.33±0.24 vs 0.63±0.42) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser resulted in a significantly better predictability of IOL power calculation than conventional phacoemulsification surgery. This difference is possibly due to a more precise capsulorrhexis, resulting in a more stable IOL position.

Corneal changes in progressive keratoconus after cross-linking assessed by Scheimpflug camera.

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal changes after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in progressive keratoconus with Scheimpflug imaging. METHODS: This prospective analysis included 40 eyes from 22 patients with progressive keratoconus. Corneal CXL was performed in 25 eyes (CXL group) and 15 fellow eyes served as controls (control group). Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), thinnest corneal thickness (ThCT), posterior elevation, and Holladay equivalent keratometry values (K1, K2) were determined with Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) before and 1 year after CXL. Area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariable general estimating equation models were used to determine the most sensitive parameters of corneal changes. RESULTS: Manifest sphere (-2.55±3.21 to -1.48±2.39 diopters [D], P=.02), UDVA (0.23±0.25 to 0.31±0.25, P<.001), and CDVA (0.58±0.28 to 0.72±0.19, P=.019) improved significantly in the CXL group. Significant decreases were found in ThCT (472.53±33.18 to 440.53±38.67 µm, P<.001), posterior elevation (68.33±28.69 to 22.67±16.21, P<.001), and keratometry values (K1 [45.06±4.55 to 43.51±4.67 D, P<.001], K2 [48.39±5.41 to 46.71±5.67 D, P<.001]) in the CXL group. These parameters remained stable in controls (P>.05). According to ROC analysis, posterior elevation change was the most characteristic parameter of corneal change after CXL (area under the curve=0.99). General estimating equation model showed that CXL (P=.001) and initial ThCT (P=.007) were significant predictors of decrease in posterior elevation with a significant negative interaction of initial ThCT on CXL effect (P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior elevation is a sensitive parameter to monitor corneal remodeling after CXL. Corneal CXL showed augmented effect on corneal protrusion in eyes with thinner corneas.