Does preperitoneal packing increase venous thromboembolim risk among trauma patients? A prospective multicenter analysis across 17 level I trauma centers.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic fractures are associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Among treatment options, including pelvic angioembolization (PA), preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP), and pelvic open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), PPP has been postulated as a VTE risk factor. We aimed to characterize the risk of VTE among pelvic fracture patients receiving PPP, PA or ORIF. METHODS: We used observational data from a 17-site Consortium of Leaders in the Study of Traumatic Thromboembolism (CLOTT) study group, a US level I trauma center collaborative working to identify factors associated with posttraumatic VTE, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or pulmonary thrombosis. The CLOTT criteria included age 18 to 40 years with at least one independent VTE risk factor. We compared outcomes of PPP, PA, and pelvic ORIF to reference of no pelvic intervention. Our primary outcome was VTE. A competing risk analysis was performed. RESULTS: Among 1,387 pelvic fracture patients, VTE incidence was 5.6%. The ORIF patients were most likely to develop VTE (24.7%), while VTE incidence for PPP was 9.0% and 2.6% for PA. After multivariate, risk-competing analysis, none of the three treatment interventions for pelvic fractures were significantly associated with VTE. Initiation of VTE prophylaxis in the first 24 hours of admission independently halved VTE incidence (hazard ratio, 0.55; confidence interval, 0.33-0.91). CONCLUSION: Pelvic fracture interventions do not appear to be independent risk factors for VTE in our study. Initiation of VTE pharmacoprophylaxis within the first 24 hours of admission remains critical to significantly decreasing VTE formation in this high-risk population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Study; Level III.

Fibrinolysis Resistance After Injury Is a Risk Factor for a Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia-Like Disease Pattern.

Background: Pneumonia is associated with increased morbidity and costs in the intensive care unit (ICU). Its early identification is key for optimal outcomes, but early biomarkers are lacking. Studies suggest that fibrinolysis resistance (FR) after major abdominal surgery is linked to an increased risk of infection. Patients and Methods: Patients in a randomized controlled trial for hemorrhagic shock were evaluated for FR. Fibrinolysis resistance was quantified by thrombelastography with exogenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA-TEG) at 24- and 48-hours post-injury and measuring LY30 (%). A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify a cutoff for increased risk of pneumonia, which was then validated in ICU patients at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounders. Results: Forty-nine patients in the hemorrhagic shock cohort had tPA-TEGs at 24- and 48-hours (median ISS, 27; 7% pneumonia). A composite tPA-TEG LY30 of less than 4% at 24 and 48 hours was found to be the optimal cutoff for increased risk of pneumonia. This cohort had a seven-fold increased rate of pneumonia (4% vs. 28%; p = 0.048). Eighty-eight patients in the VTE cohort had tPA-TEGs at 24 and 48 hours post-ICU admission (median ISS, 28; 6% pneumonia). The tPA-TEG LY30 of less than 4% was associated with a 10-fold increased rate of pneumonia (19% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.002). In patients with traumatic brain injury, the same association was found (33% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.006). Adjusting for confounders, the tPA-TEG persisted as a substantial risk factor for pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 35.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-682; p = 0.018). Conclusions: Fibrinolysis resistance quantified by tPA-TEG within 48 hours of ICU admission is associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in patients in hemorrhagic shock and those at risk for VTE. Prospective validation of the tPA-TEG LY30 optimal cutoff for pneumonia and further investigation into whether endogenous FR is a cause of an altered immunity is warranted.

Weight-based enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in young trauma patients: analysis of the CLOTT-1 registry.

Introduction: Optimal venous thromboembolism (VTE) enoxaparin prophylaxis dosing remains elusive. Weight-based (WB) dosing safely increases anti-factor Xa levels without the need for routine monitoring but it is unclear if it leads to lower VTE risk. We hypothesized that WB dosing would decrease VTE risk compared with standard fixed dosing (SFD). Methods: Patients from the prospective, observational CLOTT-1 registry receiving prophylactic enoxaparin (n=5539) were categorized as WB (0.45-0.55 mg/kg two times per day) or SFD (30 mg two times per day, 40 mg once a day). Multivariate logistic regression was used to generate a predicted probability of VTE for WB and SFD patients. Results: Of 4360 patients analyzed, 1065 (24.4%) were WB and 3295 (75.6%) were SFD. WB patients were younger, female, more severely injured, and underwent major operation or major venous repair at a higher rate than individuals in the SFD group. Obesity was more common among the SFD group. Unadjusted VTE rates were comparable (WB 3.1% vs. SFD 3.9%; p=0.221). Early prophylaxis was associated with lower VTE rate (1.4% vs. 5.0%; p=0.001) and deep vein thrombosis (0.9% vs. 4.4%; p<0.001), but not pulmonary embolism (0.7% vs. 1.4%; p=0.259). After adjustment, VTE incidence did not differ by dosing strategy (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.48); however, early administration was associated with a significant reduction in VTE (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74). Conclusion: In young trauma patients, WB prophylaxis is not associated with reduced VTE rate when compared with SFD. The timing of the initiation of chemoprophylaxis may be more important than the dosing strategy. Further studies need to evaluate these findings across a wider age and comorbidity spectrum. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic/care management.