A nationwide multicenter study of the cost effectiveness of five leading drugs for pharmacological management of cervicobrachial symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Cervicobrachial pain frequently affects the quality of life (QOL) of the general public and has a significant economic impact on the health care systems of various countries. There are a number of treatment options for this disease, including widely-used drug therapy, but the effectiveness of each option is indeterminate, and there have been no published cost-effectiveness analysis studies so far. This prospective observational study aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of drug treatment for cervicobrachial symptoms. METHODS: A 6-month medication regimen for each of five frequently-prescribed drugs for cervicobrachial symptoms was administered to 322 patients at 24 centers in Japan. Outcome measures, including of the EuroQol Group 5D, Short Form-8, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), were investigated at baseline and every month thereafter. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the drug cost to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. A stratified analysis of patient characteristics was also performed to identify baseline factors potentially affecting cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The ICER of entire drug treatment for cervicobrachial symptoms was 7,491,640 yen. Compared with the reference willingness-to-pay, the ICER was assumed to not be cost-effective. A certain number of QALYs were gained during the first 3 months after the treatment intervention, but almost no QALYs were gained during the following 3 months. Stratified analysis showed that cost-effectiveness was extremely low for patients with high baseline VAS and high QOL. CONCLUSIONS: The available medications for cervicobrachial symptoms did not have excellent cost-effectiveness. Although a certain number of QALYs were gained during the first 3 months after medication, no QALYs were gained in the latter half of the study period, suggesting that it is not advisable to continue the medication needlessly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

Comparing short vs. intermediate and long nails in elderly patients with unstable multifragmental femoral trochanteric fractures (AO type A2): Multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Unstable femoral trochanteric fractures (FTFs), especially Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/ the Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-A2 fractures, which are multifragment fractures, occur in elderly individuals with osteoporosis and are associated with high mortality and complication rates due to prolonged immobilization. Longer nails (LNs) were developed to obtain superior fracture site stabilization in unstable FTFs. We hypothesized that the postoperative outcomes of elderly patients with unstable FTFs treated with LNs would be superior to those of patients treated with short nails (SNs), with fewer complications. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of SNs versus LNs in elderly patients with unstable FTFs. From the Trauma Research Group of our university (TRON) database, 1854 trochanteric fractures treated between January 2016 and December 2020 were extracted. A total of 174 patients>65 years of age with AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures were included in the present study. They were divided into the SN group and the LN group and matched for age and sex. Parameters such as operative time, blood loss, survival rate, Parker Mobility Score (PMS), and numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, complications, and radiographic findings were analyzed. RESULTS: Both groups included 67 patients with an average age of 87.32 years. The LN group had a longer operative time (76.52 min vs. 51.61 min, P < 0.001) and more blood loss (106.79 mL vs. 49.98 mL, P = 0.014) in comparison to the SN group. However, the 1-year survival rate, PMS, and NRS for pain did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the groups. The rates of complications, including screw cutout, nonunion, implant breakage, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and surgical site infections, were comparable. The radiographic findings, including the nail/canal ratio, progression of varus, and sliding distance, were also similar. CONCLUSION: Although LNs are associated with longer operative times and increased blood loss, the overall outcomes and complication rates are comparable to those of SNs in elderly patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 type unstable FTFs. The use of LNs did not confer any distinct advantages for this specific type of fracture.

Early versus delayed weight bearing after internal fixation for femoral neck fracture in younger adults: A multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is among the most common and devastating injuries that orthopedic surgeons encounter. However, the incidence of FNF is lower in younger adults than in elderly individuals. In elderly FNF patients, early weight bearing (EWB) is preferred to prevent loss of function and decreased activity. In younger adults, some surgeons decide on delayed-weight bearing (DWB) after surgery because EWB may cause femoral neck shortening. We aimed to compare the postoperative results (clinical outcome, radiological evaluation, and complications) of EWB and DWB after FNF surgery in younger adults. METHODS: The study included 151 younger adults (age: ≤65 years at injury; nondisplaced, n = 100; displaced, n = 51) who underwent internal fixation at 11 university-affiliated hospitals in 2016-2020, and who were followed for ≥1 year. Patients were divided into the EWB (EWB in early postoperative period) and DWB (beginning weight bearing at 4 weeks after surgery) groups. The two groups were matched for age, and nondisplaced (EWB and DWB, both n = 24) and displaced (EWB and DWB, both n = 11) FNF were analyzed. The study items were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), presence of diabetes, days waiting for surgery, fracture type, Parker mobility score (PMS) at last follow-up examination, pain (Numerical Rating Scale: NRS), radiological evaluation (femoral neck shortening, Canulated Cancellous screws (CCS) backout, and complications (nonunion, femoral head osteonecrosis). RESULTS: The patient backgrounds of the nondisplaced and displaced types did not differ. The PMS was significantly higher in the DWB group at the last follow-up examination (nondisplaced: 8.00±2.20 vs. 6.67±2.22, p = 0.005, displaced: 8.67±0.89 vs. 6.91±2.77, p<0.001). NRS and the amount of femoral neck shortening were significantly lower in the DWB group (nondisplaced: 1.65±0.70 mm vs. 3.94±3.03 mm, p<0.001, displaced: 4.26± 2.64 mm vs. 8.91±5.69 mm, p<0.001). CCS backout did not differ between the groups. One case of each of nonunion and femoral head osteonecrosis were observed in the displaced EWB and DWB groups; these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: DWB after internal fixation for FNF in younger adults was associated with better outcomes than EWB.