Pain and Opioid use Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Psycho-Social Factors are More Predictive Than Pharmacogenomics.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, observational study was designed to assess the phenotype variation of the genes associated with pain and opioid use following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in comparison to psycho-social elements. METHODS: Preoperative demographic data and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-43 scores were obtained on 305 elective TKA patients. Patient visual analog scale pain scores and opioid use were extracted from the hospital record. Following discharge, participants completed a daily log of visual analog scale pain score, and medications used over 30 days. Pharmacogenomic testing was performed for three genes, CYP2D6, COMT, and OPRM1, which are involved in the opioid pathway and pain modulation. RESULTS: Other than increased pain seen in the COMT high activity group while in the hospital, none of the phenotype variations of the three genes were significantly associated with the participants' pain or opioid use. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-43 domains of pain interference and anxiety were significantly associated with pain and opioid use using multiple logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacogenomic testing in this study was not predictive of pain and opioid use following TKA compared with psycho-social variables.

Long Head of the Biceps Autograft Performs Biomechanically Similar to Human Dermal Allograft for Superior Capsule Reconstruction After Rotator Cuff Tear.

PURPOSE: To provide a biomechanical comparison between human dermal (HD) allograft and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft with and without posterior side-to-side suturing for superior capsule reconstruction. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens were tested in 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) complete supraspinatus tear, (3) LHBT, (4) LHBT with side-to-side suturing, and (5) HD allograft with side-to-side suturing. Functional abduction force, superior translation of humeral head, translational range of motion, and rotational range of motion were tested at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction within each condition. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance with post-hoc Tukey testing for pairwise comparison, with a significance value set at .05. RESULTS: Functional abduction force in the LHBT, LHBT + suture, and HD + suture conditions was significantly increased compared with the supraspinatus tear condition at abduction angles of 30° (P = .011, .001, and .017, respectively), 60° (P = .004, .001, and .002, respectively), and 90° (P = .013, .001, and .038, respectively). In addition, superior translation of the humeral head in the LHBT, LHBT + suture, and HD + suture conditions was significantly decreased compared with the tear condition at abduction angles of 30° (P = .03, .049, .03, respectively) and 60° (P = .02, .04, .03, respectively). All 3 reconstructive techniques were statistically identical to the intact rotator cuff condition in regard to translational and rotational range of motion. CONCLUSIONS: Superior capsule reconstruction with LHBT autograft without side-to-side suturing, LHBT with posterior side-to-side suturing, and HD allograft with posterior side-to-side suturing all equivalently restore functional abduction force and decrease superior translation of the humeral head after a complete supraspinatus tear. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Superior capsule reconstruction with long head of the biceps tendon autograft and human dermal allograft both restore functional abduction force and decrease superior translation of the humeral head, while displaying no losses in the range of motion in a cadaveric model.

Arthroscopic repair of degenerative medial meniscus tears in patients aged over 45 years resulted in favorable clinical outcomes and low clinical failure rates at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate clinical and radiological results of arthroscopic repair for isolated medial degenerative meniscus tears (DMTs) in patients over 45 years old at a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: From 2013 to 2017, patients aged over 45 years with isolated medial DMT refractory to conservative management or with true mechanical symptoms who had undergone arthroscopic repair were retrospectively reviewed. Arthroscopic meniscus repair was performed using all-inside or all-inside and inside-out technique in combination with bone marrow venting procedure. Tear patterns were classified according to arthroscopic findings. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and outcome evaluations, including Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up. International Cartilage Repair Society grades of the medial compartments and MRI signal at tear sites were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up. A grade 0 to 2 signal at the repair site suggested a healed meniscus, whereas a grade 3 signal suggested an unhealed meniscus. Clinical failure was determined according to Barrett criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (mean age, 57.7 ± 7.4 years) were enrolled. The mean follow-up was 52.0 ± 15.6 months. Among tear patterns, 48% were complex tears, 30% were horizontal tears, and 22% were other patterns. The mean Lysholm score and IKDC score significantly improved from 53 ± 25 to 89 ± 15 (p < 0.001) and 34 ± 24 to 72 ± 15 (p < 0.001) at the final follow-up, respectively. The median Tegner activity score significantly improved from 1 (range 1-4) to 4 (range 2-7, p < 0.001). Three (11%) patients were considered clinical failures, and five patients (19%) had cartilage lesion progression. At the final follow-up, MRI showed grade 0 in one (4%) patient, grade 1 in nine (33%) patients, grade 2 in six (22%) patients, and grade 3 in eleven (41%) patients. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of isolated medial DMT refractory to conservative management or with true mechanical symptoms in patients aged over 45 years had good to excellent clinical outcomes with low clinical failure rates, despite unhealed menisci being observed on MRI in 41% of patients at a mean 4.3-year follow-up. Arthroscopic repair could be a treatment option for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Analysis of abduction moment arms after rotator cuff tear and acellular dermal matrix allograft reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical testing of abduction moment arms presents a useful method to assess the contributions of individual rotator cuff muscles to glenohumeral function. This study aimed to investigate the changes in abduction moment arms after the treatment of supraspinatus tears with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR), and a combined SCR-BAR procedure, all with human dermal allograft. METHODS: We tested 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens under 6 conditions: (1) intact, (2) 50% supraspinatus tear (partial tear), (3) 100% supraspinatus tear, (4) SCR, (5) SCR combined with BAR, and (6) BAR. In each condition, the moment arms for the individual muscles of the teres minor, subscapularis, and infraspinatus were calculated throughout 90° of abduction using a motion capture system. Analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey testing were performed to determine significance. RESULTS: In the teres minor, the moment arms in the SCR (11.9 mm), BAR (10.1 mm), and SCR-BAR (11.9 mm) conditions were greater than those in the intact (8.5 mm; P = .001, P = .001, and P = .001, respectively), partial tear (9.1 mm; P = .001, P = .128, and P = .001, respectively), and complete tear (8.8 mm; P = .001, P = .011, and P = .001, respectively) conditions. Similarly, in the subscapularis, the moment arms in the SCR (13.4 mm), BAR (13.8 mm), and SCR-BAR (13.5 mm) conditions were greater than those in the intact (10.6 mm; P = .006, P = .001, and P = .003, respectively) and partial tear (10.4 mm; P = .006, P = .001, and P = .003, respectively) conditions. In the teres minor, the SCR (11.9 mm) and SCR-BAR (11.9 mm) conditions were also found to have significantly increased moment arms compared with the BAR condition (10.1 mm; P = .001 and P = .001, respectively). In the infraspinatus, the BAR condition (13.8 mm) was found to have a significantly decreased moment arm compared with the partial tear condition (15.8 mm, P = .026), with no other significant findings between conditions. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the moment arm contributions of the individual muscles comprising the rotator cuff can change after reconstruction to compensate for tears. SCR and SCR-BAR increase the moment arms in the teres minor and subscapularis, potentially allowing for increased abduction ability.

What do positive and negative Cutibacterium culture results in periprosthetic shoulder infection mean? A multi-institutional control study.

BACKGROUND: Deep tissue culture specimens obtained at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty are commonly positive for Cutibacterium. Clinical interpretation of positive cultures can be difficult. This was a multi-institutional study evaluating the accuracy of cultures for Cutibacterium using positive control (PC) and negative control (NC) samples. The relationship between time to culture positivity and strength of culture positivity was also studied. METHODS: Eleven different institutions were each sent 12 blinded samples (10 PC and 2 NC samples). The 10 PC samples included 2 sets of 5 different dilutions of a Cutibacterium isolate from a failed total shoulder arthroplasty with a probable periprosthetic infection. At each institution, the samples were handled as if they were received from the operating room. Specimen growth, time to culture positivity, and strength of culture positivity (based on semiquantitative assessment) were reported. RESULTS: A total of 110 PC samples and 22 NC samples were tested. One hundred percent of specimens at the 4 highest dilutions were positive for Cutibacterium. At the lowest dilution, 91% of samples showed positive findings. Cutibacterium grew in 14% of NC samples. Cutibacterium grew in PC samples at an average of 4.0 ± 1.3 days, and all of these samples showed growth within 7 days. The time to positivity was significantly shorter (P < .001) and the strength of positivity was significantly higher (P < .001) in true-positive cultures compared with false-positive cultures. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional study suggests that different institutions may report highly consistent rates of culture positivity for revision shoulder arthroplasty samples with higher bacterial loads. In contrast, with lower bacterial loads, the results are somewhat less consistent. Clinicians should consider using a shorter time to positivity and a higher strength of positivity as adjuncts in determining whether a tissue culture sample is a true positive.

Evaluation of rotator cuff abduction moment arms for superior capsular reconstruction and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The rotator cuff (RC) muscles contribute to dynamic stability and rotational actions of the glenohumeral joint. Moment arm can be used to demonstrate the potential work a muscle contributes to a musculoskeletal joint rotation. This study aimed to understand the moment arm contributions of the RC muscles and explore changes following a complete supraspinatus tear treated with either superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). METHODS: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were prepared and mounted in an apparatus where each intact RC muscle was held in tension with a line of action toward its origin on the scapula. Mean moment arms for each muscle were determined experimentally based on Optotrak data collected during cadaveric shoulder arm abduction. RESULTS: Using ANOVA testing, our analysis demonstrated significant differences (p < 0.001) in infraspinatus and teres minor moment arms after rTSA compared to the intact shoulder model. After SCR, significant differences (p < 0.001) were seen in teres minor, with these differences being statistically similar to the changes seen in teres minor after rTSA. Subscapularis showed no significant difference in moment arm values between the models (p = 0.148). CONCLUSION: Our results illustrate that mean moment arms were preserved in the RC muscles after complete supraspinatus tear. This study also shows evidence that subscapularis function may be maintained after SCR or rTSA. After SCR, infraspinatus may maintain similar abduction ability compared to the anatomical shoulder, while teres minor ability may increase. Infraspinatus may have decreased abduction ability after rTSA while teres minor may have increased ability.

Are Comorbidities Affecting Rotator Cuff Repair Outcomes? A Retrospective Review of Postoperative Costs and complications.

Our study examines the effect of comorbidities on rotator cuff repair (RCR) postoperative costs and complication rates. A retrospective review of patients receiving RCRs from 2008-2016 using the PearlDiver database was performed. We evaluated the effect of major comorbidities on postoperative costs and complications within one year of surgery. In total, 8,747 patients underwent RCR. Patients with no comorbidities had a 6-month and 12-month postoperative cost of $3,534 and $3,853, respectively. Patients with one comorbidity had 6-month postoperative costs ranging from $2,623 to $3,466 and 1-year postoperative costs ranging from $2,992 to $5,906. Patients with 3+ comorbidities receiving arthroscopic RCR had the highest complication rates at 1-, 3- and 6-month intervals (11.8%, 19.7% and 26.8%, respectively) compared to those with no comorbidities (8.1% [p = 0.139], 12.7% [p = 0.022] and 15.9% [p = 0.001], respectively). Patients with isolated comorbidities likely require similar healthcare utilization to those without, but patients with 3+ comorbidities risk greater complications and higher post-operative costs. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(1):024-029, 2021).

Trans-coracoacromial Ligament Glenohumeral Injection With Arthroscopic Confirmation.

PURPOSE: To arthroscopically evaluate the trans-coracoacromial ligament glenohumeral (GH) injection technique by understanding intra-articular needle-tip placement and potential misplacement and complications. METHODS: The technique relies on the palpation of 3 bony landmarks: anterolateral corner of the acromion, superolateral border of the coracoid tip, and curved depression of the distal clavicle. The skin entry site lies on the line connecting the curved depression of the distal clavicle and superolateral border of the coracoid tip, two-thirds of the way from the former and one-third of the way from the latter. The direction of the needle is perpendicular to the triangle formed by the 3 bony landmarks. The technique is used to insufflate the GH joint at the start of shoulder arthroscopy procedures with patients in the beach-chair position. Saline solution is injected, and the position of the needle tip in the GH joint is evaluated arthroscopically. An injection is considered successful if saline solution can be injected and the needle tip can be visualized intra-articularly. RESULTS: This study enrolled 195 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. Successful needle placement in the GH joint occurred in 179 patients (91.8%); placement occurred through the rotator interval in 122 of these, adjacent or through the long head of the biceps tendon in 41, through the upper subscapularis or anterior supraspinatus in 13, and through the anterior labrum in 3. Regarding the 16 failures (8.2%), the needle position did not allow saline solution to be injected because of high resistance in 3 patients whereas the needle tip was not visualized in 13. The needle tip was presumed to rest within the subscapularis muscle or tendon or the labrum in 10 failed injections. CONCLUSIONS: The trans-coracoacromial ligament injection technique showed a high success rate (91.8%) in anesthetized patients about to undergo arthroscopy, whereas the failed injections mainly occurred because the needle was inserted into the subscapularis or labrum. This technique can be used for awake patients with different diagnoses in multiple settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic study.

Coracoid morphology is not associated with subscapularis tears.

BACKGROUND: The observation of the roller-wringer effect fueled the idea that coracoid morphology is related to subscapularis pathology. We aimed to examine this relationship, specifically focusing on how the coracohumeral distance (CHD) and 2 new metrics of coracoid morphology relate to subscapularis tears. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we identified consecutive patients 45 years or older who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for any indication. We blindly reviewed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies of each patient, measuring the CHD, lateral extent (LE), and caudal extent (CE) of the coracoid process. Patients' subscapularis condition was assessed via operative reports; stratified according to Lafosse grade criteria; and compared for differences in the CHD, LE, and CE by 1-way analysis of variance and 2-tailed t tests. RESULTS: The study included 201 patients. Of these, 112 had no evidence of subscapularis injury, whereas Lafosse grade I injuries were identified in 52 patients; grade II, in 19; and grades III-V, in 18. The CHD, LE, and CE were not correlated with subscapularis injury (CHD, P = .36; LE, P = .36; and CE, P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: We found no correlation between subscapularis injury and the CHD, LE, and CE. These findings support the idea that coracoid morphology may not be a cause of subscapularis pathology and suggest that coracoplasty may not be necessary prophylactically or as part of subscapularis repair.

Biomechanical effects of superior capsular reconstruction in a rotator cuff-deficient shoulder: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been gaining popularity as a treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs), especially in younger patients. This biomechanical study aimed to investigate how SCR affects functional abduction force, humeral head migration, and passive range of motion following an irreparable RCT. We hypothesized that SCR will restore these parameters to nearly intact shoulder levels. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were evaluated using a custom biomechanical testing apparatus. Each shoulder was taken through 3 conditions: (1) intact (control); (2) irreparable, complete supraspinatus (SS) tear; and (3) SCR. Functional abduction force, superior humeral head migration, and passive range of motion, including axial shoulder rotation, were measured in static condition at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Data were analyzed using the paired Student t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the results of normality testing. RESULTS: The irreparable SS tear resulted in significantly lower functional abduction force at 30° of abduction (P = .01) and a trend toward a decrease (P = .17) at 60° compared with the intact configuration. SCR shoulders produced greater functional force at 0° compared with the tear configuration (P = .046). Humeral head migration was significantly increased by 4.4 and 3.0 mm at 0° and 30° of abduction, respectively, when comparing the intact vs. SS tear configurations (P = .001). SCR decreased superior migration down to levels of intact shoulders at 0° and 30° of abduction (P = .008 and P = .013, respectively) and was not significantly different from the intact configuration at any angle. SCR decreased passive shoulder extension compared with the tear configuration and increased abduction compared with the intact configuration (P = .007 and P = .03, respectively). The overall arc of axial rotation was not significantly different between SCR and the intact configuration at any angle. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of an irreparable SS tear, SCR restores key biomechanical parameters of the shoulder to intact levels. SCR should be considered for qualifying patients with irreparable RCTs.

Defining massive rotator cuff tears: a Delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND: A standard definition for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) has not been identified. The purpose of this study is to use the modified Delphi technique to determine a practical, consensus definition for MRCTs. METHODS: This study is based on responses from 20 experts who participated in 4 rounds of surveys to determine a consensus definition for MRCT. Consensus was achieved when at least 70% of survey responders rated an item at least a 4 on a 5-point scale. A set of core characteristics was drafted based on literature review and then refined to achieve a consensus MRCT definition. RESULTS: The following core characteristics reached consensus in the first round: tear size, number of tendons torn, and degree of medial retraction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative findings reached consensus as the modalities of diagnosis. The second round determined that tear size should be measured as a relative value. An initial definition for MRCT was proposed in the third round: retraction of tendon(s) to the glenoid rim and/or a tear with ≥67% greater tuberosity exposure (65% approval). A modified definition was proposed that specified that degree of retraction should be measured in the coronal or axial plane and that the amount of greater tuberosity exposure should be measured in the sagittal plane (90% approval). CONCLUSIONS: This study determined with 90% agreement that MRCT should be defined as retraction of tendon(s) to the glenoid rim in either the coronal or axial plane and/or a tear with ≥67% of the greater tuberosity exposed measured in the sagittal plane. The measurement can be performed either with MRI or intraoperatively.

Management of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rates, and treatment response.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to (1) compare patient-reported outcome scores, (2) define failure and reoperation rates, and (3) quantify the magnitude of patient response across treatment strategies. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Scopus databases were searched for studies including physical therapy and operative treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. The criteria of the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies were used to assess study quality. Primary outcome measures were patient-reported outcome scores as well as failure, complication, and reoperation rates. To quantify patient response to treatment, we compared changes in the Constant-Murley score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score with previously reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. RESULTS: No level I or II studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were found. Physical therapy was associated with a 30% failure rate among the included patients, and another 30% went on to undergo surgery. Partial repair was associated with a 45% retear rate and 10% reoperation rate. Only graft interposition was associated with a weighted average change that exceeded the MCID for both the Constant-Murley score and ASES score. Latissimus tendon transfer techniques using humeral bone tunnel fixation were associated with a 77% failure rate. Superior capsular reconstruction with fascia lata autograft was associated with a weighted average change that exceeded the MCID for the ASES score. Reverse arthroplasty was associated with a 10% prosthesis failure rate and 8% reoperation rate. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality comparative studies to guide treatment recommendations. Compared with surgery, physical therapy is associated with less improvement in perceived functional outcomes and a higher clinical failure rate.

The biomechanics of the supraspinatus-deficient shoulder treated with superior capsular reconstruction vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-experimental study.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Our objective was to compare biomechanical effects of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) on shoulder motion, in the setting of an irreparable supraspinatus (SS) tear. We hypothesized that rTSA would produce greater improvement in abduction force and shift the humerus inferiorly, while SCR would produce greater range of motion (ROM) and prevent superior migration of the humerus during abduction. METHODS: Six cadaveric shoulders were evaluated using a custom biomechanical apparatus. Each shoulder underwent four experimental conditions: (1) intact/control, (2) irreparable SS tear, (3) SCR using dermal allograft, and (4) rTSA without SCR. Deltoid abduction force, superior humeral head translation, and passive range of motion were measured in static tendon loading condition at 0, 30, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. RESULTS: Both rTSA and SCR restored abduction force to intact levels at all abduction angles. rTSA significantly increased abduction force compared with the SS-deficient shoulder at 0, 30, 60° (p = 0.04), while SCR produced a significant increase at 0° (p = 0.05) abduction. rTSA inferiorly shifted the humeral head by 27 mm (p = 0.002). SCR restored superior humeral head translation to intact SS levels. Compared with SCR, rTSA resulted in 25° less passive abduction (p = 0.001) without significant differences in forward flexion/extension. Compared with SCR, rTSA achieved 10° less passive internal rotation at 0° abduction (p = 0.03) and 26° and 17° greater external rotation at 30° and 60° abduction, respectively (p = 0.03, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: Our investigation found that abduction force was restored to intact cuff levels by both procedures, without significant differences between the two techniques. SCR restored superior humeral head migration and rTSA translated the humerus inferiorly. rTSA resulted in decreased passive abduction ROM and increased external rotation, compared with SCR. CONCLUSION: Both SCR and rTSA restore key biomechanical parameters following an irreparable SS tear, although SCR offers superior passive abduction ROM.

Editorial Commentary: "A Rush of Blood From the Head"-Predicting and Preventing Cerebral Deoxygenation During Beach-Chair Shoulder Surgery.

Orthopaedic surgeons and anesthesiologists need to work together to avoid catastrophic cerebral ischemic injuries when surgery is performed with patients in the beach-chair position. Patient risk factors include body mass index but are not strongly predictive. Anesthetic management choices, such as regional anesthesia with sedation or normotensive general anesthesia with gradual and limited head elevation and hypercapnia, can significantly decrease the risk of cerebral deoxygenation.

Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics With Horizontal Cleavage Tears and Treatment of the Lateral Meniscus in the Human Knee: An In Vitro Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Partial meniscectomy is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures for a meniscus tear. Decreased contact area and increased contact pressure have been seen in partial meniscectomies from treatment of various types of meniscal tears; however, the biomechanical effect of a horizontal cleavage tear in the lateral meniscus and subsequent treatment are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study asked whether a horizontal cleavage tear of the lateral meniscus, resecting the inferior leaf, and further resecting the superior leaf would (1) decrease contact area and (2) increase peak contact pressure. METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were evaluated under five conditions of intact meniscus, horizontal cleavage tear, inferior leaf resection, and resection of the inferior and superior leaves of the lateral meniscus. Tibiofemoral contact area and pressure were measured at 0° and 60° knee flexion under an 800-N load, normalized to that at the intact condition of the corresponding knee flexion, and compared across the five previously described conditions. RESULTS: At 0° knee flexion, normalized contact area with inferior leaf resection (65.4% ± 14.1%) was smaller than that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%, p < 0.001); smaller than horizontal cleavage tear (94.1% ± 5.8%, p = 0.001) contact area; and smaller than repaired horizontal tear (92.8% ± 8.2%, p = 0.001) contact area. Normalized contact area with further superior leaf resection (50.5% ± 7.3%) was smaller than that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%, p < 0.001); smaller than horizontal cleavage tear (94.1% ± 5.8%, p < 0.001) contact area; and smaller than repaired horizontal tear (92.8% ± 8.2%, p < 0.001) contact area. At 60° flexion, normalized contact area with inferior leaf resection (76.1% ± 14.8%) was smaller than that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%, p = 0.004); smaller than horizontal cleavage tear (101.8% ± 7.2%, p = 0.006) contact area; and smaller than repaired horizontal tear (104.0% ± 13.3%, p < 0.001) contact area. Normalized contact area with further superior leaf resection (52.1% ± 16.7%) was smaller than that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%, p < 0.001); smaller than horizontal cleavage tear (101.8% ± 7.2%, p < 0.001) contact area; and smaller than repaired horizontal tear (104.0% ± 13.3%, p < 0.001) contact area. At 60° flexion, contact area with both leaf resection (52.1% ± 16.7%) was smaller than that with inferior leaf resection (76.1% ± 14.8%, p = 0.039). At 0° knee flexion, peak pressure increased to 127.0% ± 22.1% with inferior leaf resection (p = 0.026) and to 138.6% ± 24.3% with further superior leaf resection (p = 0.002) compared with that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%). At 60° flexion, compared with that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%), peak pressure increased to 139% ± 33.6% with inferior leaf resection (p = 0.035) and to 155.5% ± 34.7% (p = 0.004) with further superior leaf resection. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the inferior leaf or both leaves of the lateral meniscus after a horizontal cleavage tear resulted in decreased contact area and increased peak contact pressure at 0° and 60° knee flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In vitro resection of one or both leaves of a horizontal cleavage tear of the lateral meniscus causes increases in peak pressure, consistent with other types of partial meniscectomies associated in a clinical setting with excessive loading and damage to knee cartilage. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing partial leaf meniscectomy could confirm this theory. Avoidance of resection may be relatively beneficial for long-term function. The findings of this in vitro study lend biomechanical support for nonoperative management.

Arthroscopic treatment successfully treats posterior elbow impingement in an athletic population.

PURPOSE: Posterior elbow impingement can cause disabling pain and limited motion during activities involving elbow extension. Less understood is whether arthroscopic treatment, compared to open surgery, can result in effective management of pain, loss of range of motion, and return athletes to previous levels of activity. This study determined whether arthroscopic debridement is a safe and effective treatment for posterior elbow impingement and whether it enables athletes to return to a previous level of function. METHODS: A retrospective review of 36 consecutive patients that underwent arthroscopic debridement of the posterior elbow was performed. There were 34 male and 2 female patients, with a median age of 32 years (17-54 years). There were 7 professional athletes, 6 college athletes, and 23 high school or recreational athletes. All patients had a positive posterior impingement test for posterior pain with extension and limitations of activity. Arthroscopic debridement and additional surgical procedures were performed, and patients underwent follow-up visits at a median 51 months (range 14-81). RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen in pain, motion, and function. No neurovascular complications were seen related to the arthroscopic debridement. The mean Andrews and Timmerman elbow score improved from 159 ± 27 to 193 ± 11 (p < 0.01). Thirty-five of thirty-six (97%) patients returned to their previous level of activity, including all professional athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic management of posterior elbow impingement is safe and effective and can return patients, including professional athletes, to high-level athletic activity. Athletes with symptomatic posterior elbow impingement can be successfully and safely treated with arthroscopic debridement and typically will return to preinjury levels of activity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Obesity is Not Associated with Increased Short-term Complications After Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed the association between elevated BMI and complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Previous studies have not consistently arrived at the same conclusion regarding whether obesity is associated with a greater number of postoperative complications. We used a national surgical database to compare the 30-day complication profile and hospitalization outcomes after primary TSA among patients in different BMI categories. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Is obesity associated with an increased risk of complications within 30 days of primary TSA? (2) Is obesity associated with increased operative time? METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program(®) database for 2006 to 2012 was queried to identify all patients who underwent a primary TSA for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. The ACS-NSQIP(®) database was selected for this study as it is a nationally representative database that provides prospectively collected perioperative data and a comprehensive patient medical profile. Exclusion criteria included revision TSA, infection, tumor, or fracture. We analyzed 4796 patients who underwent a primary TSA for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Patients who underwent a TSA were divided in four BMI categories: normal (18.5-25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-30 kg/m(2)), obesity Class 1 (30-35 kg/m(2)), and obesity Class 2 or greater (> 35 kg/m(2)). Perioperative hospitalization data and 30-day postoperative complications were compared among different BMI classes. Differences in patient demographics, preoperative laboratory values, and preexisting patient comorbidities also were analyzed among different BMI groups, and multivariate analysis was used to adjust for any potential confounding variables. RESULTS: There was no association between BMI and 30-day complications after surgery (normal as reference, overweight group relative risk: 0.57 [95% CI, 0.30-1.06], p = 0.076; obesity Class 1 relative risk: 0.52 [95% CI, 0.26-1.03], p = 0.061; obesity Class 2 or greater relative risk: 0.54 [95% CI, 0.25-1.17], p = 0.117). However, greater BMI was associated with longer surgical times (for normal BMI control group: 110 minutes, SD, 42 minutes; overweight group: 115 minutes, SD, 46 minutes, mean difference to control: 5 minutes [95% CI, -1 to 10 minutes], p = 0.096; obesity Class 1: 120 minutes, SD, 43 minutes, mean difference: 10 minutes [95% CI, 5-15 minutes], p < 0.001; obesity Class 2 or greater: 122 minutes, SD, 45 minutes, mean difference: 12 minutes [95% CI, 6-18 minutes], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the surgical time increased for patients with greater BMI, the 30-day complications and perioperative hospitalization data after TSA were not different in patients with increased BMI levels. Obesity alone should not be a contraindication for TSA, and obese patients can expect similar incidences of postoperative complications. The preoperative medical optimization plan should be consistent with that of patients who are not obese who undergo TSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.