Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(7): 840-847, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35405331

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence, type, and grade of postoperative adverse events in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy vs abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for patients with early-stage cervical cancer and determine risk factors associated with these adverse events. DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) was queried to identify patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess risk factors associated with adverse postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. SETTING: ACS NSQIP participating institutions within the United States. PATIENTS: Patients were collected from the ACS NSQIP databases (2014-2017) undergoing radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. INTERVENTIONS: N/A MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ARH had a significantly increased incidence of any 30-day postoperative adverse event compared with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (31.2% vs 19.9%, p <.001). There was a higher incidence of surgical site infection, both deep and superficial, and blood transfusions in ARH. On multivariable logistic regression, the abdominal surgical approach was the only risk factor significantly associated with any postoperative adverse event (odds ratio, 1.4; confidence interval, 1.1-1.9; p = .018; 95% CIs). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the abdominal surgical approach for radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative adverse events than the minimally invasive approach.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia
2.
Am J Surg ; 209(2): 219-29, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25457238

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pay-for-performance measures incorporate surgical site infection rates into reimbursement algorithms without accounting for patient-specific risk factors predictive for surgical site infections and other adverse postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data of 67,445 colorectal patients, multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine independent risk factors associated with various measures of adverse postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Notable patient-specific factors included (number of models containing predictor variable; range of odds ratios [ORs] from all models): American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3, 4, or 5 (7 of 7 models; OR 1.25 to 1.74), open procedures (7 of 7 models; OR .51 to 4.37), increased body mass index (6 of 7 models; OR 1.15 to 2.19), history of COPD (6 of 7 models; OR 1.19 to 1.64), smoking (6 of 7 models; OR 1.15 to 1.61), wound class 3 or 4 (6 of 7 models; OR 1.22 to 1.56), sepsis (6 of 7 models; OR 1.14 to 1.89), corticosteroid administration (5 of 7 models; OR 1.11 to 2.24), and operation duration more than 3 hours (5 of 7 models; OR 1.41 to 1.76). CONCLUSIONS: These findings may be used to pre-emptively identify colorectal surgery patients at increased risk of experiencing adverse outcomes.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reembolso de Incentivo , Fatores de Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Am J Surg ; 208(1): 41-4, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24300671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify unique risk factors for mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing nonemergent colorectal surgery. METHODS: A multivariate logistic regression model predicting 30-day mortality was constructed for patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing nonemergent colorectal procedures. Data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2010). RESULTS: Among the 394 patients analyzed, those with serum creatinine levels >7.5 mg/dL had .07 times the adjusted mortality risk of those with levels <3.5 mg/dL. For colorectal surgery patients, the average serum creatinine level was 5.52 ± 2.6 mg/dL, and mortality was 13% (n = 50). CONCLUSIONS: High serum creatinine was associated with a lower risk for mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease, even though creatinine is often considered a risk factor for surgery. These results show how variables from a patient-centered subpopulation can differ in meaning from the general population.


Assuntos
Colectomia/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/mortalidade , Íleo/cirurgia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Reto/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Biomarcadores/sangue , Creatinina/sangue , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/mortalidade , Melhoria de Qualidade , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA