Long-term intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination for glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination (RBFC), a new intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication for glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: This prospective, multicentre (23 sites in Japan), open-label study enrolled patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), OHT or exfoliative glaucoma and assigned them to one of four combination therapy cohorts, based on previous treatment(s) received: prostaglandin (PG) analogue (Cohort 1); PG analogue and beta-adrenoceptor blocker (ß-blocker) (Cohort 2); PG analogue, ß-blocker and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (Cohort 3); or other/no treatment (Cohort 4). After a ≥ 4-week screening period, eligible patients received twice-daily RBFC for 52 weeks in addition to the treatments they were already receiving. Efficacy was assessed by change in IOP from baseline through week 52. Adverse events and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored throughout. RESULTS: In total, 179 patients from Cohort 1 (n = 48), Cohort 2 (n = 44), Cohort 3 (n = 41) and Cohort 4 (n = 46) entered the RBFC treatment period. For all cohorts, mean IOP was significantly reduced at 11:00 (2 h after instillation of RBFC) through week 52 with the changes from baseline at week 52 of - 2.7 to - 4.1 mmHg across cohorts; all p < 0.001. Common ADRs were conjunctival hyperaemia (58%), allergic conjunctivitis (18%) and blepharitis (17%), most of which were mild in severity. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety of RBFC, both alone and in combination with other anti-glaucoma agents. RBFC may offer a new treatment option for the long-term management of glaucoma and OHT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080225063. DATE OF REGISTRATION: 17 February 2020.

Daily singing of adult songbirds functions to maintain song performance independently of auditory feedback and age.

Many songbirds learn to produce songs through vocal practice in early life and continue to sing daily throughout their lifetime. While it is well-known that adult songbirds sing as part of their mating rituals, the functions of singing behavior outside of reproductive contexts remain unclear. Here, we investigated this issue in adult male zebra finches by suppressing their daily singing for two weeks and examining the effects on song performance. We found that singing suppression decreased the pitch, amplitude, and duration of songs, and that those song features substantially recovered through subsequent free singing. These reversible song changes were not dependent on auditory feedback or the age of the birds, contrasting with the adult song plasticity that has been reported previously. These results demonstrate that adult song structure is not stable without daily singing, and suggest that adult songbirds maintain song performance by preventing song changes through physical act of daily singing throughout their life. Such daily singing likely functions as vocal training to maintain the song production system in optimal conditions for song performance in reproductive contexts, similar to how human singers and athletes practice daily to maintain their performance.

Screening Cutoff Values for the Detection of Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma by LC-MS/MS and a Novel Noncompetitive CLEIA.

Context: Detecting patients with surgically curable aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) among hypertensive individuals is clinically pivotal. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the ideal method of measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) because of the inaccuracy of conventional chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). However, LC-MS/MS is expensive and requires expertise. We have developed a novel noncompetitive CLEIA (NC-CLEIA) for measuring PAC in 30 minutes. Objective: This work aimed to validate NC-CLEIA PAC measurements by comparing them with LC-MS/MS measurements and determining screening cutoffs for both measurements detecting APA. Methods: We retrospectively measured PAC using LC-MS/MS and NC-CLEIA in 133 patients with APA, 100 with bilateral hyperaldosteronism, and 111 with essential hypertension to explore the accuracy of NC-CLEIA PAC measurements by comparing with LC-MS/MS measurements and determined the cutoffs for detecting APA. Results: Passing-Bablok analysis revealed that the values by NC-CLEIA (the regression slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient were 0.962, -0.043, and 0.994, respectively) were significantly correlated and equivalent to those by LC-MS/MS. Bland-Altman plot analysis of NC-CLEIA and LC-MS/MS also demonstrated smaller systemic errors (a bias of -0.348 ng/dL with limits of agreement of -4.390 and 3.694 within a 95% CI) in NC-CLEIA than LC-MS/MS. The receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that cutoff values for aldosterone/renin activity ratio obtained by LC-MS/MS and NC-CLEIA were 31.2 and 31.5 (ng/dL per ng/mL/hour), with a sensitivity of 91.0% and 90.2% and specificity of 75.4% and 76.8%, respectively, to differentiate APA from non-APA. Conclusion: This newly developed NC-CLEIA for measuring PAC could serve as a clinically reliable alternative to LC-MS/MS.

Real-World Effectiveness of Ensitrelvir in Reducing Severe Outcomes in Outpatients at High Risk for COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ensitrelvir, an oral antiviral, in reducing hospitalization risk in outpatients at high-risk for severe COVID-19 during the Omicron era. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using a large Japanese health insurance claims database. It included high-risk outpatients for severe symptoms who received their first COVID-19 diagnosis between November 2022 and July 2023. The study included outpatients aged ≥ 18 years. The primary endpoint was all-cause hospitalization during the 4-week period from the date of outpatient diagnosis and medication, comparing the ensitrelvir group (n = 5177) and the no antiviral treatment group (n = 162,133). The risk ratio and risk difference were evaluated after adjusting patient background distribution by the inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) method. Secondary endpoints were incidence of respiratory and heart rate monitoring, oxygen therapy, ventilator use, intensive care admission, and all-cause death. RESULTS: The risk ratio for all-cause hospitalization between the ensitrelvir group (n = 167,385) and the no antiviral treatment group (n = 167,310) after IPTW adjustment was 0.629 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.420, 0.943]. The risk difference was - 0.291 [95% CI - 0.494, - 0.088]. The incidence of both respiratory and heart rate monitoring and oxygen therapy was lower in the ensitrelvir group. Ventilator use, intensive care admission, and all-cause death were difficult to assess because of the limited events. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of all-cause hospitalization was significantly lower in the ensitrelvir group than in the no antiviral treatment group, suggesting ensitrelvir is an effective treatment in patients at risk of severe COVID-19.

COVID-19 still poses a risk for patients with serious health conditions and weakened immune systems, who are more likely to develop severe illness. Several studies have indicated that some oral antiviral medications might be effective in preventing severe disease. This study aimed to evaluate if ensitrelvir, an oral antiviral medication, can help prevent hospitalization in outpatients who are at risk of developing severe symptoms from the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The hospitalization rates of patients who received ensitrelvir was compared with those who did not receive any antiviral treatment, using medical records from a large health insurance database in Japan focused on outpatients who were at risk of severe symptoms and were diagnosed with COVID-19 between November 2022 and July 2023. Respiratory and heart rate monitoring, oxygen therapy, ventilator use, intensive care admission, and all-cause death were also evaluated. The study found that patients who received ensitrelvir had a lower risk of being hospitalized compared to those who did not receive any antiviral treatment. The ensitrelvir group also had lower rates of respiratory and heart rate monitoring and oxygen therapy. However, it was challenging to assess the effects on ventilator use, intensive care admission, and all-cause death due to the small number of events in the population under evaluation. Based on these findings, ensitrelvir appears to be an effective treatment for reducing the risk of hospitalization in patients at risk of severe COVID-19.