A Comparison of the Anxiolytic Properties of Tofisopam and Diazepam: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.

New clinical reports have recently been published on tofisopam-an anxiolytic drug currently registered as a benzodiazepine-after a long break in this research area. Neurobiological studies concerning its properties, which differ from those of benzodiazepines, are underway. The analyses presented in this study aimed to compare the effects of tofisopam, diazepam, and a placebo in the treatment of anxiety symptoms. A total of 66 outpatients (43 women and 23 men) with generalized anxiety disorder aged 19 to 74 years (M = 41.4; SD = 13.2) were randomized in three groups receiving (1) tofisopam (50 mg three times a day), (2) diazepam (5 mg three times a day), or (3) a placebo for 2 weeks. Then, throughout a 2-week washout period, the patients were monitored for withdrawal symptoms. During the last 2 weeks, the effects of tofisopam (50 mg three times a day) and diazepam (5 mg three times a day) were compared (crossover design). The mean improvement on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale was significantly higher in both the tofisopam and diazepam groups compared to the placebo group. There were no significant differences between the effects of diazepam and tofisopam, whereas adverse effects and withdrawal symptoms occurred less frequently in the tofisopam group. Tofisopam did not impair cognitive abilities, and related withdrawal symptoms resembled those of the placebo. If larger future studies corroborate these findings, tofisopam should be classified as a homophtalazine.

Polish cross-cultural adaptation of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory as an instrument for the post-intervention measurement of change after Gamma Knife treatment.

<b>Introduction:</b> The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is one of questionnaires for the measurement of treatment success, which is widely used in patients after vestibular schwannoma treatment.<b>Aim:</b> This study aimed to adapt the GBI originally written in English to Polish conditions and to evaluate its psychometric properties.<b>Material and methods:</b> The Polish version of the GBI used in this study was prepared by a bilingual translator, and its accuracy was ensured by back-translation. To identify the structure of the Polish version of the GBI, exploratory factor analysis was performed. The reliability was determined using Cronbach's α. To verify the validity, correlation analysis was conducted between the domains of GBI and other questionnaires.<b>Results:</b> The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original 3-factor model is not a good fit for the data. The exploratory factor analysis was performed and identified 4 factors. The total variance of the 4-factor solution was 66.25%. The Cronbach's α calculated for the total GBI reached 0.91. Our analysis confirmed significant weak or moderate correlations between tools for the measurement of general QoL (AQoL-8D: r = 0.411; p = 0.000) and health-related QoL (PANQOL: r = 0.367; p = 0.000; a tool dedicated for patients with VS), well-being (WHO-5: r = 0.432; p = 0.000), hearing and tinnitus (STS: r = -0.217; p = 0.016).<b>Conclusions:</b> This study reports the first adaptation of the GBI for patients with VS to Polish conditions. The results demonstrated that the Polish version of the GBI is a reliable and valid questionnaire that can be used to measure treatment success.

Polish cross-cultural adaptation of a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument: The Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale.

BACKGROUND: The medical community has shown a growing interest in developing methods for measuring and comparing objective patient outcomes coupled with subjective patient assessments. Questionnaires enable healthcare professionals to obtain the patient's perspective about their experienced vestibular schwannomas (VS) symptoms quickly. To date, in Poland, a cross-cultural adapted version of a disease-specific questionnaire for the measurement of quality of life (QoL) in patients with VS has not been produced. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to adapt the questionnaire evaluating disease-specific QoL in patients with VS (Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale; PANQOL) to Polish and evaluate its psychometric properties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred twenty-four patients aged between 24 and 85 years (mean (M) = 60.17 ±standard deviation (SD) = 13.27) diagnosed with VS and treated with Gamma Knife were included in the study. We used a questionnaire translated from English into Polish by a bilingual professional, verified through a back-translation. The final version consisted of 26 items. The internal consistency of the Polish version of the PANQOL scale domains was measured using the Cronbach's alpha (α). To verify the validity of PANQOL subscales, a correlation analysis was conducted between the domains of PANQOL and other questionnaires, including the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-8D), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), the 5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5), the Skarzynski Tinnitus Scale (STS) for the presence of dizziness, and the Gardner-Robertson classes. RESULTS: The majority of PANQOL domains showed excellent or good internal consistency (for a PANQOL total of 0.934; for subscales in the range of 0.916-0.424). Our analysis showed strong correlations between the total PANQOL score and AQoL-8D utility score, as well as between the subscales. We observed weak to moderately significant relationships between GBI and PANQOL domains (r = 0.18-0.43), the WHO-5 (r = 0.18-0.56) and the STS scale (r = -0.40- -0.19). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that the POL-PANQOL is a reliable and valid questionnaire for measuring QoL.

Anxiety disorders as predictors of suicidality in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Findings of a study in six European countries. / Zaburzenia lekowe jako predyktory samobójczosci u osób z cukrzyca typu 2: Wyniki badania przeprowadzonego w szesciu europejskich krajach.

OBJECTIVES: Anxiety disorders are significant predictors of suicidality and are proposed to be independent risk factors for suicide attempts. They are common in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and are associated with longer duration of diabetes and poorer treatment outcomes. The aim was to examine associations between anxiety disorders and suicidal thoughts and behaviour in people with T2DM, to establish the prevalence of suicidality among people with T2DM in the selected European countries and to examine whether anxiety disorders were predictive of current outcomes of suicidality in this population using data from the International Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetes and Depression study. METHODS: The study sample comprised 1063 adults with T2DM from 6 European countries. The presence of anxiety disorders and suicidality was assessed with the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. The group of participants with current suicidal risk was compared with the group of participants with no suicidal risk. RESULTS: The participants from Germany were more likely to report suicidality than those from other countries, whereas people from Serbia and Ukraine were less likely to report it. Depression and anxiety disorders significantly contributed to the increased presence of suicidality among people with T2DM. Agoraphobia was a significant predictor of suicidality when controlling for depression. The participants with T2DM and comorbid agoraphobia had 4.86 times higher odds to report suicidality than those without agoraphobia. CONCLUSIONS: Agoraphobia was a significant predictor of suicidality in people with T2DM.

Una comparación de la eficacia del análisis de los pensamientos automáticos en un marco individual y grupal: Informe preliminal / A comparison of effectiveness of analysis of the authomatic thoughts in individual and group settings: Preliminary report

El objetivo de este estudio fue hacer una comparación de la eficacia y la economía de la terapia focalizada en el análisis de los pensamientos automáticos registrados en marco de Terapia Comportamental Cognitiva individual y grupal. Doce pacientes admitidos en la Unidad de Trastornos Afectivos fueron asignados azar en dos grupos equivalentes: Terapia de Grupo Coportamental-Cognitiva (TGCC) o Terapia individual Comportamental-Cognitiva (TICC). Cada participante tomó parte en seis sesiones consecutivas de 90 minutos de grupo abierto o en 60 minutos de terapia individual; en ambos casos el foco estuvo en el registro de los pensamientos automáticos. Los síntomas depresivos fueron evaluados con el HAM-D y el BDI (Inventario de Depresión de Beck). De acuerdo a los resultados, la terapia de grupo (TGCC) pareciera ser más efectiva en términos de los puntajes evaluados en el HAM-D y menos costosa que la terapia individual (TICC) para el tratamiento de la depresión. Se presentan conclusiones para futuras investigaciones.