Transporter Proteins as Therapeutic Drug Targets-With a Focus on SGLT2 Inhibitors.

Membrane transporters interact not only with endogenous substrates but are also engaged in the transport of xenobiotics, including drugs. While the coordinated function of uptake (solute carrier family-SLC and SLCO) and efflux (ATP-binding cassette family-ABC, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family-MATE) transporter system allows vectorial drug transport, efflux carriers alone achieve barrier functions. The modulation of transport functions was proved to be effective in the treatment strategies of various pathological states. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are the drugs most widely applied in clinical practice, especially in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) serves as virus particles (HBV/HDV) carrier, and inhibition of its function is applied in the treatment of hepatitis B and hepatitis D by myrcludex B. Inherited cholestatic diseases, such as Alagille syndrome (ALGS) and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) can be treated by odevixibat and maralixibat, which inhibit activity of apical sodium-dependent bile salt transporter (ASBT). Probenecid can be considered to increase uric acid excretion in the urine mainly via the inhibition of urate transporter 1 (URAT1), and due to pharmacokinetic interactions involving organic anion transporters 1 and 3 (OAT1 and OAT3), it modifies renal excretion of penicillins or ciprofloxacin as well as nephrotoxicity of cidofovir. This review discusses clinically approved drugs that affect membrane/drug transporter function.

Genetic Polymorphisms in the HMGCR Gene and Associations with Cognitive Decline in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms including cognitive impairment and dementia. The etiopathogenesis of PD, as well as its protective and susceptibility factors, are still elusive. 3-Hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) is an enzyme regulating cholesterol synthesis. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene coding HMGCR have recently been correlated with the risk of Alzheimer's disease. Alternative splicing of exon 13 of the HMGCR transcript and its strongly associated HMGCR haplotype 7 (H7: rs17244841, rs3846662, rs17238540) may downregulate protein activity and cholesterol synthesis, with lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) levels associated with PD that may affect cognitive abilities. We genotyped three SNPs in the H7 HMGCR gene in 306 PD patients divided into three groups-without cognitive decline, with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and with PD dementia-and in 242 healthy participants. A correlation between the rs17238540 genotype and PD susceptibility as well as a minor association between rs3846662 and cognitive status in PD patients was observed; however, the two-sided analysis of these groups did not reveal any significance. We observed a statistically significant elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) plasma level in the minor allele carriers of rs17238540 and rs17244841 among PD patients. This study should be replicated in a larger population.

A Mixture Method for Robust Detection HCV Early Diagnosis Biomarker with ML Approach and Molecular Docking.

Given the substantial correlation between early diagnosis and prolonged patient survival in HCV patients, it is vital to identify a reliable and accessible biomarker. The purpose of this research was to identify accurate miRNA biomarkers to aid in the early diagnosis of HCV and to identify key target genes for anti-hepatic fibrosis therapeutics. The expression of 188 miRNAs in 42 HCV liver patients with different functional states and 23 normal livers were determined using RT-qPCR. After screening out differentially expressed miRNA (DEmiRNAs), the target genes were predicted. To validate target genes, an HCV microarray dataset was subjected to five machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Adaboost, Bagging, Boosting, XGBoost) and then, based on the best model, importance features were selected. After identification of hub target genes, to evaluate the potency of compounds that might hit key hub target genes, molecular docking was performed. According to our data, eight DEmiRNAs are associated with early stage and eight DEmiRNAs are linked to a deterioration in liver function and an increase in HCV severity. In the validation phase of target genes, model evaluation revealed that XGBoost (AUC = 0.978) outperformed the other machine learning algorithms. The results of the maximal clique centrality algorithm determined that CDK1 is a hub target gene, which can be hinted at by hsa-miR-335, hsa-miR-140, hsa-miR-152, and hsa-miR-195. Because viral proteins boost CDK1 activation for cell mitosis, pharmacological inhibition may have anti-HCV therapeutic promise. The strong affinity binding of paeoniflorin (-6.32 kcal/mol) and diosmin (-6.01 kcal/mol) with CDK1 was demonstrated by molecular docking, which may result in attractive anti-HCV compounds. The findings of this study may provide significant evidence, in the context of the miRNA biomarkers, for early-stage HCV diagnosis. In addition, recognized hub target genes and small molecules with high binding affinity may constitute a novel set of therapeutic targets for HCV.

Conformational Rearrangements Regulating the DNA Repair Protein APE1.

Apurinic apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is a key enzyme of the Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway, which primarily manages oxidative lesions of DNA. Once the damaged base is removed, APE1 recognises the resulting abasic site and cleaves the phosphodiester backbone to allow for the correction by subsequent enzymes of the BER machinery. In spite of a wealth of information on APE1 structure and activity, its regulation mechanism still remains to be understood. Human APE1 consists of a globular catalytic domain preceded by a flexible N-terminal extension, which might be involved in the interaction with DNA. Moreover, the binding of the nuclear chaperone nucleophosmin (NPM1) to this region has been reported to impact APE1 catalysis. To evaluate intra- and inter-molecular conformational rearrangements upon DNA binding, incision, and interaction with NPM1, we used Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), a fluorescence spectroscopy technique sensitive to molecular distances. Our results suggest that the N-terminus approaches the DNA at the downstream side of the abasic site and enables the building of a predictive model of the full-length APE1/DNA complex. Furthermore, the spatial configuration of the N-terminal tail is sensitive to NPM1, which could be related to the regulation of APE1.

Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Non-Melanoma Skin Peri-Auricular Cancers-A Retrospective Analysis of a Single Institution Experience.

The location of skin neoplasms in the area of the ears qualifies patients to the so-called high-risk group. The location of neoplasms within the auricle and around the ear often causes many problems in surgical treatment. This is due to the presence of cartilage, the difficulty of performing procedures with obtaining a visually satisfactory cosmetic effect, especially in the presence of extensive lesions and can lead to positive surgical margins which leads to a high risk of recurrence. In such cases, the use of brachytherapy, both as an independent method and as a complementary method after surgery, may be an effective method of local control with an acceptable risk of radiation complications. However, there are no large retrospective studies on the use of brachytherapy in this anatomical region. The aim of the study was to analyse the effectiveness, toxicity profile, and cosmetic effect of two different brachytherapy techniques (contact and interstitial brachytherapy). Methods: This paper presents the results of a retrospective analysis of 33 patients treated with contact or interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for skin cancers of the outer ear, involving the auricle and the skin of the adjacent area. Brachytherapy was used both as a definitive treatment (15 patients­43%) and adjuvant treatment after surgery (18 patients­57%). The basic criterion for adjuvant treatment was a positive or narrow (<1 mm) resection margin. Fraction doses from 3 to 7 Gy per fraction were used at intervals from six hours (interstitial brachytherapy) to a maximum of seven days (contact brachytherapy). The treatment time ranged from 1 to 42 days, and the total dose range was 7 to 49 Gy. The follow-up was 29.75 months (range 2−64). Results: In the group of patients treated with adjuvant therapy, in the patients with post-radiation reaction, the mean time from surgery to the start of brachytherapy was 7.72 ± 3.05 weeks, the median was 8 (6−12) weeks, and in the group without post-radiation reaction, the mean time was 11.13 ± 4.41 weeks, the median time was 11 weeks (8−14). The risk of a post-radiation reaction increased significantly more often in patients with more advanced disease. In the case of contact brachytherapy, the post-radiation reaction occurred significantly more often (14/21 patients­43%) than in the case of interstitial brachytherapy (3/11 patients­9.4%). In patients with post-radiation reactions, a significantly larger volume of the skin receiving a dose of 200% was found, and the volume receiving a dose of 150% was close to statistical significance. The mean volume of the skin receiving a 200% dose in the group with post-radiation reactions was 28.05 ± 16.56 cm3, the median was 24.86 (0.5−52.3) cm3, and the mean volume in the group without post-radiation reaction was 17.98 ± 10.96 cm3, median 14.95 (3.9−44.96) cm3. The result was statistically significant (Z = 2.035, p = 0.041). Conclusion: Interstitial HDR (high-dose-rate) brachytherapy for non-melanoma skin cancers around the ear is highly effective, short, and has a relatively low burden on the patient. The toxicity of the treatment was low. In the case of contact brachytherapy, the toxicity profile is slightly higher but acceptable for patients. This method is preferred in patients in whom interstitial brachytherapy is impossible to perform due to anatomical and logistical reasons. The unquestionable advantage of contact brachytherapy is its ability to be performed on an outpatient basis without the need to stay in the hospital. No severe and late CTCAE ≥III and late RTOG ≥III toxicity was observed. In patients after surgery, in order to minimise the risk of radiation reaction, it is optimal to start treatment at least eight weeks after surgery. In the presence of extensive lesions, the use of interstitial brachytherapy seems to be more advantageous, especially when the expected volume of healthy skin in the dose range of 200% and 150% is above 15 cm3 and 50 cm3, respectively.