Awareness of residents' technical ability can affect margin status in breast conserving operations.

PURPOSE: The current study was performed to determine if awareness of the potential affect of residents could affect margin status. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients who underwent lumpectomy from July 2006 to May 2017 was evaluated. The effect of surgical residents' participation and their technical ability was evaluated to determine the effect on margin status. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determined factors which affect margin status. RESULTS: Of 444 patients, 14% of patients had positive margins. The positive margin rate was lower during the second time period after the effect of technical ability of the residents was known 12% versus 19% (p = 0.10). Greater participation by the attending surgeon (32% vs. 21%) occurred in the second time period. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, operations done by residents with satisfactory technical skills or attending surgeon were less likely to have positive margins than those done by residents with unsatisfactory technical skills (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.10-0.38; p = 0.0001). With mean follow-up of 48 months, 1.4% had local recurrences as a first event. CONCLUSIONS: Technically ability of residents appears to affect margin status after lumpectomy. Increased intervention by the attending surgeon can improve this outcome.

Contribution of clinical and socioeconomic factors to differences in breast cancer subtype and mortality between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

PURPOSE: To assess tumor subtype distribution and the relative contribution of clinical and sociodemographic factors on breast cancer survival between Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). METHODS: We analyzed data from the California Cancer Registry, which included 29,626 Hispanic and 99,862 NHW female invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2014. Logistic regression was used to assess ethnic differences in tumor subtype, and Cox proportional hazard modeling to assess differences in breast cancer survival. RESULTS: Hispanics compared to NHWs had higher odds of having triple-negative (OR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.23-1.35) and HER2-overexpressing tumors (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.14-1.25 [HR-] and OR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.31-1.48 [HR+]). In adjusted models, Hispanic women had a higher risk of breast cancer mortality than NHW women (mortality rate ratio [MRR] = 1.24; 95% CI 1.19-1.28). Clinical factors accounted for most of the mortality difference (MRR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09); however, neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and health insurance together accounted for all of the mortality difference (MRR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.97-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Addressing SES disparities, including increasing access to health care, may be critical to overcoming poorer breast cancer outcomes in Hispanics.

Teaching residents may affect the margin status of breast-conserving operations.

PURPOSE: The current study was performed to evaluate the effects of teaching surgical residents on the margin status after lumpectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients from July 2006 to Nov 2009 was performed. The impact of the technical ability of surgical residents to perform lumpectomy was evaluated to determine if there was an effect on the margin status. A logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for clinical variables known to affect the margin status. RESULTS: Of 106 patients, 19% had positive margins. Residents with unsatisfactory technical skills had a positive margin rate of 34% compared to 8% for residents with satisfactory skills (p = 0.004). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the operating surgeon remained significantly associated with a positive margin status. Operations performed by residents with satisfactory technical skills or by attending surgeons were less likely to have positive margins than those performed by residents with unsatisfactory technical skills (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.86; p = 0.03). After a mean follow-up of 60 months, the breast cancer-specific survival rate was 94%, and there were no local recurrences as a first event. CONCLUSIONS: The technical ability of residents may affect the margin status after lumpectomy. The importance of teaching surgical residents needs to be considered in future quality of care evaluations.

Women's Impression of the Expected Breast Appearance and its Association with Breast Cancer Operations.

BACKGROUND: Significant concern exists from clinicians in all fields that rates of bilateral mastectomy and prophylactic mastectomy are increasing. This study was performed to evaluate women's perception of breast appearance and its association with breast cancer operations. METHODS: From April 2012 to May 2013, all women attending a breast clinic were shown two breast pictures, "natural" and "augmented," and asked which photograph represented the current expected appearance of breasts. Among breast cancer patients, the choice of breast cancer operation was correlated with picture selection. RESULTS: Of 1,177 consecutive women, mean age was 45 years. Overall, 70 % of patients felt that the augmented appearance is expected. This impression was seen in all racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic White 65 %, African American 67 %, Hispanic 71 %, and other groups 70 %. Younger age was strongly associated with the augmented appearance (p < 0.0001). Patients older than age 60 years selected the augmented appearance only 51 % of the time. This percentage increased with each younger decade with patients younger than 40 years selecting the augmented appearance in 85 %. Among breast cancer patients, augmented appearance selection was more likely for patients who underwent reconstruction (92 %; p < 0.001), as well as for those undergoing bilateral mastectomy (74 %; p = 0.057) compared with mastectomy alone (49 %). CONCLUSIONS: Most women felt that the augmented appearance of breasts is currently expected, and this impression was more common in young women. This impression may be another factor contributing to the current trend of more extensive breast cancer operations and implant-based reconstructions.

Hypothesized role of pregnancy hormones on HER2+ breast tumor development.

Breast cancer incidence rates have declined among older but not younger women; the latter are more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancers carrying a poor prognosis. Epidemiological evidence supports an increase in breast cancer incidence following pregnancy with risk elevated as much as 10 years post-partum. We investigated the association between years since last full-term pregnancy at the time of diagnosis (≤10 or >10 years) and breast tumor subtype in a case series of premenopausal Hispanic women (n = 627). Participants were recruited in the United States, Mexico, and Spain. Cases with known estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status, with one or more full-term pregnancies ≥1 year prior to diagnosis were eligible for this analysis. Cases were classified into three tumor subtypes according to hormone receptor (HR+ = ER+ and/or PR+; HR- = ER- and PR-) expression and HER2 status: HR+/HER2-, HER2+ (regardless of HR), and triple negative breast cancer. Case-only odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for HER2+ tumors in reference to HR+/HER2- tumors. Participants were pooled in a mixed-effects logistic regression model with years since pregnancy as a fixed effect and study site as a random effect. When compared to HR+/HER2- cases, women with HER2+ tumors were more likely be diagnosed in the post-partum period of ≤10 years (OR = 1.68; 95 % CI, 1.12-2.52). The effect was present across all source populations and independent of the HR status of the HER2+ tumor. Adjusting for age at diagnosis (≤45 or >45 years) did not materially alter our results (OR = 1.78; 95 % CI, 1.08-2.93). These findings support the novel hypothesis that factors associated with the post-partum breast, possibly hormonal, are involved in the development of HER2+ tumors.

Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.

PURPOSE: Negative margins after lumpectomy remain a prominent issue in breast surgery. The current study was performed to evaluate patient-related variables that affect risk for positive margins in an underscreened population. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent breast-conserving operations from 2001 to 2010. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were evaluated. One millimeter from tumor to inked margin was considered a negative margin. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables which affect margin status after a lumpectomy. RESULTS: Over the time period evaluated, 69 patients had positive margins (31 %) and 155 (69 %) had negative margins. Overall use of screening mammography was poor (36 %). In unadjusted analysis, patients with positive margins were less likely to have undergone screening mammography (p = 0.003) and presented with a palpable mass (p = 0.01). Histopathologic variables which predicted increased risk for positive margins included larger pathologic size, greater number of pathologically involved lymph nodes, higher pathologic stage, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and extensive intraductal component (EIC), p < 0.05. In multivariate analysis, clinical stage, poor histologic grade, LVI, and EIC were associated with positive margins (p < 0.05). By contrast, use of preoperative chemotherapy was associated with attaining negative margins (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with positive margins after lumpectomy included poor histologic grade, LVI, and EIC. Use of preoperative chemotherapy was the strongest independent predictor of lower risk for positive margins.

Post Treatment Mastalgia is a Common Complaint but not an Indication of Recurrence or Second Primary Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Post-treatment mastalgia is a common complaint in up to 68% of patients after treatment. This symptom is worrisome to patients as many believe it is a sign of recurrence. The current study was performed to evaluate if post-treatment mastalgia is associated with a second breast cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients included were seen from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2020. All patients who were treated for breast cancer and then presented with breast pain during follow up were considered to have post-treatment mastalgia. All patients who were diagnosed with a second breast cancer but did not experience post-treatment mastalagia were also evaluated. RESULTS: 1799 patients had a mean age 52.9 years. 36% of patients experienced post-treatment mastalgia. Of patients who complained of post-treatment mastalgia, 19 were diagnosed with a chest wall recurrence (CW), ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), or contralateral breast cancer (CBC). 17 of the 19 patients had breast pain after the second diagnosis and treatment were completed. The average duration between their second diagnosis and initial complaint of breast pain was 6.2 years. The two patients who complained of breast pain prior to their second diagnosis did not have mastalgia at the time of their second diagnosis. Local recurrence or contralateral breast cancer were more common in patients without post treatment mastalgia (10.1% vs 0.3%, p < 0.0001) during follow up. CONCLUSION: Post treatment mastalgia is not associated with recurrence. Interval or repeat imaging does not appear necessary and instead patient education and reassurance are important in its management.

Factors that influence mammography use and breast cancer detection among Mexican-American and African-American women.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined factors that influence mammography use and breast cancer detection, including education, health insurance, and acculturation, among Mexican-American (MA) and African-American (AA) women. METHODS: The study included 670 breast cancer cases (388 MAs and 282 AAs), aged 40-86 years at diagnosis. Data on mammography use, detection, and delay in seeking care were collected via questionnaires and medical records. Using a language-based bidimensional acculturation measure, MAs were classified as English-dominant (n = 67), bilingual (n = 173), and Spanish-dominant (n = 148). Mammography prior to diagnosis was assessed by racial/ethnic acculturation subgroup using logistic regression. RESULTS: In age-adjusted models, mammography use was non-significantly lower among English-dominant (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.45-1.59) and bilingual (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.55-1.35) MAs and significantly lower among Spanish-dominant MAs (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34-0.83) than among AA women. After adjustment for education or insurance, there was no difference in mammography use by race/ethnicity and acculturation subgroup. Despite high self-reported mammography use (75%), a large proportion of cases reported self-detection (59%) and delay in seeking care >90 days (17%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings favor promoting culturally appropriate messaging about the benefits and limitations of mammography, education about breast awareness, and prompt reporting of findings to a health professional.

Implementation of educational video improves patient understanding of basic breast cancer concepts in an undereducated county hospital population.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a video on patient understanding of basic breast cancer concepts. METHODS: An 11 item tool of breast cancer concepts was devised. A previous study obtained baseline information on patient knowledge. Subsequently an 8 min video was designed to facilitate the understanding of these concepts. The next 40 consecutive patients who saw the video were then administered the same 11 item questionnaire. RESULTS: Eighty-one women agreed to participate in the study, 41 before and 40 after the implementation of the video. Fifty-one percent had less than a high school education. The group who saw the video had a higher mean number of questions correct (6.7 vs. 8.9, P = 0.0007). Interestingly 90% of all respondents correctly answered the question on the value of screening mammography, however, only 37% of these patients underwent screening mammograms. A multiple linear regression model adjusting for years of education, language, and seeing the video, revealed that having seen the video (P = 0.0029) and years of education (P = 0.0002) remained significantly associated with higher score. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an educational video significantly improved understanding of breast cancer concepts in an undereducated population.

Mastalgia is Not An Indication for Mammogram.

BACKGROUND: Mastalgia is a common breast complaint that is worrisome to patients. This study was performed to determine if mastalgia is a sign of breast cancer and to evaluate the benefit of its work up. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 8960 consecutive patients at a safety net institution from June 1, 2006 to December 31, 2020. Data on patient reported mastalgia and diagnosis of breast cancer were collected. RESULTS: 8960 patients had a mean age of 45 years. The population was predominantly underinsured, 70% Hispanic, and 16% had adequate health literacy. Approximately 31% (2820 of 8960) of patients presented with a complaint of breast pain. Of 2820 patients with breast pain, 20 (0.7%) were found to have breast cancer. The average age of patients with breast cancer was 49 years. Physical examination identified a mass in 6 patients and only 3 patients had pain limited to the side of the cancer (10 bilateral, 7 contralateral). Of 1280 patients who were under age 40 years, 88% underwent breast imaging. The Cancer Detection Rate (CDR) was 0.9 per 1000 examinations. For 950 patients age 40 to 49 years and 590 patients age 50 years and older, 98% and 99% underwent breast imaging, respectively. The CDR was 10 per 1000 examinations for age 40 to 49 and 14 per 1000 examinations for age 50 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: Mastalgia is rarely associated with breast cancer. In the absence of other findings, imaging of patients less than age 40 is not recommended. Any workup beyond routine screening mammography in age-appropriate patients, to identify the "cause" of breast pain, does not seem warranted.

Preoperative chemotherapy for operable breast cancer improves surgical outcomes in the community hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) for operable breast cancer has demonstrated significant benefits in clinical trials. Many patients are treated in the community setting and some may question the applicability of PC outside the university setting. The potential benefits of PC in terms of surgical outcomes in a community practice were examined. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of stage II and stage IIIA breast cancer patients from January 1, 2002 to July 31, 2009. Surgical outcomes of margin status, volume of lumpectomy, rate of lumpectomy, and re-excision lumpectomy were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 212 patients included. Seventy-nine percent of patients who underwent PC had a clinical response and 25% had a pathologic complete response. For clinical stage T2 and stage T3 tumors, the PC group underwent lumpectomy more often than patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group (78% versus 50%; p = .016 and 60% versus 29%; p = .015, respectively). The rate of close or positive margins in the PC group was half the rate in the AC group (23% versus 46%; p = .04) and this resulted in fewer re-excisions (p = .01). The volume of tissue removed was also smaller in the PC group (143.6 cm³ versus 273.9 cm³; p = .003). Conclusions. PC for operable breast cancer can significantly improve surgical outcomes in community-based practice.

Preoperative chemotherapy for operable breast cancer is associated with better compliance with adjuvant therapy in matched stage II and IIIA patients.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) for operable breast cancer has shown significant benefits in prospective trials. Many patients are treated in the community setting and some may question the applicability of PC outside the university setting. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of stage II and IIIA breast cancer patients treated from January 2002 to July 2009. Fifty-three of 57 patients who underwent PC were matched based on age, tumor size, and hormone receptor status with 53 patients who did not undergo PC. Differences in patient compliance with physician recommendations for all types of adjuvant therapy were evaluated. Crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios derived from conditional logistic regression models were calculated. RESULTS: There were 106 patients included. Patient compliance with chemotherapy was better in the PC group than in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group (100% versus 70%; p = .0001). Similarly, more patients in the PC group completed radiation therapy (96% versus 65%; p = .0003) and initiated hormonal therapy (100% versus 62%; p = .0001). Conditional logistic regression revealed that higher pathologic stage and current cigarette smoking were associated with poorer compliance with chemotherapy. For radiation therapy, the univariate model revealed that compliance with chemotherapy and being employed were associated with completion of radiation, whereas current cigarette smoking and larger pathologic size were associated with poorer compliance with radiation. For hormonal therapy, current cigarette smokers were more likely to be noncompliant with initiation of hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: PC for operable breast cancer can improve patient compliance with chemotherapy. Current cigarette smokers were more likely to be noncompliant with all types of adjuvant therapy.

Use of breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ultrasound classification in pediatric and adolescent patients overestimates likelihood of malignancy.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Breast masses in the pediatric population cause patient and family concern, partially driven by public awareness of adult breast cancer. However, the spectrum of breast masses in children differs greatly from that in adults, and malignancy is exceedingly rare. The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasound-based classification system is the diagnostic standard, yet no study has validated BI-RADS in pediatric patients. This study compares BI-RADS classification with histologic diagnoses to evaluate BI-RADS validity in pediatric patients. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective evaluation of breast masses in patients under 21 years. Ultrasound reports were compared with histologic diagnoses. RESULTS: There were 283 patients with breast pathology results after excluding clinical diagnoses of gynecomastia. Mean age was 16.9 (SD 2.3), ranging 10-20 years. 227 had pre-operative ultrasounds, and 84% (191/227) were assigned a BI-RADS category. BI-RADS 4 was the most frequent category (55%, n = 124), by definition predicting 2 - 95% likelihood of malignancy. However, pathology was benign in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current BI-RADS categorization system overestimates cancer risk when applied to pediatric patients. BI-RADS scores should not be assigned to pediatric patients, and BIRADS-defined recommendations for biopsy should be disregarded. A pediatric-specific classification system could be useful.

Intraoperative touch imprint and frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of touch imprint and frozen section analysis of sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel node can determine the need for axillary dissection at the time of initial operation and therefore spare the patient a second operation. Little data, however, exists on the accuracy of intraoperative evaluation of sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all sentinel node procedures for breast cancer from 2004 to 2008 at a single institution. The sentinel node procedure was done before (no-NACT) chemotherapy in 107 patients and 37 had the procedure after neoadjuvant (NACT) chemotherapy. Intraoperative analysis of sentinel nodes was performed using touch imprint and frozen section techniques. RESULTS: In the no-NACT group, intraoperative assessment by touch imprint analysis had 61% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 87% accuracy. Frozen section analysis was similar with 74% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% accuracy. In the NACT group, touch imprint analysis had 79% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% accuracy. Frozen section analysis was again similar with 74% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 83% accuracy. When the no-NACT group and the NACT group were compared, both frozen section and touch imprint analysis had similar sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel nodes with touch imprint and frozen section analysis in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed acceptable sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Nearly all of the misses in intraoperative evaluation were in patients with micrometastases.

Understanding of breast cancer concepts in an undereducated county hospital population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine how well breast cancer patients at a County hospital understood breast cancer concepts and treatment at time of operation. METHODS: An 11 question multiple-choice examination was devised at a Flesch-Kincaid grade level of 5.8. This was administered to patients prior to undergoing their definitive cancer operation. RESULTS: Forty-one of 42 consecutive women agreed to participate in the study. Seventy-eight percent self identified as Hispanic and 64% had less than a High School education. For the question "Which surgery gives me a better chance to live?" 51% said mastectomy and lumpectomy are equal and 33% thought mastectomy was superior. Interestingly, 88% of respondents understood that screening mammograms are important. Sixty-two percent of the patients, however, did not get screening mammograms. Multivariate analysis revealed that highest level of education (P < 0.001) and employment status (P = 0.007) correlated significantly with test score. Age, insurance status, household income, and ethnicity did not significantly predict test score. CONCLUSION: Although the correct answer was the most frequently selected answer, this examination revealed deficits in the understanding of this undereducated population. Higher level of education and employment status did correlate with improved score.

Re-evaluating if observation continues to be the best management of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis.

BACKGROUND: The presentation of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis can mimic breast cancer. Therefore, awareness of the condition is important for surgeons. The current series is the largest in a US population. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients treated at a county, safety-net hospital in Arizona. Cases were identified from January 2006 to January 2019. Sociodemographic information, clinical history, management, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: There were 145 occurrences of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis among 120 women. Most of the patients (92%) were of Hispanic ethnicity and born outside (87%) of the United States. The average age was 35 years. Nearly all patients (95%) were parous, with an average of 3 pregnancies. Most (88%) presented with a palpable mass, and more than half (54%) of these masses were painful. Six patients had prolactinomas or hyperprolactinemia, 11 patients were pregnant, and 5 were postpartum. Early in the time period studied, 6 patients underwent excision of the masses. The remaining 114 underwent planned observation after biopsy confirmation of the diagnosis. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and the other 112 patients with idiopathic granulomatous mastitis resolved spontaneously. Nineteen had more than 1 episode. Average time to resolution was 5 months (range 0-20). Adjusted log-normal regression analysis found that later age of first live birth was associated with greater time to resolution (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis is a self-limited, benign condition that waxes and wanes and eventually resolves without resection. After diagnosis, medications are unnecessary, and operations can be limited to drainage procedures for fluid collections.

Breast Cancer Mortality in Older and Younger Patients in California.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer in younger patients is reported to be more aggressive and associated with lower survival; however, factors associated with age-specific mortality differences have not been adequately assessed. METHODS: We used data from the population-based California Cancer Registry for 38,509 younger (18-49 years) and 121,573 older (50 years and older) women diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer, 2005-2014. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate breast cancer-specific mortality rate ratios (MRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), stratified by tumor subtype, guideline treatment, and care at an NCI-designated cancer center (NCICC). RESULTS: Older breast cancer patients at diagnosis experienced 17% higher disease-specific mortality than younger patients, after multivariable adjustment (MRR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.23). Higher MRRs (95% CI) were observed for older versus younger patients with hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- (1.24; 1.14-1.35) and HR+/HER2+ (1.38; 1.17-1.62), but not for HR-/HER2+ (HR = 0.94; 0.79-1.12) nor triple-negative breast cancers (1.01; 0.92-1.11). The higher mortality in older versus younger patients was diminished among patients who received guideline-concordant treatment (MRR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99-1.14) and reversed among those seen at an NCICC (MRR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although younger women tend to be diagnosed with more aggressive breast cancers, adjusting for these aggressive features results in older patients having higher mortality than younger patients, with variations by age, tumor subtype, receipt of guideline treatment, and being cared for at an NCICC. IMPACT: Higher breast cancer mortality in older compared with younger women could partly be addressed by ensuring optimal treatment and comprehensive patient-centered care.

The effect of dedicated breast surgeons on the short-term outcomes in breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of breast surgeons on short-term outcomes in breast cancer care was compared at a single institution. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Many studies have demonstrated a correlation between high procedural volume and lower mortality in technically challenging procedures. Breast cancer treatment has significant impact on patient behavior, psychology, and appearance. Therefore, evaluation of outcomes cannot be limited to only operative mortality and morbidity. We sought to determine the effect of dedicated breast cancer surgeons on short-term outcomes at a single institution. METHODS: Wishard Memorial Hospital is the county hospital affiliated with the Indiana University School of Medicine. A retrospective review was performed of all patients from January 1, 1997, to February 28, 2006. On July 1, 2003, coverage for the Breast Clinic was changed from general surgeons (G) to breast surgeons (B). There were 596 patients included in the study period. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics or disease characteristics between the 2 time periods. For early stage (stage I and II) breast cancer, a higher percentage of patients underwent breast conservation in the breast surgeon period than in the general surgeon period (P = 0.04). Lumpectomy margins in breast conserving operations during the G period were more often positive (P = 0.025) or close (<1 mm) (P = 0.01). Similarly, the rates of re-excision lumpectomy were also significantly lower during the B period (21% vs. 39%, respectively, P = 0.01). Breast surgeons were more likely to perform the sentinel node procedure (P = 0.001). There were no differences in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The use of hormonal manipulation, however, was significantly higher in the B group than in the G group (P < 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons specialized in diseases of the breast demonstrate significant improvement in short-term outcomes associated with breast cancer treatment at a single institution. The differences identified cannot be attributed to differences in institutional function, patient population, surgeon case volume, or on the influence of nonsurgeon physicians.

Prognostic significance of marital status in breast cancer survival: A population-based study.

Research shows that married cancer patients have lower mortality than unmarried patients but few data exist for breast cancer. We assessed total mortality associated with marital status, with attention to differences by race/ethnicity, tumor subtype, and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES). We included, from the population-based California Cancer Registry, women ages 18 and older with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2012 with follow-up through December 2013. We estimated mortality rate ratios (MRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for total mortality by nSES, race/ethnicity, and tumor subtype. Among 145,564 breast cancer cases, 42.7% were unmarried at the time of diagnosis. In multivariable-adjusted models, the MRR (95% CI) for unmarried compared to married women was 1.28 (1.24-1.32) for total mortality. Significant interactions were observed by race/ethnicity (P<0.001), tumor subtype (P<0.001), and nSES (P = 0.009). Higher MRRs were observed for non-Hispanic whites and Asians/Pacific Islanders than for blacks or Hispanics, and for HR+/HER2+ tumors than other subtypes. Assessment of interactive effect between marital status and nSES showed that unmarried women living in low SES neighborhoods had a higher risk of dying compared with married women in high SES neighborhoods (MRR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.53-1.67). Unmarried breast cancer patients have higher total mortality than married patients; the association varies by race/ethnicity, tumor subtype, and nSES. Unmarried status should be further evaluated as a breast cancer prognostic factor. Identification of underlying causes of the marital status associations is needed to design interventions that could improve survival for unmarried breast cancer patients.