The utility of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with circulatory collapse by electrical storm.

In patients experiencing electrical storm, intensive care using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an efficient treatment to overcome a hemodynamically unstable condition. The aim of this study was to examine the utility of ECMO in patients with circulatory collapse by electrical storm. We retrospectively examined 17 consecutive patients receiving veno-arterial ECMO for electrical storm between January 2016 and December 2018 in our institution. We compared survivors (n = 11) and non-survivors (n = 6). Thirteen were weaned from ECMO, of whom 11 patients (64.7%) survived and were discharged from hospital, while 6 patients died (35.3%). In comparisons between survivors and non-survivors, blood pH before starting ECMO was significantly higher in survivors (pH 7.32) than in non-survivors (pH 6.89, p = 0.027). Blood lactate level was significantly lower in survivors (6.2 mmol/L) than in non-survivors (12.2 mmol/L, p = 0.044). Complications of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy were found in 4 non-survivors (66.7%), compared to survivors (0%, p = 0.006). Durations of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay were significantly longer in survivors (271 h, 62 days) than in non-survivors (50 h, 3 days, respectively). Outcomes of treatment using ECMO in patients with circulatory collapse due to electrical storm proved satisfactory. Increases in blood lactate level and decreases in blood pH before starting ECMO were thought to be related to mortality due to suspected irreversible organ damage by hypoxia before ECMO.

Clinical evaluation of a new dispersive aortic cannula.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral injury is a serious complication in open-heart surgery. Once it occurs, it causes significant disability and death. We developed a novel dispersive aortic cannula named the Stealth Flow cannula and used it as a standard aortic cannula in cardiopulmonary bypass. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of this aortic cannula. METHODS: A total of 182 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass were studied. The patients were divided into two groups: the Soft-Flow cannula group (n = 89) and the Stealth Flow cannula group (n = 93). Patients with a shaggy aortic arch were excluded from this study because the cannulae were inserted at the ascending aorta with a cannula tip directed toward the aortic root in these cases. Patients with multiple arterial perfusion sites were also excluded. Complications including early mortality, perioperative stroke, and intraoperative aortic injury were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Age, operative procedure, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and the Japan SCORE were not significantly different between the groups. In comparisons between the Stealth Flow and Soft-Flow groups, the incidences of early mortality, perioperative stroke, intraoperative aortic dissection, and all complications were 1.08% versus 1.12% (p = 0.98), 1.1% versus 2.2% (p = 0.53), 0% versus 1.1% (p = 0.33), and 1.1% versus 3.4% (p = 0.29), respectively. The incidence of major cardiovascular events, including early death, perioperative stroke, and aortic dissection, was not different. CONCLUSIONS: The Stealth Flow cannula, which was designed based on our previous experimental study, contributed to reducing cerebral and aortic events as much as the Soft-Flow cannula in the present clinical study.