Estimating meaningful thresholds for multi-item questionnaires using item response theory.

PURPOSE: Meaningful thresholds are needed to interpret patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) results. This paper introduces a new method, based on item response theory (IRT), to estimate such thresholds. The performance of the method is examined in simulated datasets and two real datasets, and compared with other methods. METHODS: The IRT method involves fitting an IRT model to the PROM items and an anchor item indicating the criterion state of interest. The difficulty parameter of the anchor item represents the meaningful threshold on the latent trait. The latent threshold is then linked to the corresponding expected PROM score. We simulated 4500 item response datasets to a 10-item PROM, and an anchor item. The datasets varied with respect to the mean and standard deviation of the latent trait, and the reliability of the anchor item. The real datasets consisted of a depression scale with a clinical depression diagnosis as anchor variable and a pain scale with a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) question as anchor variable. RESULTS: The new IRT method recovered the true thresholds accurately across the simulated datasets. The other methods, except one, produced biased threshold estimates if the state prevalence was smaller or greater than 0.5. The adjusted predictive modeling method matched the new IRT method (also in the real datasets) but showed some residual bias if the prevalence was smaller than 0.3 or greater than 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: The new IRT method perfectly recovers meaningful (interpretational) thresholds for multi-item questionnaires, provided that the data satisfy the assumptions for IRT analysis.

Determining the Minimally Important Change of the Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire in patients undergoing trigger finger release.

INTRODUCTION: The Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is a widely used instrument to evaluate treatment results for hand conditions. Establishing the Minimally Important Change (MIC) is essential for interpreting change in outcome that is clinically relevant. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to determine the MIC of the MHQ total and subscale scores in patients undergoing trigger finger release. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study conducted between December 2011 and February 2020. METHODS: Patients completed the MHQ prior to surgery and 3 months postoperatively. The MIC of the MHQ was determined using 5 anchor-based methods (ie, 2 anchor mean change methods and 3 receiver operating characteristic methods). The median MIC value was determined to represent the triangulated MIC. RESULTS: A total of 1814 patients were included. The MIC for the MHQ total score ranged from 7.7 to 10.9, with a triangulated estimate of 9.3. The MIC estimates for 5 of 6 of the MHQ subscales ranged from 7.7 to 20.0. No MICs could be determined for the MHQ subscale "aesthetics" due to low correlations between the anchor questions and MHQ change scores. CONCLUSIONS: These MIC estimates can contribute to the interpretation of clinical outcomes following trigger finger release and for assessment of power in prospective trials.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Open A1 Pulley Release for a Trigger Finger or Thumb.

PURPOSE: Although A1 pulley release is an effective treatment to reduce pain and improve hand function, complications may occur. More insight into risk factors for complications is essential to improve patient counseling and potentially target modifiable risk factors. This study aimed to identify factors associated with complications following A1 pulley release. METHODS: Patients completed baseline questionnaires, including patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, and the Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire. We retrospectively reviewed medical records to identify complications classified using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Complications in Hand and Wrist conditions tool. Grade 1 complications comprise treatment with additional hand therapy, splinting, or analgesics, grade 2 treatment with antibiotics or steroid injections, grade 3A minor surgical treatment, grade 3B major surgical treatment, and grade 3C complex regional pain syndrome. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the contribution of patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measurement scores to complications. RESULTS: Of the included 3,428 patients, 16% incurred a complication. The majority comprised milder grades 1 (6%) and 2 (7%) complications, followed by more severe grades 3B (2%), 3C (0.1%), and 3A (0.1%) complications. A longer symptom duration (standardized odds ratio [SOR], 1.09), ≥3 preoperative steroid injections (SOR, 3.22), a steroid injection within 3 months before surgery (SOR, 2.02), and treatment of the dominant hand (SOR, 1.34), index finger (SOR, 1.65), and middle finger (SOR, 2.01) were associated with a higher complication rate. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ≥3 preoperative steroid injections and a steroid injection within 3 months before surgery were the most influential factors contributing to complications. These findings can assist clinicians during patient counseling and may guide preoperative treatment. We recommend that clinicians should consider avoiding steroid injections within 3 months before surgery and to be reluctant to perform >2 steroid injections. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Biomechanical Study Comparing Pulvertaft, Double Side-to-Side, and Locking Side-to-Side Tendon Suture Techniques.

PURPOSE: In this study, we present a single-sided locking side-to-side (STS) suture technique as a possible alternative for the Pulvertaft weave in tendon transfers. The aim of the study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the single-sided locking STS reconstruction with Pulvertaft and double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions. METHODS: Twenty-four human cadaveric extensor digitorum communis tendons and 24 flexor digitorum superficialis tendons were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups, resulting in a total of 8 flexor tendons and 8 extensor tendons per group: Pulvertaft, double-sided nonlocking STS, and single-sided locking STS reconstructions. Load to failure was measured with a tensile testing machine. Increase in cross-sectional area was used as a measure of bulkiness at the reconstruction site. RESULTS: In extensor tendons, single-sided locking STS reconstructions showed a higher load to failure than Pulvertaft reconstructions, whereas no difference was found in load to failure between single-sided locking and double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions. In flexor tendons, single-sided locking STS reconstructions showed a higher load to failure than Pulvertaft reconstructions. However, load to failure of single-sided locking STS reconstructions was less than double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions. In both extensor and flexor tendons, the percent increase in cross-sectional area at the reconstruction site was higher in Pulvertaft reconstructions than single-sided locking STS reconstructions, whereas no difference was found between single-sided locking STS and double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Single-sided locking and double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions are suitable alternatives to the Pulvertaft technique for tendon transfers owing to a higher strength and less bulkiness. Because load to failure of both STS reconstructions did not differ in extensor tendon transfers, the single-sided locking STS reconstruction seems especially suitable for extensor tendon transfers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides anatomical evidence that the single-sided locking STS reconstruction yields a higher strength and is less bulky than the Pulvertaft reconstruction in tendon transfers.

Incision techniques for trigger thumb release: a comparison of outcomes of four types of skin incision.

Although trigger thumb release is commonly performed, there is no consensus on the optimal skin incision. This study aimed to compare outcomes of four incision techniques, including V-shaped, oblique, transverse and longitudinal incisions. Outcomes included the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, satisfaction with the treatment and postoperative complications. The results of 875 patients who underwent trigger thumb release were assessed. All groups demonstrated improvement in self-reported hand function (range of 10-14 points), pain (25-27 points) and aesthetics (4-7 points) from baseline to 3 months postoperatively with no differences between incision techniques. Of the patients, 76% reported good or excellent satisfaction with the outcome of treatment. Satisfaction and complication rates of the different incision techniques were similar. These findings imply that there is no clear benefit of one type of incision over another for trigger thumb release, suggesting that surgeons may use the technique of their preference.Level of evidence: III.

Complications and Functional Outcomes following Trigger Finger Release: A Cohort Study of 1879 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although trigger finger release is considered a safe procedure, large cohort studies reporting consistent complication rates and functional outcomes are scarce. Further insight into outcomes of this commonly performed procedure is essential for adequate treatment evaluation and patient counseling. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the complication rates and functional outcomes following trigger finger release. METHODS: This is an observational multicenter cohort study of patients undergoing trigger finger release. The primary outcome included the occurrence of complications. The secondary outcome was change in hand function (Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire) from baseline to 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Complications were observed in 17.1 percent of 1879 patients. Most complications were minor, requiring hand therapy or analgesics (7.0 percent of all patients), antibiotics, or steroid injections (7.8 percent). However, 2.1 percent required surgical treatment and 0.2 percent developed complex regional pain syndrome. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire total score improved from baseline to 3 months postoperatively with 12.7 points, although the authors found considerable variation in outcomes with less improvement in patients with better baseline scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that trigger finger release results in improved hand function, although complications occur in 17 percent. Most complications are minor and can be treated with nonsurgical therapy, resulting in improved hand function as well. However, additional surgical treatment is required in 2 percent of patients. In addition, the authors found that change in hand function depends on the baseline score, with less improvement in patients with better baseline scores. Future studies should investigate factors that contribute to the variability in treatment outcomes following trigger finger release. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of fibrin glue in peripheral nerve repair: Can we just glue it?

BACKGROUND: Within the field of peripheral nerve surgery, the use of fibrin glue as an alternative to conventional microsurgical suture repair is becoming increasingly popular. Advantages of fibrin glue for nerve reconstruction include technical ease of use, less tissue manipulation, and shorter operation times. Although fibrin glue seems a promising alternative to conventional microsurgical repair, further insight into the outcomes of nerve recovery is essential. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current literature on the use of fibrin glue for peripheral nerve repair and compare these results with outcomes following conventional suture repair. METHODS: A systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases was performed. The search included animal, cadaveric, and human studies assessing outcomes following peripheral nerve repair using fibrin glue. Data on outcomes were subdivided into functional outcomes, electrophysiology, histopathology, biomechanical outcomes, and operation times. We calculated standardized mean differences and combined these in a random effects model to estimate the overall effect. RESULTS: From a total of 2057 references, 37 animal, two cadaveric, and four human studies were included. Fibrin glue repairs resulted in similar functional and electrophysiology outcomes and shorter operation times than suture repairs. However, fibrin glue alone resulted in lower strength and more dehiscence. No dehiscence was reported when fibrin glue was combined with one or two sutures. Yet, we also found that methodological details were poorly reported in animal studies, resulting in an unclear risk of bias. This should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that nerve regeneration may be similar in fibrin glue repairs and suture repairs. Combining fibrin glue with one or two positional sutures allows for a precise realignment of the nerve fibers and seems to provide sufficient strength to prevent dehiscence.

Factors associated with self-reported pain and hand function following surgical A1 pulley release.

Surgical A1 pulley release can considerably reduce pain and improve hand function, but individual outcomes are highly variable. This study aimed to identify factors contributing to self-reported pain and hand function 3 months postoperatively. We included 2681 patients who had received surgical treatment for a trigger finger or thumb and who completed the Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Hierarchical linear regression models were used to investigate patient and clinical characteristics associated with postoperative pain and hand function. For both pain and hand function, the most influential factors associated with worse outcomes were worse MHQ scores at baseline (ß 0.38 and 0.33, respectively) and ≥3 preoperative steroid injections (ß -0.36 and -0.35). These factors indicated that patients with severe preoperative symptoms represent a group with a more advanced disease that is more difficult to treat. These findings can assist clinicians in patient counselling, expectation management and decision-making about the timing of the intervention.Level of evidence: II.

Patient-Related Outcomes of Arthroscopic Resection of Ganglion Cysts of the Wrist.

Background Ganglion cysts of the wrist can cause pain and loss of functionality. No consensus exist on optimal treatment. Arthroscopic resection shows promising results but is poorly studied. Furthermore, only few studies have used patient-related outcomes to evaluate arthroscopic treatment. Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess patient-related outcomes following arthroscopic resection of wrist ganglion cysts. Patients and Methods This was a retrospective study of all consecutive patients that underwent arthroscopic resection of a dorsal or volar wrist ganglion. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. The primary outcome was the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcomes were recurrence rate and complications. Results A total of 53 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 13 months (interquartile range: 6-23 months). Twenty-six patients (49%) presented with a recurrence following prior treatment. Mean PRWE was 13 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.8), with no difference between patients with dorsal or volar ganglion cysts. There were five recurrences (9%), of which three occurred in the first five patients who were operated. There were three patients with complications (6%), consisting of neuropraxia, extensor carpi ulnaris tendinitis, and painful scar tissue. Conclusion Arthroscopic resection results in good patient-related outcome and low complication and recurrence rates when performed by an experienced surgeon. Recurrence and complication rates are similar to arthroscopic resections described in literature and superior to open resection and needle aspiration. Well-designed randomized clinical trials will be necessary to confirm these findings. Level of Evidence This is a level IV, retrospective study.