RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The American Society of Breast Surgeons released a consensus statement that genetic testing should be made available to all patients with a personal history of breast cancer. However, it is not clear whether physicians feel comfortable with universal genetic testing (UGT) or if they have sufficient knowledge to interpret results and manage them appropriately. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore breast surgeons' attitudes toward UGT. METHODS: Breast surgeons were consented and scheduled for a semi-structured virtual interview. Transcripts were uploaded into qualitative analysis software where they were exhaustively and iteratively coded. Codes were then organized into higher-order categories and themes and data saturation were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one surgeons completed the qualitative interview. Most surgeons practiced in the academic or community setting and most practiced in the Midwest (71.0%). The majority (90.3%) reported having a structured genetics program. The majority (96.8%) referred their patients to genetics for counseling and most preferred ordering testing through a genetic services provider. Some surgeons had concerns about access to genetic services. A minority of surgeons order UGT for all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. The majority of respondents thought that more training in genetics was needed for surgeons. Many surgeons expressed concern about the psychosocial effects of UGT on patients. CONCLUSIONS: Many surgeons expressed concerns about UGT, mainly related to discomfort with their training, access to genetic services, and the psychosocial impact on their patients. Future work is needed to determine how to improve surgeon's comfort level in implementing UGT.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Feminino , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Testes Genéticos , Atitude do Pessoal de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the experience of the male breast cancer patient. Mastectomy is often offered despite evidence that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) provides similar outcomes. METHODS: Two concurrent online surveys were distributed from August to October 2020 via social media to male breast cancer (MBC) patients and by email to American Society of Breast Surgeon members. The MBC patients were asked their opinions about their surgery, and the surgeons were asked to provide surgical recommendations for MBC patients. RESULTS: The survey involved 63 MBC patients with a mean age of 62 years (range, 31-79 years). Five MBC patients (7.9 %) stated that their surgeon recommended BCS, but 54 (85.7 %) of the patients underwent unilateral, and 8 (12.7 %) underwent bilateral mastectomy. Most of the patients (n = 60, 96.8 %) had no reconstruction. One third of the patients (n = 21, 33.3 %) felt somewhat or very uncomfortable with their appearance after surgery. The response rate was 16.5 % for the surgeons. Of the 438 surgeons who answered the survey, 298 (73.3 %) were female, 215 (51.7 %) were fellowship-trained, and 244 (58.9 %) had been practicing for 16 years or longer. More than half of surgeons (n = 259, 59.1 %) routinely offered BCS to eligible men, and 180 (41.3 %) stated they had performed BCS on a man with breast cancer. Whereas 89 (20.8 %) of the surgeons stated that they routinely offer reconstruction to MBC patients, 87 (20.3 %) said they do not offer reconstruction, 96 (22.4 %) said they offer it only if the patient requests it, and 157 (36.6 %) said they never consider it as an option. CONCLUSIONS: The study found discordance between MBC patients' satisfaction with their surgery and surgeon recommendations and experience. These data present an opportunity to optimize the MBC patient experience.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama Masculina , Neoplasias da Mama , Cirurgiões , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama Masculina/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mastectomia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine how treatment delays brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the physical and emotional well-being of physicians treating these patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of physician breast specialists was posted from April 23rd to June 11th, 2020 on membership list serves and social media platforms of the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers and the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Physician well-being was measured using 6 COVID-19 burnout emotions and the 4-item PROMIS short form for anxiety and sleep disturbance. We examined associations between treatment delays and physician well-being, adjusting for demographic factors, COVID-19 testing and ten COVID-19 pandemic concerns. RESULTS: 870 physicians completed the survey, 61% were surgeons. The mean age of physicians was 52 and 548 (63.9%) were female. 669 (79.4%) reported some delay in patient care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. 384 (44.1%) and 529 (60.8%) of physicians scored outside normal limits for anxiety and sleep disturbance, respectively. After adjusting for demographic factors and COVID-19 testing, mean anxiety and COVID-19 burnout scores were significantly higher among physicians whose patients experienced either delays in surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, breast imaging or specialty consultation. A multivariable model adjusting for ten physician COVID-19 concerns and delays showed that "delays will impact my emotional well-being" was the strongest concern associated with anxiety, sleep disturbance and COVID-19 burnout factors. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer treatment delays during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States were associated with a negative impact on physician emotional wellness.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Esgotamento Profissional , COVID-19 , Oncologistas , Tempo para o Tratamento , Ansiedade/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oncologistas/psicologia , Sono , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The recent data on decision regret of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery are sparse. METHODS: An electronic cross-sectional survey was distributed to Love Research Army volunteers ages 18-70 years who underwent breast cancer surgery from 2009 to 2020. Decision regret scores were compared among patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy (BM), unilateral mastectomy (UM), breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and BCS first (BCS followed by re-excision or mastectomy) and between procedures during different time periods. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient and tumor factors, was used to determine whether surgery type was associated with a regret score in the highest quartile range. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 2148 women, 1525 (71.0%) of whom reported their surgery choice and answered all questions on the regret scale. The mean age of the participants was 50 years, and the median year of surgery was 2014. The median decision regret score for all the patients was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 0-20) on a 100-point scale. The regret score of 342 participants (22.4%) was 25 or higher (BCS, 20.2%; BCS first, 31.9%; UM, 30.8%; BM, 15.4%; p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, BM was associated with less regret than UM (odds ratio [OR], 0.40 (range, 0.27-0.58); p < 0.001), BCS (OR, 0.56 (range, 0.38-0.83; p = 0.003), or BCS first (OR, 0.32; range, 0.21-0.49; p < 0.001). During the three periods analyzed (2009-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020), the BM and BCS patients had the lowest regret scores of all the surgical types. CONCLUSIONS: Decision regret was low among the patients undergoing breast cancer surgery but lowest among the BM patients after adjustment for clinical and tumor factors including complications.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mastectomia Segmentar , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine whether an exercise program and standardized operating room positioning protocol (EOPP) would improve surgeon muscle workload and/or surgeon perception of mental/physical workload for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). METHODS: This prospective study analyzed muscle workload by EMG of four surgeons performing NSM before and after an EOPP. Surveys were administered assessing surgeon perception of mental/physical workload. EMG data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, controlling for surgeon, first assistant, duration and difficulty of procedure, left or right side, and sequence of the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 56 NSM cases performed by 3 surgeons were analyzed. One surgeon was excluded because of muscle injury and undergoing active physical therapy during the study period. After implementation of the EOPP, the left (P = 0.005) and right (P = 0.020) upper trapezii muscles had a significant decrease in overall ergonomic workload but there was no significant change in overall ergonomic workload for the bilateral cervical erector spinae, anterior deltoid, and lumbar erector spinae muscle groups. When analyzing muscle group exertion by surgeon, there was significant variability in all muscles except the left cervical erector spinae. Following the EOPP, surgeons reported that the procedures were more physically (P = 0.01) and mentally (P = 0.002) demanding and visualization (P = 0.04) was worse. The breast laterality and sequence did not affect muscle exertion. CONCLUSIONS: An EOPP decreased the overall ergonomic workload of one muscle group for surgeons performing NSM but did not impact surgeon perception of mental/physical workload. Further investigation is needed to improve surgeon ergonomics.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Cirurgiões , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Ergonomia , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia , Mamilos , Salas Cirúrgicas , Estudos Prospectivos , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
A modern perspective on the nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) looking at current indications as well as the most up-to-date evidence both in the literature and from our institution. There is an in-depth description of our NSM technique and an overview of alternative approaches, including the robotic technique. The complicated concept of the learning curve is addressed and ideas on how to train other NSM adopters.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia/métodos , Mamilos/cirurgia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The utilization of OncotypeDx in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is not well defined. The objective of this study was to determine what proportion of hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients undergoing NCT would not benefit from chemotherapy based on OncotypeDx recurrence scores (RS) and predictors of a high RS as defined by the TAILORx trial. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients with unilateral clinical stage I-III HR+/Her2- breast cancer who had an OncotypeDx score and who had undergone NCT. Patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy were used as a comparison group. RESULTS: Of 307,666 patients, 41.8% had testing with OncotypeDx. Of these, 76.6% had no chemotherapy, 22.3% adjuvant chemotherapy, and 1.1% NCT. OncotypeDx testing in NCT patients increased from 4.9% in 2010 to 8.2% in 2015. Of NCT patients with OncotypeDx testing, 11.6% had RS < 11, 44.4% RS 11-25, and 43.9% RS > 25. In patients age ≤ 50 years, 14.5% had RS < 11, 12.4% RS 11-15, 31.4% RS 16-25, and 41.7% RS > 25. Predictors of RS > 25 on multivariable analysis included grade 3 tumors (odds ratio [OR] 3.83) and PR-negative tumors (OR 5.26) but not clinical T or N stage (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of patients with OncotypeDx testing are being overtreated with NCT, and a third of younger patients are being overtreated. Predictors of a high RS are reliably available at core biopsy, suggesting an application of OncotypeDx in determining the need for NCT for some HR-positive breast cancers.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/genética , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Lobular/genética , Carcinoma Lobular/metabolismo , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Seguimentos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few decision aids for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients are used by surgeons during their consultations with patients. METHODS: From 2017 to 2019, an online interactive breast cancer in-visit decision aid (BIDA) was used on 63 patients and 57 patients underwent usual care (UC). We compared knowledge, decision involvement, anxiety and distress (HADS scale), quality of life (PROMIS), fear of recurrence, body image, and patient values between BIDA and UC before surgery. A knowledge score of ≥ 57% was considered "high knowledge." RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were enrolled of which 120 (63.8%) completed all study procedures. Patient demographic characteristics and anxiety and quality of life (QOL) at baseline were similar between patients in BIDA and UC cohorts. After seeing the surgeon, patients in the BIDA group had higher composite knowledge scores compared with UC patients [n = 55 (87.3%) vs. n = 39 (68.4%) respectively, p = 0.012]. Patients in the BIDA cohort reported being asked more often their surgical preference (p = 0.013) and discussing bilateral mastectomy (BM) as an option (p = 0.048). There was a trend of less patients in the BIDA cohort undergoing BM then in the UC cohort [10 (15.9%) vs. 14 (24.6%), p = 0.49]. Anxiety and distress, QOL, fear of recurrence, and body image were not significantly different between BIDA and UC cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A decision aid used by surgeons during their consultation was associated with higher knowledge levels, patients reporting more discussion about BM, and a trend of lower BMs. A larger study with more patients is needed to confirm this finding.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Tomada de Decisões , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Mastectomia/métodos , Imagem Corporal , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Medo , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Mastectomia/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Participação do Paciente , Preferência do Paciente , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Gravação em VídeoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several definitions of oncoplastic surgery have been reported in the literature. In an effort to facilitate communication regarding oncoplastic surgery to patients, trainees, and among colleagues, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) aimed to create a consensus definition and classification system for oncoplastic surgery. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search for oncoplastic surgery definitions using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Following this, a consensus definition and classification system was created by the ASBrS. RESULTS: Overall, 30 articles defining oncoplastic surgery were identified, with several articles contradicting each other. The ASBrS definition for oncoplastic surgery defines this set of breast-conserving operations using volume displacement and volume replacement principles as: "Breast conservation surgery incorporating an oncologic partial mastectomy with ipsilateral defect repair using volume displacement or volume replacement techniques with contralateral symmetry surgery as appropriate". Volume displacement is defined as closing the lumpectomy defect and redistributing the resection volume over the preserved breast, and is divided into two levels: level 1 (< 20%) and level 2 (20-50%). Volume replacement includes those situations when volume is added using flaps or implants to correct the partial mastectomy defect. CONCLUSION: The ASBrS oncoplastic surgery definition and classification system provides language to facilitate discussion and teaching of oncoplastic surgery among breast surgeons, trainees, and patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Mastectomia/classificação , Mastectomia/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Cirurgiões/normas , Implantes de Mama , Consenso , Feminino , Humanos , Prognóstico , Sociedades Médicas , Retalhos CirúrgicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSMs) with reconstruction are believed to be more difficult to perform than skin-sparing mastectomies (SSMs), but there is little quantitative data to support this claim. METHODS: This prospective study analyzed four surgeons performing mastectomies. Electromyography (EMG) electrodes placed on selected muscle groups on each surgeon were used to capture muscle exertion intraoperatively and a percentage of maximum voluntary exertion was calculated (%MVE). Data regarding surgeon demographics, exercise habits, musculoskeletal problems, and surgery-specific workload was collected using a questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 61 mastectomies were analyzed; 40 were NSM and 21 were SSM/total mastectomies. NSM were considered to be more mentally demanding and physically demanding than SSM (p < 0.001). When the surgeons' EMG data was analyzed as a group, there was a statistically significant difference in %MVE for NSM versus SSM at high muscle activity in bilateral anterior deltoid muscle groups and at average muscle activity for the left anterior deltoid muscle only. At low muscle activity, there was a statistically significant increase in activation for SSM versus NSM in bilateral cervical erector spinae. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed, which showed statistically significant differences at high muscle activity between NSM and SSM in the left cervical erector spinae and bilateral anterior deltoid muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study shows that intraoperative EMGs can assess muscle activity for mastectomy operations and show a difference between NSM and SSM. This is the first study to provide quantitative data on muscle strain with NSM.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Ergonomia , Mastectomia/psicologia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/psicologia , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Mastectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mamilos/cirurgia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Projetos Piloto , Prognóstico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The demand for oncoplastic breast surgery has increased significantly in recent years. However, these procedures are often not taught in standard training for breast surgeons, and a simple guide for surgeons to start performing basic oncoplastic breast surgery techniques is not available. METHODS: The basic concepts of oncoplastic breast surgery and the tools needed prior to starting these types of procedures are discussed, and the procedure, in a stepwise pattern, for the building blocks of oncoplastic techniques is outlined. RESULTS: The importance of oncoplastics from a quality of life and oncologic standpoint are described. Key concepts are defined and the decision on when it is necessary to consult reconstructive plastic surgery is delineated. The basic necessities for oncoplastic breast surgery, including patient photographs, important intraoperative tools, anatomic knowledge, and patient selection, are discussed. The building block procedures include aesthetic scar placement, parenchymal closure, deepithelialization, and donut therapeutic mastopexy, which are described in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Oncoplastic breast surgery techniques and clinical reasoning build on one another, allowing a surgeon to move from level I to level II oncoplastic procedures. Even the most basic level I breast conservation oncoplastic skills can improve a patient's cosmetic outcome and are easily learned by a general surgeon.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Oncoplastic surgery is emerging as a validated, safe, patient-centric approach to breast cancer surgery in the United States. The American Society of Breast Surgeons Oncoplastic Surgery Committee (ASBrS-OSC) conducted a survey to assess the scope of practice and level of interest in oncoplastic surgery among its members. Furthermore, the group sought to identify barriers to incorporating oncoplastic skills in a surgeon's practice. METHODS: A 10-question survey was administered in March 2017 to the entire ASBrS membership using an online format. Three solicitations were sent. Unique identifiers allowed a single response. RESULTS: Of the 2655 surveys sent out, 708 members responded. Nearly all (99%) respondents had at least some interest in oncoplastic surgery. The current rates of performing nipple-sparing mastectomy, adjacent tissue transfer, and breast reduction with lumpectomy were 80, 60, and 51%, respectively. A minority of respondents reported independently performing breast reductions/mammaplasties (19%) or contralateral symmetrization (10%). Barriers to learning oncoplastic surgery included surgeon's time and access to oncoplastic educational material/courses. Most respondents felt that training courses and videos may allow them to better incorporate oncoplastic techniques in their practices. CONCLUSIONS: The interest in oncoplastic surgery among U.S. surgeons is significant, yet there are barriers to incorporate these surgical techniques into a breast surgeon's practice. As professional organizations provide access to effective training and enduring educational resources, breast surgeons will be enabled to develop their oncoplastic skill set and safely offer these techniques to their patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia/tendências , Oncologia Cirúrgica/tendências , Competência Clínica , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Mastectomia/métodos , Mastectomia/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Oncologia Cirúrgica/normasRESUMO
Many surgeons routinely use a single preoperative prophylactic dose of an antibiotic prior to needle-localized lumpectomy, despite the lack of evidence that this practice reduces the rate of infection. The aim of this study is to determine if antibiotic administration reduces wound infection for needle-localized lumpectomy. A retrospective chart review of patients that underwent needle-localized lumpectomy from 2010 to 2012 was conducted. Data regarding patient demographics, comorbid conditions, medical history, operative details, and pathology were collected. Surgical infections requiring opening of the wound or treatment with antibiotics were documented if occurred during the first 3 months following surgery. Fisher's exact tests were used for statistical analyses. Two hundred and twenty patients were identified. Thirty-six percent (80/220) of patients received preoperative prophylactic antibiotics. The antibiotic and the nonantibiotic group were similar in age, body mass index, tobacco use, history of radiation, history of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, duration of surgery, duration needle in place, and pathology. Two percent (4/220) of patients had wound infections. Two percent (3/140) of patients in the nonantibiotic group had infections, versus 1% (1/80) in the antibiotic group. In an analysis of patients that developed infections (n = 4) and patients that did not (n = 216), there was no statistically significant difference in patient demographic, duration of surgery, duration of time needle in place, or pathology. It is safe to omit the use of antibiotics prior to needle-localized lumpectomy and avoid the cost of the medication, patient adverse reactions, and increase in resistant organisms.
Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia Segmentar/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar/instrumentação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agulhas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamografia/economia , Mamografia/instrumentação , Mastectomia/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional/economia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/economia , Margens de Excisão , Mastectomia/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Projetos Piloto , Radiologistas , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , CirurgiõesRESUMO
In recent years, there has been increased adoption of robotic technology in oncologic breast surgery, particularly with the use of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (r-NSM). Here we review the emergence of robotic-assisted surgery in breast procedures, and discuss the safety, limited oncologic outcomes, apparent advantages, and potential limitations of r-NSM compared to conventional open-NSM (c-NSM). Limited data suggests that robotic-assisted surgery offers smaller incisions and potential for improved cosmesis and ergonomic advantage when compared to c-NSM. Similar periprocedural complication rates are seen with r-NSM compared with c-NSM. Short-term oncologic follow-up is reassuring however, but remains early and continues to be investigated. The increased cost of r-NSM compared to open surgery and feasibility of widespread adoption of the procedure are important considerations that need to be evaluated. Randomized trials are currently ongoing to address the apparent advantages, oncologic outcomes, and cost/feasibility of robotic breast surgery.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mastectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Mastectomia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe patient values and personality traits associated with breast surgery choice for patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A survey based on qualitative patient interviews and the Big-Five personality trait profile was distributed to Love Research Army volunteers aged 18-70 years old who underwent breast cancer surgery from 2009 to 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent patient values and personality traits for the choice of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), unilateral mastectomy (UM) and bilateral mastectomy (BM). RESULTS: 1497 participants completed the survey. Open-mindedness was associated with UM and sociability was associated with BM. A majority of patients prioritized cancer outcomes. Compared to BM patients, BCS and UM patients were significantly more likely to choose values associated with maintaining their self-image, optimizing surgical recovery, and following their doctor's recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Other values besides cancer outcomes differentiate patient surgical choice for BCS or mastectomy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Inquéritos e Questionários , AutoimagemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases at Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited facilities relative to the United States (U.S.) population. METHODS: We examined the incidence of breast cancer cases at CoC sites using the U.S. Census population as the denominator. Breast cancer incidence was stratified by patient age, race and ethnicity, and geographic location. RESULTS: A total of 1,499,806 patients with breast cancer were included. For females, breast cancer cases per 100,000 individuals went from 188 in 2015 to 203 in 2019 and then dropped to 176 in 2020 with a 15.7% decrease from 2019 to 2020. Breast cancer cases per 100,000 males went from 1.7 in 2015 to 1.8 in 2019 and then declined to 1.5 in 2020 with a 21.8% decrease from 2019 to 2020. For both females and males, cases per 100,000 individuals decreased from 2019 to 2020 for almost all age groups. For females, rates dropped from 2019 to 2020 for all races and ethnicities and geographic locations. The largest percent change was seen among Hispanic patients (-18.4%) and patients in the Middle Atlantic division (-18.6%). The stage distribution (0-IV) for female and male patients remained stable from 2018 to 2020. CONCLUSION: The first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a decreased number of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases at Commission on Cancer sites.