Lipoprotein (a): a historical appraisal.

Initially, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] was believed to be a genetic variant of lipoprotein (Lp)-B. Because its lipid moiety is almost identical to LDL, Lp(a) has been deliberately considered to be highly atherogenic. Lp(a) was detected in 1963 by Kare Berg, and individuals who were positive for this factor were called Lpa+ Lpa+ individuals were found more frequently in patients with coronary heart disease than in controls. After the introduction of quantitative methods for monitoring of Lp(a), it became apparent that Lp(a), in fact, is present in all individuals, yet to a greatly variable extent. The genetics of Lp(a) had been a mystery for a long time until Gerd Utermann discovered that apo(a) is expressed by a variety of alleles, giving rise to a unique size heterogeneity. This size heterogeneity, as well as countless mutations, is responsible for the great variability in plasma Lp(a) concentrations. Initially, we proposed to evaluate the risk of myocardial infarction at a cut-off for Lp(a) of 30-50 mg/dl, a value that still is adopted in numerous epidemiological studies. Due to new therapies that lower Lp(a) levels, there is renewed interest and still rising research activity in Lp(a). Despite all these activities, numerous gaps exist in our knowledge, especially as far as the function and metabolism of this fascinating Lp are concerned.

FGF19 signaling cascade suppresses APOA gene expression.

OBJECTIVE: Lipoprotein(a) is a highly atherogenic lipoprotein, whose metabolism is poorly understood. Currently no safe drugs exists that lower elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations. We therefore focused on molecular mechanisms that influence apolipoprotein(a) (APOA) biosynthesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transgenic human APOA mice (tg-APO mice) were injected with 1 mg/kg of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19). This led to a significant reduction of plasma APOA and hepatic expression of APOA. Incubation of primary hepatocytes of tg-APOA mice with FGF19 induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation and, in turn, downregulated APOA expression. Repression of APOA by FGF19 was abrogated by specific ERK1/2 phosphorylation inhibitors. The FGF19 effect on APOA was attenuated by transfection of primary hepatocytes with siRNA against the FGF19 receptor 4 (FGFR4). Using promoter reporter assays, mutation analysis, gel shift, and chromatin immune-precipitation assays, an Ets-1 binding element was identified at -1630/-1615bp region in the human APOA promoter. This element functions as an Elk-1 binding site that mediates repression of APOA transcription by FGF19. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide mechanistic insights into the transcriptional regulation of human APOA by FGF19. Further studies in the human system are required to substantiate our findings and to design therapeutics for hyper lipoprotein(a).

Is Lp(a) ready for prime time use in the clinic? A pros-and-cons debate.

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is a cholesterol-rich lipoprotein known since 1963. In spite of extensive research on Lp(a), there are still numerous gaps in our knowledge relating to its function, biosynthesis and catabolism. One reason for this might be that apo(a), the characteristic glycoprotein of Lp(a), is expressed only in primates. Results from experiments using transgenic animals therefore may need verification in humans. Studies on Lp(a) are also handicapped by the great number of isoforms of apo(a) and the heterogeneity of apo(a)-containing fractions in plasma. Quantification of Lp(a) in the clinical laboratory for a long time has not been standardized. Starting from its discovery, reports accumulated that Lp(a) contributed to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Early reports were based on case control studies but in the last decades a great deal of prospective studies have been published that highlight the increased risk for CVD and MI in patients with elevated Lp(a). Final answers to the question of whether Lp(a) is ready for wider clinical use will come from intervention studies with novel selective Lp(a) lowering medications that are currently underway. This article expounds arguments for and against this proposition from currently available data.

Galactose-specific asialoglycoprotein receptor is involved in lipoprotein (a) catabolism.

Lp(a) [lipoprotein (a)] is a highly atherogenic plasma lipoprotein assembled from low-density lipoprotein and the glycoprotein apolipoprotein (a). The rate of Lp(a) biosynthesis correlates significantly with plasma Lp(a) concentrations, whereas the fractional catabolic rate does not have much influence. So far, little is known about Lp(a) catabolism. To study the site and mode of Lp(a) catabolism, native or sialidase-treated Lp(a) was injected into hedgehogs or ASGPR (asialoglycoprotein receptor)-knockout (ASGPR-) mice or wild-type (ASGPR+) mice, and the decay of the plasma Lp(a) concentration was followed. COS-7 cells were transfected with high- (HL-1) and low-molecular-mass ASGPR subunits (HL-2), and binding and degradation of intact or desialylated Lp(a) were measured. In hedgehogs, one of the few species that synthesize Lp(a), most of the Lp(a) was taken up by the liver, followed by kidney and spleen. Lp(a) and asialo-Lp(a) were catabolized with apparent half-lives of 13.8 and 0.55 h respectively. Asialo-orosomucoide increased both half-lives significantly. In mice, the apparent half-life of Lp(a) was 4-6 h. Catabolism of native Lp(a) by wild-type mice was significantly faster compared with ASGPR- mice and there was a significantly greater accumulation of Lp(a) in the liver of ASGPR+ mice compared with ASGPR- mice. The catabolism of asialo-Lp(a) in ASGPR- mice was 8-fold faster when compared with native Lp(a) in wild-type mice. Transfected COS-7 cells expressing functional ASGPR showed approx. 5-fold greater binding and 2-fold faster degradation of native Lp(a) compared with control cells. Our results for the first time demonstrate a physiological function of ASGPR in the catabolism of Lp(a).

The Physiological Role of Lipoprotein (a).

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is one of the most atherogenic lipoproteins, and, although we know plenty about the pathophysiology of Lp(a), its physiological function and metabolism remain elusive. From our previous results and more recent reports, the following model of Lp(a) metabolism emerges: apolipoprotein a (apo(a)) is biosynthesized in liver cells and the size of the isoform determines its rate of synthesis and excretion. In a first step, specific kringle IV domains in apo(a), mainly T-6 and T-7, bind to circulating low-density lipoproteins, followed by a second step in which stabilization of the newly formed Lp(a) complex is achieved by a disulfide bridge. Circulating Lp(a) interacts specifically with kidney cells, or possibly other tissues, causing cleavage of 2/3­3/4 of the N-terminal part of apo(a) by a collagenase-type protease. Part of these apo(a) fragments are found as excretory products of Lp(a) in urine, but there are indications that they, in fact, represent the biologically active form of apo(a) and are possibly responsible for the atherogenicity of Lp(a). Strategies for reducing this atherogenic lipoprotein with medication should, therefore, aim at interfering with either the assembly of Lp(a) or the stimulation of apo(a) fragmentation. (c) 2002 Prous Science. All rights reserved.

New AHA and ACC guidelines on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk.

After the publication of the new guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Atherosclerosis Society for the prevention and treatment of dyslipidemias (Eur Heart J 32:1769-1818, 2011; Eur Heart J 33:1635-1701, 2012), a group of authors has recently published on behalf of the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology guidelines on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk (Circulation 2013). These new guidelines are supposed to replace the until now widely accepted, at least in the USA, recommendations of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III from the years 2002 (Circulation 106:3143-3421, 2002) and 2004 (Circulation 110:227-39, 2004). Furthermore, they claim to be based mainly on hard evidence derived from the interpretation of results of prospective randomized controlled trials. This Joint Position Statement of the Society for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases e.V. (D.A.CH), the Austrian Atherosclerosis Society and the Working Group on Lipids and Atherosclerosis (AGLA) of the Swiss Society of Cardiology concludes that the use of individualized prevention strategies based on specific indications and LDL cholesterol target concentrations, a strategy whose worth has been widely proven and accepted for more than a decade in Europe, should not be given up.

Farnesoid X receptor represses hepatic human APOA gene expression.

High plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a), which is encoded by the APOA gene] increase an individual's risk of developing diseases, such as coronary artery diseases, restenosis, and stroke. Unfortunately, increased Lp(a) levels are minimally influenced by dietary changes or drug treatment. Further, the development of Lp(a)-specific medications has been hampered by limited knowledge of Lp(a) metabolism. In this study, we identified patients suffering from biliary obstructions with very low plasma Lp(a) concentrations that rise substantially after surgical intervention. Consistent with this, common bile duct ligation in mice transgenic for human APOA (tg-APOA mice) lowered plasma concentrations and hepatic expression of APOA. To test whether farnesoid X receptor (FXR), which is activated by bile acids, was responsible for the low plasma Lp(a) levels in cholestatic patients and mice, we treated tg-APOA and tg-APOA/Fxr-/- mice with cholic acid. FXR activation markedly reduced plasma concentrations and hepatic expression of human APOA in tg-APOA mice but not in tg-APOA/Fxr-/- mice. Incubation of primary hepatocytes from tg-APOA mice with bile acids dose dependently downregulated APOA expression. Further analysis determined that the direct repeat 1 element between nucleotides -826 and -814 of the APOA promoter functioned as a negative FXR response element. This motif is also bound by hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF4α), which promotes APOA transcription, and FXR was shown to compete with HNF4α for binding to this motif. These findings may have important implications in the development of Lp(a)-lowering medications.

Factors affecting plasma lipoprotein(a) levels: role of hormones and other nongenetic factors.

Lp(a) appears to be one of the most atherogenic lipoproteins. It consists of an low-density lipoprotein core in addition to a covalently bound glycoprotein, apo(a). Apo(a) exists in numerous polymorphic forms. The size of the polymorphism is mediated by the variable number of kringle-4 Type 2 repeats found in apo(a). Plasma Lp(a) levels are determined to more than 90% by genetic factors. Plasma Lp(a) levels in healthy individuals correlate significantly highly with apo(a) biosynthesis, and not with its catabolism. There are several hormones that are known to have a strong effect on Lp(a) metabolism. In certain diseases, such as kidney disease, the Lp(a) catabolism is impaired, leading to elevations that are up to a fivefold increase. Lp(a) levels rise with age but are otherwise only little influenced by diet and lifestyle. There is no safe and efficient way of treating individuals with elevated plasma Lp(a) concentrations. Most of the lipid-lowering drugs have either no significant influence on Lp(a) or exhibit a variable effect in patients with different forms of primary and secondary hyperlipoproteinemia.

Solution structure of human apolipoprotein(a) kringle IV type 6.

The structure of apo(a) KIVT6 was investigated by two- and three-dimensional homo- and heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. The solution structure of apo(a) KIVT6 contains only a small amount of regular secondary structure elements, comprising a short piece of antiparallel beta-sheet formed by residues Trp62-Tyr64 and Trp72-Tyr74, a short piece of parallel beta-sheet formed by the residues Cys1-Tyr2 and Thr78-Gln79, and a small 3(10)-helix within residues Thr38-Tyr40. The backbone as well as the side chains are arranged in a way similar to those of apo(a) KIVT7, apo(a) KIVT10, and plasminogen K4. We determined additionally the K(d) value of 0.31 +/- 0.04 mM for the binding of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) to apo(a) KIVT6 and mapped the binding region on apo(a) KIVT6 by means of chemical shift perturbation. This lysine binding activity, which was reported to occur within apo(a) KIVT5-8, is functionally different from the lysine binding activity found for apo(a) KIVT10.

Defective uptake of triglyceride-associated fatty acids in adipose tissue causes the SREBP-1c-mediated induction of lipogenesis.

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is the only known enzyme in the capillary endothelium of peripheral tissues that hydrolizes plasma triglycerides and provides fatty acids (FAs) for their subsequent tissue uptake. Previously, we demonstrated that mice that express LPL exclusively in muscle develop essentially normal fat mass despite the absence of LPL and the deprivation of nutritionally derived FAs in adipose tissue (AT). Using this mouse model, we now investigated the metabolic response to LPL deficiency in AT that enables maintenance of normal AT mass. We show that the rate of FA production was 1.8-fold higher in LPL-deficient AT than in control AT. The levels of mRNA and enzymatic activities of important enzymes involved in FA and triglyceride biosynthesis were induced concomitantly. Increased plasma glucose clearing and (14)C-deoxyglucose uptake into LPL-deficient mouse fat pads indicated that glucose provided the carbon source for lipid synthesis. Leptin expression was decreased in LPL-deficient AT. Finally, the induction of de novo FA synthesis in LPL-deficient AT was associated with increased expression and processing of sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP-1), together with an increase in INSIG-1 expression. These results suggest that in the absence of LPL in AT, lipogenesis is activated through increased SREBP-1 expression and processing triggered by decreased availability of nutrition-derived FAs, elevated insulin, and low leptin levels.

Endothelial cell-derived lipase mediates uptake and binding of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles and the selective uptake of HDL-associated cholesterol esters independent of its enzymic activity.

Endothelial cell-derived lipase (EDL) is a new member of the lipase gene family with high sequence homology with lipoprotein lipase (LPL). EDL is a phospholipase with very little triacylglycerol lipase activity. To investigate the effects of EDL on binding and uptake of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), as well as on the selective uptake of HDL-derived cholesterol esters (CEs), HepG2 cells were infected with adenovirus coding for EDL. For comparison, cells were also infected with LPL and with lacZ as a control. Both HDL binding and particle uptake were increased 1.5-fold and selective HDL-CE uptake was increased 1.8-fold in EDL-infected HepG2 cells compared with controls. The effect of LPL was less pronounced, resulting in 1.1-fold increase in particle uptake and 1.3-fold increase in selective uptake. Inhibition of the enzymic activity with tetrahydrolipstatin (THL) significantly enhanced the effect of EDL, as reflected by a 5.2-fold increase in binding, a 2.6-fold increase in particle uptake and a 1.1-fold increase in CE selective uptake compared with incubations without THL. To elucidate the mechanism responsible for the effects of THL, we analysed the abundance of heparin-releasable EDL protein from infected HepG2 cells upon incubations with THL, HDL and free (non-esterified) fatty acids (FFAs). In the presence of THL, vastly more EDL protein remained bound to the cell surface. Additionally, HDL and FFAs reduced the amount of cell-surface-bound EDL, suggesting that fatty acids that are liberated from phospholipids in HDL release EDL from the cell surface. This was substantiated further by the finding that, in contrast with EDL, the amount of cell-surface-bound enzymically inactive mutant EDL (MUT-EDL) was not reduced in the presence of HDL and foetal calf serum. The increased amount of cell-surface-bound MUT-EDL in the presence of THL suggested that the enzymic inactivity of MUT-EDL, as well as an augmenting effect of THL that is independent of its ability to inactivate the enzyme, are responsible for the increased amount of cell-surface-bound EDL in the presence of THL. Furthermore, in cells expressing MUT-EDL, binding and holoparticle uptake were markedly higher compared with cells expressing the active EDL, and could be increased further in the presence of THL. Despite 1.7-fold higher binding and 1.8-fold higher holoparticle uptake, the selective CE uptake by MUT-EDL-expressing cells was comparable with EDL-expressing cells and was even decreased 1.3-fold with THL. Experiments in CLA-1 (CD-36 and LIMPII analogous 1, the human homologue of scavenger receptor class B type I)-deficient HEK-293 cells demonstrated that EDL alone has the ability to stimulate HDL-CE selective uptake independently of CLA-1. Thus our results demonstrate that EDL mediates both HDL binding and uptake, and the selective uptake of HDL-CE, independently of lipolysis and CLA-1.