Coagulation, fibrinolysis and platelet drop in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) leads to transient platelet activation and hypercoagulation status, resulting in thrombocytopenia. AIMS: This study investigated the associations of coagulation/fibrinolysis status after transfemoral TAVI with valve type, post-TAVI thrombocytopenia, and complication of TAVI. METHODS: Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product (FDP) levels were measured before and 1 h, 1 day, and 2 days after TAVI. A percentage drop in platelet count (DPC) was determined from the pre- and lowest post-procedural values. RESULTS: SAPIEN 3 (S3) was implanted in 158 patients and Evolut PRO/PRO+ (Evolut) in 117. Both TAT and FDP increased after TAVI. Pre-TAVI balloon dilatation was generally performed on patients undergoing implantation with Evolut. Peak TAT was then stratified into 4 quartiles (Q1 to Q4). Of all 275 study patients, 69 patients reached ultra-hypercoagulation status (Q4). S3, TAVI without pre-balloon dilatation, DPC and bleeding complications were significantly associated with the ultra-hypercoagulation status after TAVI. TAT was significantly greater 1 h after S3 implantation than Evolut (median [IQR], 43.1 [34.1-59.6] vs. 31.0 [25.0-40.4] ng/mL; p < 0.001). In contrast, FDP levels did not differ between the two at any measurement point. The difference in DPC among the peak TAT quartiles was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The occurrence of bleeding complications was significantly higher in the group with ultra-hypercoagulation status (5.8% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in coagulation status and post-TAVI thrombocytopenia were significantly greater after S3 implantation. Ultra-hypercoagulation after TAVI was related to bleeding complications.

Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided endovascular therapy on periprocedural outcomes in patients with lower-extremity artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Although technological improvements in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) may reduce technical failures in endovascular therapy (EVT), perioperative complications (POCs) associated with IVUS use may increase. AIMS: This study investigated the impact of IVUS on periprocedural outcomes in symptomatic lower-extremity artery disease (LEAD) patients undergoing EVT. METHODS: This study evaluated 28,088 symptomatic LEAD patients who underwent EVT between January 2021 and December 2021 using a prospective nationwide registry in Japan. Outcome measures included periprocedural outcomes, including technical failure and POCs. To compare outcomes with and without IVUS use, propensity score matching analysis was performed for overall and for each arterial region (aortoiliac [AI], femoropopliteal [FP], and infrapopliteal [IP] arteries) using a binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: IVUS was used in 75%, 72%, and 37% of AI, FP, and IP lesions, respectively. After propensity matching extraction, the IVUS group had a tendency of lower technical failure rate than the non-IVUS group, although not statistically different (3.9% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.054), without an increase in the POC rate (1.8% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.54). Regarding the per-regional analysis, the technical failure rate of FP-EVT was significantly lower in the IVUS group (3.1% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.006), whereas those of AI-EVT (2.2% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.12) and IP-EVT (6.8% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.37) were not significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore, IVUS did not increase the POC rate for any region (AI-EVT: 1.3% vs. 1.3%, p = 1.00; FP-EVT: 1.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.75; and IP-EVT: 2.0% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: The current study revealed that IVUS did not increase the POCs and technical failure for overall lesions but reduced the incidence of FP-EVT technical failure.

Pharmacological and Device-Based Intervention for Preventing Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction　- A Clinical Review.

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF) is one of the most common complications that is associated with a significant burden of mortality and healthcare resources. The clinical benefits of key HF drugs, the so-called "4 pillars" or "fantastic 4", namely ß-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, have been established in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, whereas the effects of these drugs are not comprehensively appreciated in patients with acute MI. This review summarizes current evidence on pharmacological and device-based interventions for preventing HF after acute MI.

The Absorb GT1 Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System　- 5-Year Post-Market Surveillance Study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The 1-year clinical outcomes of the Absorb GT1 Japan post-market surveillance (PMS) suggested that an appropriate intracoronary imaging-guided bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation technique may reduce the risk of target lesion failure (TLF) and scaffold thrombosis (ST) associated with the Absorb GT1 BVS. The long-term outcomes through 5 years are now available. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study enrolled 135 consecutive patients (n=139 lesions) with ischemic heart disease in whom percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Absorb GT1 BVS was attempted. Adequate lesion preparation, imaging-guided appropriate sizing, and high-pressure post-dilatation using a non-compliant balloon were strongly encouraged. All patients had at least 1 Absorb GT1 successfully implanted at the index procedure. Intracoronary imaging was performed in all patients (optical coherence tomography: 127/139 [91.4%] lesions) and adherence to the implantation technique recommendations was excellent: predilatation, 100% (139/139) lesions; post-dilatation, 98.6% (137/139) lesions; mean (±SD) post-dilatation pressure, 18.8±3.5 atm. At 5 years, the follow-up rate was 87.4% (118/135). No definite/probable ST was reported through 5 years. The cumulative TLF rate was 5.1% (6/118), including 2 cardiac deaths, 1 target vessel-attributable myocardial infarction, and 3 ischemia-driven target lesion revascularizations. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate intracoronary imaging-guided BVS implantation, including the proactive use of pre- and post-balloon dilatation during implantation may be beneficial, reducing the risk of TLF and ST through 5 years.

Impact of Sex Differences on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Following Primary Revascularization for Acute Myocardial Infarction　- Insights From the Japanese Nationwide Registry.

BACKGROUND: Women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often present a worse risk profile and experience a higher rate of in-hospital mortality than men. However, sex differences in post-discharge prognoses remain inadequately investigated. We examined the impact of sex on 1-year post-discharge outcomes in patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We extracted patient-level data for the period January 2017-December 2018 from the J-PCI OUTCOME Registry, endorsed by the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. One-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events were compared between men and women. In all, 29,856 AMI patients were studied, with 6,996 (23.4%) being women. Women were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities than men. Crude all-cause mortality was significantly higher among women than men (7.5% vs. 5.4% [P<0.001] for ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]; 7.0% vs. 5.2% [P=0.006] for non-STEMI). These sex-related differences in post-discharge outcomes were attenuated after stratification by age. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an increase in all-cause mortality in both sexes with increasing age and advanced-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). CONCLUSIONS: Within this nationwide cohort, women had worse clinical outcomes following AMI than men. However, these sex-related differences in outcomes diminished after adjusting for age. In addition, CKD was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in both sexes.

Clinical efficacy of tolvaptan in acute decompensated heart failure patients with severe aortic stenosis and atrial fibrillation: a sub-analysis from the LOHAS registry.

BACKGROUND: Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are risk factors of hemodynamic instability in heart failure (HF) management due to low cardiac output, respectively. Therefore, the treatment of HF due to severe AS complicated with AF is anticipated to be difficult. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor inhibitor, is effective in controlling acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with hemodynamic stability. However, its clinical efficacy against ADHF caused by AS with AF remains to be determined. METHODS: Clinical information (from September 2014 to December 2017) of 59 patients diagnosed with ADHF due to severe AS (20 patients with AF; 39 patients with sinus rhythm [SR]) was obtained from the LOHAS registry. The registry collected data from seven hospitals and assessed the short-term effects of tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for ADHF with severe AS. We attempted to identify clinical differences from baseline up to 4 days, comparing patients with AF (AF group) versus those with SR (SR group). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in age (83.7 ± 4.5 vs. 85.8 ± 6.9 years, respectively; p = 0.11) and aortic valve area (0.60 [0.46-0.73] vs. 0.56 [0.37-0.70] cm2, respectively; p = 0.50). However, left atrial volume was larger (104 [85-126] vs. 87 [64-103] mL, respectively; p < 0.01), whereas stroke volume was lower (51.6 ± 14.8 vs. 59.0 ± 18.7 mL, respectively; p = 0.08) in the AF group versus the SR group. Body weight decreased daily from baseline up to day 4 in both groups (from 55.4 to 53.2 kg [p < 0.01] and from 53.5 to 51.0 kg [p < 0.01], respectively) without change in heart rate. Notably, the systolic blood pressure decreased slightly in the AF group after 2 days of treatment with tolvaptan. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with tolvaptan improved HF in patients hospitalized for severe AS, regardless of the presence of AF or SR. After achieving sufficient diuresis, a slight decrease in blood pressure was observed in the AF group, suggesting an appropriate timeframe for safe and effective use of tolvaptan.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with no standard modifiable risk factors undergoing primary revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the nationwide Japanese percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

BACKGROUND: Identification of and therapeutic approaches to standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs), including hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking, have led to improved survival of patients at risk for coronary events. However, recent studies have indicated that a significant proportion of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have no SMuRFs. We aimed to assess in-hospital outcomes and the prevalence of these patients using the Japanese nationwide percutaneous coronary intervention (J-PCI) registry. METHODS: The J-PCI is a procedure-based registration program in Japan. A total of 115,437 PCI procedures were performed on patients with AMI between January 2019 and December 2020. The participants were divided into 2 groups: those with at least 1 SMuRF and those without any SMuRFs. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 115,437 patients with AMI, 1,777 (1.6%) had no SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs were older; more likely to have left main disease; and more likely to present with heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest than those with SMuRFs, resulting in higher rates of mechanical circulatory support use and impaired post-PCI coronary blood flow. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients without SMuRFs than in those with SMuRFs (18.3% vs 5.3%, P < .001), irrespective of the presence or absence of ST-segment elevation. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, where annual health checks are mandated under universal health care coverage, the vast majority of patients with AMI undergoing PCI have SMuRFs. However, although small in number, patients without SMuRFs are more likely to present with life-threatening conditions and have worse in-hospital survival.

One-year outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with the revived directional coronary atherectomy catheter: Insights from the J-PCI OUTCOME registry.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the 1-year outcomes, including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and major bleeding, of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with or without the revived directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) catheter in a Japanese nationwide registry. BACKGROUND: Clinical data regarding the midterm outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with DCA are scarce in contemporary real-world practice. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 74,764 patients who underwent PCI at 179 hospitals from January 2017 to December 2018. The baseline characteristics and 1-year outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina who underwent PCI with or without DCA were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 431 patients (0.6%) underwent PCI with DCA. Patients in the DCA group were younger and predominantly male, with fewer comorbidities than patients in the non-DCA group. Stentless PCI with DCA following additional drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty was the dominant strategy in the DCA group (43.6%). One-year outcomes, including all-cause mortality (1.2% in the DCA group vs. 2.5% in the non-DCA group, respectively, p = 0.075), cardiovascular death (0.9% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.69), MACEs (1.9% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.96), and nonfatal major bleeding requiring readmission (1.2% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.62), were comparable between the two groups. In the DCA group, 1-year outcomes were comparable, regardless of whether the stent or DCB was used. CONCLUSIONS: One-year clinical outcomes after PCI with DCA in patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina are acceptable, regardless of stent use.

Ten-year clinical outcomes from a randomized trial comparing new-generation everolimus-eluting stent versus first-generation Sirolimus-eluting stent: Results from the RESET extended study.

BACKGROUND: New-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) achieved technological innovations and reported clinical advantages as compared with first-generation DES in clinical trials with 3-5 years follow-up. However, detailed clinical outcome data in very long-term follow-up is still scarce. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 10-year clinical outcomes after first- and new-generation DES implantation. METHODS: In this extende follow-up study of the RESET, which is a largest randomized trial comparing everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), the study population consisted of 2892 patients from 84 centers. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and a composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI), respectively. Complete 10-year follow-up was achieved in 87.9% of patients. RESULTS: Cumulative 10-year incidences of TLR and non-TLR were not significantly different between EES and SES (13.9% vs. 15.7%, Log-rank p = 0.20, and 33.4% vs. 31.3%, Log-rank p = 0.30). The cumulative 10-year incidence of death/MI was also not significantly different between the groups (32.5% vs. 34.4%, Log-rank p = 0.18). Cumulative 10-year incidence of definite stent thrombosis was numerically lower in EES than in SES (1.0% vs. 1.7%, Log-rank p = 0.16). The lower risk of EES relative to SES was significant for a composite endpoint of target lesion failure (TLF: 19.6% vs. 24.9%, Log-rank p = 0.001) and target vessel failure (TVF: 26.7% vs. 31.4%, Log-rank p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: During 10-year of follow-up, the risks for primary efficacy and safety endpoints were not significantly different between new-generation EES and first-generation SES, although EES compared with SES was associated with a lower risk for composite endpoints such as TLF and TVF.

Comparing the Safety and Feasibility of Endovascular Therapy via Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches in Patients with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Nationwide Registry.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of performing endovascular therapy (EVT) for aortoiliac artery disease using transradial approach (TRA) as compared to transfemoral approach (TFA). METHODS: We analyzed 9671 cases with symptomatic lower extremity artery disease due to aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) treated using EVT from a Japanese Nationwide EVT Registry between January and December 2021. We compared the baseline characteristics, procedural information, and 30-day outcomes of patients who received EVT only via TRA (n=863 [16.9%]) and those only via TFA (n=4255 [83.1%]) by using propensity score (PS) matching, after excluding those who required regular dialysis, those who underwent hybrid surgeries, and those who received EVT through 2 or more approach sites. RESULTS: After matching, the final study population consisted of 862 matched patients with similar baseline characteristics in each group. Technical success rate was comparable between the 2 groups (99.3% vs. 99.3%, p>0.99). No significant differences were observed with respect to the composite of all-cause death within 48 hours after EVT and post-procedural complications within 30 days, including severe bleeding that required transfusion, revascularization procedures, urgent surgeries, cerebral infarction, and major limb amputation (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p=0.29). Transradial approach was associated with shorter operation time (85 vs. 90 minutes, p=0.016), but longer fluoroscopy time (26 vs. 20 minutes, p<0.001) and higher contrast agent volume (80 vs. 75 mL, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: After PS matching, TRA showed the comparable rates of successful EVT and 30-day complications in patients with AIOD compared to TFA. Transradial approach was found to be safe and be a viable alternative of TFA for the treatment of AIOD. CLINICAL IMPACT: The efficacy of transradial approach (TRA) is established in percutaneous coronary intervention; however, its safety and feasibility are unclear in endovascular therapy (EVT). We analyzed 9,671 cases with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease treated using EVT from a Nationwide Registry to compare the 30-day outcomes of those who received EVT only via TRA (n = 863 [16.9%]and those only via TFA (n=4,255 [83.1%]) by using propensity score matching. Technical success rate (99.3% vs. 99.3%, p > 0.99) and 30-day complications (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.29) were comparable between the two groups. EVT via TRA could be performed safely.